Survival of Mycobacterium leprae and association with Acanthamoeba from environmental samples in the inhabitant areas of active leprosy cases: A cross sectional study from endemic pockets of Purulia, West Bengal.

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium leprae being an obligate intracellular parasite cannot be cultured in any artificial culture media but it has been shown to reside in wild armadillos in North America. Many studies suggested that M. leprae could be found in the environment and may have a role in continuing transmission of the disease. The exact role of the environment in the transmission dynamics is still speculative. The present study was undertaken to find out the presence of viable M. leprae around patients' environment like soil and water and association of free living pathogenic protozoa, Acanthamoeba which might play an important role in transmission of the disease. METHODS: Seven hundred soil and 400 water samples were collected from the surroundings of the houses of leprosy patients from endemic villages. Two hundred soil and 80 water samples were also collected from the surroundings of normal inhabitants from non-endemic villages as controls. These samples were screened for the presence of M. leprae and Acanthamoeba using DNA PCR. RNA was extracted from the PCR positive samples and Reverse Transcriptase - PCR targeting 16S rRNA gene region was performed for detection of viable M. leprae. RESULTS: We observed high PCR positivity in soil samples (218 out of 700; 31%) and water samples (73 out of 400; 18%). These samples when further screened for viability, it was observed that 106 soil samples (15% of total) and 34 water samples (8% of total) showed presence of 16S rRNA. We observed 18.3% of soil and 20.5% of water samples were PCR positive for Acanthamoeba. Soil samples from the control area, where no active leprosy case resided in the last 5 years, showed PCR positivity in 4 samples (2%) for M. leprae DNA in only soil samples with all water samples being negative. RT-PCR for all PCR positive soil samples was negative. Of the 106 soil samples positive for M. leprae RT-PCR, 30 samples were also positive for Acanthamoeba whereas out of 112 M. leprae RT-PCR negative but PCR positive samples only 10 samples were Acanthamoeba positive showing association of viability with presence of Acanthamoeba (p = .0021). Similarly, for water samples also, association of M. leprae viability with presence of Acanthamoeba was seen (p = .0009). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the surrounding environment (soil and water) of leprosy patients contain viable M. leprae and the viability has association with Acanthamoeba which may provide a protective niche for M. leprae. This could play an important role in the focal transmission of the disease.

Comparative evaluation of PCR amplification of RLEP, 16S rRNA, rpoT and Sod A gene targets for detection of M. leprae DNA from clinical and environmental samples.

PURPOSE: PCR assay is a highly sensitive, specific and reliable diagnostic tool for the identification of pathogens in many infectious diseases. Genome sequencing Mycobacterium leprae revealed several gene targets that could be used for the detection of DNA from clinical and environmental samples. The PCR sensitivity of particular gene targets for specific clinical and environmental isolates has not yet been established. The present study was conducted to compare the sensitivity of RLEP, rpoT, Sod A and 16S rRNA gene targets in the detection of M. leprae in slit skin smear (SSS), blood, soil samples of leprosy patients and their surroundings. METHOD: Leprosy patients were classified into Paucibacillary (PB) and Multibacillary (MB) types. Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining method for all the SSS samples and Bacteriological Index (BI) was calculated for all patients. Standard laboratory protocol was used for DNA extraction from SSS, blood and soil samples. PCR technique was performed for the detection of M. leprae DNA from all the above-mentioned samples. RESULTS: RLEP gene target was able to detect the presence of M. leprae in 83% of SSS, 100% of blood samples and in 36% of soil samples and was noted to be the best out of all other gene targets (rpoT, Sod A and 16S rRNA). It was noted that the RLEP gene target was able to detect the highest number (53%) of BI-negative leprosy patients amongst all the gene targets used in this study. CONCLUSION: Amongst all the gene targets used in this study, PCR positivity using RLEP gene target was the highest in all the clinical and environmental samples. Further, the RLEP gene target was able to detect 53% of blood samples as positive in BI-negative leprosy cases indicating its future standardization and use for diagnostic purposes.

Detection of viable Mycobacterium leprae in soil samples: insights into possible sources of transmission of leprosy.

Leprosy has ceased to be a public health problem world wide, after the successful implementation of effective chemotherapy (MDT) and use of control measures. However, new cases of leprosy continue to occur. Mycobacterium leprae cannot be grown in any acceptable culture medium and besides the wild armadillos, there is no known animal reservoir for leprosy. The transmission of leprosy is believed to be due to a large extent by droplet discharge of bacilli through nose and mouth and to a lesser extent by direct contact of susceptible host with a patient for long duration. The exact role of the environment in the transmission dynamics is still speculative. In the present study, we have tried to detect viable M. leprae from soil samples in endemic areas by using molecular methods. Eighty soil samples were collected from villages of this area, DNA and RNA of M. leprae extracted and identified using specific M. leprae primers. PCR amplification was done and real-time RT-PCR was used to detect viable M. leprae. DNA targeting the 16S region of M. leprae was detected in 37.5%, whereas M. leprae RNA targeting the same region was detected in 35% of these samples. Of the total 80 samples, 40 were collected from residential areas of leprosy patients whereas 40 samples were from no-patient areas. Fifty-five percent positivity for 16S rRNA of M. leprae was observed from the "patient" area in comparison to 15% positivity from the "no-patient" area (p < 0.001). This study thus provides valuable information of presence of viable M. leprae in soil specimens, which would be of use in investigating the transmission dynamics in leprosy.

A simplified reverse transcriptase PCR for rapid detection of Mycobacterium leprae in skin specimens.

An RNA-based assay is an additional molecular tool for leprosy diagnosis and determination of the viability of leprosy bacilli. To simplify RNA detection, a one-step reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was established and evaluated. RNA and DNA could be isolated simultaneously. With the use of Mycobacterium leprae-specific primers targeting a 171-bp fragment of the M. leprae 16S RNA gene, RT-PCR resulted in detection of M. leprae in both slit skin smears and skin biopsy specimens. To enhance the positive signal, a digoxigenin-labeled DNA was developed, and successfully detected the amplified RT-PCR product. The method is sensitive, as it could detect one leprosy bacillus. When it was used directly on skin specimens collected from leprosy patients, 34 of 36 multibacillary (MB) and 13 of 24 paucibacillary (PB) cases showed positive results. The assay was also effective in monitoring bacterial clearance in leprosy patients during chemotherapy; after treatment with the multidrug therapy for 6 months, resulting in bacterial clearance, 16 of 36 MB patients and three of 24 PB patients tested were still positive for the 16S rRNA gene of M. leprae, suggesting the advisability of a more prolonged treatment course. This form of RT-PCR is of value in terms of simplicity and sensitivity in identifying M. leprae in routine skin specimens, especially when acid-fast bacilli are not discernable.

Reverse transcription-PCR detection of Mycobacterium leprae in clinical specimens.

A reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA of Mycobacterium leprae was developed to detect the organism in clinical specimens. A 171-bp fragment was amplified when M. leprae RNA was used as a template but not when a panel of RNAs from 28 potentially cross-reacting mycobacterial species, seven genera related to Mycobacterium, and three organisms normally found among skin or nose flora were tested. As few as 10 organisms isolated from infected tissue could be detected, confirming the sensitivity of the assay. When the test was applied to clinical specimens, M. leprae was detected in 82% of skin biopsy specimens obtained from untreated leprosy patients, while skin biopsy specimens from healthy volunteers and patients with other dermatological disorders were negative. The sensitivity of the RT-PCR was higher than that of slit skin smear staining for acid-fast bacilli or acid-fast staining of fixed biopsy specimens since 53% of acid-fast bacillus-negative biopsy specimens were RT-PCR positive. Because 16S rRNA is rapidly degraded upon cell death, the assay may detect only viable organisms and may prove to be useful in assessing the efficacy of chemotherapy.

Microdensitometric scanning procedure for quantitative assessment of hybridization of rRNA targeting probes in leprosy.

In order to develop an objective criteria of grading of positivity of hybridization signals of gene probes targeting rRNA, a microdensitometric scanning procedure was standardised. Ribosomal RNA was extracted from the bacilli harvested from biopsies of leprosy cases across the spectrum and blotted on nitro-cellulose membranes. M. leprae specific rRNA targeting oligonucleotide probes were end-labelled and hybridization was done by the technique standardised and published earlier. The autoradiographs were developed and microdensitometric scanning was done by altering different parameters. Positivity was graded in 5 grades and compared with visual positivity. Microdensitometric scanning procedure and 5 grade system appear to be useful and reproducible. Signals in paucibacillary specimens were in 2+ to 3+ grading range whereas those in multibacillary specimens varied in grades from 2+ to 5+. This approach appears to have potential usefulness for assessing the bacillary load (possibly viable) in the clinical specimens from leprosy cases.

[Molecular pathologic detection of mycobacteria]. / Molekularpathologischer Nachweis von Mykobakterien.

In recent years, significant advances in the diagnosis of mycobacterial infections have been made by the introduction of direct pathogen detection methods. These techniques are usually based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or on a transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) process. The majority of the protocols have been optimized for the detection of mycobacterial nucleic acids in fresh fluid or fresh tissue specimen. Unfortunately pathologists are frequently confronted with the problem that tissues with histologically suspicious lesions have been entirely fixed in formalin. As a result of this routine fixation, DNA and RNA are heavily degraded and the usually high sensitivity of the amplification techniques is greatly impaired. Consequently, only PCR protocols designed for small amplification targets are still suitable for an efficient detection of microbial DNA in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. We therefore adapted PCR assays with amplification products < 200 bp for the detection of M. tuberculosis-complex DNA (targets: IS6110 and 65 kDa-antigen gene) in routine biopsies. Although the sensitivities of the two assays varied significantly with the degree of DNA degradation, we were able to detect M. tuberculosis-complex specific DNA in about 25% of the tissues with a granulomatous inflammation and negative Ziehl-Neelson stain. Recently, we have added a third PCR-assay, which in combination with direct sequencing also allows us to detect DNA from M. leprae and several atypical mycobacteria species. PCR-analysis has significantly improved the diagnosis of mycobacterial infections by supplementing conventional histological examination of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues.

A genomic study on the cultivable and nerve invading Mycobacterium HI-75 after the recovery 3 months of the inoculation to nude mice.

The sequence of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product of 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) of the leproma-derived and cultivable Mycobacterium HI-75 (M. HI-75) which was obtained from the infected regions of inoculated mice, was examined and compared with that of the cultured bacteria by the direct sequencing techniques. The sequence was completely consistent with the cultured bacilli in the comparable 837 bases of 16S rRNA. The mycobacterium examined in this study was originally isolated as M. leprae (ML) by Skinsnes, et al. in 1975 from leproma of a lepromatous type Hansen's disease patient and therefore named as Mycobacterium leprae HI-75 by them, and was maintained from 1984 using either Ogawa's or Sauton's media in the beginning and Ogawa's medium enriched with glucronic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine recently. Sasaki and Hamit reported the nerve invasion and the growth of the inoculated bacilli either to the nude mice or the I131 treated immunocompromised Swiss mice. We previously reported that cultured HI-75 was most similar to M. scrofulaceum by the direct sequencing of the gene of 16S rRNA. The 16S rRNA obtained from the mouse tissue in the present study indicated that M. HI-75 would be a variant of M. scrofulaceum possessing an ability to invade into peripheral nerve. The results suggest that the HI-75 strain claims a nature as a pathogen to develop a leproma-like lesion.

Use of NASBA RNA amplification for detection of Mycobacterium leprae in skin biopsies from untreated and treated leprosy patients.

This study was performed to assess the value of NASBA RNA amplification of a 16S rRNA target for the detection of presumably viable Mycobacterium leprae in sections of skin biopsies from leprosy patients. The NASBA positivity rate was 90.4% (84/93) for untreated multibacillary (MB) patients [bacterial index (BI) > or = 2] and 16.7% (8/48) for the untreated paucibacillary (PB) patients (BI < 2). NASBA positivity showed a good concordance with the presence of solidly stained M. leprae [morphological index (MI)] in skin biopsies from leprosy patients, but no relationship could be demonstrated between the strength of the NASBA signals and the BI. Furthermore, the usefulness of the detection of 16S rRNA by NASBA to monitor the efficacy of leprosy treatment was investigated using an additional 154 biopsy specimens analyzed from 80 MB patients during the course of treatment. The NASBA positivity rate declined during treatment. A significant decrease was observed after only 1-3 months. These results favor the view that detection of RNA by NASBA may reflect the viability of M. leprae.