Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Understanding inequalities in COVID-19 outcomes following hospital admission for people with intellectual disability compared to the general population: a matched cohort study in the UK.
Baksh, R Asaad; Pape, Sarah E; Smith, James; Strydom, André.
  • Baksh RA; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK asaad.baksh@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Pape SE; The LonDowns Consortium, London, UK.
  • Smith J; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Strydom A; The LonDowns Consortium, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(10): e052482, 2021 10 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1450608
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study explores the hospital journey of patients with intellectual disabilities (IDs) compared with the general population after admission for COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic (when demand on inpatient resources was high) to identify disparities in treatment and outcomes.

DESIGN:

Matched cohort study; an ID cohort of 506 patients were matched based on age, sex and ethnicity with a control group using a 13 ratio to compare outcomes from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK.

SETTING:

Admissions for COVID-19 from UK hospitals; data on symptoms, severity, access to interventions, complications, mortality and length of stay were extracted.

INTERVENTIONS:

Non-invasive respiratory support, intubation, tracheostomy, ventilation and admission to intensive care units (ICU).

RESULTS:

Subjective presenting symptoms such as loss of taste/smell were less frequently reported in ID patients, whereas indicators of more severe disease such as altered consciousness and seizures were more common. Controls had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors, asthma, rheumatological disorder and smoking. ID patients were admitted with higher respiratory rates (median=22, range=10-48) and were more likely to require oxygen therapy (35.1% vs 28.9%). Despite this, ID patients were 37% (95% CI 13% to 57%) less likely to receive non-invasive respiratory support, 40% (95% CI 7% to 63%) less likely to receive intubation and 50% (95% CI 30% to 66%) less likely to be admitted to the ICU while in hospital. They had a 56% (95% CI 17% to 102%) increased risk of dying from COVID-19 after they were hospitalised and were dying 1.44 times faster (95% CI 1.13 to 1.84) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS:

There have been significant disparities in healthcare between people with ID and the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have contributed to excess mortality in this group.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 / Deficiência Intelectual Tipo de estudo: Estudo de coorte / Estudo experimental / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Limite: Humanos País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Inglês Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Bmjopen-2021-052482

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 / Deficiência Intelectual Tipo de estudo: Estudo de coorte / Estudo experimental / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Limite: Humanos País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Inglês Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Bmjopen-2021-052482