Infectious mimics of rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can have various infectious mimics. As immunosuppressive agents used in treatment can aggravate the underlying infections, correct diagnosis of RA and ruling out infections is important. Numerous viral infections (Parvovirus B19, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Chikungunya and other alphaviruses, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and various other viruses), mycobacterial infections (Poncet's disease, tubercular septic arthritis, and leprosy), bacterial arthritis, brucellosis and Lyme disease are among common infections that mimic RA. Widespread travel and tourism, especially to exotic areas, high risk sexual behavior and widespread use of immunosuppressive and chemotherapeutic agents has led to numerous outbreaks of infections in areas where these infections were never reported before. Hence, rheumatologists all over the world should be familiar with musculoskeletal manifestations of infections. History of travel, comorbid fever, skin rash, genital ulcers, urethral discharge, the consumption of unpasteurized milk, lymphadenopathy, tenosynovitis, low platelet count, and positive Mantoux test can offer potential diagnostic clues. Serological testing, cultures, specific radiological signs and deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) amplification techniques often aid in diagnosis. Treatment mainly consists of antimicrobial agents, analgesics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, immunosuppressive agents including steroids and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are needed occasionally in different refractory and prolonged illnesses. Most of the times, episodes of arthritis are self-limiting and respond to treatment of underlying cause. However, few infections like Chikungunya and Lyme's disease can lead to chronic arthritis as well.

Rheumatology science and practice in India.

The practice of rheumatology in a country like India presents its own unique challenges, including the need to manage patients in a cost-constrained setting, where the lack of uniform government funding for healthcare merits the need to optimize the use of cheaper medicines, as well as devise innovative strategies to minimize the use of costlier drugs such as biologic disease-modifying agents. Use of immunosuppressive agents is also associated with increased risks of infectious complications, such as the reactivation of tuberculosis. In this narrative review, we provide a flavor of such challenges unique to Rheumatology practice in India, and review the published literature on the management of common rheumatic diseases from India. In addition, we critically review existing guidelines for the management of rheumatic diseases from this part of the world. We also discuss infectious etiologies of rheumatic complaints, such as leprosy, tuberculosis, and Chikungunya arthritis, which are often encountered here, and pose a diagnostic as well as therapeutic challenge for clinicians. There remains a need to identify and test more cost-effective strategies for Indian patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as the requirement for more government participation to enhance scant facilities for the treatment of such diseases as well as foster the development of healthcare services such as specialist nurses, occupational therapists and physiotherapists to enable better management of these conditions.

Guidelines for management of rheumatic diseases in developing countries from basics to real-world situation: relevance, need, and processes for development.

Guidelines or recommendations help to provide uniform standards in medical practice. The development of guidelines requires adherence to pre-defined norms prescribed by different international organizations such as the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR). We searched Pubmed and LILACS to identify published papers in five major rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthropathies, osteoarthritis, and scleroderma) from different countries based on their economic prosperity and could find a lack of published literature from most economically weaker regions. Similarly, published guidelines in these rheumatic diseases were sparse from Asia and Africa, which are economically developed to a lesser extent than other regions of the world. Considering differing economic realities driving patient care in different regions of the world, unique challenges in certain geographic areas such as musculoskeletal manifestations of infectious diseases like leprosy and tuberculosis, as well as distinct risk of malignancies and other comorbid conditions, National Rheumatology societies should work towards developing more guidelines for rheumatic diseases from regions such as Asia and Africa, while following strictly the prescribed norms for the same. With a paucity of guidelines for such regions currently, an alternative (although less preferable) suggestion would be that major international societies, whose guidelines are widely read and followed the world over, should consider inputs from experts from diverse regions of the world while developing these guidelines.

Prevalence and clinical patterns of psoriatic arthritis in Indian patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and clinical patterns of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) varies in different parts of the world and there is little clinical and epidemiological data from the Indian subcontinent. AIMS: Our study was designed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical patterns of PsA in Indian patients. METHODS: This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional study, in which 1149 consecutive psoriasis patients seen over 1 year were screened for PsA according to classification of psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. Demographic and disease parameters were recorded including Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), and number of swollen and tender joints. RESULTS: Among 1149 patients with psoriasis, 100 (8.7%) patients had PsA, of which 83% were newly diagnosed. The most common pattern was symmetrical polyarthritis (58%), followed by spondyloarthropathy 49%, asymmetric oligoarthritis (21%), isolated spondyloarthropathy (5%), predominant distal interphalangeal arthritis (3%), and arthritis mutilans (1%). Enthesitis and dactylitis were present in 67% and 26% of cases, respectively. The mean number of swollen and tender joints were 3.63±3.59 (range, 0-22) and 7.76±6.03 (range, 1-26), respectively. Nail changes were present in 87% of the cases. The median PASI and NAPSI of the subjects with PsA was 3.6 and 20, respectively. There was no significant correlation of number of swollen/tender joints with PASI or NAPSI. CONCLUSION: There is a relatively low prevalence of PsA among Indian psoriasis patients presenting to dermatologists. No correlation was found between the severity of skin and nail involvement and articular disease.

Management of psoriatic arthritis.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that can be progressive and may be associated with permanent joint damage and disability. Early identification of PsA will enable these patients with progressive disease to be treated early and aggressively. Due to lack of consistent diagnostic or classification criteria in the past, PsA was considered as uncommon. Overall it affects 6-10% of all psoriasis patients during the course of their disease. Both dermatologists and rheumatologists should be involved in the diagnosis and management of this disorder. Interest in PsA has greatly enhanced over the past several years due to many factors including a better understanding of disease mechanisms, improved investigational tools, better clinical trial design and perhaps most importantly, the availability of newer therapeutic agents. Mild forms of PsA can initially be treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID). In acute as well as oligo- to polyarticular joint involvement, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) are indicated for PsA. The biologics particularly tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) antagonists are gaining increasing significance as second-line therapy. Treatment choice should also take into consideration the extent of skin involvement.