Azathioprine weekly pulse versus methotrexate for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is the most commonly used drug in the treatment of psoriasis with good efficacy and safety. Recently, weekly azathioprine pulse has been shown to be effective in this disease. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of weekly pulse doses of azathioprine and methotrexate for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were recruited. After detailed clinical and laboratory evaluation, patients were randomized to 2 groups to receive either weekly 300 mg azathioprine (n = 40) or 15 mg methotrexate every week (n = 40) for 20 weeks, following which the response to treatment and adverse effects were assessed. The patients were then followed up every 4 weeks for 3 months to determine any relapse. RESULTS: Overall, 48 (60%) patients achieved PASI 75, while 36 (45%) and 59 (73.8%) patients achieved PASI 100 and 50, respectively. On intention to treat analysis, PASI ≥ 75 was achieved in 47.5% (19/40) patients in group 1 compared to 85% (34/40) patients in group 2 (p < 0.001). However, on per protocol analysis, PASI ≥ 75 was achieved in 86% (19/22) patients in group 1 and 92% (34/37) patients in group 2 (p = 0.497). Minor clinical and biochemical adverse effects were noted in both the groups, which were comparable. One (7.7%) patient in group 1 and 4 (17.4%) in group 2 relapsed during follow-up. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of study include small sample size and short follow-up. CONCLUSION: Weekly azathioprine pulse appears to be beneficial in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis. However, it is less effective than weekly methotrexate. It can thus be of use as a therapeutic option in patients with contraindication to methotrexate or other similar agents in this disease.

Off-label use of azathioprine in dermatology: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence regarding the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of off-label azathioprine use in dermatology. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE (1950-2009), EMBASE (1980-2009), and CENTRAL (1996-2009) databases on October 9, 2009. The main search terms were azathioprine and its synonyms. No restrictions were imposed regarding publication date. Only articles in English, French, German, or Dutch were included. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials, cohorts, and case series concerning the use of azathioprine in an off-label dermatologic setting were independently assessed for eligibility by 2 coauthors. The search retrieved 3870 articles, and 148 articles were selected for detailed review. DATA EXTRACTION: Forty-three articles matching the inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed for methodologic quality by 2 reviewers independently, including an evaluation of components associated with biased estimates of treatment effect. DATA SYNTHESIS: High-quality evidence (level A) was found for a moderate therapeutic effect in severe atopic dermatitis. Evidence of moderate quality (level B) was found for efficacy in parthenium dermatitis (an airborne plant allergen contact dermatitis), bullous pemphigoid, chronic actinic dermatitis, and leprosy type 1 reaction. Furthermore, favorable therapeutic effects existed for erythema multiforme, lichen planus, and pityriasis rubra pilaris, although the quality of evidence was low (level C). CONCLUSIONS: A strong clinical recommendation was given for azathioprine in atopic dermatitis. Conclusions regarding safety in an off-label setting could not be reached because of scarce and incomplete data (level C evidence). Long-term registries and prospective studies could add to the existing evidence and provide legal support for off-label drug use in dermatology.

Azathioprine versus betamethasone for the treatment of parthenium dermatitis: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Parthenium hysterophorus is the commonest cause of airborne contact dermatitis in India. Azathioprine has been shown to be effective and safe in parthenium dermatitis, but there are no reports of comparison of steroids and azathioprine in this condition. AIMS: To study the therapeutic efficacy of azathioprine versus betamethasone in patients having contact dermatitis to parthenium and compare the side effects of the drugs. METHODS: Fifty-five patients of airborne contact dermatitis to parthenium were randomly assigned to treatment with azathioprine 100 mg daily (group A) or betamethasone 2 mg daily (group B), for 6 months in a blinded manner. The patients were evaluated every month for 6 months to determine the response to treatment and side effects and then further followed up for another 6 months to determine any relapse. RESULTS: There were 26 patients in group A and 29 in group B, of which 20 patients of group A and 21 of group B completed the study. Nineteen (95%) patients in group A and all 21 (100%) patients in group B had an excellent response (complete remission) to treatment (P=0.0156 vs. 0.0005). The patients in group B, however, had more adverse effects (Fisher exact, P

Role of azathioprine in preventing recurrences in a patient of recurrent erythema nodosum leprosum.

The pathogenesis of erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) involves both immune complex deposition and dysfunction of cell mediated immunity. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) plays an important role in its pathogenesis. Thalidomide and corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for ENL. However, there are often severe limitations to their use. We report a case of recurrent ENL treated successfully with azathioprine. A 15-year-old unmarried girl with lepromatous leprosy had recurrent ENL for 2 years. She was treated with WHO-MB MDT and prednisolone in doses of 40-90 mg a day for 2-12 weeks. Her condition was inadequately controlled. The patient was therefore treated with thalidomide 300 mg and prednisolone 40 mg. The symptoms subsided after 5 days and ENL lesions healed in 2 weeks. Prednisolone was reduced by 10 mg per week and stopped, while thalidomide was reduced to 100 twice daily after 4 weeks. Azathioprine 100 mg (2 mg/kg per day) daily orally was added to prevent recurrences. Thalidomide was further reduced and stopped after another 4 weeks while she continued with azathioprine in the same doses for 8 months. There was no recurrence of ENL lesions and no side effects of the therapy. MB-MDT was stopped 1 year ago, and she is on follow-up without any relapse. Azathioprine, therefore, appears to be an effective and safe drug to prevent recurrences of ENL.

Azathioprine in dermatology: the past, the present, and the future / Azathioprine in dermatology: the past, the present, and the future

For several decades, dermatologists have utilized azathioprine to treat numerous debilitating skin diseases. This synthetic purine analog is derived from 6-mercaptopurine. It is thought to act by disrupting nucleic acid synthesis and has recently been found to interfere with T-cell activation. The most recognized uses of azathioprine in dermatology are for immunobullous diseases, generalized eczematous disorders, and photodermatoses. In this comprehensive review, the authors present recent advancements in the understanding of azathioprine and address aspects not covered in prior reviews. They (1) summarize the history of azathioprine; (2) discuss metabolism, integrating information from recent publications; (3) review the mechanism of action with attention paid to the activities of azathioprine not mediated by its 6-mercaptopurine metabolites and review new data about inhibition by azathioprine of the CD28 signal transduction pathway; (4) thoroughly examine thiopurine s-methyltransferase genetics, its clinical relevance, and interethnic variations; (5) review prior uses of azathioprine in the field of dermatology and grade the level of evidence; (6) discuss the use of azathioprine in pregnancy and pediatrics; review (7) key drug interactions and (8) adverse effects; (9) suggest a dosing and monitoring approach different from prior recommendations; and (10) explore the future of azathioprine, focusing on laboratory considerations and therapeutic application.

Behandlung eines subakut-kutanen Lupus erythematodes mit Thalidomid / Treatment of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus with thalidomide

A patient with subacute-cutaneous lupus erythematosus showed no response to corticosteroids and azathioprine. Treatment with thalidomide resulted in a dramatic clearing of skin lesions but failed to improve pathological laboratory tests.

Norwegian scabies: occurrence in a patient undergoing immunosuppression.

Norwegian scabies is rare yet distinctive. The majority of reported cases have been in patients with relatively small group of diseases, including Down syndrome and lepromatous leprosy. A case occurred in a patient on long-term immunosuppressive therapy following a kidney transplant. Altered host factors appear to be the prime determinants in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Nerve grafting in leprosy / Nerve grafting in leprosy

The most serious disability from which patients with leprosy suffer is sensory