Effects of dual-task treadmill training on motor function of children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy / 中华实用儿科临床杂志
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
; (24): 1167-1171, 2022.
Article
em Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-954705
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the influence of dual-task treadmill training on the motor function of children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy(CP).Methods:A prospective study was carried out on 36 children with spastic hemiplegic CP admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation, Qingdao Women and Children′s Hospital from March 2020 to August 2021.The subjects were divided into the control group (18 cases) and the experimental group (18 cases) by the random number sequence method.During the intervention, 2 cases in the control group dropped out of the study due to cough and fever.Finally, there were 16 cases left in the control group and 18 cases in the experimental group.Both groups received the same routine rehabilitation training.Additionally, the control group were given single-task treadmill training, while the experimental group were treated dual-task treadmill training.Before training and after 4 weeks of training, the children in the two groups were evaluated and compared by using Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88), Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), Maximum Walking Speed test(MWST), single-task modified Timed Up and Go test (mTUG) and dual-task mTUG.Gender and Gross Motor Function Classification System(GMFCS) classification in general data were compared by using the Chi-square test or Fisher′ s exact test.Age and indices of rehabilitation assessment were compared by using the paired-samples t-test within groups and indepen-dent-samples t-test between the two groups. Results:There was no significant difference in the evaluation data of the GMFM-88 D score [(34.25±1.61) points vs.(34.56±1.76) points], GMFM-88 E score [(50.53±7.20) points vs. (50.61±6.75) points], PBS score [(39.06±4.34) points vs. (38.89±4.44) points], MWST time [(12.69±3.07) s vs. (13.56±2.97) s], single-task mTUG time [(11.38±2.58) s vs. (11.94±2.51) s], and dual-task mTUG time [(30.06±8.08) s vs. (31.50±8.56) s]between the control group and the experimental group before training (all P>0.05). After 4 weeks of training, the GMFM-88 score of the control group was (35.88±1.82) points in the D dimension and (51.20±6.64) points in the E dimension.Besides, the PBS score of the control group was (40.75±4.14) points, the MWST time was (10.81±2.95) s, and the single-task mTUG time was (10.06±2.52) s. As for the experimental group, the GMFM-88 score was (36.28±1.99) points in the D dimension and (53.94±6.98) points in the E dimension, the PBS score was (43.06±4.94) points, the MWST time was (10.44±2.83) s, and the single-task mTUG time was (10.56±2.73) s. The evaluation indexes of the two groups after training for 4 weeks were significantly better than those before training ( t=-3.058, -2.197, -7.132, 1.235, 2.952 in the control group, and t=-5.953, -12.432, -8.333, 3.149, 7.578 in the experimental group, all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in GMFM-88 scores in D and E dimensions, PBS scores, MWST time and single-task mTUG time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The dual-task mTUG time of the control group was (29.10±8.28) s after 4 weeks of training, which was not statistically different from that before training ( t=1.578, P>0.05). The dual-task mTUG time of the experimental group was (23.06±7.30) s after 4 weeks of training, which was significantly better than that before training ( t=13.930, P<0.05) and that of the control group ( t=2.296, P<0.05). Conclusions:Both single-task and dual-task treadmill training can remarkably improve the motor function of children with spastic hemiplegic CP.Single-task training cannot improve the motor function of children with spastic hemiplegic CP in the dual-task condition, while dual-task training can effectively improve the motor function with spastic hemiplegic CP in the dual-task condition.
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article