ABSTRACT
Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) activate the LH receptor/cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling pathway to induce ovulation. As an alternative to parenterally administered hCG to treat anovulatory infertility, orally active low molecular weight (LMW) LHR agonists have been developed at Organon. In this paper, we present the mechanism of action of a prototypic, nanomolar potent and almost full LHR agonist, Org 43553. Org 43553 interacts with the endodomain of the LHR, whereas LH acts via the N-terminal exodomain. LH stimulates the cAMP pathway with an EC50 of 35 pM, but this stimulation is not antagonized by simultaneous incubation with Org 43553. At nanomolar concentrations, LH also stimulates phospholipase C (PLC), but Org 43553 is hardly able to do so. In contrast, Org 43553 inhibits LH-induced PLC (IC50 approximately 10 nM). While Org 43553 stimulates dissociation of [125I]hCG from the LHR and reduces [125I]hCG binding, LH reduces specific [3H]Org 43553 binding. We conclude that Org 43553 is a signaling-selective, allosteric LHR agonist. We hypothesize that Org 43553 and LH induce a similar LHR conformation necessary for activating adenylyl cyclase, which initiates most, if not all, physiological responses of LH.
Subject(s)
Adenylyl Cyclases/metabolism , Cyclic AMP/metabolism , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Receptors, LH/agonists , Thiophenes/pharmacology , Allosteric Regulation , Animals , CHO Cells , Cell Line , Chorionic Gonadotropin/metabolism , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Humans , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Luteinizing Hormone/administration & dosage , Luteinizing Hormone/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Type C Phospholipases/drug effects , Type C Phospholipases/metabolismABSTRACT
Gepirone, a pyridinyl piperazine 5-HT1A receptor agonist, has been developed by Fabre-Kramer as an antidepressant. Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) outlicensed the compound to Fabre-Kramer in 1993 and is no longer involved in its development [337393]. In May 1998, NV Organon (a subsidiary of Akzo Nobel) licensed the rights to the drug product for further development and marketing from Fabre-Kramer and, by October 1999, had submitted the drug for approval in the US [347133]. In December 2000, the company expected US and European launches in 2002 and 2003, respectively [402686]. Mechanism of action studies have demonstrated that gepirone, compared to buspirone, possesses a much greater selectivity for 5-HT1A receptors over dopamine D2 receptors. Long-term studies have shown that gepirone has a differential action at presynaptic (agonist) and post-synaptic (partial agonist) 5-HT1A receptors. However, further studies are still required to determine the relative contribution of pre- and post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors to the therapeutic action of gepirone and related compounds. In March 2001, according to Schroder Salomon Smith Barney, Akzo Nobel targeted peak sales of Euro 300 million for gepirone [409013]. This amount was reiterated in an April 2001 report by HSBC Securities, which stated that gepirone was expected to achieve this figure in 2009 or 2010 [409014].
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety/drug therapy , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic use , Animals , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/metabolism , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antidepressive Agents/toxicity , Anxiety/psychology , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Humans , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/metabolism , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/toxicity , Serotonin Antagonists/metabolism , Serotonin Antagonists/pharmacology , Serotonin Antagonists/toxicity , Structure-Activity RelationshipABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Homeopathic potencies are used as specific remedies in complementary medicine. Since the mode of action is unknown, the presumed specificity is discussed controversially. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of potentised substances on two yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, in a stable and reliable test system with systematic negative controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Yeast cells were cultivated in either potentised substances or water controls in microplates and their growth kinetics were measured photometrically. Water control runs were performed repeatedly to investigate the stability of the experimental set-up (systematic negative controls). RESULTS: 4 out of 14 screened substances seem to have affected the growth curve parameters slope or yield. Out of these substances, azoxystrobin and phosphorus were chosen for 8 further replication experiments, which partly confirmed the results of the screening. On the average of all experiments, azoxystrobin affected the slope of the growth curve of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (p < 0.05), and phosphorus affected the slope of the growth curve of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (p < 0.05). No effects were seen in the water control runs. In addition, significant interactions between treatment with potentised substances and experiment number were observed in all experiments with potentised substances (p < 0.01), but not in the water control runs. CONCLUSIONS: Both yeast species reacted to certain potentised substances by changing their growth kinetics. However, the interactions found point to additional factors of still unknown nature, that modulate the effects of potentised substances. This stable test system with yeasts may be suitable for further studies regarding the efficacy of homeopathic potencies.