Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of machine learning methods with logistic regression analysis in creating predictive models for risk of critical in-hospital events in COVID-19 patients on hospital admission.
Sievering, Aaron W; Wohlmuth, Peter; Geßler, Nele; Gunawardene, Melanie A; Herrlinger, Klaus; Bein, Berthold; Arnold, Dirk; Bergmann, Martin; Nowak, Lorenz; Gloeckner, Christian; Koch, Ina; Bachmann, Martin; Herborn, Christoph U; Stang, Axel.
  • Sievering AW; Semmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Wohlmuth P; Semmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Geßler N; Asklepios Proresearch, Research Institute, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Gunawardene MA; Semmelweis University, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Herrlinger K; Asklepios Proresearch, Research Institute, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bein B; Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Arnold D; Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bergmann M; Department of Internal Medicine, Asklepios Hospital Nord-Heidberg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Nowak L; Asklepios Tumorzentrum, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Gloeckner C; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Koch I; Asklepios Tumorzentrum, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bachmann M; Department of Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Care and Rheumatology, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Herborn CU; Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, and Pneumology, Asklepios Hospital Wandsbek, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Stang A; Department of Intensive Care and Ventilation Medicine, Asklepios Hospital München-Gauting, Gauting, Germany.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 22(1): 309, 2022 Nov 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2139266
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been trained to early predict critical in-hospital events from COVID-19 using patient data at admission, but little is known on how their performance compares with each other and/or with statistical logistic regression (LR). This prospective multicentre cohort study compares the performance of a LR and five ML models on the contribution of influencing predictors and predictor-to-event relationships on prediction model´s performance.

METHODS:

We used 25 baseline variables of 490 COVID-19 patients admitted to 8 hospitals in Germany (March-November 2020) to develop and validate (75/25 random-split) 3 linear (L1 and L2 penalty, elastic net [EN]) and 2 non-linear (support vector machine [SVM] with radial kernel, random forest [RF]) ML approaches for predicting critical events defined by intensive care unit transfer, invasive ventilation and/or death (composite end-point 181 patients). Models were compared for performance (area-under-the-receiver-operating characteristic-curve [AUC], Brier score) and predictor importance (performance-loss metrics, partial-dependence profiles).

RESULTS:

Models performed close with a small benefit for LR (utilizing restricted cubic splines for non-linearity) and RF (AUC means 0.763-0.731 [RF-L1]); Brier scores 0.184-0.197 [LR-L1]). Top ranked predictor variables (consistently highest importance C-reactive protein) were largely identical across models, except creatinine, which exhibited marginal (L1, L2, EN, SVM) or high/non-linear effects (LR, RF) on events.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the LR and ML models analysed showed no strong differences in performance and the most influencing predictors for COVID-19-related event prediction, our results indicate a predictive benefit from taking account for non-linear predictor-to-event relationships and effects. Future efforts should focus on leveraging data-driven ML technologies from static towards dynamic modelling solutions that continuously learn and adapt to changes in data environments during the evolving pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04659187.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12911-022-02057-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12911-022-02057-4