Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Interscalene Block vs. Interscalene Block and Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Fixation of Clavicular Fractures
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-202234
Introduction: Regional anaesthesia is seldom used forclavicle fractures considering the anatomical location of thebone. We aim to compare the efficacy of two techniques ofregional anaesthesia as sole anaesthesia technique for fixationsof clavicular fractures.Material and methods: 60 Adult patients with claviclefractures were divided randomly in two groups (1 and 2) andwere administered interscalene block (ISB) only or interscaleneblock and superficial cervical plexus block(ISB+SCPB) assole anaesthetic, respectively. Patients were monitored forefficacy of block and adequacy of anaesthesia and analgesiaat the surgical site. Side effects and hemodynamic parameterswere also monitored.Results:. ISB+SCPB provides excellent anaesthesia forclavicle fixation. Only 1 patient in group 2 required GeneralAnaesthesia(GA) whereas in Group 1, 8 patients required someform of supplemental anaesthesia. There was no statisticallysignificant difference in side-effects and hemodynamic profilein both the groups.Conclusion: ISB+SCPB is significantly better than ISB onlyfor anaesthesia for fixation of clavicular surgeries.
Key words
Полный текст: 1 База данных: IMSEAR Год: 2019 Тип: Article
Полный текст: 1 База данных: IMSEAR Год: 2019 Тип: Article