Papaverine: A Miraculous Alkaloid from Opium and Its Multimedicinal Application.

The pharmacological actions of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids are quite substantial, and have recently attracted much attention. One of the principle benzylisoquinoline alkaloids has been found in the unripe seed capsules of Papaver somniferum L. Although it lacks analgesic effects and is unrelated to the compounds in the morphine class, it is a peripheral vasodilator and has a direct effect on vessels. It is reported to inhibit the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) phosphodiesterase in smooth muscles, and it has been observed to increase intracellular levels of cAMP and cGMP. It induces coronary, cerebral, and pulmonary artery dilatation and helps to lower cerebral vascular resistance and enhance cerebral blood flow. Current pharmacological research has revealed that papaverine demonstrates a variety of biological activities, including activity against erectile dysfunction, postoperative vasospasms, and pulmonary vasoconstriction, as well as antiviral, cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, neuroprotective, and gestational actions. It was recently demonstrated that papaverine has the potential to control SARS-CoV-2 by preventing its cytopathic effect. These experiments were carried out both in vitro and in vivo and require an extensive understanding of the mechanisms of action. With its multiple mechanisms, papaverine can be considered as a natural compound that is used to develop therapeutic drugs. To validate its applications, additional research is required into its precise therapeutic mechanisms as well as its acute and chronic toxicities. Therefore, the goal of this review is to discuss the major studies and reported clinical studies looking into the pharmacological effects of papaverine and the mechanisms of action underneath these effects. Additionally, it is recommended to conduct further research via significant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies.

Ayush [Indian System of Medicines] Prophylaxis Against COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Second Update).

Background: Ayush (Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) system of medicine has been extensively used in India for the prevention and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The present report is the second update of a living systematic review and meta-analysis and has been intended to assess the preventive potential and safety of Ayush drugs against COVID-19. Methods: A search of databases such as PubMed, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 database, the clinical trial registry-India, the AYUSH research portal, and preprint repositories was performed till March 1, 2023. Randomized controlled trials or analytical observational studies were included. Incidences of COVID-19 infections and mortality were taken as primary outcome measures; and symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, incidences of hospital admissions, and adverse events were taken as secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was evaluated by version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2) and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Data were synthesized through the RevMan 5.4 tool, and the certainty of the evidence was ranked through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Out of 2350 articles, 15 studies were included in the review. The pooled estimate of Guduchi [Tinospora cordifolia (Thunb.) Miers], Chyawanprasha, and Ayuraksha kit was obtained. Meta-analysis of the data suggested that Guduchi may reduce the incidences of COVID-19 infections (risk ratio [RR]: 0.67 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.48-0.95]) and the symptom development among the infected (RR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.73-1.08]), however, no change was observed in hospital admissions (RR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.20-4.53]). It is uncertain that Chyawanprasha reduces the incidence of COVID-19 infection (RR: 0.28; [95% CI: 0.07-1.08]). Ayuraksha kit as chemoprophylaxis may reduce the incidences of COVID-19 infections (RR: 0.49; [95% CI: 0.32-0.77]). The certainty of the evidence was low to moderate mainly due to the serious risk of bias. Conclusion: Prophylactic use of Ayush medicines for populations at risk may help to prevent COVID-19 infection by reducing incidence and severity. However, considering the certainty and fewer studies, high-quality studies are still desired to confirm the efficacy and safety of Ayush chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19. Nevertheless, this update will serve as a torchbearer for policymakers, physicians, and other stakeholders for their decision-making through evidence-based medicine.

A Systematic Analysis of COVID-19 Clinical Trials Registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) database is a registry of various trials conducted in India and this study scrutinized the studies registered for COVID-19 from the database to detect patterns in trial design, appraising the target regions of therapies and comprehending the terrain of research endeavors. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study that analyzed the registered trials for COVID-19 between March 2020 and September 2023. A trial search was conducted on the CTRI database to include all types of studies registered for COVID-19 with keywords like "COVID" and "coronavirus" and studies conducted on conditions other than COVID-19 were excluded. The data regarding study characteristics were noted under various sections in a preformed proforma. RESULTS: A total of 807 trials were taken for final analysis and there were about 344 prospective and 260 retrospective interventional trials, 35 prospective and 165 retrospective observational studies, and two prospective and one retrospective post-marketing surveillance study. The majority of the studies had duration under 12 months (91%). The maximum number of studies were registered from AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) and allied therapies (n = 283), with about 104 types of interventions, followed by the drug category having 119 trials registered and about 57 types of interventions. Kabasura Kudineer and yoga in the AYUSH category, molnupiravir, colchicine, and favipiravir in the drug category, and tocilizumab and convalescent plasma among biologics were some common interventions used. The majority of trials did not mention the trial phase and declared it as not applicable (54%), whereas 15% were registered as phase 2 and 13% as phase 3. About 54% of the studies were randomized and randomized parallel-group design (20%) was the most common study design. Only 6% of the trials were post-graduate thesis and the majority of the trials (n = 535) denied sharing their individual participant data. Only 0.86% and 0.61% of the trials were terminated and suspended, respectively, denoting proper design and conduct of the trials. CONCLUSION: In the CTRI database, the majority of trials were prospective interventional studies, with a predominance of AYUSH therapies and drug interventions. Common interventions included Kabasura Kudineer and yoga in AYUSH, and molnupiravir, colchicine, and favipiravir in drugs. Most studies had durations under 12 months and randomized parallel-group design was the most common study design. The intention to use and promote an indigenous system of medicine looks promising in the absence of any definite therapy. A minute number of registered suspended and terminated trials might be a positive picture of meticulously designed and executed trials even during a pandemic situation in India.

A systematic review of trials currently investigating therapeutic modalities for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and registered on WHO International Clinical Trials Platform.

BACKGROUND: Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is a well-recognized, complex, systemic disease which is associated with substantial morbidity. There is a paucity of established interventions for the treatment of patients with this syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review registered trials currently investigating therapeutic modalities for PACS. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted up to the 16 September, 2022, using the COVID-19 section of the WHO Internal Clinical Trials Registry Platform. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Interventional clinical trials of any sample size examining any therapeutic modality targeting persistent symptoms among individuals after diagnosis with COVID-19. METHODS: Data on trial characteristics and intervention characteristics were collected and summarized. RESULTS: After screening 17 125 trials, 388 trials, from 42 countries, were eligible. In total, we had 406 interventions, of which 368 were mono-therapeutic strategies, whereas 38 were intervention combinations. Among 824 primary outcomes identified, there were >300 different outcomes. Rehabilitation was the most employed class of intervention in 169 trials. We encountered 76 trials examining the pharmacological agents of various classes, with the most common agent being colchicine. Complementary and alternative medicine encompassed 64 trials exploring traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurveda, homeopathic medications, naturopathic medications, vitamins, dietary supplements, and botanicals. Psychotherapeutic and educational interventions were also employed in 12 and 4 trials, respectively. Other interventions, including transcranial direct current stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, general electrical stimulation, cranial electrotherapy stimulation, various stem cell interventions, and oxygen therapy interventions, were also employed. CONCLUSION: We identified 388 registered trials, with a high degree of heterogeneity, exploring 144 unique mono-therapeutic interventions for PACS. Most studies target general alleviation of symptoms. There is a need for further high-quality and methodologically robust PACS treatment trials to be conducted with standardization of outcomes while following WHO's recommendation for uniform evaluation and treatment.

Safety and Evaluation of the Immune Response of Coronavirus Nosode (BiosimCovex) in Healthy Volunteers: A Preliminary Study Extending the Homeopathic Pathogenetic Trial.

Objectives: Regulatory clinical Phase I studies are aimed at establishing the human safety of an active pharmaceutical agent to be later marketed as a drug. Since homeopathic medicines are prepared by a potentizing method using alcohol, past a certain dilution, their toxicity/infectivity is assumed to be unlikely. We aimed to develop a bridge study between homeopathic pathogenetic trials and clinical trials. The primary purpose was to evaluate the safety of a nosode, developed from clinical samples of a COVID-19 patient. The secondary objectives were to explore whether a nosode developed for a specific clinical purpose, such as use during an epidemic, may elicit laboratory signals worthy of further exploration. Methods: An open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and immune response of the Coronavirus nosode BiosimCovex, given orally on three consecutive days to ten healthy volunteers. Clinical examinations, laboratory safety and immune parameters were established. Interferon-gamma, Interleukin-6, and CD 4 were measured. (CTRI registration number: CTRI/2020/05/025496). Results: No serious/fatal adverse events were reported. Laboratory tests to measure safety were unchanged. Three subjects showed elevated Interleukin-6 (IL-6) on day 17 in comparison to the baseline, and ten subjects showed elevated IL-6 on day 34. A significant difference between IL-6 observations, calculated by repeated measures ANOVA, was found to be highly significant. On day 60, the IL-6 values of nine subjects were found to return to normal. Corresponding CD4 cell elevation was observed on day 60, when compared to day 34. Conclusions: HPT may potentially extend into physiological changes with regards to immune response and should encourage future studies.

Application of a Non-Linear multi-model Ayurveda Intervention in elderly COVID-19 patients- a retrospective case series.

The COVID-19 pandemic is ravaging the world, leaving the mainstream medical system handicapped with no proven treatment at one end and the ambiguities regarding the efficacies of vaccines at the other. The elderly population is at greater risk in terms of complications and death. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) against COVID-19 has already been documented in countries like China with a national participation rate of 90%. In this regard, the practice of CAM especially Ayurveda is relevant in India. The current report is a case series of 64 elderly COVID-19 patients managed through a Non-Linear multi-modal Ayurveda Intervention (NLMAI) via online consultation. NLMAI is a combination of herbal and herbo-mineral drug interventions, lifestyle modifications, and psychological support done in 2 phases. The post-management analysis revealed a mean duration of 11 symptoms of COVID-19 assessed through survival function as 0.577 days [SE=0.39] with a CI of 95% [0.500-0.653] which was considerably low when compared to global statistics. Moreover, none of the cases advanced to complications or death. Hence, novel approaches like NLMAI can be utilized to counter the gravity of the COVID-19 after scientific validation.

Medicines for the new coronavirus in the view of Classical Systemic Homeopathy.

INTRODUCTION: According to the World Health Organization, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has 48.896.564 reported cases and 1.236.995 deaths worldwide on November 5, 2020. Despite great efforts, there is no treatment of COVID-19 up to nowadays. Therefore, it is essential to search for therapeutic alternatives to COVID-19, such as Integrative Medicine, especially Homeopathy, which was used with excellent results in the great epidemics. AIM: This study aims to describe the coronavirus Pandemic from the perspective of Classical Systemic Homeopathy and to identify the homeopathic medicine (medicines genius) that has its sphere of action in most of the symptoms involved in this pandemic. METHODS: Articles published in indexed journals and websites of medical institutions, books of homeopathic materia medica, scientific journals, and government publications were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 39 references were selected and enclosed 20 articles indexed on COVID-19, 08 references of systemic conditions, 11 articles indexed of homeopathy, 06 classic homeopathy books. After the study, the homeopathic medicine Cinchona officinalis (China officinalis) was proposed, according to pathogenesis (experimental pathophysiological study in humans) described in the materia medica books consulted, for the relief of symptoms. Its sphere of action in most of the symptoms involved in this pandemic. Moreover, acute homeopathic medicines were determined to act in the relief of symptoms of the various phases of the manifestations of the disease. CONCLUSION: Data contributes to use in homeopathic interventions during the COVID-19 epidemic as a health promotion and treatment strategy that can be used as an adjunct to all sanitary and therapeutic measures recommended by health authorities.

Survey-reported medication changes among older adults during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Speculation on benefits and harms of prescription, over-the-counter and complementary medications has been widespread during the SARS-CoV-2 (or COVID-19) pandemic. This community-based survey assessed self-reported changes in medications including those stopped, started, or if access had been impacted. METHODS: A survey was collected via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). The survey was advertised in the community through social media, email lists, websites, and post-cards. Survey responses were collected between 5/21/2020 and 6/24/2020. Variables included demographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, marital status, education, employment, income, and community type. Questions related to medication changes included: "Have you started any medication due to COVID-19?", "Have you stopped any medication due to COVID-19?" and "Have you had issues getting your prescription medications?". Respondents aged 50 years or older were included. RESULTS: There were N = 1397 responses of which 1169 were older adults ≥50 years-old. Of these, 1141 responded to the medication changes survey questions and 28 had missing responses and were excluded from the survey sample for this analysis. Among these, 31 (2.7%) reported a medication change included 5 (0.4%) reported stopping a medication, 18 (1.6%) reported starting a medication, and 8 (0.7%) reported trouble obtaining medications. Medications started included mostly vitamins or other supplements including zinc (n = 9), vitamin C (6), and other supplements (3). Among prescription medications, antidepressants and anti-anxiety medications (4) were reported as well as aspirin (1), losartan (1), and low dose naltrexone (1). One respondent reported unidentified homeopathy. There were no significant differences between those with medication changes and those with none. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based survey sample of over one thousand older adults, only a small percentage (2.7%; n = 31) reported any changes to medications during the pandemic. As essential workers during this crisis, pharmacists have played a critical role in providing medication information and continued access.

Adjunctive homeopathic treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients (COVIHOM): A retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: and purpose. COVID-19 is a novel viral disease causing worldwide pandemia. The aim of this study was to describe the effect of adjunctive individualized homeopathic treatment delivered to hospitalized patients with confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. PATIENT PRESENTATION: Thirteen patients with COVID-19 were admitted. Mean age was 73.4 ± 15.0 (SD) years. Twelve (92.3%) were speedily discharged without relevant sequelae after 14.4 ± 8.9 days. A single patient admitted in an advanced stage of septic disease died in hospital. A time-dependent improvement of relevant clinical symptoms was observed in the 12 surviving patients. Six (46.2%) were critically ill and treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Mean stay at the ICU of the 5 surviving patients was 18.8 ± 6.8 days. In six patients (46.2%) gastrointestinal disorders accompanied COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The observations suggest that adjunctive homeopathic treatment may be helpful to treat patients with confirmed COVID-19 even in high - risk patients especially since there is no conventional treatment of COVID-19 available at present.

COVID-19: Disease, management, treatment, and social impact.

COVID-19 was originated from Wuhan city of Hubei Province in China in December 2019. Since then it has spread in more than 210 countries and territories. It is a viral disease due to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. The patients show flu-like symptoms with a dry cough, sore throat, high fever, and breathing problems. The disease due to SARS-CoV-2 was named as COVID-19. About 2.2 million people have been infected with more than 0.15 million deaths globally. The United States of America is the most affected country with the highest patients of about 0.7 million. Despite great efforts, there is no treatment of this disease. However, prevention and management are the best options. This article describes SARS-CoV-2, disease, prevention and management, treatment and social impact on society. It was analyzed that a combination of antiviral drugs with hydroxyl-chloroquine and azithromycin (with the consultation of a medical practitioner) may be the best option to treat the patients, depending on the patient's conditions and symptoms. However, Unani therapy may be useful along with allopathic treatment. It is urgently advised and requested that all the persons should follow the preventive measures, managements and quarantine strictly without any religious discrepancy otherwise the situation may be the worst. Also, there is an urgent requirement to educate our new generation for science and technology to fight against any such disaster in future; if any. There is no need to be panic and proper prevention and management are essential to combat this disease. This article may be useful to create awareness among the public, to prevent, manage and treat COVID-19.

Medicamentos homeopáticos mais comercializados na pandemia de COVID-19 no município de João Pessoa/Paraíba / best-selling homeopathic medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic in the municipality of João Pessoa/Paraíba

No dia 31 de dezembro de 2019, a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) recebeu a primeira comunicação sobre um surto de pneumonia ocorrido na cidade de Wuhan, onde o agente causador foi determinado como um novo coronavírus. No Brasil, o primeiro caso foi registrado em 26 de fevereiro de 2020 e após 21 dias foi anunciado pela Secretaria de Estado da Saúde da Paraíba o primeiro caso de COVID-19 nesse estado. Uma das opções utilizadas pela população para a chamada prevenção contra a COVID-19 foi o uso de medicamentos homeopáticos. Esta pesquisa objetivou identificar os medicamentos homeopáticos mais vendidos em farmácias homeopáticas do município de João Pessoa no período de janeiro a setembro de 2020. Para coleta dos dados foi realizada uma entrevista com os proprietários das farmácias homeopáticas que responderam a um questionário previamente elaborado. O estudo evidenciou um aumento expressivo na venda de medicamentos homeopáticos a partir do mês de março de 2020 nas farmácias pesquisadas. Os medicamentos mais comercializados por ordem de frequência foram: Camphora, Arsenicum album, Gelsemium, Oscilococcinum, Influenzinum, Antimonium tartaricum, Carbo vegetabilis e Aviarium. Os dados obtidos neste trabalho sugerem que o fluxo de incidência de Oscilococcinum e Influenzinum foi maior nos meses iniciais da Pandemia, provavelmente, relacionado a sua indicação como preventivo, assim como o aumento expressivo de Camphora e Arsenicum álbum nos meses de abril, maio e junho de 2020, reflete a indicação desses medicamentos não apenas como preventivo, mas também nos casos da doença já instalada.

On December 31, 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) received the first communication about a pneumonia outbreak in the city of Wuhan, which was caused by a new coronavirus. In Brazil, the first case was registered in February 26, 2020, and after 21 days the State Health Department of Paraíba announced the first case of COVID-19 in this state. One of the options used by the population to what was considered prevention against the COVID-19 was the homeopathic medicines. This research aimed to identify the best-selling homeopathic medicines in homeopathic drugstores in the municipality of João Pessoa, in the period from January to September 2020. The data was collected in an interview with the owners of the homeopathic drugstores, which answered to a previously designed questionnaire. The study evidenced an expressive enhance in the selling of homeopathic medicines starting from March 2020 in the research drugstores. The most commercialized medicines, in order of frequency, were: Camphora, Arsenicum album, Gelsemium, Oscilococcinum, Influenzinum, Antimonium tartaricum, Carbo vegetabilis and Aviarium. The data found in this study suggest that the incidence flow of Oscilococcinum and Influenzinum was higher in the initial months of the Pandemic, probably, because of their indication as a preventive, and the expressive enhance of Camphora and Arsenicum álbum in the months of April, May and June, 2020 reflect the indication of these medicines not only as preventive, but also in the cases that the illness is confirmed.

Resultados terapêuticos da homeopatia em pacientes suspeitos ou confirmados de COVID-19: um estudo longitudinal prospectivo / Therapeutic results of homeopathy in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients: a longitudinal study

A infecção humana causada pelo vírus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), diagnosticada como pneumonia de causa desconhecida originalmente na cidade de Wuhan (China), foi considerada como pandemia pela Organização Mundial da Saúde. Com a inexistência inicial de uma vacina para proteção dos sadios, foi adotada a estratégia de isolamento social e tratamento com medidas de suporte geral e/ou avançado. Neste contexto, coube investigar a contribuição da terapêutica homeopática no enfrentamento da doença, notadamente no alívio dos sintomas desconfortáveis por ela provocados em sua fase inicial, com acompanhamento e registro dos resultados obtidos pelos médicos homeopatas. MÉTODO: Este estudo coletou, durante o período de maio a setembro de 2020 (após aprovação pelo CEP), informações de pacientes diagnosticados com a doença, tratados por médicos homeopatas com medicamentos homeopáticos escolhidos de acordo com a sintomatologia apresentada pelo paciente. Foram avaliados os efeitos no estado de saúde do paciente, por meio de escores e escalas clínicas, bem como aspectos relacionados à segurança do medicamento, variação na duração da doença e medicamentos mais associados a eventuais sucessos terapêuticos. Questionário padronizado e específico para a COVID-19 foi elaborado e e aplicado para preenchimento dos médicos colaboradores do estudo durante o acompanhamento dos pacientes. Os dados foram armazenados em planilhas eletrônicas e analisados com técnicas estatísticas descritivas e inferenciais. Os pacientes selecionados eram colaboradores do Hospital Santo Antônio - Obras Sociais Irmã Dulce (OSID) e foram submetidos a uma avaliação preliminar presencial no ambulatório de Otorrinolaringologia deste hospital. As consultas homeopáticas foram realizadas por plataforma de Telemedicina para seguimento e acompanhamento do caso. Foram avaliados 116 colaboradores, com faixa etária que variou entre 21 e 66 anos, sendo a média de idade 38 anos; destes, 84 (72%) eram do gênero feminino e 32 (16%) gênero masculino; 53 pacientes (70% dos colaboradores atendidos) eram profissionais da saúde (médicos, enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem); 63 (30%) eram colaboradores de áreas administrativas ou técnicas; 50 pacientes tinham critérios para inclusão no grupo de risco (43%). Quanto ao resultado do RT-PCR: 58 pacientes (50%) tiveram RT-PCR detectado (confirmados); 58 pacientes (50%) tiveram RT-PCR não-detectado - destes, 18 pacientes (31%) apresentaram anosmia em sua evolução. Dos 116 pacientes do critério de inclusão, 77 estavam incluídos na síndrome clássica da COVID19. Destes 77 colaboradores, 3 não usaram o medicamento homeopático (N=74). Os medicamentos homeopáticos mais indicados foram: Arsenicum album (42%); Bryonia (24%), Phosphorus (15%); Gelsemium (15%); Pulsatilla (2%); outros (4%). O Score médio de sintomas antes do tratamento foi 12,27 e após o tratamento foi 0,52 (p < xxxxx). Dos 57 pacientes que tiveram anosmia, houve recuperação total em 43 (75%) dos casos no momento da reavaliação. O tempo médio decorrido entre o uso da medicação homeopática e a recuperação dos sintomas foi de 9 dias. Apenas 3 pacientes (3,9%) necessitaram de internamento hospitalar sem necessidade de intubação, sendo 2 deles pertencentes ao grupo de risco. apesar destes resultados serem parciais (pois ainda existem sujeitos da pesquisa ainda em fase de avaliação), os resultados sugerem que o tratamento homeopático promoveu o restabelecimento do quadro infeccioso sem necessidade de internamento em 97% dos pacientes. A anosmia teve recuperação completa em 75% dos pacientes. Arsenicum album, Bryonia e Phosphorus foram os medicamentos predominantemente eleitos para o tratamento, o que corrobora com outros estudos homeopáticos.

The human infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19), originally diagnosed as pneumonia of unknown cause in the city of Wuhan (China), was considered a pandemic by the World Health Organization. With the initial lack of a vaccine to protect healthy people, the strategy relating to social isolation and treatment with general and/or advanced support measures was adopted. In this context, it was necessary to investigate the contribution of homeopathic therapy in coping with the disease, particularly in terms of relieving the uncomfortable symptoms caused by it in its initial phase, with monitoring and recording of the results obtained by homeopathic physicians. METHOD: This study collected information from patients diagnosed with the disease, treated by homeopathic physicians with homeopathic medications chosen according to the symptoms manifested by the patient, from May to September 2020 (after approval by the REC). The effects on the health conditions of patients were assessed using clinical scores and scales, as well as aspects related to the safety of the medication, variations in the duration of the disease and the medications most associated with any therapeutic successes. A standardized questionnaire specific to COVID-19 was drawn up and filled in by the physicians who collaborated in the study during patient monitoring. The data was stored in electronic spreadsheets and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The selected patients were employees of Hospital Santo Antônio - Obras Sociais Irmã Dulce (OSID) and underwent a preliminary in-person assessment at the otolaryngology outpatient clinic of this hospital. The homeopathic consultations were carried out via a telemedicine platform to follow-up and monitor the case. A total of 116 employees were assessed, ranging in age from 21 to 66, with the average age being 38; of these, 84 (72%) were females and 32 (16%) males; 53 patients (70% of the employees cared for) were health care professionals (physicians, nurses and nursing technicians); 63 (30%) were employees from administrative or technical areas; 50 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the risk group (43%). As for the RT-PCR result: 58 patients (50%) had RT-PCR detected (confirmed); 58 patients (50%) had RT-PCR not detected - of these, 18 patients (31%) had anosmia during their evolution. Of the 116 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 77 were included in the classic COVID-19 syndrome. Of these 77 collaborators, 3 did not use homeopathic medication (N=74). The most indicated homeopathic medications were: Arsenicum album (42%); Bryonia (24%), Phosphorus (15%); Gelsemium (15%); Pulsatilla (2%); others (4%). The average symptom score before treatment was 12.27 and after treatment was 0.52 (p < xxxxx). Of the 57 patients who had anosmia, there was full recovery in 43 (75%) of the cases at the time of reassessment. The average time elapsed between the use of homeopathic medication and the recovery of symptoms was 9 days. Only 3 patients (3.9%) required hospitalization without the need for intubation, 2 of whom belonged to the risk group. Although these results are partial (as there are still research subjects in the evaluation phase), the results suggest that homeopathic treatment promoted the re-establishment of the infectious condition without the need for hospitalization in 97% of the patients. Anosmia recovered completely in 75% of the patients. Arsenicum album, Bryonia and Phosphorus were the drugs predominantly chosen for treatment, which corroborates other homeopathic studies.

Manifestaciones autoinmunes asociadas a la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 / Autoimmune manifestations associated with coronavirus disease 2019

Introducción: La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (Coronavirus Disease 2019 o COVID-19), causada por un nuevo coronavirus: el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo 2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), ha teniendo un impacto devastador en todo el mundo. Su fisiopatología es el resultado de los efectos citopáticos directos del SARS-CoV-2 sobre el epitelio respiratorio, el endotelio y otros tipos de células específicas de órganos, con la posterior inducción de una tormenta de citocinas proinflamatorias y una inmunidad adaptativa desregulada que causa daño tisular severo. Objetivo: Describir las características autoinmunes presentes durante la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica sobre COVID-19 y manifestaciones autoinmunes en los sitios web: Pubmed, Medline, SciELO. Se hizo un análisis y resumen de la información revisada. Análisis y síntesis de la información: Los virus se han considerado los principales agentes infecciosos que desencadenan fenómenos autoinmunes en individuos genéticamente susceptibles. El SARS-CoV-2 ya se ha relacionado con una larga lista de afecciones autoinflamatorias y autoinmunes que pueden ser inducidas por varios mecanismos propuestos para explicar la autoinmunidad inducida por virus. En esta patología, el más descrito, es el mimetismo molecular. La COVID-19 comparte similitudes con las enfermedades autoinmunes en sus manifestaciones clínicas, mecanismos fisiopatológicos y respuesta terapéutica, de forma que potentes reacciones inmunes participan en la patogénesis de ambas enfermedades. Conclusiones: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 puede representar al vínculo complejo e interrelacionado entre las infecciones y la autoinmunidad(AU)

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a new coronavirus. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is having a devastating impact throughout the world. Its pathophysiology is the result of direct cytopathic effects of SARS-CoV-2 on respiratory epithelium, endothelium, other organ-specific cell types and the subsequent induction of a pro-inflammatory cytokine storm and dysregulated adaptive immunity, causing severe tissue damage. Objective: To describe autoimmune characteristics present during SARS-Cov-2 infection. Methods: A literature review on COVID-19 and autoimmune manifestations was carried out. The articles were selected from a search of the following websites: Pubmed, Medline, SciELO. An analysis and summary of the reviewed information was made. Analysis and synthesis of information: Viruses have been considered the main infectious agents that trigger autoimmune phenomena in genetically susceptible individuals. SARS-CoV-2 has already been linked to a long list of autoinflammatory and autoimmune conditions that can be induced by various mechanisms proposed to explain virus-induced autoimmunity. In this pathology, the most described, is molecular mimicry. COVID-19 shares similarities with autoimmune diseases in its clinical manifestations, pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic response, such powerful immune reactions participate in the pathogenesis of both entities. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection may represent the complex and interrelated link between infections and autoimmunity(AU)

Análise sintomatológica de adultos com Covid-19: uma abordagem homeopática / Symptomatic analysis of adults with Covid-19: a homeopathic approach

A doença pelo novo coronavírus (SARS-CoV-2), denominada COVID-19, apresentou rápida disseminação nos cinco continentes, e tem causado graves implicações sanitárias e socioeconômicas nos países afetados. Embora a maioria das pessoas afetadas apresente doença leve, pacientes vulneráveis podem ter pneumonia intersticial com complicações graves ou até mesmo fatais. O objetivo do presente estudo quali-quantitativo foi coletar e analisar, numa perspectiva homeopática, os sintomas da COVID-19, bem como identificar os medicamentos homeopáticos mais similares ao quadro sintomático da doença (identificação do gênio epidêmico). Foram entrevistados, por médicos homeopatas, 46 indivíduos provenientes de quatro regiões brasileiras (Fortaleza, Campo Grande, Florianópolis e São Paulo). Observou-se um padrão consistente de sintomas entre os diferentes centros, com pouca diferença quanto à frequência e intensidade nos sintomas. A análise da totalidade sintomática da amostra, com auxílio de diferentes técnicas repertoriais, identificou Arsenicum album, Phosphorus e Bryonia alba como medicamentos homeopáticos mais similares aos quadros clínicos nesta epidemia de COVID-19. Estes resultados podem fornecer informações subsidiárias aos estudos de intervenção que avaliam a efetividade e eficácia da Homeopatia na prevenção e tratamento da COVID-19.

The disease caused by the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), denominated COVID-19, has spread rapidly across five continents, and has been causing serious health and socioeconomic implications for the affected countries. Although most affected individuals have mild illness, vulnerable patients can have interstitial pneumonia with serious or even fatal complications. The objective of the present qualitative and quantitative study was to collect and analyze, under a homeopathic perspective, the symptoms of COVID-19, as well as to identify the homeopathic remedies most similar to the symptomatic picture of the disease (epidemic genius method). Forty-six individuals from four Brazilian regions (Fortaleza, Campo Grande, Florianópolis and São Paulo) were interviewed by homeopathic physicians. There was a consistent pattern of symptoms between the different centers, with little difference in frequency and intensity of symptoms. The symptomatic analysis of the entire sample, with the aid of different repertoire techniques, indicated the homeopathic remedies Arsenicum album, Phosphorus and Bryonia alba as the epidemic genius for this COVID-19 epidemic. Our results may provide support information for the intervention experiments assessing the effectiveness of Homeopathy in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

La Medicina Natural y Tradicional en la prevención y el tratamiento de la COVID-19 / Natural and Traditional Medicine in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19

RESUMEN Hasta hoy no existe cura para la COVID-19. No obstante, se reportan diversos tratamientos encaminados a prevenir el contagio y a tratar los síntomas y complicaciones de la misma. La Medicina Natural y Tradicional ha sido usada frente a diversas dolencias, pero la información de su aplicación en pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2 es escasa. El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir el uso de la Medicina Natural y Tradicional en la prevención y el tratamiento de la COVID-19. Para ello, se realizó una búsqueda de información utilizando recursos disponibles a través de Infomed (PubMed, PubMed Central, SciELO, EBSCO, ClinicalKey) y Google Académico, lo que permitió realizar una revisión bibliográfica sobre el uso de la Medicina Natural y Tradicional en la infección por COVID-19. A pesar de los beneficios conocidos de la Medicina Natural y Tradicional, esta ha sido subvalorada como tratamiento frente a la COVID-19. Múltiples ensayos clínicos han tratado el uso de las diferentes terapias de Medicina Natural y Tradicional. Se informa que en los pacientes sometidos a estas terapias se incrementó la tasa de curación, disminuyó el número de casos graves y la tasa de alta hospitalaria mejoró notablemente. La Medicina Natural y Tradicional no protege directamente contra la enfermedad ni causa la curación de la misma, pero sí contribuye a que el organismo esté fortalecido a la hora de enfrentar la infección, y su empleo es eficaz en la reducción y alivio de los síntomas.

ABSTRACT Up today, there is no cure for COVID-19. Nevertheless, several treatments are reported with regard of preventing contagion and treating its symptoms and complications. Natural and traditional medicine has been used against various illnesses, but the information on its application in patients with SARS-CoV-2 is scarce. The aim of this work was to describe the use of Natural and Traditional Medicine in the prevention and treatments of COVID-19. For that, a search of information was conducted using resources available through Infomed (PubMed, PubMed Central, SciELO, EBSCO, ClinicalKey) and Google Academic, what allowed to carry out a bibliographic review on the use of Natural and Traditional Medicine in the infection caused by COVID-19. Despite of the known benefits of the Natural and Traditional Medicine, it has been undervalued as a treatment against COVID-19. Numerous clinical trials have treated the use of the different therapies of Natural and Traditional Medicine. It is reported that in patients undergoing these therapies the cure rate increased, the number of severe cases decreased and the hospital discharge rate improved outstandingly. Natural and traditional medicine does not directly protect against disease, or causes its healing, but it does contribute to the body being strengthened at the time of facing the infection, and its use is efficacious in reducing and alleviating the symptoms.

Estudo preliminar para avaliação de sintomas e medicamentos prevalentes do "gênio epidêmico" da pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil / Preliminary study for evaluation of prevalent symptoms and medicines of Covid-19 epidemic genius in Brazil

A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) reconheceu a Covid-19 como uma nova doença infectocontagiosa em 12/01/2020, que logo tornou-se pandêmica. A Homeopatia historicamente apresenta bons resultados no tratamento de doenças epidêmicas, desde quando seu criador, Samuel Hahnemann, obteve êxito no tratamento, controle e profilaxia de uma epidemia de escarlatina no ano de 1799. O objetivo desse trabalho era o estudo retrospectivo de sintomas comuns da doença na sua primeira fase, buscando um grupo de sintomas característicos que indicassem os possíveis medicamentos do "gênio epidêmico". Para isso, utilizamos a metologia desenvolvida por Hahnemann e James Tyler Kent para o entendimento dos sintomas comuns da doença. Foram utilizados relatos de casos de 27 pacientes com Covid-19 confirmados laboratorialmente enviados por médicos homeopatas em diversas regiões do Brasil. Os sintomas mais característicos encontrados foram: fraqueza intensa, febre baixa, tosse seca, sudorese profusa noturna, cefaleia incaracterística e ageusia/anosmia. Utilizando-se de várias técnicas de repertorização desses sintomas, chegou-se ao grupo de cinco medicamentos possíveis para o tratamento da doença: Arsenicum album, Bryonia alba, China officinalis, Chininum arsenicosum e Phosphorus.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recognized Covid-19 as a new infectious disease on 12th January of 2020, which soon became a pandemic. Homeopathy historically presents good results in the treatment of epidemic diseases, since the time when its creator, Samuel Hahnemann, was successful in the treatment, control and prophylaxis of a scarlet fever epidemic in the year of 1799. The objective of this work was the retrospective study of common symptoms of disease in its first phase, looking for a group of characteristic symptoms that would indicate the possible remedies of the "epidemic genius". For this, we used the methodology developed by Hahnemann and James Tyler Kent to understand the common symptoms of the disease. Case reports of 27 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 sent by homeopathic physicians in different regions of Brazil were used. The most characteristic symptoms found were: intense weakness, low fever, dry cough, profuse night sweats, uncharacteristic headache and ageusia/anosmia. Using various techniques for repertorizing these symptoms, a group of five possible drugs for the treatment of the disease was reached: Arsenicum album, Bryonia alba, China officinalis, Chininum arsenicosum and Phosphorus.

Parámetros de laboratorio clínico en pacientes con la COVID-19 / Clinical laboratory parameters in patients with COVID-19

Introducción: Conocer las alteraciones en exámenes de laboratorio clínico, es de utilidad en el diagnóstico y el progreso de pacientes con la COVID-19. Objetivo: Describir los parámetros de laboratorio clínico en pacientes diagnosticados con la COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo en 82 pacientes hospitalizados con la COVID-19. Las variables analizadas fueron edad, sexo, comorbilidad, reporte de paciente, estado al egreso, hemoglobina, recuento de glóbulos blancos, conteo absoluto de neutrófilos, conteo absoluto de linfocitos, conteo de plaquetas, eritrosedimentación, dímero D, creatinina, urea, alanina aminotransferasa, aspartato aminotransferasa, #947;-glutamil transpeptidasa, fosfatasa alcalina, lactato deshidrogenasa, relación neutrófilos/ linfocitos y de plaquetas/ linfocitos. Resultados: La edad promedio fue de 55,61 ± 22,04, fue mayoría el sexo femenino (57,3 por ciento), hipertensos (41,5 por ciento), el 18,3 por ciento reportados de grave y el 14,6 por ciento falleció. La edad avanzada y la comorbilidad se asociaron al reporte de gravedad. Hubo disminución significativa de la hemoglobina, linfocitos; elevación de la eritrosedimentación, dímero D, creatinina, #947;-glutamil transpeptidasa y lactato deshidrogenasa, sobre todo en graves. La relación neutrófilos/ linfocitos y de plaquetas/ linfocitos alertaron sobre el agravamiento del paciente y la posibilidad de fallecer. Conclusiones: Los pacientes tenían una media de edad de 55,61, del sexo femenino, con hipertensión arterial; egresaron vivos, reportados de no graves. Disminuyen los valores medios de hemoglobina, conteo global de los linfocitos, sobre todo en graves; aumenta el dímero D, creatinina, ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, y LD. La relación neutrófilos/ linfocitos y de plaquetas/ linfocitos muestran valores medios altos, sobre todo en graves y en quienes fallecieron (AU)

Introduction: Knowing the alterations in clinical laboratory tests is useful in the diagnosis and progress of patients with COVID-19. Objective: To describe the clinical laboratory parameters in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods: Descriptive study in 82 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The variables analyzed were age, sex, comorbidity, patient report, discharge status, hemoglobin, white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, D-dimer, creatinine, urea, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophil / lymphocyte and platelet / lymphocyte ratio. Results: The average age was 55.61 ± 22.04, the majority were female (57.3 percent), hypertensive (41.5 percent), 18.3 percent reported serious and 14.6 percent died. Advanced age and comorbidity were associated with the severity report. There was a significant decrease in hemoglobin, lymphocytes; elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, D-dimer, creatinine, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and lactate dehydrogenase, especially in severe patients. The neutrophil / lymphocyte and platelet / lymphocyte ratio warned about the worsening of the patient and the possibility of death. Conclusions: The patients a mean age of 55.61, female, with arterial hypertension; they were discharged alive, reported as not serious. Mean hemoglobin values ​​decrease, global lymphocyte count, especially in severe patients; increases D-dimer, creatinine, ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, and LD. The neutrophil / lymphocyte and platelet / lymphocyte ratio show high mean values, especially in severely ill patients and in those who died(AU)

An open-label, exploratory documentation of proving-symptoms of CVN01 (Coronavirus nosode from the clinical sample) in healthy volunteers

Homeopathic Pathogenetic Trials (Proving) are human studies to examine the pathogenetic effects of investigational drugs in high dilution on healthy volunteers. As a part of the new coronavirus nosode development process for prophylactic use, the phase 1 study was conducted. The documentation of proving symptoms for a fast-track nosode development for a pandemic condition was the objectives of this study. An open-label trial to evaluate the safety and proving symptoms of Coronavirus nosode given orally to 10 volunteers (18-65 years age and of both the genders). Volunteers were administered 6 doses of nosode as 6 pills twice daily for 3 consecutive days. Pre and post examinations (physical), vital signs, and laboratory investigations, were done at day 0, 17, 34. Symptoms experienced by the volunteers were recorded. RESULTS Symptoms reported by volunteers were analyzed. The symptoms reported were mild to severe but reversible and matching with the symptoms produced by the viral infection. There were no serious/fatal adverse events during the study. The basic biochemistry and Liver Function tests were not affected by the Nosode. New nosode developed during a pandemic condition produced certain symptoms in the homeopathic pathogenetic trial as a part of the Phase 1 study.

Similitudes y diferencias entre el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo causado por SARS-CoV y la COVID-19 / Similarities and differences among COVID-19 and the severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by SARS-CoV

Introducción: De manera epidémica, en los años 2003, 2012 y 2019, han ocurrido eventos caracterizados por tener una elevada morbilidad y mortalidad poblacional y ser originados por tres nuevos Beta-CoV denominados: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV y SARS-CoV-2 (este último comparte una identidad de 82 por ciento en su secuencia génica con el SARS-CoV), causantes del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo, el síndrome respiratorio del Medio Oriente y la COVID -19, respectivamente. Objetivo: Examinar las principales similitudes y diferencias entre el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo causado por el SARS-CoV y la COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó la búsqueda en las bases de datos Medline, Scielo y Google académico. Se seleccionaron artículos en inglés y en español y las palabras clave: utilizadas fueron: infecciones por coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: Una similitud importante entre ambas afecciones es que tienen igual vía de transmisión y periodo de incubación; sin embargo, la letalidad en el SRAS duplicó la de la COVID-19. Existen diferencias estructurales entre el SARS-CoV y el SARS-CoV-2 pero ambos se fijan al receptor de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina 2. Las manifestaciones clínicas y exámenes complementarios son similares, pero existen diferencias relacionadas con el inicio de los síntomas respiratorio, su frecuencia y orden de aparición. Consideraciones finales: Existen similitudes entre las enfermedades causadas por el SARS-CoV y el SARS-CoV 2; pero también existen diferencias en sus características epidemiológicas, clínicas y de laboratorio que nos podrían permitir hacer un diagnóstico diferencial y garantizar un tratamiento y seguimiento adecuado en situaciones específicas(AU)

Introduction: In the years 2003, 2012 and 2019 have happened epidemic events characterized with a high population morbidity and mortality and originated by three new Beta-CoV called: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 (this last one shares with SARS-CoV an identity of 82 percent in its gene sequence) which cause the severe acute respiratory syndrome, the Middle East respiratory syndrome and COVID-19, respectively. Objective: To assess the main similarities and differences among COVID-19 and the severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by SARS-CoV. Methods: It was carried out the search in Medline, Scielo and Google Scholar databases. The requirements used were that the articles were in English or Spanish language and the keywords were: infections by coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2. Results: An important similarity among both conditions is that they have the same transmission way and incubation period; however, lethality in the SARS doubled the COVID-19 one. There are structural differences among SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 but both are fixed to the recipient of the angiostensina 2 converter´s enzyme. Clinical manifestations and complementary exams are similar but there are differences related to the onset of respiratory symptoms, their frequence and the order of appareance. Final considerations: There are similarities among the diseases caused by SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2; but also there are differences in their epidemiological, clinical and laboratory characteristics that can allow to do a differencial diagnosis and to guarantee an adequate treatment and follow-up in specific situations(AU)