Control de la lepra en Venezuela después de más de cinco décadas de desarrolo

La lucha antileprosa se incia en Venezuela en el siglo XIX, y se refuerza a comienzos del siglo XX. Con la creación del Ministerio de Sanidad en 1936 se inicia el servicio de lucha antileprosa y en 1946 se crea la División de Lepra, que se convertirá después en el Departamento de Dermatología, el cual actualmente forma parte del Instituto de Biomedicina, que es organismo rector de esta actividad a nivel estatal, y cuyas actividades a nivel operativo se realizan a través de los 31 servicios regionales de Dermatología Sanitaria. En 1985 se inició la aplicación de la poliquimioterapia supervisada como tratamiento de elección. La evolución de la lepra en Venezuela desde 1946 se caracteriza por un aumento de la detección y la prevalencia en los años inmediatos a esta fecha, con un descenso posterior desde la década del 60, estabilizándose la deteción desde inicios de la década del 80, con tasas alrededor de 0'25 (algo más de 500 casos) por 10.000 habitantes por año. Para este período de ha mantenido el descenso de la prevalencia, la cual mostró cambios bruscos en 1982 y 1995, por actuatualización de los registros. En nivel de eliminación de la lepra como problema de salud (de acuerdo al criterio de la OMS de una tasa de prevalencia inferior a uno ano por 10.000 habitantes), se alcanzó en Venezuela en 1997. En las entidadades federales, soleamente cuatro de las 23 (Apure, Barinas, Dojedes y Portuguesa) mantienen tasas de prevalencia por encima del nivel de eliminación. Dado el hecho de haber alcanzado el nivel de eliminación, manteniéndose relaticamente estables el número de casos nuevos y la tasa de detección, se propone que el criterio para clasificar a un país como "en fase de eliminación) sea más estricto e incluya, además de la tasa de prevaelncia, datos relativos a la detección de casos. El tipo clínico predominante es el multibacilar. Las tasas de detección por edade muestran un aumento gradual al avanzar en edad. La racón masculino/femenino se mantiene alrededor de 2. Un 10% de los casos presentaron algún grado de discapacidad, aunque discreta en la mayoría de los casos. Existe un porcentaje de casos nacidos en el ixterior que es superior a la proporción de población con esta característica en el país. La mayor proporción de casos proviene del área urbana, especialmente de las zonas marginales, aun cuando las tasas son mayores para la zona...

Leprosy in women: characteristics and repercussions.

"Health is often measured in terms of low mortality; nevertheless, merely being alive is not a measure of the quality of life" H. Méndez Castellanos. Physiological, socioeconomic and cultural factors play important roles in the response of women to Mycobacterium leprae and in the impact of leprosy on their lives. They appear to develop stronger immunological responses to M. leprae than men, as suggested by lower incidence and less severe clinical forms of disease in most areas of the world, as well as stronger reactions of cell-mediated immunity after prophylactic vaccination. Genetic factors and physiological status including pregnancy, intercurrent infection and malnutrition might be among the factors which modulate this response. Women in leprosy-endemic areas of the world, with few exceptions, suffer from marked economic and social dependency and inferiority which can only be heightened by the social stigma associated with leprosy. Nevertheless, they bear an enormous responsibility for the health of their families, often as head of the household, and they often possess a unique capacity to influence community opinion. With the introduction of multidrug therapy, leprosy control throughout the world is no longer an unrealistic goal. Active vaccination may constitute the other factor necessary for eventual eradication of the disease. The incorporation of women at all levels into active roles in health care programs may constitute one of the decisive factors in the success or failure of leprosy control.

Immunoprophylactic trial with combined Mycobacterium leprae/BCG vaccine against leprosy: preliminary results.

In an attempt to find a vaccine that gives greater and more consistent protection against leprosy than BCG vaccine, we compared BCG with and without killed Mycobacterium leprae in Venezuela. Close contacts of prevalent leprosy cases were selected as the trial population since they are at greatest risk of leprosy. Since 1983, 29,113 contacts have been randomly allocated vaccination with BCG alone or BCG plus 6 x 10(8) irradiated, autoclaved M leprae purified from the tissues of infected armadillos. We excluded contacts with signs of leprosy at screening and a proportion of those whose skin-test responses to M leprae soluble antigen (MLSA) were 10 mm or more (positive reactions). By July, 1991, 59 postvaccination cases of leprosy had been confirmed in 150,026 person-years of follow-up through annual clinical examinations of the trial population (31 BCG, 28 BCG/M leprae). In the subgroup for which we thought an effect of vaccination was most likely (onset more than a year after vaccination, negative MLSA skin-test response before vaccination), leprosy developed in 11 BCG recipients and 9 BCG/M leprae recipients; there were 18% fewer cases (upper 95% confidence limit [CL] 70%) in the BCG/M leprae than in the BCG alone group. For all cases with onset more than a year after vaccination irrespective of MLSA reaction the relative efficacy was 0% (upper 95% CL 54%; 15 cases in each vaccine group). Retrospective analysis of data on the number of BCG scars found on each contact screened suggested that BCG alone confers substantial protection against leprosy (vaccine efficacy 56%, 95% CL 27-74%) and there was a suggestion that several doses of BCG offered additional protection. There is no evidence in the first 5 years of follow-up of this trial that BCG plus M leprae offers substantially better protection against leprosy than does BCG alone, but the confidence interval on the relative efficacy estimate is wide.

Immunotherapy with a mixture of Mycobacterium leprae and BCG in different forms of leprosy and in Mitsuda-negative contacts.

A total of 529 weak or non-reactors to M. leprae, including Mitsuda-negative contacts and patients with leprosy, were vaccinated once or repeatedly, as necessary, with a mixture of 6 x 10(8) purified, heat-killed M. leprae and 0.01 mg to 0.2 mg of viable BCG. Clinical, histopathological and immunological criteria were used to evaluate the response of these individuals. Clinical changes, including sharper definition of borders and progressive flattening and regression of lesions, were observed in 57% of the active LL cases and 76% of the active BL cases. Histopathological study revealed infiltration of the lesions by mononuclear cells, appearance of epithelioid differentiation, and fragmentation of the microorganisms. Delayed-type skin tests with soluble antigen from purified M. leprae became positive in significant numbers of each group studied. These results demonstrate the efficacy of combined immunotherapy in low-resistance forms of leprosy and potential utility in the immunoprophylaxis of the disease.

In vitro activation of neutrophils by suspensions of Mycobacterium leprae.

Activation, defined as an increase in the proportion of cells that reduce nitroblue-tetrazolium in vitro, is present in neutrophils from patients with reactional lepromatous leprosy but not in neutrophils from patients with non-reactional lepromatous leprosy. Neutrophils from patients with all forms of leprosy are equally well activated by endotoxin in vitro. We have now shown that in vitro activation induced by Mycobacterium leprae suspensions is of comparable magnitude in neutrophils from patients with all forms of leprosy (including lepromatous and reactional lepromatous leprosy). There is no intrinsic neutrophil anergy in patients with lepromatous leprosy vis-à-vis M. leprae as pertains to activation. Spontaneous activation in reactional lepromatous leprosy is likely due to an indirect mechanism, probably of immunologic nature, and not simply to the presence of circulating Mycobacterium leprae in the blood.

Comparative study of the 48-hour response to soluble antigens obtained from human and armadillo leprosy material in lepromatous leprosy patients and normal persons, contacts of leprosy patients.

We prepared antigens by precipitating with 80% ammonium sulfate supernatants of human and armadillo antigen at a concentration of 160 X 10(6) bacteria per ml. The precipitate was resuspended, dialyzed and filtered. The antigen obtained was inactivated with trypsin during 30 minutes. The tests made with these antigens were negative for the 48-hour test in lepromatous patients and highly positive in normal persons who were contacts of leprosy patients.

Specificity of the 48-hour reaction to Mitsuda antigen. Use of a soluble antigen from human and armadillo lepromin.

Two antigens were tested and compared in relation to the 48-h Fernandez reaction. They were obtained from standard human and from standard armadillo lepromin. All the tests were negative in patients with lepromatous leprosy and highly positive in those with tuberculoid leprosy and in lepromin-positive contacts. There was total agreement in all tests done with the two types of antigen. The antigenic component has the following basic properties: it precipitates with 80% saturated ammonium sulfate; it is not destroyed by autoclaving or by treatment with 0.4% phenol; it is non-dialysable; and it is destroyed by treatment with trypsin.

Tests with three antigens in leprosy-endemic and non-endemic areas.

A study comparing the 48-h and 30-day reactions produced by three antigens was made in areas of low and high leprosy endemicity in Venezuela and in areas of Chile, a non-endemic country. The antigens used for the intradermal tests were standard Mitsuda antigen, supernatant from standard Mitsuda antigen, and PPD. The results indicate that there is no difference in the Mitsuda reaction of persons living in areas of high or low endemicity, but they show a statistically significant difference between the reactions in persons who live in endemic areas and those of persons living in a country where the disease has not been described. The difference in the Fernandez reaction obtained with the supernatant was not statistically significant between the two population groups in the endemic country, but was highly significant when comparing the endemic and the non-endemic countries.