Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.
Batista, Diane R; Floriano, Idevaldo; Silvinato, Antonio; Bacha, Hélio A; Barbosa, Alexandre N; Tanni, Suzana E; Bernardo, Wanderley M.
  • Batista DR; . Divisão de Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil.
  • Floriano I; . Medicina Baseada em Evidências, Associação Médica Brasileira, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.
  • Silvinato A; . Medicina Baseada em Evidências, Cooperativa Baixa Mogiana, Mogi-Guaçu (SP) Brasil.
  • Bacha HA; . Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.
  • Barbosa AN; . Departamento de Infectologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil.
  • Tanni SE; . Divisão de Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil.
  • Bernardo WM; . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.
J Bras Pneumol ; 48(4): e20220041, 2022.
Статья в английский, португальский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1893706
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

METHODS:

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

RESULTS:

A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate- and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low.

CONCLUSIONS:

Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.
Тема - темы

Полный текст: Имеется в наличии Коллекция: Международные базы данных база данных: MEDLINE Основная тема: Venous Thromboembolism / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Тип исследования: Когортное исследование / Экспериментальные исследования / Прогностическое исследование / Рандомизированные контролируемые испытания / Отзывы / Систематический обзор/метаанализ Темы: Длинный Ковид Пределы темы: Люди Язык: английский / португальский Журнал: J Bras Pneumol Год: 2022 Тип: Статья

Документы, близкие по теме

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Полный текст: Имеется в наличии Коллекция: Международные базы данных база данных: MEDLINE Основная тема: Venous Thromboembolism / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Тип исследования: Когортное исследование / Экспериментальные исследования / Прогностическое исследование / Рандомизированные контролируемые испытания / Отзывы / Систематический обзор/метаанализ Темы: Длинный Ковид Пределы темы: Люди Язык: английский / португальский Журнал: J Bras Pneumol Год: 2022 Тип: Статья