Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 306
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Homeopathy ; 111(2): 147-151, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34521145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: EPI3 is an observational study of a representative sample of general practitioners (GPs) and patients in France, demonstrating that patient characteristics differ according to the prescribing preferences of their GPs for homeopathy. For selected conditions (musculoskeletal disorders, sleep disorders, anxiety/depression, upper respiratory tract infections), progression of symptoms and adverse events over follow-up in the homeopathy preference group did not significantly differ from other practice preferences, but there was a two-fold to four-fold lower usage of conventional medicines. The EPI3 study's validity was challenged due to absence of head-to-head comparison of medicines to conclude on a causal association between homeopathy and outcomes. METHODS: A critical review of the nine EPI3 publications was conducted, focusing on generalizability, selection bias, outcome measurements and confounding. RESULTS: The conceptual framework of EPI3 rests on a systemic construct, i.e., the homeopathic treatment concept assessed using the type of GP prescribing preference, taking into account the clinical, human and social aspects. The enrollment process enhanced the generalizability of findings. Validated instruments for outcome measurements were used for three conditions, and control of confounding was rigorous. CONCLUSION: EPI3 was conducted according to best practices. Homeopathy prescribing preference met specific patient needs with less use of conventional medicines and without an apparent loss in therapeutic opportunity.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Homeopathy , Respiratory Tract Infections , Sleep Wake Disorders , France , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(10): 5873-5881, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33763723

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In France, homeopathy is the most frequently used complementary therapy in supportive care in oncology (SCO); its use is steadily increasing. However, data is limited about the perception and relevance of homeopathy by oncologists and general practitioners (GPs) both with and without homeopathic training (HGPs and NHGPs, respectively). Our aim was to evaluate French physicians' perceptions of homeopathy to clarify its place in SCO through two original observation survey-based studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys of French physicians were conducted involving (1) 150 specialist oncologists; (2) 97 HGPs and 100 NHGPs. Questions evaluated physician attitudes to homeopathy and patterns of use of homeopathic therapies in patients requiring SCO. Survey responses were described and analyzed on the basis of physician status. RESULTS: Ten percent of oncologists stated they prescribe homeopathy; 36% recommend it; 54% think that homeopathy is potentially helpful in SCO. Two-thirds of the NHGPs sometimes prescribe homeopathy in the context of SCO and 58% regularly refer their patients to homeopathic doctors. HGPs have a positive perception of homeopathy in SCO. CONCLUSIONS: Homeopathy is viewed favorably as an integrated SCO therapy by the majority of French physicians involved with cancer patients-oncologists and GPs. Symptoms of particular relevance include fatigue, anxiety, peripheral neuropathy, sleep disturbance, and hot flashes. In such clinical situations, response to conventional therapies may be suboptimal and homeopathy is considered a reliable therapeutic option. These two studies highlight the fact that homeopathy has gained legitimacy as the first complementary therapy in SCO in France.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Homeopathy , Neoplasms , Oncologists , Cross-Sectional Studies , France , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Perception , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
BMC Fam Pract ; 22(1): 134, 2021 06 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172006

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a current trend to reassess the adequacy of care. Establishing top five lists by involving patients is one way to address medical overuse. The objective of this study was to establish a patients' top five list in general practice in France. The secondary objective was to identify selection criteria. METHOD: Patients from the web-based cohort GrippeNet.fr were invited to establish their top five list from 15 care procedures previously selected by general practitioners on the basis of medical overuse. The care procedures were presented on a web-interface with guides written with the help of a patient association. A questionnaire was used to explore factors that may have influenced the choices of the participants. RESULTS: In total, 691 patients established the following top five list: 1/ Prescription of antibiotics for acute bronchitis, nasopharyngitis, otitis media with effusion, or uncomplicated influenza; 2/ Prescription of benzodiazepine and benzodiazepine-like agents for insomnia, generalised anxiety and all indications for older patients; 3/ Prescription of a homeopathic treatment (Influenzinum) for flu prevention; 4/ Prescription of antitussive or expectorant agents for acute cough or acute bronchitis care; 5/ Prescription of statins for the primary prevention of cardio-vascular risk in older patients. More than 70% of participants gave importance to the recommendations, effectiveness, and tolerance of the care procedures, whereas only half considered the cost. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to establish a patient's top-five list in general practice. This list provides direction for deciding the main targets in limiting medical overuse.


Subject(s)
Bronchitis , General Practice , General Practitioners , Aged , France , Humans , Medical Overuse/prevention & control
4.
Homeopathy ; 110(3): 168-173, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33662993

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The use of homeopathy in oncological supportive care seems to be progressing. The first French prevalence study, performed in 2005 in Strasbourg, showed that only 17% of the subjects were using it. What is the situation 12 years later? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study, using a questionnaire identical to that used in 2005, on 633 patients undergoing treatment in three anti-cancer centers in Strasbourg. The results of the "homeopathy" sub-group were extracted and studied. RESULTS: Of the 535 patients included, 164 used homeopathy: that is 30.7%. The main purpose of its use was to reduce the side effects of cancer treatments (75%). Among the users, 82.6% were "somewhat" or "very" satisfied, against "quite" satisfied for 15.5%, and "not at all" satisfied for 1.9%. The homeopathic treatment was prescribed by a doctor in 75.6% of the cases; the general practitioner was kept informed in 87% of the cases and the oncologist in 82%. Fatigue, pain, nausea, anxiety, sadness and diarrhea were improved in 80% of the cases. However, alopecia, weight disorders and loss of libido were the least improved symptoms. The use of homeopathy was significantly associated with the female sex. CONCLUSION: With a prevalence of 30.7%, homeopathy is the most used complementary medicine in integrative oncology in Strasbourg. Over 12 years, we have witnessed an increase of 83% in its use in the same city. Almost all respondents declare themselves satisfied and tell their doctors more readily than in 2005.


Subject(s)
Integrative Oncology/methods , Materia Medica/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Humans , Integrative Oncology/instrumentation , Male , Materia Medica/standards , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Ann Pharm Fr ; 79(1): 44-52, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32485144

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) to improve their well-being. Little is known about real risks. OBJECTIVE: To highlight 3 different types of axes: 1/cancer patients' perceptions concerning CAM; 2/misinformation/miscommunication about CAM; 3/CAM toxicity (direct toxicity, CAM-anticancer drugs, CAM-cancer interactions). METHOD: A questionnaire was proposed to cancer patients for 2 months. The CAM toxicity was analyzed if patients documented their drugs and CAM. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients responded: 72/85 were taking≥1CAM. In total, 95% patients were satisfied. There was an increasing CAM intake after cancer diagnosis. One hundred and seventeen different CAM were identified (63 herbs, 24 essential oils, 28 food supplements, 2 homeopathic specialities). Only 30/85 were aware CAM could interact with anticancer drugs. No other type of risk was perceived. INFORMATION SOURCES: 43/85 Internet, 38/85 general practitioner, 38/85 community pharmacist, 32/85 entourage, 25/85 other patients, 22/85 oncologist. In total, 81.3% questioned healthcare professionals (HCP) about CAM. Twelve patients noticed HCP lacked knowledge regarding CAM. The toxicity analysis was carried out for 24 patients who consumed 1 to 24CAM. In total, 133CAM were reported, including 87 different CAM. For only 43CAM/87, studies were found. All patients presented≥1risk: 14 at risk of CAM-cancer interactions, 15 of CAM-anticancer drug interactions, 21 of CAM direct toxicities. CONCLUSION: Many CAM are used by patients. The diagnosis of cancer favors their use. The risks are manifold: low perception of risk that can be induced by CAM, diverse and insecure sources of information and many potential toxicities that are not scientifically documented.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Communication , Dietary Supplements , Drug Interactions , Female , France , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Materia Medica , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Plant Preparations , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(9): 4405-4412, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31919664

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Palliative care for cancer deals with physical, psychosocial, and spiritual issues faced by cancer patients, their families, communities, and healthcare providers. Research on complementary medicine (CM) use in France is limited despite high rates of reported CM use in other countries including by palliative patients. This study describes the use of CM by individuals receiving palliative care in Lyon, France. DESIGN: This study employed an observational cross-sectional survey design. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in three palliative care centers in Lyon, France; two tertiary hospitals and one palliative care unit (3 sites). Inpatients and outpatients visiting the palliative care clinic with a primary diagnosis of cancer at each study site were invited to participate. RESULTS: Of 138 eligible patients, 100 completed the survey (RR 72.4%). The majority (90.7%) reported using CM in the previous 6 months or since their primary cancer diagnosis. Participant CM use was either the same (20.7%) or increased since their primary cancer diagnosis (33.7%). Average out-of-pocket expenses associated with CM use in the previous 6 months or since diagnosis were €157.40 (SD €330.15). The most common CM health professional visited was an aromatherapist (72.7%), a Coupeurs de feu (38.6%), osteopath (28.6%) and naturopath (15.3%). The most common CM used were aromatherapy oils (33.7%), homeopathy (30.0%), and vitamins (29.4%). CONCLUSION: This second survey on CM use in France; is the first conducted in palliative care centers. Results show people with cancer in Lyon, France, have a very high prevalence of CM utilization.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/standards , Palliative Care/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence
7.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 58(4): 198-208, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31933473

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the off-label medication use in a cohort of pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter prospective longitudinal observational study in the Haute-Vienne department (France) called the NéHaVi cohort ("Né en Haute-Vienne" meaning "born in Haute-Vienne"). Women who had given birth to a viable baby in one of three maternity wards in the Haute-Vienne were included in the study after giving their informed consent. Data on the progress and outcome of pregnancies, childbirth, and drug or toxic exposure during pregnancy were collected. Drugs were classified, according to the labeling of the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) regarding the use in pregnancy, as follows: on-label, off-label at risk, and off-label contra-indicated. RESULTS: During their pregnancy, the 397 included women gave birth to 400 viable babies (209 boys, 191 girls, 3 sets of twins). All women had used at least 1 health product: 3,533 (92%) drugs, 298 (7.5%) homeopathic products, and 18 (0.5%) herb derivatives. The mean number of different drugs taken was 8.9 ± 5.3 (min 1, max 31). All pregnant women used at least 1 drug either with a license or considered as safe to take during pregnancy. Among the 2,538 (71.6%) on-label drugs, the most frequently used were analgesics (n = 611, 24.1%) (acetaminophen (n = 566)), antianemia preparations (n = 528, 20.8%), drugs for functional gastrointestinal disorder (n = 269, 10.6%), vitamins (n = 192, 7.5%), drugs for acid-related disorders (n = 148, 5.8%), and antibacterials (n = 118, 4.6%). In total, 321 (80.9%, 95% CI: 77.0 - 84.7) pregnant women used at least 1 off-label drug; and more precisely, 285 (71.8%, 95% CI: 67.4 - 76.2) used at least 1 off-label high-risk drug, and 189 (47.6%, 95% CI: 42.7 - 52.5) at least 1 contra-indicated drug. Among the 995 off-label drugs (28.2%), 760 (21.5%) were considered high-risk, including vasoprotectives (n = 156, 20.5%) (treatment of hemorrhoids (n = 147)), antithrombotic agents (n = 91, 11.6%) (heparins (n = 88)), and calcium channel blockers (n = 88, 11.6%). Lastly, 235 (6.7%) off-label drugs used were contraindicated medications (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the 3rd trimester (n = 231)). Five babies were born with malformations not related to the drugs used during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: We showed for the first time the magnitude of off-label prescription during pregnancy in France. Women and health professionals should be made more aware of the potential drug-induced risk during pregnancy. Drug adverse effects during pregnancy should be evaluated through an improved notification in pharmacovigilance and appropriate pharmacoepidemiologic studies in order to change SmPC labelings as early as possible, when necessary.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Off-Label Use , Pregnancy , Female , France , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies
8.
Homeopathy ; 109(3): 140-145, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32311747

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Arnica montana L. (Arnica m.) is a popular traditional medicine, used for its therapeutic properties in healing traumas, but little is known about its biological action on tissue formation and repair. This new work tested the effects of Arnica m. homeopathic dilutions on human macrophages, key cells in tissue defence and repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Macrophages derived from the THP-1 cell line were differentiated with interleukin-4 to induce a 'wound-healing'-like phenotype, and treated with various dilutions of Arnica m. centesimal (100 times) dilutions (2c, 3c, 5c, 9c, and 15c) or control solvent for 24 hours. RNA samples from cultured cells were analysed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in five separate experiments. RESULTS: Arnica montana at the 2c dilution (final concentration of sesquiterpene lactones in cell culture = 10-8 mol/L) significantly stimulated the expression of three genes which code for regulatory proteins of the extracellular matrix, namely FN1 (fibronectin 1, % increase of 21.8 ± standard error of the mean 4.6), low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 1 (% increase of 33.4 ± 6.1) and heparan sulphate proteoglycan 2 (% increase of 21.6 ± 9.1). Among these genes, the most quantitatively expressed was FN1. In addition, FN1, unlike other candidate genes, was upregulated in cells treated with higher dilutions/dynamisations (3c, 5c, and 15c) of Arnica m. CONCLUSION: The results support evidence that the extracellular matrix is a potential therapeutic target of Arnica m., with positive effects on cell adhesion and migration during tissue development and healing.


Subject(s)
Arnica , Fibronectins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Homeopathy/methods , Macrophages/drug effects , France , Humans , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , THP-1 Cells , Up-Regulation
9.
Oncology ; 97(1): 18-25, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31132779

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: It is usual for cancer patients to use complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) and yet the literature evaluating their efficacy in cancer patients is very limited. The objective of the present study was to report on the nature, frequency of use, and patient-reported outcome of CAMs in a single-center study. METHODS: All the consecutive patients treated between November 2017 and June 2018 at the Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute (France) were screened. Their reasons for using CAMs and their usage habits were collected. Patients evaluated their benefit. RESULTS: Of the 209 patients screened, 200 patients were included. CAMs ranged from osteopathy, homeopathy, acupuncture, healing touch, magnetism, naturopathy, suction cups, Chinese medicine, reflexology, to hypnosis. CAMs were widely used (n = 166, 83%), the first being osteopathy (n = 99, 49.5%), the second homeopathy (n = 78, 39.0%), and finally acupuncture (n = 76, 38.0%). Whatever the CAM, high satisfaction rates were reported (median satisfaction: 61-81%). CAMs were mainly used to prevent/treat side effects of anticancer treatments (81.2% for healing touch), increase well-being (55.4% for naturopathy), improve the immune system (16.9% for homeopathy), and treat cancer (n = 3, 5.1% for homeopathy). Patients could easily consider using CAMs, as up to 50.8% would have accepted a consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons for using CAMs differed among patients. They praised CAMs and kept asking for more information although there is limited evidence about their efficacy in the literature. Thus, prospective randomized controlled trials exploring the safety and efficacy of CAMs in cancer patients are needed.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Complementary Therapies/methods , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Complementary Therapies/psychology , Female , France/epidemiology , Homeopathy/methods , Humans , Hypnosis/methods , Male , Massage/methods , Naturopathy/methods , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/pathology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome
10.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 36(1): 27-50, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30901269

ABSTRACT

This article examines the efforts of Dr. Fernand Lagrange to establish the study of the physiology of exercise on a scientific basis. As a sports enthusiast and physician, Lagrande was inspired by the efforts of Claude Bernard and Étienne-Jules Marey to use his own body as a source of experimentation and methodical observation. Lagrande's self-experimentation pioneered the physiology of exercise, but his primary goal was to improve human health by demonstrating the benefits that could be derived from regular physical exercise. His observations of other human subjects, be they farmers, schoolchildren, students, or sportsmen, were always driven by the "moral motivation" for his new science to realize a more perfect knowledge of its object.


Cet article a pour but de dévoiler l'origine des travaux de Fernand Lagrange et la méthodologie qu'il a mise en place, à une époque où la physiologie des exercices corporels n'en était qu'à ses balbutiements. Il en ressort que ce docteur sportsman a éprouvé personnellement les choses avant de les éclairer scientifiquement. Dans la veine impulsée par Claude Bernard ou Étienne-Jules Marey, il a pratiqué ce que l'on est en droit d'appeler une auto-expérimentation athlétique. Précurseur incontestable et incontesté de la physiologie des exercices du corps, son objectif premier fut d'améliorer la santé de l'être humain en démontrant tous les bénéfices que ce dernier pouvait tirer d'une pratique physique régulière. Il a toujours porté un regard sur les autres, qu'ils soient paysans, écoliers, étudiants ou sportifs, avec une « motivation morale ¼, et ce en vue de fonder son intervention avec une parfaite connaissance de son objet.


Subject(s)
Autoexperimentation/history , Exercise/physiology , Physicians/history , Sports/physiology , France , History, 19th Century , Humans
11.
Homeopathy ; 107(2): 81-89, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29558779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of psychotropic drugs to treat anxiety and depressive disorders (ADDs) is concerning. According to the study, 'Etude Pharmacoépidémiologique de l'Impact de Santé Publique des modes de prise en charge pour 3 groupes de pathologies' (EPI3)-LASER, adult ADD patients who consult a general practitioner prescribing homeopathic medicines (GP-Ho) report less psychotropic drug use and are marginally more likely to experience clinical improvement than those receiving conventional care. We determined whether these observations also apply to patients ≥ 65 years old in the EPI3 cohort. METHODS: The EPI3-LASER study, conducted in France between March 2007 and July 2008, was a nationwide, observational survey of the three most common reasons for primary care consultation, including ADD, and the impact of the GPs' prescribing preferences: homeopathy (GP-Ho), conventional medicines (GP-CM) or mixed prescriptions (GP-Mx). This sub-analysis included 110 patients ≥ 65 years old with ADD from the EPI3 cohort who consulted either a GP-CM or GP-Ho. Socio-demographic and medical data and details of any medications prescribed were collected at inclusion. Information regarding the patients' functional status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS)]) was obtained via a telephone interview 72 hours after inclusion, and at 1, 3 and 12 months post-inclusion. Medication use and outcome were determined over the 12-month period. Differences between the GP-CM and GP-Ho groups were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were recruited and 87 (79.1%) with ADD (HADS ≥ 9) at the 72-hour interview were evaluated (age range: 65-93 years, 82.8% female). Patients who consulted a GP-Ho were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 10.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-81.07) to have clinical improvement (HADS < 9) after 12 months than those in the GP-CM group. Patients who consulted a GP-Ho reported less psychotropic drug use (OR = 22.31 [95% CI: 2.20-226.31]) and benzodiazepine use (OR = 60.63 [95% CI: 5.75-639.5]) than GP-CM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Management of ADD patients aged ≥ 65 years by GP-Ho appears to have a real public health interest in terms of effectiveness and lower psychotropic drug use.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , General Practitioners/organization & administration , Homeopathy/methods , Materia Medica/therapeutic use , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
12.
Minerva Pediatr ; 70(2): 117-126, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28211646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over-the-counter medicines may be proposed by pharmacists for children with acute cough. Study objectives were to describe the sociodemographic profile of children who were proposed a cough syrup by a pharmacist, the nature of the cough and type(s) of cough syrup proposed and to assess the evolution of the cough, tolerance and satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: Observational, prospective, longitudinal, multicentre study with 157 pharmacies in France. Children who were proposed a cough syrup by a pharmacist were recruited. Questionnaires were completed by the pharmacists and/or parents at inclusion and by the parents after 5 days of treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred fourteen children were included (mean age: 6.0±2.9 years); 45.9% had a dry and 43.3% a productive cough. 30.4% were proposed an allopathic antitussive syrup, 28.3% an allopathic expectorant syrup and 23.7% a homeopathic syrup. Children with a dry cough were more likely to be given an allopathic antitussive (55.2%) or homeopathic (28.2%) syrup. Children with a productive cough or cough of several days duration were more likely to be given an allopathic expectorant syrup (70.1%). Cough disappearance was more frequent with homeopathic syrups compared to allopathic expectorants (P=0.002), or allopathic antitussives (P=0.042). Adverse events were most common with allopathic antitussive syrups (18.7%) (P<0.001). Two-thirds of parents were satisfied with the treatment their child received. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists play an important role in the management of acute cough in children. Homeopathic cough syrups may have an interest in terms of public health.


Subject(s)
Antitussive Agents/administration & dosage , Cough/drug therapy , Expectorants/administration & dosage , Nonprescription Drugs/administration & dosage , Acute Disease , Child , Child, Preschool , Community Pharmacy Services , Female , France , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Minerva Pediatr ; 70(6): 519-528, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27668452

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary tooth eruption in infants is associated with a range of local and systemic symptoms although this remains a subject of much debate. In addition, data are limited on the role of physicians in managing infant teething, and on the benefit of homeopathic treatments. METHODS: We conducted an observational, multicenter, prospective survey evaluating teething symptoms, and symptom course following routine medical management by French pediatricians in 597 infants aged from 3 to 24 months. We also examined the response to treatment with routinely prescribed teething medications; the homeopathic agent, Camilia® and topically applied gingival agents (Delabarre® or Dolodent®). RESULTS: Most infants (96.6%) had buccogingival symptoms and 93.3% had at least one general symptom. Fever (≥38 °C) was reported in 15.2% of infants. For teething, 212 infants were prescribed Camilia®, 172 a gingival solution (Delabarre® or Dolodent®) and 213 received Camilia® along with a gingival agent. Infants prescribed both a homeopathic and a gingival treatment had a significantly higher number of symptoms at presentation compared with those prescribed a single agent. There were no significant differences in symptom course across these three treatment groups. Systemic analgesics/antipyretics were prescribed in 68.8% of cases. Parent satisfaction with medical management and prescribed treatments was high. CONCLUSIONS: Teething is frequently associated with transient local and systemic upset in infants and is a significant concern to parents. Camilia® provides a similar benefit to topical therapy, and is frequently used by pediatricians in France.


Subject(s)
Materia Medica/administration & dosage , Parents/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Tooth Eruption , Administration, Topical , Benzoates/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Female , Fever/epidemiology , Fever/etiology , France , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
14.
Therapie ; 72(4): 465-474, 2017 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28341159

ABSTRACT

AIM: In vitro Influenzinum induce a cellular change. We present the results of the first study examining the effectiveness of Influenzinum against influenza-like illnesses. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study during winter 2014-2015. After influenza epidemic, a self-assessment questionnaire was offered to patients presenting for a consultation. The primary endpoint was the declaration of an influenza-like illness. The exposed patients (treated by Influenzinum) were matched to two non-exposed patients (untreated) with a propensity score. A conditional logistic model expressed influenza-like illness risk reduction provided by the Influenzinum. RESULTS: The cohort included 3514 patients recruited from 46 general practitioners. After matching, the treated group (n=2041) and the untreated group (n=482) did not differ on variables collected. Influenzinum preventive therapy does not significantly alter the likelihood of influenza-like illness (adjusted odds ratio=0,91 [0,62 to 1,35], p=0,64). CONCLUSION: Influenzinum preventive therapy did not appear effective in preventing influenza-like illness.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , France , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , Young Adult
15.
Hist Psychiatry ; 28(2): 147-165, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28181451

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on the shift from a concept of insanity understood in terms of religion to another (as entertained by early psychiatry, especially in France) according to which it is believed that forms of madness tinged by religion are difficult to cure. The traditional religious view of madness, as exemplified by Pascal (inter alia), is first illustrated by entries from the Encyclopédie. Then the shift towards a medical view of madness, inspired by Vitalistic physiology, is mapped by entries taken from the same publication. Firmed up by Pinel, this shift caused the abandonment of the religious view. Esquirol considered religious mania to be a vestige from the past, but he also believed that mental conditions carrying a religious component were difficult to cure.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/history , Psychiatry/history , Religion and Psychology , France , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans
17.
Homeopathy ; 105(1): 84-91, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26828002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and sleep disorders (SDS) are frequently treated with psychotropic drugs. Health authorities in France have been advised to improve access to alternative treatments such as homeopathic medicines. Our aim was to describe the socio-demographic characteristics and clinical progression of patients prescribed homeopathic medicine Passiflora Compose (PC) for anxiety and/or SDS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an open-label, observational study. Randomly selected general practitioners (GPs) known to prescribe homeopathic medicines recruited consecutive patients (≥18-years) prescribed PC. The following data were recorded at inclusion by the GP: socio-demographic data and anxiety severity (Hamilton anxiety rating scale or HAM-A); and by the patients: level of anxiety (STAI Spielberger self-assessment questionnaire) and SDS (Jenkins sleep scale or JSS). Anxiety and SDS were reassessed after 4 weeks of treatment using the same scales. RESULTS: A total of 639 patients (mean age: 46.3 ± 17.5 years; 78.6% female) were recruited by 98 GPs. Anxiety was present in 85.4% (HAM-A) and 93.3% (Spielberger State) at inclusion (mean scores: 17.8 ± 8.91 and 54.59 ± 11.69, respectively) and SDS was present in 74.0% (mean score: 15.24 ± 5.28). A total of 401 (62.7%) patients received PC alone and 167 (26.1%) PC + psychotropics. After 4 weeks, mean anxiety scores decreased by more than 7, 12 and 6 points (HAM-A, Spielberger State and Trait respectively), and SDS score by more than 4 points (JSS). CONCLUSION: Anxiety and/or SDS improved significantly in patients included on this study. PC could be an alternative to the use of psychotropic drugs for first intention treatment of anxiety and SDS. Further studies are needed to confirm those results.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/drug therapy , Homeopathy/methods , Passiflora , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France , Humans , Male , Materia Medica/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use
18.
Homeopathy ; 105(4): 289-298, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27914568

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The motivations of patients who consult a homeopathic (GP-Ho) or conventional (GP-CM) general practitioner for supportive care during cancer treatment have not been widely studied. We investigated the reasons why cancer patients consult a GP-Ho versus a GP-CM for supportive care and the GPs' motivations for their prescriptions. METHODS: This observational survey was carried out in France between October 2008 and October 2011. GPs across France were randomly selected and asked to recruit four cancer patients each. At inclusion, the sociodemographic and clinical (including psychological) characteristics and medical history of the patients were recorded by the GPs and the patients noted their quality of life (QoL) and anxiety/depression using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) self-questionnaires. The main motivations of the patients regarding the type of GP consultation and the main reasons for the GPs' prescriptions were recorded. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty four patients were included in the analysis: 399 consulted a GP-CM (n = 112) and 245 a GP-Ho (n = 73). Patients consulting a GP-Ho were more often female [OR = 1.93; 95%CI: 1.11-3.35; p = 0.02], employed in a professional capacity [OR = 6.57; 95%CI: 1.96-21.99; p = 0.002], have a shorter time since cancer diagnosis [OR = 2.19; 95%CI: 1.24-3.87; p = 0.007], have received targeted anticancer therapy [OR = 3.70; 95%CI: 1.67-8.18; p = 0.001] and have a high QLQ-C30 score for constipation [OR = 1.01; 95%CI: 1.00-1.02; p = 0.001]. Patients mainly consulted a GP-Ho to receive overall care (73.5% vs. 64.9%; p = 0.024) and medicines to prevent anticancer treatment-related side-effects (63.7% vs. 41.4%; p < 0.0001). In contrast, patients consulted a GP-CM to receive psychological care (50.1% vs. 40.8%; p = 0.021) and more information regarding the oncologists' strategic decisions (p < 0.0001). There was a significantly greater prescription of psychotropic drugs by GP-CM (53.7% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients consulting a GP-Ho or GP-CM had different motivations for seeking supportive care. There was a significantly greater prescription of psychotropic drugs by GP-CM.


Subject(s)
Homeopathy , Motivation , Neoplasms/psychology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Female , France , General Practitioners , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prospective Studies , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Rev Hist Pharm (Paris) ; 64(390): 241-248, 2016 Jun.
Article in English, French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29485781

ABSTRACT

A pharmacist facinated by materia medica Henri Bocquillon-Limousin (1856-1917) get married with the daughter of Stanislas Limousin in 1885. After being graduated from pharmacy high school of Paris, he joined the laboratory of Jungfleisch. Afterwards, he briefly worked in the municipal laboratory of Paris and then he turned to a pharmacy activity. He took up the pharmacy of his father in law in 1887. His research was mainly directed to materia medica and valorization of colonial medicinal plants. Thanks to a well expanded network of associates, he managed to obtain an important collection of medicinal plants which is actually preserved in "Francois Tillequin museum - Collections of materia medica" in the faculty of pharmacy of Paris. H. Bocquillon-Limousin is also well known for his numerous editions of Formulaire des medicaments nouveaux and his books in the field of material medica.


Subject(s)
Materia Medica/history , Pharmacists , France , History of Pharmacy , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Paris
20.
Fam Pract ; 32(4): 442-8, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25921648

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of homeopathic medicine is poorly described and the frequency of combined allopathic and homeopathic prescriptions is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To analyse data on medicines, prescribers and patients for homeopathic prescriptions that are reimbursed by French national health insurance. METHODS: The French national health insurance databases (SNIIRAM) were used to analyse prescriptions of reimbursed homeopathic drugs or preparations in the overall French population, during the period July 2011-June 2012. RESULTS: A total of 6,705,420 patients received at least one reimbursement for a homeopathic preparation during the 12-month period, i.e. 10.2% of the overall population, with a predominance in females (68%) and a peak frequency observed in children aged 0-4 years (18%). About one third of patients had only one reimbursement, and one half of patients had three or more reimbursements. A total of 120,110 healthcare professionals (HCPs) prescribed at least one homeopathic drug or preparation. They represented 43.5% of the overall population of HCPs, nearly 95% of general practitioners, dermatologists and pediatricians, and 75% of midwives. Homeopathy accounted for 5% of the total number of drug units prescribed by HCPs. Allopathic medicines were coprescribed with 55% of homeopathic prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Many HCPs occasionally prescribe reimbursed homeopathic preparations, representing however a small percentage of reimbursements compared to allopathic medicines. About 10% of the French population, particularly young children and women, received at least one homeopathic preparation during the year. In more than one half of cases, reimbursed homeopathic preparations are prescribed in combination with allopathic medicines.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Homeopathy/economics , Homeopathy/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Databases, Factual , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL