Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of implant site and axial direction on the immediate weight bearing stress of central incisors in different alveolar fossa shapes / 口腔医学
STOMATOLOGY
; (12): 222-227, 2023.
Article
在 Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-979358
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To analyze and investigate the effects of implant location and axial direction on the stress distribution of implants, abutments, central screws, and crowns during immediate loading of maxillary mesial incisors with different alveolar fossa morphology based on three-dimensional finite element method.@*Methods@#Referring to the oral CBCT images of a healthy adult, a three-dimensional finite element model was established for immediate implant loading of maxillary central incisors with three alveolar fossa morphs labial, intermediate, and palatal; different implant sites(apical site, palatal/labial site) and axes(tooth long axis, alveolar bone long axis) were simulated; the established model was loaded with a force of 100 N. ANSYS software was applied to analyze the stress values of the implants, abutments, central screwss, and crownss. @*Results@#The 3D finite element models of 12 maxillary central incisors with different alveolar sockets were successfully established;the implants and their superstructures were least stressed when the maxillary central incisors with partial labial and partial palatal shape were placed along the long axis of the alveolar bone in the palatal/labial position for immediate implant loading;the implants and their superstructures were least stressed when the maxillary central incisors with central shape were placed along the long axis of the tooth in the palatal position for immediate implant loading. The implant and its superstructure were subjected to the least stress when the implant was placed along the long axis of the tooth in the immediate loading position. @*Conclusion@#The bio-mechanical characteristics of the implant and its superstructure are influenced by the different socket morphology, implantation sites and axes. Therefore, in clinical practice, different implantation axes and implantation sites should be developed for different socket morphs.