Survival of cheese-ripening microorganisms in a dynamic simulator of the gastrointestinal tract.

A mixture of nine microorganisms (six bacteria and three yeasts) from the microflora of surface-ripened cheeses were subjected to in vitro digestive stress in a three-compartment "dynamic gastrointestinal digester" (DIDGI). We studied the microorganisms (i) grown separately in culture medium only (ii) grown separately in culture medium and then mixed, (iii) grown separately in culture medium and then included in a rennet gel and (iv) grown together in smear-ripened cheese. The yeasts Geotrichum candidum, Kluyveromyces lactis and Debaryomyces hansenii, were strongly resistant to the whole DIDGI process (with a drop in viable cell counts of less than <1 log CFU mL(-1)) and there were no significant differences between lab cultures and cheese-grown cultures. Ripening bacteria such as Hafnia alvei survived gastric stress less well when grown in cheese (with no viable cells after 90 min of exposure of the cheese matrix, compared with 6 CFU mL(-1) in lab cultures). The ability of Corynebacterium casei and Staphylococcus equorum to withstand digestive stress was similar for cheese and pure culture conditions. When grow in a cheese matrix, Brevibacterium aurantiacum and Arthrobacter arilaitensis were clearly more sensitive to the overall digestive process than when grown in pure cultures. Lactococcus lactis displayed poorer survival in gastric and duodenal compartments when it had been grown in cheese. In vivo experiments in BALB/c mice agreed with the DIDGI experiments and confirmed the latter's reliability.

Microbial cell-free extracts as sources of enzyme activities to be used for enhancement flavor development of ewe milk cheese.

Freeze-dried cell-free extracts (CFE) from Lactobacillus casei LC01, Weissella cibaria 1XF5, Hafnia alvei Moller ATCC 51815, and Debaryomyces hansenii LCF-558 were used as sources of enzyme activities for conditioning the ripening of ewe milk cheese. Compared with control cheese (CC), CFE did not affect the gross composition and the growth of the main microbial groups of the cheeses. As shown through urea-PAGE electrophoresis of the pH 4.6-soluble nitrogen fraction and the analysis of free AA, the secondary proteolysis of the cheeses with CFE added was markedly differed from that of the CC. Compared with CC, several enzyme activities were higher in the water-soluble extracts from cheeses made with CFE. In agreement, the levels of 49 volatile compounds significantly differentiated CC from the cheeses made with CFE. The level of some alcohols, ketones, sulfur compounds, and furans were the lowest in the CC, whereas most aldehydes were the highest. Each CFE seemed to affect a specific class of chemical compounds (e.g., the CFE from H. alvei ATCC 51815 mainly influenced the synthesis of sulfur compounds). Apart from the microbial source used, the cheeses with the addition of CFE showed higher score for acceptability than the control cheese. Cheese ripening was accelerated or conditioned using CFE as sources of tailored enzyme activities.