Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Long Covid stigma: Estimating burden and validating scale in a UK-based sample.
Pantelic, Marija; Ziauddeen, Nida; Boyes, Mark; O'Hara, Margaret E; Hastie, Claire; Alwan, Nisreen A.
  • Pantelic M; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Ziauddeen N; Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Boyes M; School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • O'Hara ME; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Hastie C; School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
  • Alwan NA; Curtin enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0277317, 2022.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2140640
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stigma can be experienced as perceived or actual disqualification from social and institutional acceptance on the basis of one or more physical, behavioural or other attributes deemed to be undesirable. Long Covid is a predominantly multisystem condition that occurs in people with a history of SARSCoV2 infection, often resulting in functional disability. This study aimed to develop and validate a Long Covid Stigma Scale (LCSS); and to quantify the burden of Long Covid stigma.

METHODS:

Data from the follow-up of a co-produced community-based Long Covid online survey using convenience non-probability sampling was used. Thirteen questions on stigma were designed to develop the LCSS capturing three domains-enacted (overt experiences of discrimination), internalised (internalising negative associations with Long Covid and accepting them as self-applicable) and anticipated (expectation of bias/poor treatment by others) stigma. Confirmatory factor analysis tested whether LCSS consisted of the three hypothesised domains. Model fit was assessed and prevalence was calculated.

RESULTS:

966 UK-based participants responded (888 for stigma questions), with mean age 48 years (SD 10.7) and 85% female. Factor loadings for enacted stigma were 0.70-0.86, internalised 0.75-0.84, anticipated 0.58-0.87, and model fit was good. The prevalence of experiencing stigma at least 'sometimes' and 'often/always' was 95% and 76% respectively. Anticipated and internalised stigma were more frequently experienced than enacted stigma. Those who reported having a clinical diagnosis of Long Covid had higher stigma prevalence than those without.

CONCLUSION:

This study establishes a scale to measure Long Covid stigma and highlights common experiences of stigma in people living with Long Covid.
Тема - темы

Полный текст: Имеется в наличии Коллекция: Международные базы данных база данных: MEDLINE Основная тема: COVID-19 Тип исследования: Когортное исследование / Наблюдательное исследование / Прогностическое исследование / Качественное исследование Темы: Длинный Ковид Пределы темы: Женщины / Люди / Мужчины / Middle aged Страна как тема: Европа Язык: английский Журнал: PLoS One Тематика журнала: Наука / Медицина Год: 2022 Тип: Статья Аффилированная страна: Journal.pone.0277317

Документы, близкие по теме

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Полный текст: Имеется в наличии Коллекция: Международные базы данных база данных: MEDLINE Основная тема: COVID-19 Тип исследования: Когортное исследование / Наблюдательное исследование / Прогностическое исследование / Качественное исследование Темы: Длинный Ковид Пределы темы: Женщины / Люди / Мужчины / Middle aged Страна как тема: Европа Язык: английский Журнал: PLoS One Тематика журнала: Наука / Медицина Год: 2022 Тип: Статья Аффилированная страна: Journal.pone.0277317