Clinical observation on osimertinib combined with bevacizumab in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor T790M positive / 肿瘤研究与临床

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the clinical effect of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M positive.Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 83 EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC patients who were admitted to Anhui Chest Hospital from April 2018 to December 2020. The patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group using random number table method. Among them, 41 cases in the control group were treated with osimertinib, while 42 cases in the observation group were treated with osimertinib combined with bevacizumab. The clinical efficacy, tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), serum neuron specific enolase (NSE)] levels, tumor vascular associated protein factor (S100β protein) level and adverse reactions between the two groups after 3 months of treatment were compared. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves, and the 1-year survival status of patients in the two groups was compared.Results:The disease control rate in the observation group was 69.05% (29/42), which was higher than that in the control group [43.90% (18/41)] ( χ2 = 5.34, P = 0.021), but there was no statistical difference in the objective response rate between the two groups [33.33% (14/42) vs. 21.95% (9/41)] ( χ2 = 1.34, P = 0.247). After treatment, the serum levels of CEA [(19.9±3.6) μg/ml vs. (79.3±7.9) μg/ml, (27.8±4.8) μg/ml vs. (78.6±8.1) μg/ml] and NSE [(18.9±3.2) ng/ml vs. (27.2±5.0) ng/ml, (22.0±3.3) ng/ml vs. (26.1±4.8) ng/ml] in the observation group and control group were lower than those before treatment (all P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in CEA and NSE levels between the two groups before treatment (both P > 0.05), and after treatment, the observation group was lower than the control group (both P < 0.001). The serum S100β levels of patients in the observation and control groups after treatment were all higher than those before treatment [(50±5) μg/ml vs.(44±5) μg/ml, (55±4) μg/ml vs. (45±6) μg/ml, both P = 0.001), and the difference in S100β level between the two groups before treatment was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05), and after treatment, the observation group was lower than the control group ( P < 0.001). Both groups of patients did not experience acute severe adverse reactions during the medication period. There were no statistical differences between the observation group and the control group in the incidence rates of nausea and vomiting [9.52% (4/42) vs. 7.32% (3/41)], constipation and diarrhea [4.76% (2/42) vs. 4.88% (2/41)], thrombocytopenia [9.52% (4/42) vs. 4.88% (2/41)], and liver function damage [7.14% (3/42) vs. 2.44% (1/41)] (all P > 0.05). The 1-year overall survival rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group [68.3% (95% CI 47.9%-86.1%) vs. 41.0% (95% CI 22.4%-65.3%)], and the overall survival of the observation group was better than that of the control group ( χ2 = 2.60, P = 0.037). Conclusions:The combination of osimertinib and bevacizumab in treatment of EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC can effectively regulate the levels of tumor related factors, with good efficacy and safety.