Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37609746

ABSTRACT

Background There is emerging evidence of a relationship between atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), though the data available are scarce with conflicting viewpoints. We explored the occurrence of contact hypersensitivity among children with atopic dermatitis by patch testing them with the Indian standard series and tried to correlate the presence of contact hypersensitivity with the clinical severity of AD in these children. Methods In this single-centre, cross-sectional study, children between 6 months and 12 years diagnosed with atopic dermatitis were included and patch tested with the Indian standard series. Outcome parameters were the proportion of patients having positive patch-test reactions, the proportion of positive patch-test reactions for each allergen and factors associated with patch test positivity in atopic dermatitis. Results Of the 136 patients, 80 were boys. The mean age of the study population was 5.6 ± 3.2 years. Twenty-eight (20.6%) patients had patch test positivity at 96 h. Fragrance mix was the commonest allergen, followed by potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride hexahydrate and nickel. SCORing atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) was significantly higher in patients with positive patch tests as compared to patients with negative patch tests (P = 0.009). Conclusion Greater disease severity in atopic dermatitis was found to be associated with patch test positivity. Limitations Inability to establish relevance in about 50% of the patients was a limitation of our study. Follow-up data regarding the impact of allergen avoidance is not available.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Atopic , Child , Male , Humans , Child, Preschool , Female , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Patch Tests/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Allergens , Patient Acuity
2.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 83(5): 525-535, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28485305

ABSTRACT

Occupational dermatoses contribute to a significant portion of work-related diseases, especially in Asia, where a major portion of the workforce is in the unorganized sector. This review article is focussed on the frequency and pattern of occupational skin diseases reported across Asian countries and type of allergens implicated in different occupations. The literature was searched systematically using key words 'occupational dermatoses,' 'occupational skin disease' and name of each Asian country. Ninty five full-text articles were considered relevant and evaluated. Some of the dermatoses seen in industrial workers in Asian countries are similar to those in Western countries, including dermatoses due to chromate in construction and electroplating workers, epoxy resin, and chromate in painters, wood dust in workers in the furniture industry, azo dyes in textile workers and formaldehyde and chromates in those working in the leather and dyeing industries, dermatoses in domestic workers, chefs and health-care workers. Dermatoses in workers engaged in agriculture, beedi (tiny cigars) manufacture, agarbatti (incense sticks) production, fish processing, carpet weaving, sanitation and those working in coffee plantations and coal mines appear to be unique to Asian countries. Recognition of clinical patterns and geographic variations in occupational skin diseases will provide an impetus to further strengthen future research in these areas, as well as improving their management.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Agrochemicals/adverse effects , Asia/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Humans , Industrial Waste/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Patch Tests/methods , Pesticides/adverse effects
3.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 82(6): 645-650, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27451929

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hair dye is one of the most common causes of allergic contact dermatitis. The main allergen has been identified as para-phenylenediamine. To prevent the recurrence of contact dermatitis to para-phenylenediamine, patients should discontinue the use of para-phenylenediamine-containing hair dye products. However, many patients are unable to discontinue their use for cosmetic or social reasons. Sometimes, they continue to have symptoms even after switching to so-called "less allergenic" hair dyes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of 15 commercially available hair dye products in patients with allergic contact dermatitis due to para-phenylenediamine. METHODS: We performed patch tests using 15 hair dyes that were advertised as "hypoallergenic," "no para-phenylenediamine" and "non-allergenic" products in the market. RESULTS: Twenty three patients completed the study and 20 (87.0%) patients had a positive patch test reaction to at least one product. While four (26.7%) hair dye products contained para-phenylenediamine, 10 (66.7%) out of 15 contained m- aminophenol and 7 (46.7%) contained toluene-2,5-diamine sulfate. Only one product did not elicit a positive reaction in any patient. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and possibility of false-positive reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologists should educate patients with allergic contact dermatitis to para-phenylenediamine about the importance of performing sensitivity testing prior to the actual use of any hair dye product, irrespective of how it is advertised or labelled.


Subject(s)
Coloring Agents/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Hair Dyes/adverse effects , Patch Tests/methods , Phenylenediamines/adverse effects , Aged , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26087081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic paronychia, earlier considered to be an infection due to Candida, is currently being considered as a dermatitis of the nail fold. Irritant, allergic and protein contact dermatitis are the suggested major pathogenic mechanisms. Hypersensitivity to Candida is more likely to be the etiology, rather than the infection itself. AIMS: To assess the clinico-etiological profiles of patients with chronic paronychia and to determine the role of contact sensitization and hypersensitivity to Candida. METHODS: All consecutive patients of chronic paronychia attending the dermatology outpatient department (OPD) were assessed for risk factors, number of nails affected, clinical presentation and presence of fungus, patch tested for contact allergy and prick tested for hypersensitivity to Candida allergen. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients of chronic paronychia were recruited into our study. There was female preponderance (66 patients, 82.5%), with the most common group affected being housewives (47 patients, 58.8%). Frequent washing of hands (64 patients, 80%) was the most common risk factor. Fungal culture was positive in 56.1% (41 patients), the predominant species cultured was Candida albicans (15 patients, 36.5%). Patch testing with Indian standard series was positive in 27.1% patients (19 out of 70 patients tested), with nickel being the most common allergen. Prick test with Candida allergen was positive in 47.6% patients (31 out of 65 patients tested). LIMITATIONS: Prick test and patch test provide indirect evidence of hypersensitivity, with inherent limitations. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that chronic paronychia is probably a form of hand dermatitis associated with prolonged wet work, and that there is a higher incidence of contact sensitization and Candida hypersensitivity in these patients.


Subject(s)
Candida/isolation & purification , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Paronychia/diagnosis , Paronychia/epidemiology , Adult , Candida/immunology , Chronic Disease , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nails/immunology , Nails/pathology , Paronychia/immunology , Patch Tests/methods
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22421645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common distressing condition aggravated by a number of endogenous and exogenous factors. Various morphological forms of hand eczema have been described, but categorization into one of them is not always possible. AIMS: To study the morphological patterns of hand eczema, relationship of atopy with hand eczema, and the implications of contact sensitization with respect to severity and diagnosis of hand eczema. METHODS: Hundred consecutive patients of hand eczema attending the contact dermatitis clinic of the institute were recruited over a two year period from 2004-05. Objective assessment was done using hand eczema severity index (HECSI) and all the patients were patch tested using Indian standard series. RESULTS: Unspecified type of hand eczema with no definite morphologic picture was seen in 62% followed by pompholyx in 14%. Hand eczema severity was not found to be statistically associated with age, sex, and atopic status of the patient. Positive patch test to one or more allergen was present in 65% of patients. The most common allergens were potassium dichromate (25%), fragrance mix (16%), nickel sulphate (14%), and PPD (13%). There was no significant correlation between patch test positivity and hand eczema severity or atopic status of the patient. Among the morphological patterns pompholyx was strongly associated with an atopic status (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Hand eczema was seen twice more commonly in men. Atopic and non-atopic patients of hand eczema had no difference in the severity of disease. Contact sensitivity to different allergens did not correlate with increased eczema severity.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/pathology , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Eczema/pathology , Hand Dermatoses/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Female , Fingers/pathology , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Household Products/adverse effects , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20061729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rapid urbanization, westernization of lifestyles, poor quality of objects available and extremely relaxed vigilance on adherence to 'product safety guidelines' make any developing country like India highly susceptible to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) even in children. There has been no previous attempts to assess the magnitude of childhood ACD in India. AIMS: To assess the clinico-allergological profile of ACD in Indian children. METHODS: All consecutive children up to 15 completed years of age who were patch tested over the last 3 years were analyzed from the records. RESULTS: A total of 70 children were studied (average age of disease onset 8.39+/-3.59 years [SD], range 1-15 years and average age of presentation 10.8 +/- 2.99 years [SD], range 5-15 years). Relevant allergy was noted in 48.6% of the patients. Age and sex had no significant role on the prevalence of ACD. Common allergens were paraben (43%), potassium dichromate (27%) and fragrance mix (26%). Most relevant allergens were potassium dichromate, paraben and fragrance. Foot was the most commonly involved site (25.7% of patients). Atopy was present in 18 patients (25.7%). A total of 22 irritant reactions were noted in 13 patients. CONCLUSION: This study reflects the current status of childhood ACD of this region.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Allergens/analysis , Child , Child, Preschool , Consumer Product Safety/standards , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infant , Male , Patch Tests/trends
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19736427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photodermatitis is an abnormal response to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). The photoallergic contact dermatitis caused by plant allergens is a serious cause of morbidity in India. Airborne contact dermatitis is the classical presentation of plant-induced dermatosis, which may become difficult to differentiate from chronic actinic dermatitis in chronic cases. The rapid growth of parthenium weed in India and its ill effects on the population make it important to detect all cases of parthenium sensitivity, which in some cases might simulate photodermatitis. AIMS: This study aims to detect the occurrence of plant sensitivity and photosensitivity in idiopathic-acquired photodermatoses, airborne contact dermatitis and general population taken as controls. METHODS: One hundred and fifty six consecutive patients suffering from polymorphic light eruption (PMLE), chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) and airborne contact dermatitis (ABCD) were enrolled in the study over a period of three years (June 2004 to May 2007). An equal number of age and sex matched healthy subjects were enrolled in the study as controls. All the patients were subjected to detailed history taking, clinical examination and histopathological examination for diagnosis. Patch and photopatch testing were perfomed in all the patients and healthy controls for detection of allergic and photoallergic reactions to parthenium, xanthium and chrysanthemum plant antigens and control antigens. RESULTS: Out of 156 patients enrolled in the study, 78 (50%) had CAD, 67 (42.9%) had PMLE and 11 (7.05%) had ABCD. The occurrence of parthenium/xanthium allergy and photoallergy, either to parthenium or both was most commonly found in ABCD (72.7%), followed by CAD (32%). In PMLE 4.5% cases showed photoallergy. Only 1.9% in the control group showed sensitivity to parthenium and xanthium. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that parthenium (and possibly xanthium) may act as important environmental factors in the initiation and perpetuation of not only ABCD but of CAD as well. Photoexacerbation to UVA at positive parthenium/xanthium sensitivity sites in ABCD and CAD indicates that ABCD with photosensitivity to compositae can lead to CAD.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Plant/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/epidemiology , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/immunology , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Photosensitivity Disorders/diagnosis , Photosensitivity Disorders/epidemiology , Photosensitivity Disorders/immunology , Plants/adverse effects , Plants/immunology , Young Adult
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17921610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patch testing is a definitive tool for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). It reveals the prevalence and trends of contact sensitization in the community, thereby paving the way for better standard series. There is paucity of large series of patch-tested patients from India. AIM: To report the 9-year patch-test data from a single general dermatology centre in North India. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with signs/symptoms of suspected ACD were patch tested from May 1997 to April 2006. The Indian Standard Series was used. Parthenium was tested only in selected patients and cetrimide and chloroxylenol were added to the series. RESULTS: In total, records of 1000 patients (566 male, 434 female) were analyzed, yielding 1155 positive reactions in 590 (59%) patients. Footwear dermatitis was the commonest suspected diagnosis, followed by ACD to medicaments, cosmetic dermatitis and plant dermatitis. Out of the allergens that were tested in all the patients, positivity to nickel was the commonest (12.9%), followed by potassium dichromate (11.1%) neomycin (7%), mercaptobenzthiazole (6.6%), nitrofurazone (6%), colophony (5.7%), fragrance mix (5.5%) and cobalt chloride (5.4%). However, parthenium was the commonest allergen based on the proportion of patients tested with it (14.5%). In men, potassium dichromate (30%) was the commonest sensitizer and in women, nickel (43%) was the commonest to show patch-test positivity. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed higher prevalence of footwear and medicament dermatitis in comparison to existing data. Allergy to antiseptics is significant in our patients. Further collaborative studies involving patients from other parts of India are required to have an overall view of ACD in India.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Drug Eruptions/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Metals/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Shoes/adverse effects
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17921611

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Footwear dermatitis represents a distinct and common group among all types of contact dermatitis cases seen in India. This ailment, however, often remains undiagnosed, misdiagnosed or empirically diagnosed without pinpointing the contributory allergens. AIMS: This study was undertaken to detect the epidemio-allergological pattern of footwear dermatitis in India. METHODS: A total number of 155 cases with footwear dermatitis were evaluated from July 2005 to June 2006, by detailed history and clinical examination. They were patch tested using Indian Standard Battery (ISB) approved by the Contact and Occupational Dermatoses Forum of India (CODFI) with pre- and post patch-test counseling. RESULTS: The proportion of footwear dermatitis was 24.22% (n=155) among a total of 640 patients patch tested during that period. Females [61.93% (n=96)] were commonly affected than males [38.06% (n=59)]. The ages ranged from 8 to 75 years. The age group that predominantly involved was the fifth decade [24.52% (n=38)]. Occupationwise housewives were most commonly involved [47.48 (n=66)]. Contributory allergens in order of frequency were: potassium dichromate, 45.8% (n=71); cobalt chloride, 38.06% (n=59); paraphenylenediamine, 32.25% (n=50); epoxy resin, 20% (n=31); black rubber mix, 20% (n=31); nickel sulfate, 14.83% (n=23); mercaptobenzothiazole, 12.9% (n=20); colophony, 11.6% (n=18); thiuram mix, 10.32 % (n=16); p-tert-butyl-formaldehyde resin, 9.67% (n=15); and formaldehyde, 4.5% (n=7). Among the different categories of footwear allergens, the highest positivity was shown by leather and leather-related chemicals in 61.9% cases (n=96). CONCLUSION: Footwear dermatitis, a common dermatosis, is mostly caused by leather processing chemicals, metal buckles, black dyes of shoes and socks, adhesives, plastic, rubber shoes and polishing agents in order of frequency.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Foot Dermatoses/etiology , Shoes/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Female , Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Sex Factors
13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16394381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronically relapsing dermatitis with no known cure. Due to the chronic nature of the condition, frequent and long term topical therapy is used. This may lead to sensitization, resulting in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). AIMS: The aim of the study was to observe the frequency of ACD in atopic patients in this part of the country using Indian standard battery. METHODS: A total number of 30 cases of AD were taken for the study. Diagnosis of AD cases was based on the criteria of Hannifin and Rajka (1980). All the selected cases of AD had mild to moderate grade of severity. All these cases were treated and patch tested during the remission period. The duration of the study was 12 months. RESULTS: Out of the 30 AD cases, 7 cases showed positive ACD with patch test allergens. CONCLUSION: This study shows that ACD is not uncommon amongst atopic individuals.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16394407

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Forefoot eczema (FE) is characterized by dry fissured dermatitis of the plantar surface of the feet. AIM: To study the clinical profile of FE and the possible etiological factors. METHODS: Forty-two patients with FE were included in the study. A detailed history was recorded and examination done. Fungal scrapings and patch test with Indian Standard Series (ISS) were performed in all patients. RESULTS: The most common site affected was the plantar surface of the great toe in 16 (38.09%) patients. Hand involvement, with fissuring and soreness of the fingertips and palm, was seen in four patients (9.5%). Seven patients (16.6%) had a personal history of atopy whereas family history of atopy was present in six (14.2%). Seven patients (16.6%) reported aggravation of itching with plastic, rubber or leather footwear, and 13 (30.9%), with detergents and prolonged contact with water. Negative fungal scrapings in all patients ruled out a dermatophyte infection. Patch testing with ISS was performed in 19 patients and was positive in five. CONCLUSIONS: FE is a distinctive dermatosis of the second and third decade, predominantly in females, with a multifactorial etiology, possible factors being chronic irritation, atopy, footwear and seasonal influence.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatomycoses/diagnosis , Eczema/diagnosis , Eczema/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatomycoses/epidemiology , Eczema/drug therapy , Female , Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Foot Dermatoses/drug therapy , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Forefoot, Human , Humans , Incidence , India/epidemiology , Male , Patch Tests , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Sampling Studies , Sex Distribution , Treatment Outcome
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16394434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Paddy farming is one of the main occupations in coastal South India. Dermatological problems in paddy field workers have not received much attention. AIM: The purpose of this study was to study the dermatoses of the exposed parts of the body, viz. face, hands, and feet, in paddy field workers. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-one workers were questioned and clinical findings noted. Scrapings for bacterial and fungal examination were taken by random selection. RESULTS: Seventy-three per cent had work-related itching. Melasma was the commonest facial lesion (41.1%). The main problems on the hands were hyperkeratosis (26.4%), nail dystrophy (15.2%) and paronychia (8.8%). Common feet dermatoses included nail dystrophy (57.1%), pitted keratolysis (42.5%) and fissuring (23.5%). Common aerobic and anaerobic bacteria isolated from pitted keratolysis and intertrigo were Klebsiella and Clostridium species. Aspergillus species were the commonest fungus grown from intertrigo. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational dermatoses are common in paddy field workers.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Female , Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16394482

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A chronic dermatosis like nummular dermatitis may be complicated by contact dermatitis due to an impaired cutaneous barrier. This study is aimed at evaluating secondary contact dermatitis in patients with nummular dermatitis. METHODS: Patch testing with the Indian Standard Series was performed in 50 of 78 patients with a clinical diagnosis of nummular eczema. Significant reactions were graded as per ICDRG criteria. RESULTS: Significant reactions were noted in 23 of 50 tested patients. The most frequent sensitizers were colophony, nitrofurazone, neomycin sulfate and nickel sulfate (7.14% each). Reactions to antigens in topical medications, cosmetics and toiletries constituted 64.28% of all the reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nummular dermatitis are at significant risk of developing secondary allergic contact dermatitis, which contributes to the severity and chronicity of their dermatitis. Patch testing has the potential to improve the quality of life in these patients. Hence, patients with chronic recalcitrant nummular dermatitis must be patch tested.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Patch Tests , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL