Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd ; 160(12): 727-736, 2018 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30516475

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: At present, the usage of antimicrobial agents in organic dairy farming is a subject of controversial public debate because of its impact on animals, humans and the environment. This study shows how farms can be successfully managed without using antimicrobials for udder diseases. Thereby, animal welfare and targeted low bulk tank somatic cell counts should not be neglected. The operating data analysed in this study was collected during feeding and milking time on 18 swiss dairy farms that have not been treating diseased udders with antibiotics for at least 3 years. This study is a cross-sectional study. Farmers put the focus on breed characteristics such as a high life performance, low bulk tank somatic cell counts over several lactations, animals with a calm character, and small-formed cows with a deep flank. A trend towards dual-purpose breeds was observed. Few persons were involved in the milking process. Moreover, 94% of the farmers were raising their own young cattle directly on the farm. Consequently, animal transport has been minimized. Furthermore, clear management practices and work processes as well as a good animal observation influenced decisively the production success. additionally some farmers used phytotherapy, homeopathy and tried and true home remedies.


INTRODUCTION: Dans l'élevage laitier, les médicaments vétérinaires contenant des antibiotiques susceptibles d'avoir un effet sur l'homme, l'animal et l'environnement sont un sujet discuté de façon controversée dans le grand public. La présente étude veut démontrer comment fonctionnent des exploitations qui n'utilisent pas de préparations antibiotiques intra-mammaires. Cela doit se passer sans que ni le bien-être des animaux ni un nombre de cellules bas dans le lait ne soient affectés. Les données utilisées pour ce travail ont été collectées pendant l'affouragement et la traite sur 18 exploitations suisses qui, dans les 3 années précédentes, n'avaient pas utilisé d'antibiotiques au niveau de la mamelle. Il s'agit ici d'une étude transversale qui présente les prévalences. Les producteurs s'intéressent à des caractéristiques d'élevage tels que la production totale sur la durée de vie de l'animal, un nombre de cellules bas au cours de plusieurs lactations, un caractère paisible et des vaches de petit format avec une flanc profond. On a constaté une tendance en direction des races à deux fins. Les propriétaires portaient leur attention à ce qu'un petit nombre de personnes pratiquent la traite régulièrement. Vu l'élevage des propres jeunes animaux sur 94% des exploitations, le trafic des animaux a été réduit. D'autre part, des structures d'exploitation et des processus de travail clairs ainsi qu'une bonne observation des animaux avaient un effet décisif sur le succès de ce mode de production. Sur ces exploitations, des méthodes de traitement spécifiques, telles l'homéopathie ou la phytothérapie ainsi que des remèdes traditionnels étaient utilisés en soutien.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle Diseases/therapy , Dairying/methods , Milk/metabolism , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/metabolism , Conservative Treatment , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Mammary Glands, Animal/physiology , Prescription Drug Overuse/prevention & control , Quality of Life
2.
J Dairy Sci ; 99(4): 2896-2903, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874421

ABSTRACT

The main objectives of this study were to evaluate to what extent variations in herd-level antimicrobial consumption (AMC) can be explained by differences in management practices that are consistently effective in the prevention of (sub)clinical mastitis, on the one hand, and by differences in mastitis treatment strategies, on the other hand. Antimicrobial consumption data were obtained during 2012 and 2013 by "garbage can audits" and expressed as antimicrobial treatment incidences (ATI) for all compounds combined (total ATI) and for the critically important antimicrobials for human health separately. Data on mastitis prevention and control practices were obtained via face-to-face interviews performed during herd visits in March 2013. Some management practices and treatment strategies related to udder health were associated with the total AMC. However, the results demonstrated that implementing effective udder health management practices does not necessarily imply a low AMC and vice versa. Herds participating in a veterinary herd health management program and herds selectively drying off cows used fewer antimicrobials compared with herds not participating in such a program or applying blanket dry-cow therapy. Moreover, herds treating (some) (sub)clinical mastitis cases with intramammary homeopathic substances consumed fewer antimicrobials than herds not applying such homeopathic treatments. Besides these factors, no other direct association was found between effective udder health management practices on the one hand and AMC on the other hand. Also, the use of critically important antimicrobials was only associated with the way in which subclinical mastitis cases were treated. The latter indicates that the AMC of critically important antimicrobials is potentially driven by factors other than those included in this study such as those related to the "mindset" of the veterinarians and their farmers. Future research should therefore aim to unravel the reasoning of vets and their farmers behind the use of those critically important antimicrobials for the treatment of mastitis and other diseases.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Dairying/methods , Mastitis, Bovine/prevention & control , Mastitis, Bovine/therapy , Animals , Belgium , Cattle , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Mastitis, Bovine/drug therapy
3.
J Dairy Sci ; 97(3): 1319-27, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24393179

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to investigate the environmental, feeding, and health management of organic (ORG) family dairy farms in the south of Brazil in comparison with conventional (CONV) farms, and to assess their degree of compliance with Brazilian organic legislation and the strategies they adopt to accomplish this (n=17 per group). During 2 visits to each farm in March and September, 2010, observations were made on the environment, feed, and health management, followed by bulk milk testing, clinical evaluation, and breed assessment of each individual cow, and an evaluation of diseases and treatments reported within the period. Additional data were collected directly from the farmers through direct interviews. The number of lactating cows was, on average, 11 (range 5 to 19) in the ORG and 16 (range 7 to 42) in the CONV herds. The ORG herds presented a lower percentage of the Holstein breed; whereas CONV herds were predominantly Holstein, in the ORG herds, only 2 herds were 100% Holstein and the remaining herds were crosses of Holstein, Jersey, and Gir (Bos indicus) cattle. Milk production per cow was lower (10.2 vs. 15.1 ± 1.22 L/cow, respectively) in ORG than in the CONV farms. The ORG farms offered less concentrate feed than CONV farms and had better pasture management. Organic farmers reported using phytotherapic and homeopathic products, and pasture management as a strategy to keep infection levels of endo- and ectoparasites low, whereas CONV farmers regularly used anthelmintics and acaricides. Milk production was lower in ORG than in CONV farms, but cow health and condition scores were broadly similar, indicating that the with these strategies ORG farms were able to secure levels of animal welfare comparable with CONV farms while complying with organic regulation, although at the cost of lower cow productivity.


Subject(s)
Dairying/methods , Dairying/standards , Organic Agriculture/methods , Organic Agriculture/standards , Animal Feed/standards , Animal Welfare , Animals , Brazil , Cattle , Diet/standards , Diet/veterinary , Female , Food Quality , Genotype , Government Regulation , Lactation , Milk
4.
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd ; 154(9): 371-9, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22923321

ABSTRACT

Health prophylaxis management practices have acquired a major role in the success of dairy herd health programs, however, little is known about the scope and level of implementation on Swiss dairy farms. The main objective of this study was therefore to provide a general overview of the most important preventive measures which are currently being used on these farms. In March 2011, an online survey with 75 questions was sent to 2'285 randomly selected Swiss dairy farmers. Response rate by question ranged from 35 to 53 %. Within this study, answers were compared between dairy farms with a tie-stall (n = 739) and farms with a free-stall (n = 458). Homeopathic treatments were used by 51 % of the dairy farmers and antibiotic dry cow treatments by 94 %. Farmers with a tie-stall tended to carry out more prophylactic treatments against external parasites, vaccinated their cows more frequently against Clostridium chauvoei and Moraxella bovis, and carried out claw trimming more frequently than dairy farmers with a free-stall. A higher proportion of dairy farmers with a free-stall had a written feeding plan, carried out regular feed analysis, wore an apron and rubber gloves during milking, and carried out post milking teat disinfection more frequently than dairy farmers with a tie-stall. The data collected in this survey could assist in improving future dairy health communication campaigns in Switzerland.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle Diseases/therapy , Dairying/methods , Veterinary Medicine/methods , Animals , Cattle , Female , Switzerland
5.
J Dairy Sci ; 94(4): 1738-43, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21426962

ABSTRACT

Despite the recent growth of the organic dairy industry, organic producers and veterinarians have limited information when choosing mastitis treatments for animals in organic dairy production. Organic producers commonly administer homeopathic or other plant-based products without having research evaluating the efficacy of these products and using estimated or no withholding times to treat mastitis and other health problems in their herds. In this pilot study, we attempted to identify several active ingredients of Phyto-Mast (Penn Dutch Cow Care, Narvon, PA), a plant-based mastitis treatment used on organic dairy farms, and to quantify the product residue in milk and plasma after intramammary administration. We developed an assay to quantify thymol (one of the active ingredients in Phyto-Mast) in milk and plasma using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Thymol is a volatile aromatic compound with antiinflammatory properties. As a model for dairy cows, 5 healthy, lactating alpine dairy goats were given 5 mL of Phyto-Mast per udder half. For 10 d following treatment, we analyzed blood and milk samples for thymol residues using GC-MS. The GC-MS assay was very sensitive for thymol detection, to a concentration of 0.01 µg/mL in plasma. Using thymol as a marker, Phyto-Mast was detectable and quantifiable in plasma beginning with the 15-min posttreatment sample, but was no longer detectable in the 4-h posttreatment sample. Thymol residues were only detected in the 12-h posttreatment milk sample. An inflammatory response was not evident in the udder following phytoceutical administration. Although this study provides information about the elimination of thymol, the product contains several other active chemicals, which may have different pharmacokinetic behaviors. Further analysis and additional study animals will help to determine a milk withholding time for Phyto-Mast. Given the recent growth of the organic dairy industry, understanding the pharmacokinetics of therapeutics used in organic production and developing accurate withholding recommendations will help to ensure milk safety.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/analysis , Drug Residues/analysis , Mammary Glands, Animal/metabolism , Mastitis/veterinary , Milk/chemistry , Phytotherapy/veterinary , Thymol/analysis , Angelica sinensis , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/blood , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Dairying/methods , Drug Administration Routes , Female , Gaultheria , Glycyrrhiza uralensis , Goats , Mastitis/drug therapy , Mastitis/metabolism , Pilot Projects , Thymol/blood , Thymol/therapeutic use , Thymus Plant
6.
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr ; 114(7): 268-74, 2007 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17724935

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of different prophylactically applied homeopathic compounds on health and fertility during the periparturient period on an organic dairy farm. In a randomised double blinded study 146 dairy cows were enrolled in two treatment groups. The average milk yield was about 5100 kg per cow per lactation. The treatment group received the homeopathic compounds Carduus comp. and Coenzyme comp. at drying off, Traumeel on the day of calving, Lachesis comp. on day 7 post partum (p.p.) and Carduus comp. and Coenzyme comp. on day 14 days p.p. The control group followed the same protocol with a placebo (physiological saline solution). Each drug was administered subcutaneously in a dosage of 5 ml. At drying off, the day of calving and in weekly intervals until day 35 p.p. clinical examinations as well as blood sampling were performed. The effect of treatment was measured by clinical parameters, reproductive performance and serum profiles (Ca, P, AST, Urea, Bilirubin). Data of reproductive performance (days to first service, days open, conception rate) were compared between treatment groups and to those in the previous lactation. There was no significant difference between both treatment groups. Cows of the treatment group had an earlier onset of cyclic activity, especially when milk yield was considered as an influencing factor (82% vs. 57%, P < 0,05). In contrast the cows of the treatment group had a significant lower submission rate. The prophylactic treatment of all cows did not have an effect in general, but in cows with increased milk yield, especially in the current lactation. The reproductive performance in the previous lactation did not have any effects on the success of the homeopathic treatment. Reproductive performance in the herd could be enhanced slightly compared to the previous lactation.


Subject(s)
Fertility/drug effects , Formularies, Homeopathic as Topic , Lactation/physiology , Milk/metabolism , Animals , Cattle , Dairying/methods , Double-Blind Method , Female , Pregnancy , Reproduction
7.
Vet Rec ; 155(22): 701-7, 2004 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15605537

ABSTRACT

Eighteen Norwegian dairy farmers were interviewed to examine their reasons for using homoeopathic treatments in managing their herds' health. Overall, they chose the treatments on the basis of factors related to their personal experience, considerations of individual animals and the framework for dairy production. For individual animals homoeopathy was used as an alternative to conventional veterinary treatment, but at the herd level it was used to complement it. The farmers' use of homoeopathic treatment for personal health problems and the experience of their colleagues with its use in dairy production were important factors motivating their initial use of homoeopathy. Other factors included a desire to decrease the use of antibacterial drugs, reduce costs and find alternatives when conventional veterinary medicine provided no effective treatment. In individual cases, the severity of disease, previous experience and the farmers' personal knowledge and resources were important. These factors parallel those found to influence the use of complementary and alternative therapies in human medicine. The lack of understanding and documentation of the effects of homoeopathic remedies was not important to the farmers, and they valued personal experience more highly than scientific evidence or the opposition to homoeopathy encountered within the veterinary profession.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Dairying/methods , Homeopathy , Veterinary Medicine/methods , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mastitis, Bovine/therapy , Norway , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Anim Sci ; 87(13 Suppl): 43-55, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18820158

ABSTRACT

This paper compares management of mastitis on organic dairy farms with that on conventional dairy farms. National standards for organic production vary by country. In the United States, usage of antimicrobials to treat dairy cattle results in permanent loss of organic status of the animal, effectively limiting treatment choices for animals experiencing bacterial diseases. There are no products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that can be used for treatment of mastitis on organic dairy farms, and usage of unapproved products is contrary to Food and Drug Administration guidelines. In general, organic dairy farms tend to be smaller, produce less, and more likely to be housed and milked in traditional barns as compared with conventionally managed herds. It is difficult to compare disease rates between herds managed conventionally or organically because perception and detection of disease is influenced by management system. To date, no studies have been published with the defined objective of comparing animal health on organic dairy herds with that on conventional dairy herds in the United States. European studies have not documented significant differences in animal health based on adoption of organic management. Few differences in bulk tank somatic cell counts have been identified between organic and conventional herds. Farmers that have adopted organic management consistently report fewer cases of clinical mastitis, but organic farmers do not use the same criteria to detect clinical mastitis. European dairy farmers that adopt organic management report use of a variety of conventional and alternative therapies for treatment and control of mastitis. In the United States, organic farmers treat clinical mastitis using a variety of alternative therapies including whey-based products, botanicals, vitamin supplements, and homeopathy. Organic farmers in the United States use a variety of alternative products to treat cows at dry-off. Virtually no data are available that support the clinical efficacy of any of the alternative veterinary products used for treatment or prevention of mastitis. Some associations between organic management and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive mastitis pathogens have been noted, but overall, few mastitis pathogens from both conventional and organic dairy herds demonstrate resistance to antibiotics commonly used for mastitis control.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Dairying/methods , Food, Organic/standards , Mastitis, Bovine/therapy , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/economics , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Cattle , Complementary Therapies/veterinary , Dairying/economics , Dairying/standards , Disease Management , Female , Mastitis, Bovine/diagnosis , Mastitis, Bovine/economics , Mastitis, Bovine/microbiology , Milk/standards
9.
Acta Vet Scand ; 48: 11, 2006 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16987390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mastitis is one of the major threats to animal health, in organic farming as well as conventional. Preliminary studies of organic dairy herds have indicated better udder health in such herds, as compared to conventional herds. The aim of this paper was to further study mastitis and management related factors in certified organic dairy herds. METHODS: An observational study of 26 certified organic dairy herds in mid-eastern Sweden was conducted during one year. A large-animal practitioner visited the herds three times and clinically examined and sampled cows, and collected information about general health and management routines. Data on milk production and disorders treated by a veterinarian in the 26 herds, as well as in 1102 conventional herds, were retrieved from official records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between herd type (organic vs. conventional) and incidence of disorders. RESULTS: The organic herds that took part in the study ranged in size from 12 to 64 cows, in milk production from 3772 to 10,334 kg per cow and year, and in bulk milk somatic cell counts from 83,000 to 280,000 cells/ml. The organic herds were found to have a lower incidence of clinical mastitis, teat injuries, and a lower proportion of cows with a high somatic cell count (as indicated by the UDS, Udder Disease Score) compared to conventional herds. The spectrum of udder pathogenic bacteria was similar to that found in other Swedish studies. Treatment of mastitis was found to be similar to what is practised in conventional herds. Homeopathic remedies were not widely used in the treatment of clinical mastitis.The calves in most of these organic herds suckled their dams for only a few days, which were not considered to substantially affect the udder health. The main management factor that was different from conventional herds was the feeding strategy, where organic herds used a larger share of forage. CONCLUSION: Udder health in Swedish organic herds appears to be better than in conventional herds of comparable size and production. The major difference in management between the two types of farms is the proportion of concentrates fed. The mechanisms explaining the association between intensity of feeding and udder health in dairy cows require further research.


Subject(s)
Dairying/methods , Mastitis, Bovine/therapy , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Animals, Suckling , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Cattle , Disease Management , Female , Housing, Animal , Incidence , Mastitis, Bovine/epidemiology , Mastitis, Bovine/microbiology , Milk/cytology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL