Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surgery ; 105(2 Pt 1): 166-9, 1989 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2644719

ABSTRACT

Sixty-six patients undergoing cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either intercostal blockade with bupivacaine supplemented with papaveretum or papaveretum alone for postoperative analgesia. Both groups were similar regarding distribution of sex, age, and weight. These two groups were compared. Patients who did not have intercostal blockade required postoperative analgesia sooner. There was no significant difference, however, in the total consumption of papaveretum. Both groups experienced similar degrees of pain, and there were no differences in postoperative pulmonary function. We conclude that although single intercostal blockade is an effective analgesic, it does not improve pain relief and does not improve pulmonary function after cholecystectomy when compared with a regimen of on-demand, intramuscularly administered papaveretum.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy , Intercostal Nerves , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Respiratory Function Tests , Thoracic Nerves , Analgesia , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Opium/administration & dosage , Peak Expiratory Flow Rate , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation , Vital Capacity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL