Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Homeopathy ; 106(2): 79-86, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28552177

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Glycaemic goals are not achieved in most patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), especially in those with long disease duration and taking multiple oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of individualized homeopathic treatment in glycaemic control. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: At least 6 months of individualized homeopathic treatment at a private homeopathic centre in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven adults aged 37-84 years were treated with individualized homeopathic remedies between 2012 and 2015. Published data on 40 T2DM patients under standard conventional treatment in Hong Kong were used as a control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 12-month or the last follow-up, whichever is earlier. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional treatment only group, the homeopathy group had higher baseline FPG (p = 0.044), and more patients had a long (>20 years) duration of diabetes (p = 0.006), and a history of cardiac events (p = 0.022). The mean difference in FPG in the homeopathy group was significantly greater than in the control after 12 months: -2.24 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.47 to -1.01) vs 0.16 mmol/L (95% CI: -1.72 to 2.04), p = 0.001. The mean difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was also significantly greater, -1.11% (95% CI: -2.17 to -0.05) vs 0.08% (95% CI: -1.37 to 1.53), p = 0.046. Poorer baseline glycaemic control was associated with better outcome (r = -0.750, p < 0.001), but not the duration of diabetes (r = 0.058, p = 0.772). The improvement was robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Individualized homeopathic treatment was associated with better glycaemic control compared with standard conventional treatment alone.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Homeopathy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Glucose , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin , Hong Kong , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Per Med ; 19(2): 155-163, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35220727

ABSTRACT

Diabetic patients always seek alternative treatments to lower their blood glucose level efficiently, because antidiabetic drugs produce adverse effects and many patients experience reduced response after a treatment period. Opium poppy (Papaver somniferum) is frequently consumed by diabetic patients for reduction of blood glucose level. Scientific studies found controversial results in the investigation of the blood glucose-lowering effects of opium poppy. In this regard, we explored the antidiabetic effect of opium poppy more closely. The antidiabetic or antihyperglycemic effect of P. somniferum alkaloids were reviewed. Next, opioid receptors and their role in diabetes were explored. In the final part origins of interindividual variabilities in opioid receptors and metabolizing enzymes' functions including genetic and epigenetic factors were reviewed.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Papaver , Humans , Papaver/genetics , Opium , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Receptors, Opioid , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use
3.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 13(2): 1209-1212, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is rising at an alarming rate in India and the national capital forms a significant part of the nation's diabetic population. The metabolic disorder is no more a disease specific to the rich countries but has also markedly spread its roots in middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the prevalence of associated co-morbidities in the diabetic population of Delhi, a metropolitan city in India. Moreover, this study was conducted to help with adding information to the limited shreds of evidence of diabetes prevalence in Delhi along with the usually preferred therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, observational, survey-based study was conducted on people (n = 798) of different age groups (18 years and above) belonging to different regions of Delhi. All subjects were enrolled after obtaining oral consent. Detailed information about clinical, demographic and metabolic profiles was obtained with the help of a pre-structured, open-ended questionnaire. The data were analyzed, and the correlation between diabetes and several other fields was drawn. RESULTS: Out of the 798 diabetic patients 458 (57.39%) were males and 340 (42.60%) were females. The presence of diabetes was higher in the age group of 50-60 years irrespective of the gender. CO-MORBIDITIES: 54.13% of patients suffered with additional co-morbidities which is significantly high. The associated co-morbidities found in the survey included Hypertension, Hypothyroidism, Dyslipidemia, Obesity, Coronary Artery Diseases etc. About 30.57% of patients suffered from hypertension making it the most commonly associated co-morbidity. The other diseases included hypothyroidism (11.52%), Dyslipidemia (10.27%), Obesity (9.27%) etc. MEDICATION: Majority of patients i.e about 60.65% received oral hypoglycemic agents (including patients receiving both insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents). About 19.92% of patients were prescribed with insulin. 14.16% of patients were found to be following diet control and yoga with about 3.13% more females the males. A small percentage of patients (5.25%) were also following alternative systems (Ayurvedic/Unani/Homeopathic) of treatment. Overall, amongst oral hypoglycemic agents, the combination of metformin and DPP4 inhibitors (Vildagliptin, Sitagliptin) was being prescribed majorly i.e 16.41%. CONCLUSION: The number of diabetic population is high in Delhi. It was evident that a significant percentage of diabetic patients suffered from additional diseases that may lead to worsening of the health conditions. Thus, there is an urgent need to educate and spread awareness amongst the masses about the potential benefits of lifestyle modifications like the incorporation of a healthy diet and physical activities. Additionally, continuous and regular tests should be taken to avoid further complications.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diet , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Life Style , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/analysis , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prognosis
4.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 9(3 Pt 1): 228-35, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18331412

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly used in adults and children. Studies on CAM in diabetes have mainly focused on the adult population and its use among children with type 1 diabetes has not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: This study determines prevalence, parental reasons and motivations, perceived effectiveness, costs, and communication of CAM use. Moreover, caregiver-related variables associated with the use of CAM were investigated. METHODS: A self-completed anonymous questionnaire was administered to parents of children with type 1 diabetes in four pediatric diabetes centers in Germany (Leipzig, Berlin, Stuttgart, and Bonn). RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty eight (65.9%) of 346 families completed the survey. Mean age of the diabetic patients was 11.9 +/- 3.8 yr. Forty two (18.4%) received one or more types of CAM, with the most common types being homeopathy (14.5%), vitamins and minerals (13.7%), modified diet (12.9%), aloe vera (7.3%), and cinnamon (5.6%). Users had a significantly higher family income and parental tertiary education (p < 0.05) and stated a significantly stronger interest in self-care (p < 0.01). Parents' motivations for using CAM were the hope for an improved well-being (92.1%), to try everything (77.8%), and assumption of fewer side effects (55.2%). Costs for the entire treatment varied between less than euro100 and up to euro5000, with mostly no reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CAM in children with type 1 diabetes is less common than that documented for adults. Parents using CAM do not question the need for insulin. When using CAM, improved well-being and quality of life are important considerations where CAM can have a role.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/economics , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/economics , Documentation , Female , Germany , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Parents , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Pathol Biol (Paris) ; 44(4): 235-40, 1996 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8763584

ABSTRACT

The bioavailability of rapid-acting insulin administered as a nasal spray was studied in 6 type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. They received long-acting bovine insulin (Ultratardum 40 U/ml, Organon) as basal treatment at 8 a.m. Rapid-acting insulin was also administered at 8 a.m., then at noon and 6 p.m, subcutaneously on day 1 as a 100 U/ml solution and intranasally by aerosol spray as a 100 U/ml and 500 U/ml with 1% (w/v) 9 lauryl ether solution on day 2 and day 3 respectively. On days 2 and 3, the dose of insulin was at least nine times higher than the subcutaneous dose on day 1. Free and total plasma insulin concentrations were assayed after the noon insulin administration. The peaks of the free and total plasma insulin levels were reached earlier and the return to basal levels was obtained earlier after nasal insulin administration than after insulin injected subcutaneously. The bioavailability of nasal spray insulin versus subcutaneous insulin with a 100 U/ml insulin solution was similar to that with a 500 U/ml insulin solution: 5.14 +/- 0.38% (m +/- SEM) and 4.64 +/- 0.46% according to the total plasma insulin level. This study suggests that the bioavailability of nasal spray insulin is not increased by increasing insulin concentration in our experimental conditions.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Aged , Biological Availability , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/blood , Injections, Subcutaneous , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/blood , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL