Observation of binocular visual quality after single-focal and multifocal intraocular lens with different types of implantation / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

ABSTRACT

AIM: The clinical outcomes of unilateral single-focal intraocular len(SIOL), contralateral implanted multifocal IOL(MIOL)and the SIOL was implanted in binoculus were compared.METHODS: There were 60 cases with 120 eyes age-related cataract patients in January 2019 to January 2021 underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation in Chengdu Aier Eye Hospital. The SIOL has been implanted in the dominant eyes, all patients were divided into three groups according to the types of IOL implanted in the contralateral non-dominant eyes, among them, there were 36 eyes of 18 cases in group A with non-dominant eyes implanted MIOL(SBL-3); 38 eyes of 19 cases in group B were implanted MIOL(SN6AD1)in non-dominant eyes. SIOL was implanted in all 46 eyes of 23 cases of control group. After operation at 3mo,the results of binocular vision and visual quality of the three groups were evaluated and compared.RESULTS: After operationat 3mo, there was no difference in the uncorrected distance vision and corrected distance vision, uncorrected medium vision and corrected near vision among the three groups(P<0.05).The uncorrected near visual acuity and corrected intermediate visual acuity of both eyes in groups A and B were significantly improved in both groups compared with the control group(P<0.05). The scores of Catquest 9SF-CN scale showed that the quality of life of patients in group A and group B(11.11±1.323, 11.89±1.883 scores)was better than that in the control group(14.65±1.722 scores, both P<0.05). The rate of lens removal in group A, B and control group were 88.9%, 84.2% and 39.1%, respectively, and the rate of lens removal in group A was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.0167).CONCLUSION: Dominant eye implantation of SIOL in patients with cataract and contralateral non-dominant eye implantation of MIOL(SBL-3/SN6AD1)can obtain better full-range visual acuity than binoculus, less postoperative adverse visual symptoms, and higher patient disengagement rate and satisfaction.