ABSTRACT
Context: Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a chronic degenerative condition that presents with chronic neck pain and stiffness with radiation of pain to the occiput or upper limbs and a sensation of numbness or tingling. Conservative treatment only provides short term relief. Objective: This case was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of individualised homoeopathy in the management of CS. Methods: A 39-year-old female patient was treated in the outpatient dept at Dr. D. Y. Patil homoeopathic medical college and research centre with the complaint of neck pain with stiffness. Radiological findings revealed the diagnosis of cervical spondylosis. Individualised homoeopathic medicine was selected after detailed case taking. 'Modified naranjo criteria' were used to assess the effect of homoeopathic medicine. Result: Homoeopathic medicine silicea terra was prescribed and found to be effective in this case. Conclusion: Further studies can be undertaken to assess the effectiveness of individualised homoeopathic medicine in the management of cervical spondylosis.
Subject(s)
Homeopathy , Materia Medica , Spondylosis , Adult , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Female , Homeopathy/adverse effects , Humans , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Neck Pain/etiology , Neck Pain/therapy , Spondylosis/complications , Spondylosis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylosis/therapyABSTRACT
Traditional and complementary health care services have a growing and significant role in both developed and developing countries. In the United Kingdom the British Medical Association (BMA) has identified five complementary approaches to health care that should now be regarded as "discrete clinical disciplines" because they have "established foundations of training and have the potential for greatest use alongside orthodox medical care". These are acupuncture, chiropractic, herbalism, homeopathy and osteopathy. The BMA recommended that there should be legislation to regulate these disciplines and the Chiropractors' Act enacted in the U.K in 1994. The chiropractic profession was founded in the United States in 1895, and the practice of chiropractic has been regulated in the United States and Canada since the 1920s, in Australia since the late 1940s, in New Zealand and South Africa since the 1960s, and more recently in Asia, Europe, Latin America and elsewhere. Figure 1 lists the countries which currently recognize and regulate the chiropractic profession. Many countries, such as Japan with approximately 10,000 chiropractors with different levels of education, and Trinidad & Tobago with 5 chiropractors who are graduates of accredited chiropractic colleges in North America, are considering legislation. Croatia, with 3 chiropractors, is preparing legislation. Cyprus, with 6 chiropractors, has legislation. Even in countries such as these, where the profession is small, there are compelling public interest arguments for regulation. This is especially true in the 1990s. One reason is the growing incentive for lay healers and others without formal training to use the title "chiropractor" as chiropractic practice gains increasing acceptance. The majority of chiropractic practice involves patients with non- specific or mechanical back and neck pain. The chiropractic approach to management, which includes spinal adjustment or manipulation, other physical treatments, postural advice, rehabilitative exercises and early return to activities, formally only had empirical evidence of success. Now there is firm scientific support. Recent national, evidence- based, multi-disciplinary guidelines in Canada (neck pain), the United Kingdom (back pain), and the United States (back pain) support these methods as a first line of management for most patients. Another reason for regulation is that international standards of chiropractic education and scope of practice have been established by appropriate chiropractic organizations, including the World Federation of Chiropractic which represents national associations of chiropractors in 63 countries. This paper now reviews current legislation worldwide.
Subject(s)
Back Pain/rehabilitation , Chiropractic/legislation & jurisprudence , Complementary Therapies/legislation & jurisprudence , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Back Pain/etiology , Canada , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Humans , Neck Pain/etiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe use of chiropractic and/or osteopathic manipulation by children in the United States along with the specific health conditions for which they sought care. METHODS: The study was a secondary data analysis of the National Health Interview Survey 2007, Child Alternative Medicine file as well as the Child Core Sample. National population estimates were generated for reported use of chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation (C/OM) by children for specific health conditions. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated from binary logistic regression models that assessed the likelihood that children of specific characteristics would use this therapy. RESULTS: National estimates indicated that 2.3 million children (2.3%) in the United States had used C/OM in 2007. C/OM was the most common complementary and alternative medicine procedure. Children aged 12-18 years were more likely to have seen these providers than were younger age groups (OR=3.4 [95% CI, 2.1-5.5]). Homeopathy (1.2%), massage (1.0), and naturopathy (0.3%) were the next most common procedures. The most common complaints were back and neck pain. Other conditions for which children were seen included other musculoskeletal conditions, sinusitis, allergies, and nonmigraine headaches. Racial categories did not differ significantly regarding use of manipulation, but those children with both mother and father in the household were more likely to have used this form of care (OR=1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.6]). CONCLUSIONS: C/OM is primarily used for back and neck pain, which is increasing in prevalence in children. Teens are more likely to use it than are younger children.
Subject(s)
Back Pain/therapy , Manipulation, Chiropractic/statistics & numerical data , Manipulation, Osteopathic/statistics & numerical data , Neck Pain/therapy , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Confidence Intervals , Family Characteristics , Female , Headache/therapy , Health Care Surveys , Homeopathy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Massage/statistics & numerical data , Naturopathy/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Sinusitis/therapy , United StatesSubject(s)
Homeopathy , Manipulation, Chiropractic , Quality of Life , Spinal Stenosis/physiopathology , Spinal Stenosis/therapy , Aged , Homeopathy/methods , Humans , Male , Manipulation, Chiropractic/methods , Neck Pain/etiology , Neck Pain/therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Low Back Pain , Neck Pain , Occupational Diseases , Shoulder Pain , Chiropractic , Female , Homeopathy , Humans , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/etiology , Low Back Pain/therapy , Male , Manipulation, Spinal , Massage , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Neck Pain/etiology , Neck Pain/therapy , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/therapy , Pain Measurement , Shoulder Pain/diagnosis , Shoulder Pain/etiology , Shoulder Pain/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
La columna cervical ocupa el segundo lugar de afectación de dãno en las articulaciones; tiene como principal síntoma el dolor e incapacidad funcional, por lo que en muchas ocasiones se requiere tratamiento convencional prolongado con efectos segundarios de mayor trascendencia que la propia enfermedad [...] Este proyecto se realizó en un periodo de 6 meses dividido en 2 etapas; la primera (3 meses) para la recopilación bibliográfica y la elaboración estructural del mismo, la segunda etapa consistió en la captación de pacientes, la prescripción y toma del medicamento, así como la recopilación y análisis de los resultados [...] En ningún paciente permaneció el dolor con la misma intensidad que al inicio, ni tampoco hubo pacienttes que abandonaran el tratamiento; por lo tanto podemos decir que la Actea racemosa a la 6C tiene una efectividad de un 100% en el tratamiento del dolor cervical postraumático.(Au)