ABSTRACT
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common lifestyle disorder that has become a major international public health concern affecting young women of reproductive age. Homeopathy aims to provide an individual with optimal health on all levels-emotional, mental, physical and spiritual. Homeopathy's goal is to promote an individual's overall well-being rather than just treat symptoms. Dr. Boenninghausen's unique contribution to the promotion of scientific prescribing in homeopathic practice is the concept of remedy relationship and its reportorial analysis. Homeopathy takes into account a person's natural environment and lifestyle. Then, a homeopathic physician provides treatment that closely matches individual symptoms and recommends homeopathy remedies for the same. A 22-year-old female came into the homeopathic outpatient department (OPD) with complaints of irregular menses, pustular acne and constipation. An ultrasound of the abdomen and pelvis was done to confirm the diagnosis of POCS. Other investigations were performed, including thyroid function tests and hormonal assays, to rule out the presence of other disorders. The case was managed with homeopathic medicines, which were prescribed per Hahnemannian guidelines after referring relationship of remedies.
Subject(s)
Homeopathy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Homeopathy/psychology , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/therapy , Constipation/therapy , OutpatientsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies had been described in patients with disabling, chronic and painful conditions; these characteristics define the majority of vascular surgery (VS) entities. A lack of disclosure about CAM use from patients has been universally cited and may impact effective patient-doctor communication. Our primary objective was to describe CAM use, modalities, perceived benefits, safety, and associated factors among adult patients attending a VS outpatient clinic; we additionally explored patient's attitudes about CAM disclosure with their primary vascular surgeon. METHODS: This cross-sectional study invited 223 consecutive outpatients to an interview where the ICAM-Q (International Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire) and the PDRQ-9 (Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9 items) were applied. In addition, sociodemographics, vascular disease and treatment-related information, comorbidity, and disease severity characteristics were obtained. Appropriated statistics was used; multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors associated to CAM use. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. IRB approval was obtained. RESULTS: Patients recruited were primary females (69%) and had a median age of 65 years (54-75). Most frequent vascular diagnoses were chronic venous insufficiency (36.2%) and peripheral artery disease (26%). There were 104 (46.6%) patients who referred CAM use, primarily self-helped practices (96%), and use of herbal, vitamins, or homeopathic medicines (23.7%). Overall, the majority of the patients perceived CAM modalities helpful and 94.6% denied any adverse event. Female sex (OR: 1.768, 95% CI: 0.997-3.135, p = 0.051) and hospitalization during the previous year (OR: 3.173, 95% CI: 1.492-6.748, p = 0.003) were associated to CAM use. The majority of the patients (77%) agreed about CAM disclosure with their primary vascular surgeon; meanwhile, among CAM users, up to 54.9% did not disclose it, and their main reasons were "Doctor didn't ask" (32%) and "I consider it unnecessary" (16%). The patient-doctor relationship was rated by the patients with high scores. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use is frequent and perceived as safe and beneficial among VS outpatients; nonetheless, patients do not disclose CAM use with their primary vascular surgeons, and a wide range of reasons are given by the patients that prevent effective and open communication.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Adult , Aged , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Referral and Consultation , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are only few studies on cancer patients who are treated in complementary and alternative medicine clinics and comparing them with patients in conventional care. We will present the comparison of characteristics of two patient cohorts: one was treated in a homeopathic cancer care clinic and one was treated in a conventional oncology care (CC) outpatient clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six-hundred and forty-seven patients were included in this cross-sectional cohort study and had to fill in questionnaires [health-related quality of life (QoL) (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory) and expectancies toward treatment]. Clinical data were extracted from medical records. This study presents the comparison of both cohorts. RESULTS: Patients in the homeopathy cohort are younger, better educated and more often employed than patients in the CC cohort. The most pronounced differences indicate longer disease histories and different diagnostic and clinical pretreatment variables. Despite the clinical differences, QoL as well as anxiety, depression and fatigue was similar in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Homeopathic treatment is sought by cancer patients at a different phase during the course of the disease, which has particular implications for research. However, expectancies toward the benefit of the treatment as well as QoL data are similar.
Subject(s)
Homeopathy , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life , Affective Symptoms/etiology , Affective Symptoms/therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pain/etiology , Pain Management , Patient Satisfaction , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Radiotherapy Dosage , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We interviewed 300 patients (54.7% male; mean age was 65.8 ± 9.5) attending the Movement Disorders Clinic at the Buenos Aires University Hospital to determine the prevalence of CATs use and their association with demographic, social, or disease-specific characteristics among patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We found that 25.7% of the PD patients interviewed (77/300) stated they had used CATs to improve their PD symptoms whereas 38.0% (114/300) had used some CATs without any relation to PD, at least once in life. At the moment of the interview, CATs prevalence use was 50.6% in the former group and 25.0% in the latter. The use of CATs was much more frequent among women and more common in the 50- to 69-year age group. Friends and neighbors of the patients had most frequently recommended these therapies. No major association was observed between CATs use and the duration of the disease, side of initial involvement, PD phenotype, or the Hoehn and Yahr staging. Acupuncture, homeopathy, yoga, and therapeutic massage were the most widely used therapies. After the initiation of conventional treatment the use of massage, yoga, and acupuncture in patients using CATs to improve PD significantly increased. Neurologists should be aware and inquire about the use of CATs to rule out potentially harmful effects.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Aged , Argentina/epidemiology , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain and fatigue are the main symptoms of postpoliomyelitis syndrome (PPS). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an anthroposophic multimodal treatment for chronic pain in PPS outpatients. METHODS: A twelve-week, four-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 prospective clinical trial was designed to compare four groups (n = 48): groups A and B received daily active experimental transdermal gel (ETG) or placebo gel (PTG), respectively; groups C and D received weekly external therapies, art therapies, and neurofunctional reorganization, plus either daily ETG or PTG, respectively. The pain symptoms were evaluated through a visual analogue scale (VAS), the McGill questionnaire, and thermography. Quality of life and resilience were evaluated by the WHOQOL-BREF and Antonovsky sense of coherence questionnaires applied at baseline and after the interventions. RESULTS: No related adverse events occurred, and 10% of the patients reports dysphagia improvement. In the groups C and D, pain reduction was statistically significant in both the placebo group (p = .02, d = 1.315) and in the ETG (p = .005, d = 2.035). However, following the week-to-week evolution of pain with the concomitant use of the ETG, this significant pain reduction occurred earlier from the 4th week and continued to decrease (p = .016, d = 1.369). In the group that received the complete multimodal treatment, the greatest significant benefit in increasing quality of life occurred in the physical domain and elevation in resilience with an emphasis on meaning and comprehension domains. CONCLUSIONS: The anthroposophic multimodal treatment group presented both safety and efficacy as an analgesic in the groups that received the nonpharmacological therapies, much earlier when associated with the ETG. The multimodal approach corresponded to the pattern of better efficacy for both pain reduction and improvement in quality of life and resilience.
Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Art Therapy , Chronic Pain/therapy , Materia Medica/therapeutic use , Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome/therapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Materia Medica/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Pain Measurement , Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome/psychology , Prospective Studies , Resilience, Psychological , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We report findings from a pilot data collection study within a programme of quality assurance, improvement and development across all five homeopathic hospitals in the UK National Health Service (NHS). AIMS: (1) To pilot the collection of clinical data in the homeopathic hospital outpatient setting, recording patient-reported outcome since first appointment; (2) to sample the range of medical complaints that secondary-care doctors treat using homeopathy, and thus identify the nature and complexity of complaints most frequently treated nationally; (3) to present a cross section of outcome scores by appointment number, including that for the most frequently treated medical complaints; (4) to explore approaches to standard setting for homeopathic practice outcome in patients treated at the homeopathic hospitals. METHODS: A total of 51 medical practitioners took part in data collection over a 4-week period. Consecutive patient appointments were recorded under the headings: (1) date of first appointment in the current series; (2) appointment number; (3) age of patient; (4) sex of patient; (5) main medical complaint being treated; (6) whether other main medical complaint(s); (7) patient-reported change in health, using Outcome Related to Impact on Daily Living (ORIDL) and its derivative, the ORIDL Profile Score (ORIDL-PS; range, -4 to +4, where a score
Subject(s)
Homeopathy/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pilot Projects , Professional-Patient Relations , Sex Distribution , State Medicine/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and determinants of complementary medicine (CM) use in a multi-ethnic paediatric outpatient population. METHODOLOGY: A parent-completed questionnaire survey of paediatric outpatients attending general and sub-specialist outpatient clinics at a North West London hospital during September to December 2005. RESULTS: Parents' use of CM for their children in this multi-ethnic population was higher than expected at 37%. Use was correlated with parental CM use and education but independent of ethnic group. Parental CM use and child's health status were significant predictors of child CM use. The main reason for using CM was word of mouth (45%) and the main source of information was friends and family (51%). The most popular treatments used for children were homeopathy and herbal medicine (used by 30% and 28% of CM users, respectively). 88% of CM was bought over the counter and 53% of CM use was not reported to their doctor. Parents also used traditional complementary remedies for their children. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that CM use in children is higher than previously estimated in the UK. This indicates the need for greater professional awareness of CM as part of clinical care. There is a need to acknowledge the beliefs that inform parents' decision-making process.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Status , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , London , Outpatients , Parents , Regression Analysis , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine has recently attracted attention due to its widespread use. In a recent study in Israel, almost a half of CAM users in the general population used it for joint diseases or back pain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of CAM use among patients with defined rheumatic diseases, and analyze the demographic features of CAM users, their reasons for using CAM and the use of specific CAM methods. METHODS: We conducted face-to-face structured interviews of 350 patients attending rheumatology clinics, regarding past or present use of CAM, specifying the various CAM types they used, and reasons for using CAM. Demographic data including age, gender, country of birth and origin, and level of education were also collected. RESULTS: Altogether, 148 patients reported using CAM (42%). In general, homeopathy and acupuncture were the most commonly used types (44% and 41% of the patients, respectively). The mean number of CAM methods per patient was 1.9 +/- 1.1. CAM was more commonly used by patients with advanced education (52% vs. 37% of patients with lower education, P= 0.007). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis used CAM significantly less than patients with other rheumatologic conditions (32% vs. 48%, P= 0.008). CONCLUSION: CAM use is influenced by level of education. The choice of the preferred CAM method among patients with rheumatic diseases seemed to follow the popular CAM methods in the general population, and was not specific to rheumatic diseases.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Special , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
Opium , Papaver , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Analgesics, Opioid , Arthroplasty , Humans , Inpatients , Outpatients , PandemicsABSTRACT
In this short communication we present a re-analysis of homeopathic patient data in comparison to control patient data from the same Outpatient´s Unit "Homeopathy in malignant diseases" of the Medical University of Vienna. In this analysis we took account of a probable immortal time bias. For patients suffering from advanced stages of cancer and surviving the first 6 or 12 months after diagnosis, respectively, the results show that utilizing homeopathy gives a statistically significant (p<0.001) advantage over control patients regarding survival time. In conclusion, bearing in mind all limitations, the results of this retrospective study suggest that patients with advanced stages of cancer might benefit from additional homeopathic treatment until a survival time of up to 12 months after diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Homeopathy/mortality , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Outpatients , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increased over the last few years, and an emergent data suggests that some CAM modalities may be helpful in addressing gastrointestinal (GI) conditions. Our aim was to find out the prevalence of such practices for GI condition amongst patients visiting an OPD of a large tertiary care centre of Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: Patients visiting outpatient department of Hepatogastroenterology department at SIUT, Pakistan from March 2014 to March 2015, were included in this cross sectional study. A pre designed questionnaire was used that included the demographic data, primary disease of the patient, CAM modality used, reason for the use of CAM therapy and reasons for stopping it. Frequencies of different variables were computed using SPSS version 18. RESULTS: 906 patients were interviewed, out of which 52% (471) were males. The mean age at presentation was 39.81±12.4 years. 234 (25.8%) of the participants used one of the CAM modalities; Herbal medicine being most common one, seen in 122 (52.13%) followed by spiritual 61 (26%), and homeopathy 33 (14%). The duration of therapy was limited to six months in 161(68%), whereas 7 patients (2.9%) had prolonged duration of use of more than five years. Reasons for using CAM therapy included advice by family and friends in 66 patients (28%), personal will in 42 (17.94%), no benefit from allopathic treatment in 34 (14.5%), while high cost was the reason of use in 3(5%) of the patients. The most common reason for discontinuation of CAM was no benefit, seen in 113 patients (48.30%), followed by physician's advice in 32 (17%) patients, and side effects in 19 (8%). On the other hand 44 patients (18.80%) reported benefit from the therapy while 14 (5.9%) were still continuing with CAM modality. Among the CAM users 140 (60.09%) were un-educated or had primary education while CAM nonusers had 328 (47%) were either uneducated or had primary education only correlation reveals P value 0.004. CONCLUSION: Significant numbers of patients used CAM therapy. A lower level of education was associated with increased usage of CAM while cost had no major impact on its usage.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/methods , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Phytotherapy/methods , Spiritual Therapies/methods , Adult , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Materia Medica/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Pakistan , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate initial results of a ambulatory major surgery program in Gynecology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive study of the period March 2018 to June 2019. The interventions included were: surgical sterilizations via vaginal, minilap and laparoscopic, diagnostic laparoscopy, laparoscopic cyst or anexectomy, hysteroscopy, TOT, vaginal plasty, biopsy curettage, polypectomy, extraction of IUD under anesthesia, labiaplasty, and removal of transobsturatrix tape. Quality indicators such as suspension, readmissions and systemic and surgical complications have been analyzed. RESULTS: 136 patients were operated by CMA of which 43 were laparoscopic (31.6%), 55 patients vaginally (40.4%), 34 histeroscopy (25%) and 4 patients by minilap (3%)There were 4 minor and late complications (2.9%) that corresponded to operative wound infection in vaginal plasty and nymphoplasty, a dysfunctional TOT tape that had to be removed in a mediated manner and a PIP post surgical sterilization via vaginal route. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecological ambulatory major surgery is feasible to perform in a hospital of medium complexity with a low percentage of minor complications in this study.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Laparoscopy/methods , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Hysterectomy, Vaginal/methods , Outpatients , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Clinical Record , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Treatment Outcome , Hysterectomy/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of use of alternative diets and other alternative therapies by cancer patients DESIGN: Descriptive, questionnaire. METHOD: During one week, a written survey was held among all 429 patients visiting the outpatient cancer clinic of the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Patients were asked about their use of alternative therapies both current and in the past, their reasons for using these therapies and the extra expenses involved. A total of 405 patients participated in the study. RESULTS: In all, 121 (30%) patients used an alternative therapy. Of the 51 patients (13%) using an alternative diet, 63% were using the Houtsmuller diet. Twelve years ago, 8% of patients used an alternative diet, which was in most cases the Moerman diet; the Houtsmuller diet did not yet exist. Seventy patients (17%) were using other alternative therapies, such as homeopathy, vitamins, herbs and paranormal therapies. The costs of especially the Houtsmuller diet, including supplements, were considerable: patients paid about Dfl. 480 monthly, expenses not covered by insurance. More than half the patients using a diet believed it would cure them, delay tumour progress or both. CONCLUSION: Compared with 12 years ago, the number of cancer patients using alternative diets and other alternative therapies had increased by about 80%. The Houtsmuller diet was used by 63% of patients using alternative diets and had, consequently, supplanted the Moerman diet.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Neoplasms/diet therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diet, Fat-Restricted , Diet, Protein-Restricted , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/economics , Netherlands , Outpatients , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
This study investigated the use of complementary and alternative medicines by surgical patients at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver. Elective surgical outpatients were randomly surveyed with anonymous self-report questionnaires during day-surgery admission about alternative medicines taken during the 2 weeks before surgery; 496 of 500 questionnaires were completed and returned. Of the patients, 37% reported 62 types of herbs, 59% reported 14 types of vitamins, 45% reported 36 types of of dietary supplements, and 1% reported taking 5 types of homeopathics. A total of 73.4% of patients took alternative medicines preoperatively (range, 1-44 medicines). After a literature review, the alternative medicines were categorized for potential interactions with anesthetic drugs. Alternative medicines that have inhibitory effects on the coagulation cascade were reported by 40% of surgical patients. The following percentages of patients took medicines that affect blood pressure, 32%; affect cardiac function, 20%; cause sedation, 17%; or have potential to alter electrolyte levels, 9%. Herbs recognized to interact with pharmaceuticals were consumed by 23% of patients. Further research, education, and improved communication are needed to safely integrate alternative medicines for surgical patients.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Preoperative Care , Adult , Anesthetics/adverse effects , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Data Collection , Drug Interactions , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Plant Preparations/adverse effectsABSTRACT
AIM: To assess validity of adjuvant use of pumpan, a homeopathic compound, in patients with unstable angina pectoris and angina of effort (functional class III-IV) receiving conventional treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A direct open controlled trial for 15 months performed initially in hospital, then outpatiently, covered 49 patients with severe angina. Examination of the patients included evaluation of clinical condition and the disease course, lipid metabolism, hemostasis, blood plasma electrolytes, aminotransferases, echo-CG, bicycle exercise, rheoencephalography, ultrasonic dopplerography of head and neck vessels. RESULTS: Pumpan produced a positive effect total nonspecific systemic resistance improved, number of hospitalizations reduced, intracardiac hemodynamics improved in some cases with severe angina. CONCLUSION: Homeopathic compound pumpan can be recommended in the treatment of severe angina to reinforce antianginal effect, improve the disease clinical course, to obtain a hypocoagulative and hypocholesterolemic effect, to normalize intracardiac hemodynamics, to raise myocardial performance and intracoronary reserve as well as nonspecific resistance of the body.
Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/drug therapy , Homeopathy , Aged , Angina Pectoris/blood , Angina Pectoris/physiopathology , Angina, Unstable/blood , Angina, Unstable/drug therapy , Angina, Unstable/physiopathology , Echocardiography, Doppler , Exercise/physiology , Exercise Test , Follow-Up Studies , Hemodynamics , Hemostasis , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Safety , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) present a challenging and expensive public health problem. Polypharmacy is defined according to the WHO criteria as the, "concurrent use of five or more different prescription medication". Elderly are more prone to adverse reactions due to comorbid conditions, longer lists of medications and sensitivity to drug effects. The aim of the study is to estimate the incidence and strength of association of ADRs due to polypharmacy among the geriatric cohort attending outpatient clinics at a tertiary care center. METHODS: A hospital based prospective cohort study was conducted at ambulatory care clinics of Aga Khan University Hospital April 2012 to March 2013. One thousand geriatrics patients (age ≥ 65 years) visiting ambulatory clinics were identified. They were divided on the basis of exposure (polypharmacy vs. no polypharmacy). We followed them from the time of their enrollment (day zero) to six weeks, checking up on them once a week. Incidence was calculated and Cox Proportional Hazard Model estimates were used. RESULTS: The final analysis was performed on 1000 elderly patients. The occurrence of polypharmacy was 70% and the incidence of ADRs was 10.5% among the study cohort. The majority (30%) of patients were unable to read or write. The use of herbal medicine was reported by 3.2% of the patients and homeopathic by 3%. Our Cox adjusted model shows that polypharmacy was 2.3 times more associated with ADRs, con-current complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) was 7.4 times and those who cannot read and write were 1.5 times more associated with ADRs. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ADRs due to poly pharmacy is alarmingly high. The factors associated with ADRs are modifiable. Policies are needed to design and strengthen the prescription pattern.
Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Geriatrics , Outpatients , Polypharmacy , Tertiary Care Centers , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Pakistan , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current literature suggests a positive influence of additive classical homeopathy on global health and well-being in cancer patients. Besides encouraging case reports, there is little if any research on long-term survival of patients who obtain homeopathic care during cancer treatment. DESIGN: Data from cancer patients who had undergone homeopathic treatment complementary to conventional anti-cancer treatment at the Outpatient Unit for Homeopathy in Malignant Diseases, Medical University Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Vienna, Austria, were collected, described and a retrospective subgroup-analysis with regard to survival time was performed. Patient inclusion criteria were at least three homeopathic consultations, fatal prognosis of disease, quantitative and qualitative description of patient characteristics, and survival time. RESULTS: In four years, a total of 538 patients were recorded to have visited the Outpatient Unit Homeopathy in Malignant Diseases, Medical University Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Vienna, Austria. 62.8% of them were women, and nearly 20% had breast cancer. From the 53.7% (n=287) who had undergone at least three homeopathic consultations within four years, 18.7% (n=54) fulfilled inclusion criteria for survival analysis. The surveyed neoplasms were glioblastoma, lung, cholangiocellular and pancreatic carcinomas, metastasized sarcoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Median overall survival was compared to expert expectations of survival outcomes by specific cancer type and was prolonged across observed cancer entities (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Extended survival time in this sample of cancer patients with fatal prognosis but additive homeopathic treatment is interesting. However, findings are based on a small sample, and with only limited data available about patient and treatment characteristics. The relationship between homeopathic treatment and survival time requires prospective investigation in larger samples possibly using matched-pair control analysis or randomized trials.
Subject(s)
Homeopathy , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Austria/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pharmacists play an increasing role in advising on treatment for minor illnesses such as influenza-like illness (ILI) or ear, nose, and throat (ENT) disorders. However, the profile of patients consulting pharmacists with these illnesses, the types of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines recommended by pharmacists, and the effectiveness of these treatments have not been studied. OBJECTIVES: To describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients recommended allopathic and/or homeopathic medicines for ILI or ENT disorders by pharmacists in France and to investigate the effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was carried out in randomly selected pharmacies across the 8 IDREM medical regions of France. Pharmacies that agreed to participate recruited male or female patients who responded to the following inclusion criteria: age ≥ 12 years presenting with the first symptoms of an ILI or ENT disorder that were present for less than 36 hours prior to the pharmacy visit. All medicines recorded in the study were recommended by the pharmacists. The following data were recorded at inclusion and after 3 days of treatment: the intensity of 13 symptoms, global symptom score, and disease impact on daily activities and sleep. Two groups of patients were compared: those recommended allopathic medicine only (AT group) and those recommended homeopathic medicine with or without allopathic medicine (HAT group). The number and severity of symptoms, change in global symptom score, and disease impact on daily activities and sleep were compared in the 2 treatment groups after 3 days of treatment. Independent predictors of recommendations for homeopathic medicine were identified by multi-factorial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 242 pharmacies out of 4,809 (5.0%) contacted agreed to participate in the study, and 133 (2.8%) included at least 1 patient; 573 patients were analyzed (mean age: 42.5 ± 16.2 years; 61.9% female). Of these, 428 received allopathic medicines only (74.7%; AT group), and 145 (25.3%) received homeopathic medicines (HAT group) alone (9/145, 1.6%) or associated with allopathy (136/145, 23.7%). At inclusion, HAT patients were significantly younger (39.6 ± 14.8 vs. 43.4 ± 16.1 years; P less than 0.05), had a higher mean number of symptoms (5.2 ± 2.5 vs. 4.4 ± 2.5; P less than 0.01), and more severe symptoms (mean global symptom score: 24.3 ± 5.5 vs. 22.3 ± 5.8; P = 0.0019) than AT patients. After 3 days, the improvement in symptoms and disease impact on daily activities and sleep was comparable in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients recommended homeopathic medicine by pharmacists were younger and had more severe symptoms than those recommended allopathic medicine. After 3 days of treatment, clinical improvement was comparable in both treatment groups. Pharmacists have an important role to play in the effective management of ILI and ENT disorders.
Subject(s)
Common Cold/drug therapy , Cough/drug therapy , Homeopathy/methods , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Disease Management , Female , Homeopathy/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Pharmacists , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is used by both adults and children in Europe. Diverse cultural, ethnic and historical preconditions in European countries result in broad differences between the types of CAM practiced, prevalence of CAM use and integration in the health system. To date, no survey of CAM availability to paediatric patients in Europe exists. METHODS: We present an overview of CAM integration within the different levels of the European paediatric health systems as a narrative review. Paediatric CAM specialists in 20 European countries provided information about CAM integration in their countries in semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Data from 20 European countries were available, representing 68% of the European population. CAM is offered in private practices in all 20 (100%) countries, and 80% described some form of CAM training for health professionals. While CAM is offered in outpatient clinics treating adults in 80% of these countries, only 35% offer CAM in paediatric outpatient clinics. Dedicated CAM inpatient wards exist in 65% of the countries for adults, but only in Germany and the Netherlands for children. Groups conducting some CAM research or CAM research focussed on paediatrics exist in 65% and 50% of the 20 countries, respectively. Homeopathy, acupuncture and anthroposophic medicine were most often named. CONCLUSION: Every child in Europe has access to CAM treatment, mainly in private practices, whereas CAM outpatient clinics and inpatient services for children are rare. This is in contrast to adult treatment facilities, many of which offer CAM services, and the high percentage of European children using CAM.