One year follow up of a cohort of suspected leprosy cases: findings from a leprosy 'Selective Special Drive' in Gadchiroli district, Maharashtra, India.

OBJECTIVES: The study involves a follow-up visit in 2010, to hyper-endemic Gadchiroli district of Maharashtra, India, to evaluate the current status of those suspected in 2009 of having skin/nerve lesions suggestive of leprosy, and to study the interactions between such people and the State leprosy programme. DESIGN: The study cohort comprised of those confirmed with leprosy (n = 151 and 157/233 absentee 'suspects' who were not examined by the study team in 2009 in 14 of 45 Primary Health Centres (PHCs). At follow-up, the treatment status of the confirmed cases was checked from PHC registers and cross-checked by direct questioning of patients and their views were sought on PHC leprosy services. The 157 absentee 'suspects' were queried about the reasons for their absence. RESULTS: Thirty nine 'absentee suspects' were found to have leprosy. A notable feature of the follow-up visit was that 114 people in the communities, other than those listed as 'suspects' by Community Health Workers (CHWs), voluntarily sought out the team for their opinion on hypopigmented/anaesthetic lesions, which resulted in a further 39 new cases being brought to light. (Total new cases = 78). The follow-up revealed discrepancies (100% vs. 75%) between PHC records and testimonies of the registered patients about regularity of treatment; irregularity of MDT supply was cited by some for dropping out of treatment. Other reasons proffered for irregularity were lepra reaction, fear of stigma, ignorance about leprosy and preference for faith healers. Medical Officers of PHCs were not trained in the management of lepra reactions; that task, along with disability care being entrusted to a paramedical worker of an NGO during periodic visits. CONCLUSIONS: There are remediable lacunae in the recording and dispensing of MDT by the State apparatus, as well as a need for refresher training in leprosy diagnosis for PHC staff, and in lepra reaction management for medical officers. The large number (78) of new cases detected in the follow-up, in part of Gadchiroli district strongly suggests more to-be-discovered cases in the communities.

The first international leprosy conference, Berlin, 1897: the politics of segregation.

The present paper examines the first attempts to internationalize the problem of leprosy, a subject hitherto overlooked by historians of imperialism and disease. The last decade of the nineteenth century saw many in the 'civilized countries' of the imperialist West gripped by a paranoia about an invasion of leprosy via germ-laden immigrants and returning expatriates who had acquired the infection in leprosy-endemic colonial possessions. Such alarmists clamoured for the adoption of vigorous leper segregation policies in such colonies. But the contagiousness of leprosy did not go unquestioned by other westerners. The convocation in Berlin of the first international meeting on leprosy revealed the interplay of differing and sometimes incompatible views about the containment of leprosy by segregation. The roles of officials from several countries, as well as the roles of five protagonists (Albert Ashmead, Jules Goldschmidt, Edvard Ehlers, Armauer Hansen, and Phineas Abraham) in the shaping of the Berlin Conference are here examined.