Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative quality of life of patients with cleft lip and palate in Nigeria: a multicentre cross-sectional pilot study
Afieharo, Igbibia Michael; Adeola, Adenike Olusanya; Chinedu, Michael Okoli; Bardi, Martins; Akintunde, Joseph Akintayo; Ijeoma, Onwuagha.
Affiliation
  • Afieharo, Igbibia Michael; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Oyo State. NG
  • Adeola, Adenike Olusanya; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Afidea Medical Centre, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Oyo State. NG
  • Chinedu, Michael Okoli; Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria. Enugu State. NG
  • Bardi, Martins; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amino Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano State, Nigeria,. Kano State. NG
  • Akintunde, Joseph Akintayo; Department of Surgery, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. Jos. NG
  • Ijeoma, Onwuagha; Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Port Harcourt. NG
Article 在 En | AIM | ID: biblio-1556133
Responsible library: CG1.1
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

the objective of this study was to determine the quality of life (QOL) of the patient with a cleft lip or palate scheduled for surgery.

Methods:

this analytic multicenter cross-sectional study involved six participating Smile Train Partner Hospitals from five geopolitical zones of the country and three major ethnic groups. Patients with cleft lip or cleft palate aged between 8 to 29 years scheduled for repair were recruited. The main outcome measure was quality of life scores as measured by cleft Q.

Results:

thirty-four (females 18, males 16) patients were scheduled for surgery of either cleft lip n=7 (20.6%) or cleft palate n=27 (79.4). Patients scheduled for primary surgeries were more than those for secondary surgeries, 23 (68.7%) vs 10 (30.3%). Of the QOL scales, the speech distress score was the least (56.0 ± 22.6) and the psychological score highest (73.9 ± 15.8). All QOL mean scores except the psychological score fell below normative cleft Q scores. The psychological scores in males (80.9 ± 16.2) were significantly higher than in females (67.7 ± 12.9, p=0.01). Patients for lip repair had lower psychological scores than those for palatal repair (median=59 vs 73, p=0.01). Patients for palate repair demonstrated significantly lower speech function and distress scores than those for lip repair (p=0.01, p<0.01 respectively).

Conclusion:

most of the QOL measures in patients with cleft lip and palate in this study fell below normative values. Gender and cleft type affect the quality of life. A larger study is recommended to establish national normative data.
Subject(s)
Key words