Application value of texture analysis of magnetic resonance images in prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy efficacy for rectal cancer / 中华胃肠外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
; (12): 1051-1058, 2018.
Article
em Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-691279
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the application value of texture analysis of magnetic resonance images (MRI) in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(nCRT) for rectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 34 rectal cancer patients who were hospitalized at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from February 2015 to April 2017 were prospectively enrolled and received 3.0T MRI examination at pre-nCRT (1 day before nCRT), early stage (at 10-day after nCRT) and middle stage (at 20-day after nCRT).</p><p><b>INCLUSION CRITERIA</b>distance from tumor lower margin to anal edge was less than 12 cm under rectoscope; rectal cancer was confirmed by preoperative pathology; clinical stage was T3 or above; lymph node metastasis existed but without distant metastasis; functions of liver, kidney and heart present no contraindications of operation.</p><p><b>EXCLUSION CRITERIA</b>unfinished nCRT, surgery and three examinations of MRI; image motion artifacts; lack of postoperative pathological results. All the patients underwent rectal cancer long-term three-dimensional radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with nCRT (oxaliplatin plus capecitabine). The tumor regression grading (TRG) was divided into TRG 0 to 4 grade after nCRT, and TRG 4 was classified as pathological complete remission (pCR); TRG 2 to 3 was classified as partial remission (PR); the rest was no remission (NR). Extraction and analysis of texture features in T2-weighted MR-defined tumor region were performed using Omni Kinetics texture software. The texture values of each time point were statistically analyzed, and the differences of texture values and change differences between pCR and PR+NR, and NR and pCR+PR were compared respectively. Statistically significant texture values were screened and were used in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the prediction of the efficacy of nCRT.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of 34 patients, 21 were males and 13 were females with median age of 49.3 years. Nineteen (55.9%) patients were low rectal adenocarcinoma and 15 (44.1%) patients were middle rectal adenocarcinoma. Nine (26.5%) cases belonged to pCR, 13 (38.2%) belonged to PR, and 12 (35.3%) belonged to NR. Before nCRT, the entropy of tumor area in pCR patients was significantly higher than that in PR+NR patients (7.164±0.272 vs. 6.823±0.309, t=2.925, P=0.006). At the middle stage of nCRT, as compared with PR+NR patients for the texture features of tumor region, the variance (1566±281 vs. 2883±867, t=-4.435, P=0.000) and entropy(5.436±0.934 vs. 6.803±0.577, t=-4.118,P=0.002) of pCR patients were significantly lower; kurtosis(4.800±1.288 vs. 3.206±1.211, t=3.333, P=0.002) and energy (0.016±0.005 vs. 0.010±0.004, t=3.240, P=0.003) of pCR patients were significantly higher. As compared to pCR+PR patients, the kurtosis(2.461±0.931 vs. 4.264±1.205, t=-4.493, P=0.000) and energy (0.011±0.004 vs. 0.014±0.004, t=-3.453, P=0.000) of the NR patients were significantly lower. As for texture change values between early stage and middle stage, the entropy difference was significant between pCR and PR+NR, NR and pCR+PR (1.344±0.819 vs. 0.489±0.319, t=3.047, P=0.014; 0.446±0.213 vs. 0.917±0.677, t=-3.638, P=0.001, respectively). As for texture change values between pre-nCRT and middle stage, variance and entropy differences between pCR and PR+NR (1759±1226 vs. 977±842, t=2.113, P=0.042; 1.728±0.918 vs. 0.524±0.355, t=3.832, P=0.004), and the change values of entropy between NR and pCR+PR (0.475±0.349 vs. 1.044±0.860, t=-2.722, P=0.011) were statistically significant. The above indicators were included in the ROC curve. The results revealed that at the middle stage, entropy value >5.983 indicated the best efficacy for the diagnosis of pCR, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.885, the sensitivity of 100%, and the specificity of 66.7%; the energy <0.010 indicated the best AUC for diagnosis of NR was 0.902, with the sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 81.8%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Texture analysis based on T2 weighted images can predict the efficacy of nCRT for rectal cancer. The middle stage of nCRT is the best time of prediction. The entropy and energy of this period are texture parameters having higher predictive ability.</p>
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Assunto principal:
Prognóstico
/
Neoplasias Retais
/
Terapêutica
/
Diagnóstico por Imagem
/
Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética
/
Valor Preditivo dos Testes
/
Resultado do Tratamento
/
Terapia Neoadjuvante
/
Quimiorradioterapia
/
Estadiamento de Neoplasias
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Limite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2018
Tipo de documento:
Article