Current drug therapy and pharmaceutical challenges for Chagas disease.

One of the most significant health problems in the American continent in terms of human health, and socioeconomic impact is Chagas disease, caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Infection was originally transmitted by reduviid insects, congenitally from mother to fetus, and by oral ingestion in sylvatic/rural environments, but blood transfusions, organ transplants, laboratory accidents, and sharing of contaminated syringes also contribute to modern day transmission. Likewise, Chagas disease used to be endemic from Northern Mexico to Argentina, but migrations have earned it global. The parasite has a complex life cycle, infecting different species, and invading a variety of cells - including muscle and nerve cells of the heart and gastrointestinal tract - in the mammalian host. Human infection outcome is a potentially fatal cardiomyopathy, and gastrointestinal tract lesions. In absence of a vaccine, vector control and treatment of patients are the only tools to control the disease. Unfortunately, the only drugs now available for Chagas' disease, Nifurtimox and Benznidazole, are relatively toxic for adult patients, and require prolonged administration. Benznidazole is the first choice for Chagas disease treatment due to its lower side effects than Nifurtimox. However, different strategies are being sought to overcome Benznidazole's toxicity including shorter or intermittent administration schedules-either alone or in combination with other drugs. In addition, a long list of compounds has shown trypanocidal activity, ranging from natural products to specially designed molecules, re-purposing drugs commercialized to treat other maladies, and homeopathy. In the present review, we will briefly summarize the upturns of current treatment of Chagas disease, discuss the increment on research and scientific publications about this topic, and give an overview of the state-of-the-art research aiming to produce an alternative medication to treat T. cruzi infection.

Antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi among blood donors in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to study the prevalence of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi in the blood donor population in Buenos Aires, to compare the relative sensitivity and specificity of the two screening tests used and to confirm the results with a third assay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between May 1995 and July 1999, 64,887 blood donor consecutive samples were screened with the following commercial tests: indirect hemagglutination (IHA) (Polychaco, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (40,222 with Chagatek, Organon Teknika, Buenos Aires, Argentina, and 24,665 with Chagas EIA, Abbott, São Paulo, Brazil). Repeatedly reactive samples in one or both tests were analyzed with a third method: dot blot (Bio Chagas, Gador, Buenos Aires, Argentina) or particle agglutination (Serodia, Fujirebio, Tokyo, Japan). Sera that reacted in at least two tests were considered positive. RESULTS: The seroprevalence was 2.66% (1744 samples were reactive for one or both screening tests), and 1.46% (949 samples) were confirmed positive. The ELISAs proved to be more sensitive (relative sensitivity: 99.67-99.71%) whereas 192 samples (0.47%) were IHA false-negatives (relative sensitivity: 79.77%). Relative specificity for EIA was 98.47--99.23% and for IHA 99.85%. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the need of performing two screening tests for Chagas disease in blood banks from endemic areas and the importance of a third confirmatory assay to avoid unnecessary medical counseling.