Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Earlier cancer diagnosis in primary care: a feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!
Anthony, Bethany Fern; Disbeschl, Stefanie; Goulden, Nia; Hendry, Annie; Hiscock, Julia; Hoare, Zoe; Roberts, Jessica; Rose, Jan; Surgey, Alun; Williams, Nefyn Howard; Walker, Daniel; Neal, Richard; Wilkinson, Clare; Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor.
  • Anthony BF; Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, Bangor, UK b.anthony@bangor.ac.uk.
  • Disbeschl S; North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Goulden N; NWORTH, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Hendry A; North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Hiscock J; North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Hoare Z; NWORTH, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Roberts J; North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Rose J; National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), Consumer Member, London, UK.
  • Surgey A; North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Williams NH; Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Walker D; North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Neal R; College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Wilkinson C; North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Edwards RT; Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
BJGP Open ; 7(1)2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2227596
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

UK cancer survival rates are much lower compared with other high-income countries. In primary care, there are opportunities for GPs and other healthcare professionals to act more quickly in response to presented symptoms that might represent cancer. ThinkCancer! is a complex behaviour change intervention aimed at primary care practice teams to improve the timely diagnosis of cancer.

AIM:

To explore the costs of delivering the ThinkCancer! intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in primary care. DESIGN &

SETTING:

Feasibility economic analysis using a micro-costing approach, which was undertaken in 19 general practices in Wales, UK.

METHOD:

From an NHS perspective, micro-costing methodology was used to determine whether it was feasible to gather sufficient economic data to cost the ThinkCancer! INTERVENTION Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, ThinkCancer! was mainly delivered remotely online in a digital format. Budget impact analysis (BIA) and sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore the costs of face-to-face delivery of the ThinkCancer! intervention as intended pre-COVID-19.

RESULTS:

The total costs of delivering the ThinkCancer! intervention across 19 general practices in Wales was £25 030, with an average cost per practice of £1317 (standard deviation [SD] 578.2). Findings from the BIA indicated a total cost of £34 630 for face-to-face delivery.

CONCLUSION:

Data collection methods were successful in gathering sufficient health economics data to cost the ThinkCancer! INTERVENTION Results of this feasibility study will be used to inform a future definitive economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Estudo experimental / Estudo prognóstico / Ensaios controlados aleatorizados Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: BJGPO.2022.0130

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Estudo experimental / Estudo prognóstico / Ensaios controlados aleatorizados Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: BJGPO.2022.0130