ABSTRACT
(1) Seasonal allergic rhinitis, otherwise known as hayfever, is a harmless condition, although it can cause major discomfort and interfere with activities of daily living. We conducted a review of the literature, based on our in-house methodology, to determine the risk-benefits of treatments used in this setting. (2) Placebo-controlled trials show that sodium cromoglicate relieves symptoms, especially if it is used before symptoms appear. Adverse effects are rare with sodium cromoglicate nasal solutions and eye drops. (3) Nasal steroids have well-documented efficacy. Beclometasone is the best choice. Adverse effects include epistaxis, nasal irritation and, occasionally, systemic disorders. (4) Oral antihistamines are less effective than nasal steroids. They also provoke adverse effects, especially drowsiness. Nasal azelastine seems to have a similar efficacy as oral antihistamines. (5) The adverse effects of systemic steroids must not be overlooked, especially with long-term use. Oral administration is an alternative for severe symptoms that do not respond to other treatments, although this is rarely the case. Long-acting intramuscular steroids carry an increased risk of adverse effects. (6) Despite evaluation in several randomised controlled trials, there is no firm evidence that homeopathic preparations have any specific efficacy in allergic rhinitis. (7) Vasoconstrictors, ipratropium and montelukast, have negative risk-benefit balances in hay fever. (8) When a single allergen is responsible (grasses, ragweed, birch), clinical trials suggest that specific desensitisation can provide a modest improvement. However, this treatment carries a risk of local adverse effects, as well as a risk of rare but severe anaphylactic reactions, especially in patients who also have unstable severe asthma. (9) Sublingual desensitisation seems to be even less effective than subcutaneous desensitisation in adults. Follow-up is too short to know whether there is a risk of severe anaphylactic reactions. The results of paediatric studies are even less convincing. (10) In practice, when drug therapy is needed to relieve symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis, sodium cromoglicate is the first-line treatment. If a nasal steroid solution is chosen, it should be used for the shortest possible period.
Subject(s)
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Acetates/adverse effects , Acetates/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Allergens , Asthma/drug therapy , Beclomethasone/adverse effects , Beclomethasone/therapeutic use , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cromolyn Sodium/adverse effects , Cromolyn Sodium/therapeutic use , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Homeopathy , Humans , Ipratropium/adverse effects , Ipratropium/therapeutic use , Male , Pollen , Pregnancy , Quinolines/adverse effects , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Steroids/adverse effects , Steroids/therapeutic use , Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have suggested that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients rank high among users of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). To further elucidate this phenomenon, we sent questionnaires to a large sample of IBD patients in Germany to determine the patterns and predictors of their CAM use. METHODS: Pretested 73-item questionnaires were mailed to a randomly selected representative sample of 1000 IBD patients from the approximately 16,000 members and associates of the German Crohn's and Colitis Association. Predictors of CAM use were evaluated by logistic regression models. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 684 patients (female patients, 61.4%; Crohn's disease patients, 58.3%; ulcerative colitis patients, 38.2%). Of the 671 adult respondents, 344 (51.3%) had experience with CAM, and significantly more of the ulcerative colitis patients (59.8%) than the Crohn's disease patients (48.3%) had experience with CAM. There was no difference by gender. Homeopathy (52.9%) and herbal medicine (43.6%) were the most commonly used types of CAM. The most frequent personal reasons for CAM use were the search for an "optimum treatment" (78.9%) and the wish to stop taking steroids (63.8%). Using logistic regression, we found that total cortisone intake (P = 0.0077), but not duration of disease, was a strong predictor of CAM use. Other predictors were experience with psychosomatic and psychotherapeutic support (P = 0.0029), relaxation techniques (P = 0.0284), an academic education (P = 0.0173), a diet utilizing whole grains (P = 0.0123), and a normal body weight (P = 0.0215). Although 80% of patients indicated that they were interested in using CAM in the future, only 24.7% felt sufficiently informed about it. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of a large group of German IBD patients had used CAM. Prolonged or intensive steroid treatment, an academic education, active ways of coping, and a health-conscious life-style are associated with CAM use. Given the potential side effects and interactions, the treating physician should focus on thorough information about the benefits and limitations of conventional and complementary treatment options, especially for IBD patients who have received prolonged or intensive steroid treatment.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Crohn Disease/therapy , Steroids/therapeutic use , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The thymus provides an optimal cellular and humoral microenvironment for a cell line committed differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells. The immigration process requires the secretion of at least one peptide, called thymotaxin, by cells of the reticulo-epithelial (RE) network of the thymic stromal cellular microenvironment. The thymic RE cells are functionally specialised based on their intrathymic location and this differentiation is modulated by various interaction signals of differentiating Thymocytes and other nonlymphatic, haematopoietic stem cells. The subcapsular, endocrine, RE cell layer is comprised of cells filled with periodic acid Shiff's-positive granules, which also express A2B5/TE4 cell surface antigens and MHC Class I (HLA A, B, C) molecules. Thymic nurse cells also produce thymosins beta 3 and beta 4 and display a neuroendocrine cell specific immunophenotype (IP): Thy-1+, A2B5+, TT+, TE4+, UJ13/A+, UJ127.11+, UJ167.11+, UJ181.4+ and presence of common leukocyte antigen (CLA+). Cortical RE cells express a surface antigen, gp200-MR6, which plays a significant role of thymocyte differentiation. Medullar RE cells display MHC Class II (HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, HLA-DR) molecule restriction. Thymic RE cells also produce numerous cytokines that are important in various stages of haematopoietic cell activation and differentiation. The co-existence of pituitary hormone and neuropeptide secretion, as well as the production of a number of interleukins and growth factors, and expression of receptors for all, by RE cells is an unique molecular biological phenomenon. Thymic neuroendocrine polypeptides are the source of self antigens presented by the MHC molecules to differentiating haematopoietic stem cells. On the level of individual RE cells, the numerous projections associated with a single cell, which engulf developing lymphocytes, nurturing and guiding them in their maturation, may differ in their hormone production and/or hormone receptor expression profile, thus allowing a single cell to be involved in distinct, separate steps of the T-cell and other haematopoietic cell maturation process. Thymic RE cells represent an important cellular and humoural network within the thymic microenvironment and are involved in the homeopathic regulation mechanisms of the multicellular organism. The intrathymic T-lymphocyte selection is a complex, multistep process, influenced by several functionally specialised RE cells and under immuno-neuroendocrine regulation control reflecting the dynamic changes of the mammalian organism.
Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/pathology , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Animals , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Bone and Bones/physiology , Humans , Lipid Metabolism , Osteoporosis/metabolism , Osteoporosis/pathology , Peptides/therapeutic use , Steroids/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Con la introducción de los esteroides para su uso tópico en la década de los cincuenta, el tratamiento de una gran variedad de enfermedades inflamatorias de la piel cambió radicalmente. Desde entonces se han desarrollado diversos esteroides en un intento por aumentar la potencia y disminuir los efectos colaterales de los mismos. Sus efectos se basan en actividades antiinflamatorias-inmunosupresoras, antiproliferativas y vasoconstrictoras, secundarias a la unión del esteroide y su receptor con el DNA. Para ejercer sus efectos, el esteroide debe dejar el vehículo aplicado y difundir en la piel y a través de los tejidos hacia la circulación sistémica. Su absorción depende del vehículo, la técnica de aplicación y el sitio anatómico en el que utilice. Actualmente se ha definido las dermatosis que tienen buena, moderada o pobre respuesta al uso de esteroides y existen algunas indicaciones precisas para su administración. Sin embargo, el uso de esteroides se puede acompañar de efectos secundarios bien identificados, que se minimizan cuando se administran en las dermatosis en las que su utilidad está bien definida, y se siguen las guías adecuadas para su uso