The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae. Influenza vaccine is an important influenza prevention strategy and the preparations used display good safety and tolerability profiles. But the safety of applying influenza vaccine on the clinical cured leprosy patients is unclear. METHODS: We conducted an observational clinical study, in Wuhan between November 15, 2016 and March 1, 2017. Two groups of participants ≥50 years of age received a 0.5 ml dose of the inactivated split-virion trivalent influenza vaccine and a follow-up 28 days observation of any solicited and unsolicited adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 134 subjects were included in the study. The total rate of reactogenicity was 5.4% [2/37] in leprosy group and 15.5% [15/ 97] in control group, the difference of reactogenicity between two groups was not significant (p = 0.1522). For solicited injection-sites adverse events (AEs), 12.4% [12/ 97] participants in the control group reported of itching, pain, erythema, swelling or induration, and no participants in leprosy group reported of any solicited injection-sites AEs. For solicited systemic AEs, 7.2% [7 / 97] participants in the control group reported of fever, malaise or headache, and 2.7% [1 / 37] participants in the leprosy group reported of fever, statistic result showed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.4438). Unsolicited AEs was reported by one male aged 76, 4 hours after vaccination administration, his plantar ulcer area began bleeding. All AEs were grade 1 or grade 2, and no recurrence of lepra reaction, AEs leading to early withdrawal from the study, or deaths were reported in this study. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the first clinical study to evaluate the safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients. We concluded that clinically cured leprosy patients are relatively safe for influenza vaccine. More importantly, our study make a positive and scientific efforts to eradicate discrimination on leprosy. In our study, we described a patient with plantar ulcer undergoing bleeding for 4 hours after vaccine administration. Based on evidence we have, we interpret that this adverse event may probably associated with vaccine, and patients with ulcer and leprosy need intensive attention after vaccines administration.

Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of "Mycobacterium w" against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice immunized with live versus heat-killed M. w by the aerosol or parenteral route.

As the disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis continues to be a burden, there is a concerted effort to find new vaccines to combat this problem. One of the important vaccine strategies is whole bacterial vaccines. This approach relies on multiple antigens and built-in adjuvanticity. Other mycobacterial strains which share cross-reactive antigens with M. tuberculosis have been considered as alternatives to M. bovis for vaccine use. One such strain, "Mycobacterium w", had been evaluated for its immunomodulatory properties in leprosy. A vaccine against leprosy based on killed M. w is approved for human use, where it has resulted in clinical improvement, accelerated bacterial clearance, and increased immune responses to Mycobacterium leprae antigens. M. w shares antigens not only with M. leprae but also with M. tuberculosis, and initial studies have shown that vaccination with killed M. w induces protection against tuberculosis in Mycobacterium bovis BCG responder, as well as BCG nonresponder, strains of mice. Hence, we further studied the protective potential of M. w and the underlying immune responses in the mouse model of tuberculosis. We analyzed the protective efficacy of M. w immunization in both live and killed forms through the parenteral route and by aerosol immunization, compared with that of BCG. Our findings provide evidence that M. w has potential protective efficacy against M. tuberculosis. M. w activates macrophage activity, as well as lymphocytes. M. w immunization by both the parenteral route and aerosol administration gives higher protection than BCG given by the parenteral route in the mouse model of tuberculosis.

Restoration of proliferative response to M. leprae antigens in lepromatous T cells against candidate antileprosy vaccines.

Several studies conducted in the last decade suggest that Mycobacterium lepraereactive T cells exist in lepromatous patients, but their number may be too few to yield a detectable response in cell-mediated immunity (CMI) assays. Immunizations with candidate antileprosy vaccines and stimulation of T cells with M. leprae + interleukin-2 restore the M. leprae-induced CMI response in lepromatous leprosy patients. These immunizations and stimulation may enrich the pre-existing M. leprae-responsive T cells in lepromatous patients and, thereby, induce a detectable CMI response to M. leprae antigens upon repeat testing. To verify this proposition, we carried out a study in a group of 10 lepromatous leprosy patients. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained from these patients were anergic to M. leprae antigens in proliferative assays, but they responded to the antigens of candidate antileprosy vaccines, i.e., M. bovis BCG, M. bovis BCG + M. leprae, and Mycobacterium w. The enrichment of M. leprae-responsive T cells was performed by establishing T-cell lines from the PBMC after in vitro stimulation with M. leprae, M. bovis BCG, M. bovis BCG + M. leprae, and Mycobacterium w. When tested for their proliferative responses, 1/10, 3/10, 6/10 and 2/10 T-cell lines established against M. leprae, M. bovis BCG, M. bovis BCG + M. leprae, and Mycobacterium w, respectively, responded to M. leprae. These results suggest that enrichment of pre-existing M. leprae-responsive T cells may contribute to the restoration of the T-cell response to M. leprae in some lepromatous patients. Four of the 10 M. leprae-induced T-cell lines proliferated in response to the 65 kDa, 36 kDa, 28 kDa, and 12 kDa recombinant antigens of M. leprae, suggesting that the nonresponsiveness of T cells in some lepromatous patients may be overcome by using recombinant antigens of M. leprae.

Lepromin responses in recipients of a candidate antileprosy bacterin vaccine (WHO-IMMLEP Mycobacterium leprae killed preparation) in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Identification of the nine-banded armadillo as a potential source of massive numbers of Mycobacterium leprae led to the development of a candidate bacterin vaccine for possible immunoprophylaxis. METHODS: Volunteers were from a leprosy-hypoendemic, nonBCG-using area (USA). They had been vaccinated intradermally 3 years earlier with a candidate antileprosy bacterin vaccine of irradiated and autoclaved Mycobacterium leprae obtained from experimental nine-banded armadillos. They were tested for dermal responsiveness to standard lepromin A. RESULTS: Values for induration and erythema appeared slightly greater for the vaccinated group; however, the differences were not statistically significant, indicating no appreciable 'anamnestic' effect on either Fernandez (early) or Mitsuda (late) reactions after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Because previous studies had demonstrated that administration of this bacterin produced no humoral changes, it now appears less probable that laboratory methods will be of much help in assessing even possible effectiveness of such vaccination.

Cellular immune response to the cell walls of Mycobacterium leprae in leprosy patients and healthy subjects exposed to leprosy.

Cell walls of M. leprae consist of complex arrangements of carbohydrate, lipid, peptidoglycan and protein molecules. Recently, extractable proteins of a wide range of molecular weights were identified as components of the cell wall. We have examined the cellular immune responses of Nepali leprosy patients to a cell wall preparation of M. leprae enriched for these proteins. Strong lymphocyte proliferative responses to the antigens were present in half of the paucibacillary leprosy patients and in the majority of healthy control subjects with occupational exposure to leprosy. Patients with multibacillary disease responded poorly and patients with tuberculosis had intermediate responses. Proliferative responses to the cell wall protein fraction were strongly correlated to the proliferative responses to sonicates of the whole leprosy bacillus. Immunization of mice with cell wall proteins resulted in inhibition of growth of M. leprae following foot-pad inoculation with viable organisms. Therefore cell-mediated immune responses to the extractable proteins of the cell wall may play a role in protective immunity against M. leprae infection.

Association of HLA antigens with differential responsiveness to Mycobacterium w vaccine in multibacillary leprosy patients.

Leprosy patients undergoing phase II trials in two hospitals of New Delhi, India, were HLA typed to see the association of HLA with differential responsiveness to Mycobacterium w vaccine. The vaccine comprises an atypical, nonpathogenic mycobacterium, Mycobacterium w, which has cross-reactive antigens with M. leprae. Multibacillary patients who are lepromin negative are vaccinated at an interval of 3 months. Considerable improvement is evident in the patients in terms of a decline in bacterial indices and histopathological and immunological upgrading. But all the patients do not respond to the vaccine in the same manner; some are slow responders, while others are good responders. HLA-A28 and DQw3 (DQw8 + 9) were found to be associated with slow responsiveness, while DQw1 and DQw7 were found to be associated with a more rapid responsiveness to the M. w vaccine. However, these associations were not significant after P correction for the number of antigens tested for each locus except for HLA-DQw3 (DQw8 and DQw9) and DQw7. DQw7, a new defined split of HLA-DQw3, seems to be associated with the responsiveness to M. w vaccine.

Improving on BCG.

BCG is the only vaccine for tuberculosis and leprosy known to be effective in at least some places. Unfortunately it tends to be less successful in just those areas of the developing world where a vaccine is most needed. Although molecular biology offers the prospect of alternatives, these still lie in the indefinite future, and the best use has to be made of BCG. A number of preparations are available from different manufacturers, and a vaccine should be selected with good evidence of efficacy, and a low incidence of complications. Selection of the optimal age for administering BCG should be based on factors pertaining in the area where it is to be used. The influence of contact with environmental mycobacteria, the age at which mycobacterial diseases occur, and the logistics of vaccine delivery must be taken into account. The addition of a suspension of killed Mycobacterium vaccae to BCG may increase its efficacy. Skin test data show that recognition of antigens common to all mycobacterial species and thought to be the first step in the protective immune response, is significantly enhanced by the additive. M. vaccae also contains a substance, or substances, "switching off" the tissue destructive aspect of the Koch phenomenon that is part of the immunopathology of tuberculosis. A suspension of killed M. vaccae alone can be used to enhance immune responses of persons unsuitable for BCG vaccination, such as those already tuberculin positive, and those with scars of earlier BCG vaccination.

Vaccination and skin test studies on the children of leprosy patients.

In an attempt to achieve maximal skin-test positivity to leprosin A in children of leprosy patients living in Baba Baghi Leprosy Sanatorium in Iranian Azerbaijan, two new vaccines have been employed. Children without scars of previous BCG and without response to leprosin A were given a vaccine containing 10(8) viable units of BCG Glaxo plus 10(7) killed Mycobacterium vaccae per dose (vaccine B). Children with BCG Pasteur (Teheran) scars but without response to leprosin A were given a vaccine containing 10(8) killed M. vaccae alone (vaccine D). Eight years later skin testing was repeated, and both new vaccines were found to have significantly increased the numbers of children responding to leprosin A above the level that would have been expected had they received BCG Pasteur alone. This increase was due in large part to increases in the proportions of individuals responding to group i (common mycobacterial) antigens, and known as category 1 responders. The use of suspensions of killed M. vaccae in conjunction with BCG may represent a considerable advance in inducing protection from multibacillary leprosy in close contacts of leprosy patients if leprosin A positivity is truly a correlate of protective immunity. A comparison, using the same criteria, with the other proposed vaccines for leprosy would be very interesting.