ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Biologic effects of high homeopathic potencies can be studied in cell cultures using cell lines or primary cells. We hypothesized that primary cells would be more apt to respond to high potencies than cell lines, especially cancer cell lines. We set out to investigate the effects of low doses and high homeopathic potencies of cadmium chloride, respectively, in an intoxication model with human primary lymphocytes compared to a human leukemia cell line (Jurkat). DESIGN: Cells were pretreated with either low concentrations (nM-microM) or high potencies (pool 15-20c) of cadmium for 120 hours, following which they were exposed to a toxic treatment with a range of cadmium concentrations (8-80 microM) during 24 hours. Cell viability was eventually assessed by use of the MTS/PES assay. Controls included a vehicle (NaCl 0.9%) for the low concentrations of cadmium or water 15-20c for cadmium 15-20c. A total of 34 experiments were conducted, 23 with low concentrations and 11 with high potencies of cadmium. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. RESULTS: Pretreatment with low concentrations or high potencies of cadmium significantly increased cell viability in primary lymphocytes after toxic challenge, compared to control cells (mean effect +/- standard error = 19% +/- 0.9% for low concentrations respectively 8% +/- 0.6% for high potencies of cadmium; p < 0.001 in both cases). The pretreatment effect of low doses was significant also in cancerous lymphocytes (4% +/- 0.5%; p < 0.001), albeit weaker than in normal lymphocytes. However, high homeopathic potencies had no effect on cancerous lymphocytes (1% +/- 1.9%; p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: High homeopathic potencies exhibit a biologic effect on cell cultures of normal primary lymphocytes. Cancerous lymphocytes (Jurkat), having lost the ability to respond to regulatory signals, seem to be fairly unresponsive to high homeopathic potencies.
Subject(s)
Cadmium Chloride/pharmacology , Carcinogens/pharmacology , Homeopathy , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , Analysis of Variance , Cadmium Chloride/administration & dosage , Carcinogens/administration & dosage , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Jurkat Cells/drug effects , Leukemia, T-Cell/drug therapyABSTRACT
This paper provides a personal account of the history of the hormesis concept, and of the role of the dose response in toxicology and pharmacology. A careful evaluation of the toxicology and pharmacology literatures suggests that the biphasic dose response that characterizes hormesis may be much more widespread than is commonly recognized, and may come to rival our currently favored ideas about toxicological dose responses confined to the linear and threshold representations used in risk assessment. Although hormesis-like biphasic dose responses were already well-established in chemical and radiation toxicology by the early decades of the 20th century, they were all but expunged from mainstream toxicology in the 1930s. The reasons may be found in a complex set of unrelated problems of which difficulties in replication of low-dose stimulatory responses resulting from poor study designs, greater societal interest in high-dose effects, linking of the concept of hormesis to the practice of homeopathy, and perhaps most crucially a complete lack of strong leadership to advocate its acceptance in the right circles. I believe that if hormesis achieves widespread recognition as a valid and valuable interpretation of dose-response results, we would expect an increase in the breadth of evaluations of the dose-response relationship which could be of great value in hazard and risk assessment as well as in future approaches to drug development and/or chemotherapeutics.
Subject(s)
Toxicology/history , Animals , Carcinogens/administration & dosage , Carcinogens/history , Carcinogens/toxicity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Models, Biological , Mutation , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/history , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
The immune response modifier Canova® is a homeopathic remedy indicated for patients with depressed immune system, since this drug appears to increase adaptive immunity and induce an immune response against multiple and severe pathological conditions, including cancer. We evaluated the pattern of immune cellular response in non-human primates of the species Cebus apella exposed to N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) with and without Canova®. Twelve animals were divided into four groups, with three animals each: negative control and three experimental groups, MNU-alone (35 days); MNU (35 days)-plus-Canova® (3 days) and Canova®-alone (3 days). The animals received MNU orally and Canova® by three intravenous injections. Evaluation of the cellular immune response was performed by immunophenotyping of T-lymphocytes (CD4(+), CD8(+)), B-lymphocytes and natural killer cells. Analysis was also performed of the cell cycle. Our results suggest an increase of T-lymphocytes (CD4(+)CD3(+)) only in the Canova® group, while in the MNU-plus-Canova® group only B-lymphocytes increased.
Subject(s)
Carcinogens/toxicity , Crotalid Venoms/pharmacology , Immunity, Cellular/drug effects , Immunity, Cellular/immunology , Methylnitrosourea/toxicity , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Animals , Antigens, Surface/metabolism , Carcinogens/administration & dosage , Cebus , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Crotalid Venoms/administration & dosage , Immunophenotyping , Lymphocytes/drug effects , Lymphocytes/immunology , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Methylnitrosourea/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Previous studies have been interpreted as suggesting that low concentrations of N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) have an adaptive effect in the cultured lymphocytes of responsive donors (that is, the cells are protected against the mutagenic effects of a subsequent challenge with a higher concentration of MNNG). The objectives of the present study were to investigate, under stringent experimental conditions, whether a protective effect exists at very low and extremely low doses of MNNG (10(-8) and 10(-24) M, respectively). Peripheral blood lymphocytes from a donor considered responsive in a previous study were stimulated to divide and were cultured under standard conditions. Pre-adaptive treatments with dilutions of MNNG were added to the cultures repeatedly before a challenge treatment with MNNG. Bromodeoxyuridine was added at the same time as the challenge treatment and, following mitotic arrest, cells were differentially stained so that the number of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) could be counted. The study was designed to address potential criticisms of earlier studies which did not include replicate cultures. Samples of blood were divided into two identical batches for independent processing. Five replicate cultures were prepared for each combination of pre-adaptive and challenge treatments in each batch. The complete experiment was repeated to provide a further test of the consistency of results. Five replicates per treatment combination were chosen in an attempt to provide an experiment of adequate statistical power. Considerable precautions were taken to minimise the effect of factors outside experimental control on the results. Scoring was done by three scorers. In order to minimise inter-scorer variation, 240 cells were scored at each treatment observation (five cells per-scorer, three scorers per culture, four cultures per batch, two batches per experiment and two experiments). The study was designed in this way to take account of the sources of variability to ensure that any response obtained would exceed that obtainable by experimental variability alone. A high level of quality assurance monitoring was undertaken throughout the investigation. Two measures of SCE induction were used: (i) the mean frequency of SCEs; (iii) proportion of cells with at least 20 SCEs. In both experiments, the challenge concentration of MNNG significantly increased SCE frequency. There were, however, highly significant differences between the two experiments. The proportion of high frequency cells (HFCs) in Experiment 1 was increased significantly; the proportion of HFCs was also increased in Experiment 2, but the increase was not statistically significant. The pre-adaptive concentrations of MNNG included an extremely low dilution of 6.8 x 10(-24) M and a very low dilution of 6.8 x 10(-8) M in Experiment 1 and 1.4 x 10(-7) M in Experiment 2. The various pre-adaptive concentrations used had no consistent protective effect against the SCE-inducing capacity of the challenge concentration of MNNG of 6.8 x 10(-6) M. It is concluded that an adaptive response to the alkylating agent MNNG could not be demonstrated in cultured human lymphocytes. Neither a very low nor an extremely low dilution of MNNG elicited an adaptive response in terms of SCE induction (measured either as SCE frequency or as proportion of HFCs). This is in contradiction to previous reports published by us and other groups. This study was carefully designed with large numbers of replicates, a preliminary statistical power calculation, predefined comparisons and extensive quality assurance at each treatment administration. Despite these precautions the variability between scorers and between batches was much larger than anticipated. This resulted in some statistically significant differences, but these are likely to be false positives. Our findings indicate the need for such methodological refinement in human cell adaptive response studies.
Subject(s)
Carcinogens/pharmacology , Lymphocytes/drug effects , Methylnitronitrosoguanidine/pharmacology , Mutagens/pharmacology , Sister Chromatid Exchange , Carcinogens/administration & dosage , Cells, Cultured , Cytoprotection , Humans , Methylnitronitrosoguanidine/administration & dosage , Mutagens/administration & dosage , Random AllocationABSTRACT
The high incidence of oesophageal cancer in Northern Iran has been associated with opium. N-Nitrosamines are the only carcinogens known to induce oesophageal cancer in animals. Ethanol, which is the major influence on oesophageal cancer incidence in the West, inhibits the first pass clearance of N-nitrosodimethylamine in animals and increases the alkylation of oesophageal DNA by oesophageal cancer-inducing N-nitrosamines. The experiments now reported were to test whether opium or morphine, which is the major alkaloid in opium, have a similar effect. It is shown that administration of morphine to rats does increase the ethylation of oesophageal DNA by N-nitrosodiethylamine and may reduce the first pass clearance of N-nitrosodimethylamine by the liver, but only at high doses of morphine.