Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Infect Chemother ; 26(4): 335-342, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31839561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium leprae causes leprosy and ofloxacin is used to control this bacterium. However, specific amino acid substitutions in DNA gyrases of M. leprae interferes with the effect of ofloxacin. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we tested the inhibitory effect of WQ-3810 on DNA gyrases in M. leprae, using recombinant gyrases. We theorized that WQ-3810 and DNA gyrases interacted, which was tested in silico. Compared with control drugs like ofloxacin, WQ-3810 showed a better inhibitory effect on ofloxacin-resistant DNA gyrases. The in-silico study showed that, unlike control drugs, a specific linkage between a R1 group in WQ-3810 and aspartic acid at position 464 in the subunit B of DNA gyrases existed, which would enhance the inhibitory effect of WQ-3810. This linkage was confirmed in a further experiment, using recombinant DNA gyrases with amino acid substitutions in subunits B instead. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The inhibitory effect of WQ-3810 was likely enhanced by the specific linkage between a R1 group residue in its structure and DNA gyrases. Using interactions like the one found in the present work may help design new fluoroquinolones that contribute to halt the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Azetidines/pharmacology , DNA Gyrase/drug effects , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Mycobacterium leprae/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azetidines/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Leprosy/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Ofloxacin/pharmacology
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 506, 2018 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30290790

ABSTRACT

The ongoing transmission of Mycobacterium (M.) leprae reflected in a very slow decline in leprosy incidence, forces us to be innovative and conduct cutting-edge research. Single dose rifampicin (SDR) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for contacts of leprosy patients, reduces their risk to develop leprosy by 60%. This is a promising new preventive measure that can be integrated into routine leprosy control programmes, as is being demonstrated in the Leprosy Post-Exposure Programme that is currently ongoing in eight countries.The limited (60%) effectiveness of SDR is likely due to the fact that some contacts have a preclinical infection beyond the early stages for which SDR is not sufficient to prevent the development of clinical signs and symptoms of leprosy. An enhanced regimen, more potent against a higher load of leprosy bacteria, would increase the effectiveness of this preventive measure significantly.The Netherlands Leprosy Relief (NLR) is developing a multi-country study aiming to show that breaking the chain of transmission of M. leprae is possible, evidenced by a dramatic reduction in incidence. In this study the assessment of the effectiveness of an enhanced prophylactic regimen for leprosy is an important component. To define the so called PEP++ regimen for this intervention study, NLR convened an Expert Meeting that was attended by clinical leprologists, public health experts, pharmacologists, dermatologists and microbiologists.The Expert Meeting advised on combinations of available drugs, with known efficacy against leprosy, as well as on the duration of the intake, aiming at a risk reduction of 80-90%. To come to a conclusion the Expert Meeting considered the bactericidal, sterilising and bacteriostatic activity of the potential drugs. The criteria used to determine an optimal enhanced regimen were: effectiveness, safety, acceptability, availability, affordability, feasibility and not inducing drug resistance.The Expert Meeting concluded that the enhanced regimen for the PEP++ study should comprise three standard doses of rifampicin 600 mg (weight adjusted when given to children) plus moxifloxacin 400 mg given at four-weekly intervals. For children and for adults with contraindications for moxifloxacin, moxifloxacin should be replaced by clarithromycin 300 mg (weight adjusted).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Leprosy/prevention & control , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Leprosy/drug therapy , Leprosy/microbiology , Moxifloxacin , Netherlands , Rifampin/therapeutic use
3.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 16(1): 11, 2017 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28279173

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Polymicrobial keratitis with fungus and bacteria can lead to blindness and is challenging to treat. Here, we introduce a case of fungal keratitis caused by two different strains in addition to definite bacterial super-infection caused by an α-Streptococcus sp., and describe the importance of microscopic examination. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman, who had a past history of infection with leprosy, presented with conjunctival hyperaemia, pain, and corneal opacity in her right eye. Under the presumptive diagnosis of infectious keratitis, corneal scrapings were stained by various reagents and inoculated on several agar plates. Microscopic findings of the scrapings revealed fungi and a small number of Gram-positive cocci. Multiple anti-fungal therapies with levofloxacin ophthalmic solution were administered. Although empiric treatment was initially effective, keratitis recurred 10 days after its initiation. Repeated corneal scraping revealed an abundance of Gram-positive chain cocci and a small amount of fungi, resulting in the switching of an antibiotic medication from levofloxacin to moxifloxacin and cefmenoxime. Keratitis resolved gradually after the conversion. Stemphylium sp., Acremonium sp., and α-Streptococcus sp. were simultaneously isolated from the corneal scrapings. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of fungal keratitis caused by Stemphylium sp., and also the first case of super-infection in the cornea caused by two different fungi and one bacterium. Microscopic examination of the corneal scrapings was beneficial in rapid decision of changing to appropriate drug according to the dominancy of pathogenicity.


Subject(s)
Acremonium/growth & development , Coinfection/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Fungal/diagnosis , Keratitis/diagnosis , Saccharomycetales/growth & development , Streptococcus/growth & development , Acremonium/drug effects , Acremonium/pathogenicity , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Cefmenoxime/therapeutic use , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/pathology , Cornea/drug effects , Cornea/microbiology , Cornea/pathology , Eye Infections, Fungal/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Fungal/microbiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/pathology , Female , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Keratitis/drug therapy , Keratitis/microbiology , Keratitis/pathology , Levofloxacin/therapeutic use , Moxifloxacin , Saccharomycetales/drug effects , Saccharomycetales/pathogenicity , Streptococcus/drug effects , Streptococcus/pathogenicity
4.
Indian J Lepr ; 88(3): 147-58, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30207440

ABSTRACT

Leprosy, a debilitating disease of the skin and peripheral nerves is caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) and is treated by multidrug therapy (MDT) comprising of Dapsone, Rifampicin and Clofazimine. Resistance to any of these drugs poses a threat to the current disease control strategies. With the emergence of Rifampicin resistance in leprosy, it is important that alternative drugs need to be tested to develop a treatment strategy to combat drug resistant leprosy. In the current study, we have investigated WHO MDT, Rifapentine, Clarithromycin, Minocycline, Moxifloxacin, Ofloxacin and their combinations in intermittent and daily dose regimens in rifampicin resistant strains of M. leprae through mouse foot pad experiments in order to determine the loss in viability of M. leprae in response to these drugs and their combinations. Our findings suggest that WHO MDT is still the best combination in Rifampicin resistance cases. Combination of Moxifloxacin with Minocycline and Clarithromycin may also be taken up for clinical trials in cases with Rifampicin resistant leprosy. Rifapentine and Moxifloxacin can be effective alternative drugs to replace Rifampicin where required either in daily dose shorter duration regimens or intermittent dose longer regimen to treat resistant strains.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Leprostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Leprosy/drug therapy , Leprosy/microbiology , Mycobacterium leprae/drug effects , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Mice , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Moxifloxacin , Ofloxacin/therapeutic use , Rifampin/analogs & derivatives , Rifampin/therapeutic use
5.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 7(11): e2559, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24244784

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Multidrug resistant leprosy, defined as resistance to rifampin, dapsone and fluoroquinolones (FQ), has been described in Mycobacterium leprae. However, the in vivo impact of fluoroquinolone resistance, mainly mediated by mutations in DNA gyrase (GyrA2GyrB2), has not been precisely assessed. Our objective was to measure the impact of a DNA gyrase mutation whose implication in fluoroquinolone resistance has been previously demonstrated through biochemical studies, on the in vivo activity of 3 fluoroquinolones: ofloxacin, moxifloxacin and garenoxacin. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used the proportional bactericidal method. 210 four-week-old immunodeficient female Nude mice (NMRI-Foxn1(nu) /Foxn1(nu) ) were inoculated in the left hind footpad with 0.03 ml of bacterial suspension containing 5 × 10(3), 5 × 10(2), 5 × 10(1), and 5 × 10(0) M. leprae AFB organisms of strain Hoshizuka-4 which is a multidrug resistant strain harboring a GyrA A91V substitution. An additional subgroup of 10 mice was inoculated with 5 × 10(-1) bacilli in the untreated control group. The day after inoculation, subgroups of mice were treated with a single dose of ofloxacin, moxifloxacin, garenoxacin or clarithromycin at 150 mg/kg dosing. 12 months later mice were sacrificed and M. leprae bacilli were numbered in the footpad. The results from the untreated control group indicated that the infective inoculum contained 23% of viable M. leprae. The results from the moxifloxacin and garenoxacin groups indicated that a single dose of these drugs reduced the percentage of viable M. leprae by 90%, similarly to the reduction observed after a single dose of the positive control drug clarithromycin. Conversely, ofloxacin was less active than clarithromycin. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: DNA gyrase mutation is not always synonymous of lack of in vivo fluoroquinolone activity in M. leprae. As for M. tuberculosis, in vivo studies allow to measure residual antibiotic activity in case of target mutations in M. leprae.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium leprae/drug effects , Mycobacterium leprae/pathogenicity , Quinolones/therapeutic use , Animals , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Leprosy/drug therapy , Leprosy/microbiology , Mice , Moxifloxacin , Quinolines/therapeutic use
7.
Acta Leprol ; 12(3): 107-11, 2003.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15040700

ABSTRACT

Histoid leprosy is a particular variant of lepromatous leprosy presenting as cutaneous or subcutaneous nodular and/or plaque-like lesions arising form apparently normal skin. It is characterized histologically by spindle-shaped histiocytes in interlacing bundles and whorls, containing numerous intact and rod-shaped Mycobacterium leprae. It can occur de novo or secondary in patients treated for a long course by dapsone alone. We describe a case of lepromatous leprosy treated according to the national Moroccan protocol who developed histoid lesions during his treatment by dapsone. The patient responded well to fluoroquinolone, rifampicin and clofazimine, with however, the occurrence of erythema nodosum leprosum.


Subject(s)
Erythema Nodosum/pathology , Leprosy, Lepromatous/pathology , Adult , Clofazimine/therapeutic use , Dapsone/therapeutic use , Erythema Nodosum/drug therapy , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Histiocytes/pathology , Humans , Leprostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Leprosy, Lepromatous/drug therapy , Male , Mycobacterium leprae/isolation & purification , Rifampin/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL