Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros


Bases de datos
Asunto principal
Año de publicación
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lepr Rev ; 66(2): 126-33, 1995 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7637523

RESUMEN

In 2 non-governmental organization projects in Bangladesh 244 new leprosy patients were classified in the field according to clinical criteria. Skin smears were taken at 4 standardized sites and at the most active peripheral lesion, where a biopsy was also taken. Comparison of the clinical field classification with the results of the skin smears and biopsies gives a sensitivity of 92.1% for the clinical criteria, but a specificity of only 41.3%. The skin-smear results, on the other hand, have a sensitivity of 88.4% and a specificity of 98.1%. Thus, skin smears may contribute considerably to the operational classification of leprosy patients under field conditions. Quality control of the peripheral laboratory is essential. Appropriate site selection for the smear taking will also contribute to increased performance. Analysis of the skin-smear results suggests that the policy of taking smears at standardized sites should be abandoned in favour of the earlobes and active peripheral lesions.


Asunto(s)
Lepra/diagnóstico , Piel/microbiología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Bangladesh , Biopsia con Aguja , Femenino , Humanos , Lepra/clasificación , Masculino , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Piel/patología
2.
Lepr Rev ; 66(2): 134-43, 1995 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7637524

RESUMEN

In 2 non-governmental organization projects 244 new leprosy patients in Bangladesh were classified in the field according to clinical criteria i.e. number of skin lesions and number of enlarged nerves. Comparison of these classification results with the results of skin smears and biopsies yielded a sensitivity (for detection of a MB case) of 92.1%, but the 'unconfirmed MB rate' amounted to 52.6%. In order to improve the reliability of the operational classification, several additional clinical criteria were investigated. It was found that neither the presence of anaesthesia in the skin lesions nor the presence of grade 2 disabilities or peripheral anaesthesia or voluntary muscle testing (VMT) impairment contributed to an improved classification. Counting the number of body areas showing signs of leprosy, which had proven very useful in other programmes, did not result in a more reliable classification in the 2 projects in Bangladesh. The presence of clinical signs of lepromatous leprosy, more specifically nodules or diffuse infiltration, could be a useful addition to the classification criteria. If the sensitivity must remain higher than 90%, the lowest 'unconfirmed MB rate' obtainable in Bangladesh, using clinical criteria only, is 46.4%, for a sensitivity of 91.0%. However, the inclusion of skin-smear results in the classification criteria could improve the sensitivity to 96.6% and lower the 'unconfirmed MB rate' to 40.3%. A reduction in MB overclassification will result in more efficient and more cost-effective leprosy control programmes.


Asunto(s)
Lepra/diagnóstico , Piel/microbiología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Bangladesh , Biopsia con Aguja , Humanos , Lepra/clasificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Piel/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA