ABSTRACT
The use of mercury as an injection mass in anatomical experiments and preparations was common throughout Europe in the long eighteenth century, and refined mercury-injected preparations as well as plates of anatomical mercury remain today. The use and meaning of mercury in related disciplines such as medicine and chemistry in the same period have been studied, but our knowledge of anatomical mercury is sparse and tends to focus on technicalities. This article argues that mercury had a distinct meaning in anatomy, which was initially influenced by alchemical and classical understandings of mercury. Moreover, it demonstrates that the choice of mercury as an anatomical injection mass was deliberate and informed by an intricate cultural understanding of its materiality, and that its use in anatomical preparations and its perception as an anatomical material evolved with the understanding of the circulatory and lymphatic systems. By using the material culture of anatomical mercury as a starting point, I seek to provide a new, object-driven interpretation of complex and strongly interrelated historiographical categories such as mechanism, vitalism, chemistry, anatomy, and physiology, which are difficult to understand through a historiography that focuses exclusively on ideas.
Subject(s)
Anatomy/methods , Blood Vessels/anatomy & histology , Lymphatic System/anatomy & histology , Mercury/history , Preservation, Biological/methods , Alchemy , Anatomy/history , Europe , Historiography , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , Humans , Injections/methods , VitalismABSTRACT
To establish whether the plasma concentration of pancuronium reflects magnitude of neuromuscular blockade, the authors determined times of recovery from neuromuscular blockade and associated plasma concentrations following equipotent doses of pancuronium using three methods of pancuronium administration: the isolated-arm technique in conscious volunteers (n = 4), and the bolus intravenous injection (n = 7) and continuous-infusion methods (n = 3) in anesthetized patients. Although maximum depressions of twitch tension were similar (85 +/- 11,91 +/- 6, and 92 +/- 4 per cent, respectively) with the three techniques, times to recovery from neuromuscular blockade differed significantly, being 10 +/- 2 min with the isolated-arm technique, 23 +/- 7 min with the bolus-injection technique, and 46 +/- 5 min with the continuous-infusion method. The plasma concentration of pancuronium necessary for neuromuscular blockade was least with the isolated-arm technique and greatest with continuous infusion. At 25 and 75 per cent recovery, mean plasma concentrations were 0.07 +/- 0.01 and 0.04 +/- 0.01 microgram/ml in the isolated arm; 0.13 +/- 0.04 and 0.09 +/- 0.02 microgram/ml after bolus injection, and 0.20 +/- 0.04 and 0.11 microgram/ml during continuous infusion, respectively. It is concluded that the relationship between plasma concentration of pancuronium and magnitude of neuromuscular blockade depends on the method of pancuronium administration.