Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 29(12): 574-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26595596

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the Lauge-Hansen classification to predict ligament injuries in ankle fractures using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative findings. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation in consecutive patients. SETTING: Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Three-hundred patients with an operatively treated ankle fracture who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: Injury ankle radiographs were assigned to a Lauge-Hansen classification. MRI scans were obtained to evaluate the syndesmotic and deltoid ligaments. A Lauge-Hansen classification for each patient was recorded based on intraoperative findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Comparisons were made between the predicted ankle ligamentous injuries based on radiographic Lauge-Hansen classifications, preoperative MRI analyses, and intraoperative findings. RESULTS: On the basis of the Lauge-Hansen system and injury radiographs, 77% (231/300) were classified as supination external rotation, 13% (40/300) were pronation external rotation, 4% (11/300) were supination adduction, <1% (1/300) was pronation abduction, and 6% (17/300) were not classifiable. Of the 283 fractures that were classified into Lauge-Hansen classes, 266 (94%) had MRI readings of ligamentous injuries consistent with the Lauge-Hansen predictions. Intraoperative findings also highly correlated with the Lauge-Hansen class of ankle fractures, with nearly complete agreement. Comparing MRI and intraoperative findings revealed discrepancies in 6% (16/283) of ankle fracture classifications. CONCLUSIONS: In our large cohort of patients, comparisons between injury radiographs, preoperative MRI, and intraoperative findings suggest that the Lauge-Hansen system is an accurate predictor of ligamentous injuries. The predictions based on the Lauge-Hansen system can be useful for fracture reduction maneuvers and operative planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo/diagnóstico , Fracturas de Tobillo/epidemiología , Ligamentos/lesiones , Ligamentos/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Examen Físico/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Femenino , Humanos , Ligamentos/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Examen Físico/métodos , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estadística como Asunto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
5.
s.l; s.n; 2000. 2 p.
No convencional en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, HANSEN, Hanseníase, SESSP-ILSLACERVO, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1237963
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA