ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess chiropractic (DC) and naturopathic doctors' (ND) pediatric care natural health product (NHP) recommendations. DESIGN: Surveys were developed in collaboration with DC and ND educators, and delivered as an on-line national survey. NHP dose, form of delivery, and indications across pediatric age ranges (from newborn to 16 years) for each practitioner's top five NHPs were assessed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Of the 421 respondents seeing one or more pediatric patients per week, 172 (41%, 107 DCs, 65 NDs) provided 440 NHP recommendations, categorized as: vitamins and minerals (89 practitioners, 127 recommendations), probiotics (110 practitioners, 110 recommendations), essential fatty acids (EFAs: 72 practitioners, 72 recommendations), homeopathics (56 practitioners, 66 recommendations), botanicals (29 practitioners, 31 recommendations), and other NHPs (33 practitioners, 34 recommendations). Indications for the NHP recommendations were tabulated for NHPs with 10 or more recommendations in any age category: 596 total indications for probiotics, 318 indications for essential fatty acids, 138 indications for vitamin D, and 71 indications for multi-vitamins. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study documenting the pediatric NHP recommendations of two popular complementary medicine professions. Common NHPs at standard doses are the most frequently recommended products, with use and doses adjusted according to age. High-quality evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and dosing for NHP use in children is scarce; development of evidence-informed pediatric guidelines is recommended, particularly for the most commonly used and recommended NHPs.
Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Chiropractic/statistics & numerical data , Dietary Supplements/statistics & numerical data , Naturopathy/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Attitude of Health Personnel , Canada , Child , Child, Preschool , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that between 7% and 55% of expectant mothers use herbal medicines or other types of natural health products (NHPs). Unfortunately, the safety and efficacy of NHPs during pregnancy and lactation is largely unknown. The Motherisk Program, at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, the is the major Canadian group to counsel and monitor outcomes of women using medications or NHPs, or of women exposed to chemicals, radiation or infection during pregnancy and lactation. OBJECTIVE: To create a network for research on NHPs during pregnancy and lactation by forming longstanding collaborations among Canadian medical and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners and scientists. METHODOLOGY: MotherNature Network members participated in three 2-day workshops and three conference calls throughout the length of this study. Each member was responsible to lead discussions surrounding one theme and address the following: initiation; development; presentation; and synthesis of comments of all members on the designated theme. RESULTS: We prioritized areas in high need for future research and collaborative means to conduct such research. NHPs were prioritized for their importance for future study. Areas for the prospective collection of data on NHP use in pregnancy and lactation were identified. A research and business plan was developed for the long-term sustainability of the Network. CONCLUSIONS: The MotherNature Network is well-situated to create a new climate in Canada, where data are collected and interpreted on the effects and safety of NHPs during pregnancy and lactation.
Subject(s)
Community Networks , Drug Information Services/standards , Mothers/education , Naturopathy/standards , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Phytotherapy/standards , Adult , Attitude to Health , Complementary Therapies/standards , Female , Government Regulation , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Materia Medica/standards , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Ontario , Pregnancy , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An open-label pilot study of individualized homeopathy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was conducted to assess the potential for future studies with a focus on the feasibility of the recruitment plan and outcome measure schedules; identification of any group characteristics of participants who respond significantly to the therapy; and establishing the length of time required for an improvement in ADHD symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants (aged 6-16) were recruited through community advertisement and outreach. Participants completed 1 screening and 9 individualized homeopathic follow-up consultations. ADHD symptoms were assessed using the Conners 3 - Parent Questionnaire administered at each consultation. The pre- and post-study difference in Conners Global Index - Parent (CGI-P) T-score was evaluated for each participant. Baseline data of those who showed a statistically significant improvement (responders) were compared to those who did not (non-responders). RESULTS: 35 participants were enrolled over 11 months. 80% completed all 10 consultations in a median of 12.1 months. 63% had a statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome, first occurring after a mean of 4.5 visits. Overall scores for participants completing at least 2 data points decreased from a baseline median of 85.5 to 74.0 (p < 0.001, CI 95%). There were no significant baseline differences between responders and non-responders. No serious adverse events related to the therapy were reported. CONCLUSION: The change in the median CGI-P T-score from baseline to the end of this open-label pilot study was statistically significant. The research methods are feasible. Future studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01141634.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Materia Medica/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Materia Medica/administration & dosage , Materia Medica/adverse effects , Pilot Projects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that up to 60% of children with neurologic conditions have tried complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of CAM among patients presenting to neurology clinics at two academic centers in Canada. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed to inquire about use of CAM products and therapies, including reasons for use, perceived helpfulness, and concurrent use with conventional medicine, and administered to patients or their parents/guardians at the Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) in Ottawa. RESULTS: Overall CAM use at the Stollery was 78%, compared to 48% at CHEO. The most common CAM products used were multi-vitamins (84%), vitamin C (37%), homeopathic remedies (24%), and fish oil/omega 3 s (22%). The most common CAM practices used were massage (47%), chiropractic (37%), faith healing (18%), aromatherapy (16%), homeopathy (16%), and relaxation (16%). Many patients used CAM products at the same time as conventional medicine but just over half (57%) discussed this concurrent use with their physician. CONCLUSION: CAM use is common in pediatric neurology patients and most respondents felt that it was helpful, with few or no harms associated. However, this use is often undisclosed, increasing possibility of interactions with conventional drugs. We urge clinicians to inquire about CAM use during routine history taking at every patient visit. Parents would clearly like more information about CAM from their specialty clinics; such information would be easier to share if more primary data were available about the safety and effectiveness of commonly used therapies.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Pediatrics , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Canada , Child , Child, Preschool , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Complementary Therapies/methods , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Male , OntarioSubject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Holistic Health , Otitis Media/therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Bacterial Infections/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/administration & dosage , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant , Materia Medica , Osteopathic Medicine , Otitis Media/etiology , Otitis Media/microbiology , Pharmaceutical Solutions/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is high among children and youth with chronic illnesses. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and patterns of CAM use in 10 subspecialty clinics in Canada and to compare CAM use between 2 geographically diverse locations. METHODS: This survey was carried out at 1 Children's Hospital in western Canada (Edmonton) and 1 Children's Hospital in central Canada (Ottawa). Questionnaires were completed by parents in either French or English. RESULTS: Although demographic characteristics of the 2 populations were similar, CAM use at the western hospital was 71% (n = 704) compared with 42% (n = 222) at the central hospital (P < .0001). Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they feel comfortable discussing CAM in their clinic. The most common CAM products currently used were multivitamins/minerals, herbal products, and homeopathic remedies. The most common CAM practices currently used were massage, chiropractic, relaxation, and aromatherapy. Eighty adverse effects were reported, and 55 (68.8%) of these were self-assessed as minor. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that CAM use is high among pediatric specialty clinic outpatients and is much greater in the western than in the central hospital. Most respondents felt that their CAM use was helpful with few or no harms associated. Many patients, using CAM alongside their conventional medicines, are still not discussing their CAM use with their physicians and are increasing the likelihood for potential interactions and preventable harms.
Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/therapy , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Alberta , Child , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Consumer Behavior , Female , Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Ontario , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
In this article we examine decision-making about complementary and alternative medicine use when the patient is an adolescent. A case scenario describes patient-parent conflict when a 14-year-old boy who was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis that has continued to progress even with medication refuses recommended surgery despite his physician's and parents' support for that option; he prefers homeopathy instead. We address (1) who has decision-making authority about treatment for young people, (2) how to determine if a young person can consent to or refuse treatment, (3) special considerations when counseling and treating adolescents (whether they can decide about treatment for themselves), and (4) parent-child conflicts about treatment. In addition, we suggest ways that health care providers can foster a trusting relationship with patients and parents.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Decision Making , Informed Consent By Minors , Mental Competency , Patient Participation , Patient Preference , Adolescent , Canada , Child , Child Welfare/ethics , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Decision Making/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Humans , Informed Consent By Minors/ethics , Informed Consent By Minors/legislation & jurisprudence , Male , Parent-Child Relations , Physician-Patient Relations , Treatment Refusal , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown substantially in North America and has drawn the attention of conventional-medicine practitioners. Conventional-medicine practitioners have expressed concern about the potential for unregulated CAM therapies to cause harm, the sometimes-uncertain cost-benefit ratios associated with these therapies, and the possibility that some CAM providers might advise against established conventional therapies, such as vaccination. These concerns are heightened with respect to the pediatric use of CAM products. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic audit of pediatric and adolescent case files at a large, college-based, Canadian naturopathic teaching clinic. We specifically sought to describe the demographic characteristics, reasons for presentation, use of CAM products, and vaccinations status of children presenting for naturopathic assessment. We also determined factors associated with the use of CAM products and vaccination status. METHODS: We identified all charts for children (<18 years of age) who presented to the Robert Schad Naturopathic Clinic, the teaching clinic of the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, between February 1 and May 31, 2002. Data were abstracted directly from the standardized patient intake forms and from clinical notes recorded during the patient's initial visit to the clinic. The following data were obtained: age, gender, chief presenting complaints reported by parents, CAM product use at presentation, vaccination status, and reactions to vaccination. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with both CAM product use and vaccination status. RESULTS: A total of 482 charts were identified. The mean age of patients was 6.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-11.4 years). The ratio of female subjects to male subjects was 1.09:1 (248:227). The most common reasons for presentation were skin disorders (23%), gastrointestinal complaints (17%), and psychiatric/behavioral disorders (15%). Thirty-five percent of children were using CAM products at presentation (21.2% when both vitamins and minerals were excluded). Vitamins were the most commonly used products (34.6%), followed by herbal remedies (14.9%), oil blends/fats (7.2%), minerals (5.6%), probiotics (4.5%), and homeopathic remedies (3.7%). Of charts with vaccination information, 8.9% indicated that children had not been vaccinated; possible vaccine-associated adverse events were reported for 27% of those who had been vaccinated. Partial or unvaccinated status was associated with younger age, attending the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine for advice regarding vaccination, and greater use of CAM products. CAM product use was associated with unvaccinated or partially vaccinated status (odds ratio [OR]: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.46-5.63), presenting with poor energy or fatigue (OR: 3.36; 95% CI: 1.00-11.26), or presenting with throat or sinus infections (OR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.23-13.04). CONCLUSIONS: Children present for naturopathic assessment for diverse reasons, are high-level consumers of CAM products, and have lower rates of vaccination than population averages. The conventional-medicine community should work with naturopaths to address public health concerns in this population.