Impact of basic psychological support on stigma and the mental well-being of people with disabilities due to leprosy and lymphatic filariasis: a postintervention evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: A peer support intervention, called basic psychological support for people affected by neglected tropical diseases (BPS-N), was piloted in India to improve mental well-being and social participation and to reduce stigma among people with disabilities due to leprosy or lymphatic filariasis. Preintervention and postintervention assessments showed improvements in mental well-being and reductions in depression and stigma. This study aimed to further evaluate this intervention at approximately 2 mo after its completion. METHODS: Scales were administered to 62 clients to measure stigma, depression, mental well-being and participation levels. Interviews with 13 clients and six peer supporters were conducted. RESULTS: Stigma scores were significantly reduced at 2 mo postintervention compared with preintervention and postintervention. The improvement in mental well-being detected at immediate postintervention had not changed significantly 2 mo later. Depression levels were higher than at postintervention, but lower than at preintervention levels. No significant differences were found in median participation scores, but the number of clients with moderate and severe participation restrictions reduced significantly from postintervention to 2 mo follow-up. Qualitative results showed that clients received information about their condition and treatment, and that some experienced positive effects on their emotions and self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides additional evidence on the proof of concept of BPS-N. CONTEXTE: Une intervention de soutien par les pairs, appelée Soutien psychologique de base pour les personnes atteintes de maladies tropicales négligées (BPS-N), a été pilotée en Inde afin d'améliorer le bien-être mental et la participation sociale, et de réduire la stigmatisation, chez les personnes souffrant d'incapacités dues à la lèpre ou à la filariose lymphatique. Les évaluations avant et après l'intervention ont montré une amélioration du bien-être mental et une réduction de la dépression et de la stigmatisation chez ces personnes. Cette étude avait pour but d'évaluer cette intervention environ 2 mois après son achèvement. MÉTHODES: Des échelles ont été administrées à 62 clients pour mesurer la stigmatisation, la dépression, le bien-être mental et les niveaux de participation. Des entretiens ont été menés avec 13 clients et 6 pairs aidants. RÉSULTATS: Les scores de stigmatisation ont été significativement réduits deux mois après l'intervention par rapport à la situation avant et après l'intervention. L'amélioration du bien-être mental détectée immédiatement après l'intervention n'a pas changé de manière significative deux mois plus tard. Les niveaux de dépression étaient plus élevés qu'après l'intervention, mais plus bas qu'avant l'intervention. Aucune différence significative n'a été constatée dans les scores médians de participation, mais le nombre de clients ayant des restrictions de participation modérées et sévères a diminué de manière significative entre la période post-intervention et les deux mois de suivi. Les résultats qualitatifs ont montré que les clients ont reçu des informations sur leur état et leur traitement, et que certains ont ressenti des effets positifs sur leurs émotions et leur estime de soi. CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude a fourni des preuves supplémentaires de l'efficacité de la BPS-N. INTRODUCCIÓN: Una intervención de apoyo entre iguales, denominada Apoyo Psicológico Básico para personas afectadas por enfermedades tropicales desatendidas (BPS-N), se puso a prueba en la India para mejorar el bienestar mental y la participación social y reducir el estigma entre las personas con discapacidades debidas a la lepra o la filariasis linfática. Las evaluaciones previas y posteriores a la intervención mostraron mejoras en el bienestar mental y reducciones en la depresión y el estigma. El objetivo de este estudio era seguir evaluando esta intervención ∼2 meses después de su finalización. MÉTODOS: Se administraron escalas a 62 clientes para medir el estigma, la depresión, el bienestar mental y los niveles de participación. Se realizaron entrevistas con 13 clientes y 6 compañeros de apoyo. RESULTADOS: Las puntuaciones de estigma se redujeron significativamente a los 2 meses de la intervención, en comparación con antes y después de la misma. La mejora del bienestar mental detectada inmediatamente después de la intervención no había cambiado significativamente 2 meses después. Los niveles de depresión eran más altos que en el postintervención, pero más bajos que en el preintervención. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones medias de participación, pero el número de clientes con restricciones de participación moderadas y graves se redujo significativamente entre el periodo posterior a la intervención y los 2 meses de seguimiento. Los resultados cualitativos mostraron que los clientes recibieron información sobre su enfermedad y tratamiento, y que algunos experimentaron efectos positivos en sus emociones y autoestima. CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio aportó pruebas adicionales sobre la prueba de concepto de la BPS-N.

Impact of basic psychological support on stigma and mental well-being of people with disabilities due to leprosy and lymphatic filariasis: a proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: People with leprosy and lymphatic filariasis (LF)-related disabilities experience higher levels of poor mental well-being compared with the general community. Mental health services are often not available. This study was conducted to provide proof of concept that basic psychological support for people affected by neglected tropical diseases (BPS-N) can be given by peer supporters to reduce stigma, improve mental well-being and participation among clients. METHODS: The BPS-N approach was tested in a quasi-experimental design using mixed methods. To provide psychological support using the BPS-N, peer supporters were selected and trained. They supported people with leprosy- and LF-related disabilities. Preintervention and postintervention, stigma, mental well-being, depression and participation were measured through standard scales within 4 wk of the intervention; differences were tested using standard tests of significance. RESULTS: After 3 mo of intervention, the mean level of stigma had decreased (30.3 to 24, p<0.001); high mental well-being increased (0% to 13.3%, p<0.001); and moderate to severe depression decreased (88% to 47%, p<0.001). No significant change occurred in participation restrictions (87% to 92%, p=0.497). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological peer support using the BPS-N guideline appears effective in reducing stigma and improving mental well-being and can be operationalised. However, this should be confirmed through a randomised controlled trial. CONTEXTE: Les personnes atteintes de lèpre et de handicaps liés à la filariose lymphatique (FL) souffrent davantage d'un manque de bien-être mental que le reste de la population. Les services de santé mentale ne sont souvent pas disponibles hors des zones urbaines. Cette étude a été menée pour démontrer que le soutien psychologique de base pour les personnes atteintes de MTN (BPS-N) peut être dispensé par des pairs (dans une logique de transfert de tâches) afin de réduire la stigmatisation et d'améliorer le bien-être mental et la participation des clients. MÉTHODES: L'approche du BPS-N a été testée dans le cadre d'un modèle quasi-expérimental utilisant des méthodes mixtes. Pour fournir un soutien psychologique à l'aide du BPS-N, des pairs ont été sélectionnés et formés. Ils sont venus en aide aux personnes atteintes de lèpre et de déficiences liées à la FL. Avant et après l'intervention, les éléments suivants ont été mesurés à l'aide d'échelles standardisées: niveau de stigmatisation, bien-être mental, symptômes dépressifs, et enfin, la participation sociale. Les différences ont été testées à l'aide de tests de signification standardisés. RÉSULTATS: Après 3 mois d'intervention, le niveau moyen de stigmatisation a diminué (30,3 à 24, p<0 001) ; le niveau de bien-être mental a augmenté (0% à 13,3%, p<0 001) et la dépression modérée à sévère a diminué (88% à 47%, p<0 001). Aucun changement significatif n'a été observé en ce qui concerne les restrictions de participation (87% contre 92%, p=0 497). CONCLUSIONS: Le soutien psychologique par les pairs utilisant la ligne directrice BPS-N semble efficace pour réduire la stigmatisation et améliorer le bien-être mental. Toutefois, cette efficacité doit être confirmée par un essai contrôlé randomisé. ANTECEDENTES: Las personas con lepra y discapacidades relacionadas con la filariasis linfática (FL) sufren niveles más altos de malestar mental en comparación con la comunidad en general. Los servicios de salud mental no suelen estar disponibles a nivel periférico. Este estudio se llevó a cabo para proporcionar una prueba de concepto de que el Apoyo Psicológico Básico para personas afectadas por NTDs (BPS-N) puede ser dado por compañeros de apoyo (rotación de tareas) para reducir el estigma, mejorar el bienestar mental y la participación entre los clientes. MÉTODOS: El enfoque BPS-N se probó en un diseño cuasi-experimental utilizando métodos mixtos. Para proporcionar apoyo psicológico con el BPS-N, se seleccionaron y formaron compañeros de apoyo. Apoyaron a personas con lepra y discapacidades relacionadas con la FL. El estigma, el bienestar mental, la depresión y la participación se midieron antes y después de la intervención, mediante escalas estándar; las diferencias se comprobaron mediante pruebas estándar de significación. RESULTADOS: Después de 3 meses de intervención, el nivel medio de estigma disminuyó (30,3 a 24, p<0 001); el bienestar mental alto aumentó (0% a 13,3%, p<0 001) y la depresión moderada a grave disminuyó (88% a 47%, p<0 001). No se produjeron cambios significativos en las restricciones de participación (87% frente a 92%, p=0 497)). CONCLUSIONES: El apoyo psicológico entre iguales, utilizando la guía BPS-N, parece eficaz para reducir el estigma y mejorar el bienestar mental. Sin embargo, esto debe confirmarse mediante un ensayo controlado aleatorizado.

Identifying clusters of leprosy patients in India: A comparison of methods.

BACKGROUND: Preventive interventions with post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are needed in leprosy high-endemic areas to interrupt the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae. Program managers intend to use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to target preventive interventions considering efficient use of public health resources. Statistical GIS analyses are commonly used to identify clusters of disease without accounting for the local context. Therefore, we propose a contextualized spatial approach that includes expert consultation to identify clusters and compare it with a standard statistical approach. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We included all leprosy patients registered from 2014 to 2020 at the Health Centers in Fatehpur and Chandauli districts, Uttar Pradesh State, India (n = 3,855). Our contextualized spatial approach included expert consultation determining criteria and definition for the identification of clusters using Density Based Spatial Clustering Algorithm with Noise, followed by creating cluster maps considering natural boundaries and the local context. We compared this approach with the commonly used Anselin Local Moran's I statistic to identify high-risk villages. In the contextualized approach, 374 clusters were identified in Chandauli and 512 in Fatehpur. In total, 75% and 57% of all cases were captured by the identified clusters in Chandauli and Fatehpur, respectively. If 100 individuals per case were targeted for PEP, 33% and 11% of the total cluster population would receive PEP, respectively. In the statistical approach, more clusters in Chandauli and fewer clusters in Fatehpur (508 and 193) and lower proportions of cases in clusters (66% and 43%) were identified, and lower proportions of population targeted for PEP was calculated compared to the contextualized approach (11% and 11%). CONCLUSION: A contextualized spatial approach could identify clusters in high-endemic districts more precisely than a standard statistical approach. Therefore, it can be a useful alternative to detect preventive intervention targets in high-endemic areas.

Changing perception and improving knowledge of leprosy: An intervention study in Uttar Pradesh, India.

INTRODUCTION: Since ancient times leprosy has had a negative perception, resulting in stigmatization. To improve the lives of persons affected by leprosy, these negative perceptions need to change. The aim of this study is to evaluate interventions to change perceptions and improve knowledge of leprosy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a pre-post intervention study in Fatehpur and Chandauli districts, Uttar Pradesh, India. Based on six steps of quality intervention development (6SQuID) two interventions were designed: (1) posters that provided information about leprosy and challenged misconceptions, and (2) meetings with persons affected by leprosy, community members and influential people in the community. The effect of the interventions was evaluated in a mixed-methods design; in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and questionnaires containing a knowledge measure (KAP), two perception measures (EMIC-CSS, SDS) and an intervention evaluation tool. 1067 participants were included in Survey 1 and 843 in Survey 2. The interventions were effective in increasing knowledge of all participant groups, and in changing community and personal attitudes of close contacts and community members (changes of 19%, 24% and 13% on the maximum KAP, EMIC-CSS and SDS scores respectively, p<0.05). In Survey 1, 13% of participants had adequate knowledge of leprosy versus 53% in Survey 2. Responses showed stigmatizing community attitudes in 86% (Survey 1) and 61% (Survey 2) of participants and negative personal attitudes in 37% (Survey 1) and 19% (Survey 2). The number of posters seen was associated with KAP, EMIC-CSS and SDS scores in Survey 2 (p<0.001). In addition, during eight post-intervention focus group discussions and 48 interviews many participants indicated that the perception of leprosy in the community had changed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Contextualized posters and community meetings were effective in changing the perception of leprosy and in increasing leprosy-related knowledge. We recommend studying the long-term effect of the interventions, also on behavior.

Prospective analytical study of assessment of off loading by Total Contact Cast in treatment of non healing plantar ulcers in anaesthetic foot.

BACKGROUND: Chronic planter ulcer, also known as trophic ulcer, shows no tendency towards healing. It is usually seen in sensory deficient foot. The clinical result of a sensory, motor or autonomic loss of a nerve function is frequently the same--ulceration, although the exact cause may vary. The treatment principle involves dressing and avoiding pressure on the ulcerated site called 'offloading' and patient education for prevention. AIM OF THE STUDY: To determine the outcome of non-healing planter ulcers in an anaesthetic foot treated with offloading, total contact casting (TCC), in terms of rate and duration of healing and percentage of ulcers healed based on improvement of Wagner's grading with respect to the clinical profile of the patient. METHOD: Detailed examination of the patients was done, and neuropathic foot confirmed. Surgical debridement of the ulcer was done to take off all the necrotic tissues, periwound callus, and infected material down to viable tissues. Once the ulcer became clean, a total contact cast was applied with a walking iron for ambulation. TCC was renewed every 2 weeks and rate of healing was assessed. RESULT: 80% of the cases healed within 8 weeks, healing defined by complete re-epithelisation of wound. Average duration of healing of an ulcer was 6.73 ±1.92 weeks. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY: Small sample size and the lack of control subjects for comparison. CONCLUSION: Offloading with total contact casts is believed to be the gold standard method with better and faster healing rates.