Optimizing Myanmar's community-delivered malaria volunteer model: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: In parallel with the change of malaria policy from control to elimination and declines in the malaria burden in Greater Mekong Sub-region, the motivation and social role of malaria volunteers has declined. To address this public health problem, in Myanmar, the role and responsibilities of malaria volunteers have been transformed into integrated community malaria volunteers (ICMV), that includes the integration of activities for five additional diseases (dengue, lymphatic filariasis, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and leprosy) into their current activities. However, this transformation was not evidence-based and did not consider inputs of different stakeholders. Therefore, qualitative stakeholder consultations were performed to optimize future malaria volunteer models in Myanmar. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key health stakeholders from the Myanmar Ministry of Health and Sports (MoHS) and malaria implementing partners to obtain their perspectives on community-delivered malaria models. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to explore the experiences of the stakeholders in policymaking and programme implementation. Interview topic guides were used during the interviews and inductive thematic data analysis was performed. RESULTS: While ICMVs successfully provided malaria services in the community, the stakeholders considered the ICMV model as not optimal and suggested that many aspects needed to be improved including better training, supervision, support, and basic health staff's recognition for ICMVs. Stakeholders believe that the upgraded ICMV model could contribute significantly to achieving malaria elimination and universal health care in Myanmar. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In the context of high community demand for non-malaria treatment services from volunteers, the integrated volunteer service package must be developed carefully in order to make it effective in malaria elimination programme and to contribute in Myanmar's pathway to universal health coverage (UHC), but without harming the community. An evidenced-based, community-delivered and preferred model, that is also accepted by the MoHS, is yet to be developed to effectively contribute to achieving malaria elimination and UHC goals in Myanmar by 2030.

[Orientation of primary care in actions to control leprosy: factors relating to professionals]. / Orientación de la atención primaria en las acciones contra la lepra: factores relacionados con los profesionales.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors of professionals that relate to the degree of primary health care orientation in the control of leprosy. METHOD: Study carried out in 70 units of Family Health Strategy of a capital of Brazil, between July and September 2014. An evaluation instrument applied to 408 health professionals was used. The multiple linear regression-bootstrap model was applied to analyze the association of the general, essential and derived score with the explanatory factors of the professionals (work time in the unit and in primary care services, control actions, case care and leprosy training). RESULTS: In the descriptive analysis most of the professionals did not attend cases and did not receive training to perform leprosy actions. A strong orientation was observed in the essential and general score of primary care and the association with leprosy education. In the derived score, weak orientation and association were observed with training in the disease for doctors and community health agents. CONCLUSION: Professional experience in the Family Health Strategy and leprosy care is crucial for the service to be a provider of control actions oriented according to the essential and derived attributes of primary health care. Brazil has made progress in reducing the incidence of leprosy; however, it is necessary to increase the effectiveness of health surveillance, as a means of early detection and training of professionals.