Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid-19: A Meta-Analysis.
Jorda, Anselm; Siller-Matula, Jolanta M; Zeitlinger, Markus; Jilma, Bernd; Gelbenegger, Georg.
  • Jorda A; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Siller-Matula JM; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Zeitlinger M; Center for Preclinical Research and Technology CEPT, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Jilma B; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Gelbenegger G; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 111(3): 614-623, 2022 03.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1549189
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. It has been hypothesized that higher-dose anticoagulation, including therapeutic-dose and intermediate-dose anticoagulation, is superior to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID-19. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of higher-dose anticoagulation compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19. Ten randomized controlled open-label trials with a total of 5,753 patients were included. The risk of death and net adverse clinical events (including death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding) were similar between higher-dose and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% CI, 0.79-1.16, P = 0.66 and RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73-1.03, P = 0.11, respectively). Higher-dose anticoagulation, compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation, decreased the risk of thromboembolic events (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.19-2.62, P = 0.005). The risk of death showed no statistically significant difference between higher-dose anticoagulation and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.52, P = 0.62) and in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (RR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.93-1.17, P = 0.5). The risk of death was similar between therapeutic-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.21, P = 0.54) and between intermediate-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63-1.61, P = 0.98). In patients with markedly increased d-dimer levels, higher-dose anticoagulation was also not associated with a decreased risk of death as compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64-1.16, P = 0.34). Without any clear evidence of survival benefit, these findings do not support the routine use of therapeutic-dose or intermediate-dose anticoagulation in critically or noncritically ill patients with COVID-19.
Тема - темы

Полный текст: Имеется в наличии Коллекция: Международные базы данных база данных: MEDLINE Основная тема: COVID-19 Drug Treatment / Anticoagulants Тип исследования: Экспериментальные исследования / Прогностическое исследование / Рандомизированные контролируемые испытания / Отзывы Пределы темы: Люди Язык: английский Журнал: Clin Pharmacol Ther Год: 2022 Тип: Статья Аффилированная страна: Cpt.2504

Документы, близкие по теме

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Полный текст: Имеется в наличии Коллекция: Международные базы данных база данных: MEDLINE Основная тема: COVID-19 Drug Treatment / Anticoagulants Тип исследования: Экспериментальные исследования / Прогностическое исследование / Рандомизированные контролируемые испытания / Отзывы Пределы темы: Люди Язык: английский Журнал: Clin Pharmacol Ther Год: 2022 Тип: Статья Аффилированная страна: Cpt.2504