Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Reumatismo ; 58(1): 66-75, 2006.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16639491

RESUMO

It is well-known that the modern history of salicylates began in 1899 when the compound acetylsalicylic acid was registered and introduced commercially as "aspirin" by the Bayer Company of Germany. As a matter of fact, however, remedies made from willow bark had been used to treat fever and rheumatic complaints at least since 1763, when Edward Stone described their efficacy against malarian fever. A number of Italian scientists made significant contributions during the long period of research leading up to the synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid and its widespread use in rheumatic diseases. In this paper we will review the contributions of some of these researchers, beginning with Bartolomeo Rigatelli, who in 1824 used a willow bark extract as a therapeutic agent, denominating it "salino amarissimo antifebbrile" (very bitter antipyretic salt). In the same year, Francesco Fontana described this natural compound, giving it the name "salicina" (salicin). Two other Italian chemists added considerably to current knowledge of the salicylates: Raffaele Piria in 1838, while working as a research fellow in Paris, extracted the chemical compound salicylic acid, and Cesare Bertagnini in 1855 published a detailed description of the classic adverse event associated with salicylate overdoses--tinnitus--which he studied by deliberately ingesting excessive doses himself. Bertagnini and above all Piria also played conspicuous roles in the history of Italy during the period of the Italian Risorgimento, participating as volunteers in the crucial battle of Curtatone and Montanara during the first Italian War of Independence.


Assuntos
Salicilatos/história , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/história , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/história , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/história , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Autoexperimentação , Álcoois Benzílicos/isolamento & purificação , Overdose de Drogas , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Glucosídeos , História do Século XVIII , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , Itália , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Militar/história , Paris , Fitoterapia , Casca de Planta , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Editoração/história , Salicilatos/efeitos adversos , Salicilatos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Salicílico/isolamento & purificação , Salix , Sicília , Zumbido/induzido quimicamente
2.
Nurs Stand ; 31(13): 15, 2016 Nov 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27892232

RESUMO

Essential facts Teething is a normal physiological process when a baby's first set of teeth emerge through the gums. Most babies grow their first tooth at some point during their first year. Babies can experience teething differently, with some showing signs of distress.


Assuntos
Materia Medica/efeitos adversos , Dor/prevenção & controle , Erupção Dentária/fisiologia , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Reino Unido
3.
Ther Umsch ; 54(2): 64-70, 1997 Feb.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9139407

RESUMO

Migraine is caused by intermittent brain dysfunction. Attacks result in severe unilateral headache with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia and general weakness. The prevalence of migraine is 12 to 20% in women and 8 to 12% in man. Treatment of an acute attack is done by antiemetics in combination with analgesics. Severe migraine attacks are treated with ergotamine or sumatriptan. Parenteral treatment is performed most efficiently and safely with i.v. ASA. Frequent and severe attacks require prophylaxis. Drugs of first choice are metoprolol, propranolol, flunarizine and cyclandelate. Substances of second choice are valproic acid, DHE, pizotifen, methysergide and magnesium. Homeopathic remedies are not superior to placebo. Nonpharmacological treatment consists of sport therapy and muscle relaxation techniques.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ergotamina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Terapia de Relaxamento , Sumatriptana/uso terapêutico
4.
PLoS One ; 6(11): e26166, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22087222

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of injection therapy for low-back pain is still debatable. We compared the efficacy of local injections of the homeopathic preparation Disci/Rhus toxicodendron compositum (verum) with placebo injections and with no treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a randomized controlled partly double blind multicenter trial patients with chronic low back pain from 9 German outpatient clinics were enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1∶1∶1 ratio to receive subcutaneous injections (verum or placebo) into painful sites on the lower back over 12 treatment sessions within eight weeks, or no treatment (rescue pain medication with paracetamol or NSAIDs). All trial personnel and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the average pain intensity over the last seven days on a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm, 0 = no pain, 100 = worst imaginable pain) after eight weeks. Follow-up was 26 weeks. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. Between August 2007 and June 2008, 150 patients were randomly allocated to three groups (51 verum, 48 placebo and 51 no treatment). The mean baseline-adjusted low back pain intensity at week eight was: verum group 37.0 mm (97.5% CI 25.3;48.8), no treatment group 53.0 (41.8;64.2), and placebo group 41.8 (30.1;53.6). The verum was significantly superior to no treatment (P = 0.001), but not to placebo (P = 0.350). No significant side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The homeopathic preparation was not superior to placebo. Compared to no treatment injections resulted in significant and clinical relevant chronic back pain relief. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00567736.


Assuntos
Dor Lombar/tratamento farmacológico , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Toxicodendron , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Método Duplo-Cego , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Injeções , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Presse Med ; 39(5): e103-11, 2010 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20080382

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and the safety of the association, paracetamol, opium prepared and caffeine, in two different dosages as compared to the conventional analgesic tramadol hydrochloride, on acute postoperative dental pain. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group clinical trial to test the efficacy and safety of single doses of two associations; paracetamol 500 mg, caffeine 50mg, opium prepared 25, and paracetamol 500 mg, caffeine 50mg, opium prepared 50mg, as compared to tramadol hydrochloride 100mg (called hereafter tramadol 100), and placebo, in the control of postoperative pain following the removal of 2 ipsilateral impacted third molars. The primary efficacy criterion was the sum of pain intensity differences as assessed every 30 minutes within 3 hours after the baseline assessment and administration of study treatment (SPID(0-3h)). RESULTS: Of the 232 randomised patients, 228 (98%) completed the study. Analysis of the primary efficacy criterion (SPID(0-3h)) established: (i) the superiority of the 3 active study treatments vs. placebo (p<0.005); (ii) non-inferiority of paracetamol, caffeine, and opium 25mg, and paracetamol, caffeine, and opium 50mg vs. tramadol. Besides, both formulations of paracetamol, caffeine, and opium showed: (i) a faster onset of analgesic effect as compared to tramadol 100; (ii) a significantly stronger analgesic efficacy than tramadol 100, as measured 1 hour after the treatment intake; this superiority lasted all over the study duration for paracetamol, caffeine, and opium 50mg but not for paracetamol, caffeine, and opium 25mg. No unexpected safety concerns occurred, the two formulations of paracetamol, caffeine, and opium showed a good safety profile especially with paracetamol, caffeine, and opium 25mg as compared to tramadol. DISCUSSION: This study evidenced the non-inferiority of the paracetamol, caffeine, and opium 25mg or 50mg vs. tramadol 100, and even though the strengths of the tested formulations were higher than that of the 2009, commercialised formulation of paracetamol, caffeine, and opium, efficacy was not offset by an alteration of the well recognised safety profile of the less strengthened formulation of the product being in use for decades.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Cafeína/uso terapêutico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Ópio/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Extração Dentária , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Cafeína/administração & dosagem , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/administração & dosagem , Química Farmacêutica , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Dente Serotino/cirurgia , Ópio/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor , Placebos , Segurança , Dente Impactado/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 43(9): 601-6, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17608647

RESUMO

AIM: To report Australian parents' medication (paracetamol, ibuprofen and homeopathic) use in childhood fever management. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 401 Queensland parents of children aged between 6 months and 5 years recruited through advertising (48.4%), face-to-face (26.4%) and snowball (24.4%) methods was conducted. A 17-item instrument was developed; construct and content validity were determined by an expert panel; and item reliability by test-retest with nine parents. Areas targeted were medication use and influences on and barriers to medication use. RESULTS: Most participants were female, had tertiary education and lived in a major city (mean age 34.6 years). Reducing children's fever with over-the-counter medications was common (91%): 94% of parents reported using paracetamol and 77% reported using ibuprofen. A few (3.7%) used homeopathic remedies. Dosage was determined by weight (86.3%), age (84.3%), temperature (32.4%), illness severity (31.4%) and lethargy (20.9%). Frequency was determined by instructions on the medication label (55.3%), temperature (40.6%) and well-being (27.7%). Ibuprofen was administered too frequently by 31.5% (four hourly by 22.8%), and paracetamol by 3.8%. Fifty-two per cent had alternated medications, 65.8% of these for temperatures below 38.5 degrees C. Decisions to alternate were influenced by information from doctors/hospitals (49.5%) and children remaining febrile post-antipyretic (41.7%). Most parents reported over-the-counter medications as potentially harmful (73.2%), citing liver (38.2%), stomach (26.4%) and kidney (18.6%) damage and overdose (35.7%) as concerns. When medications were refused or spat out (44.0%), parents used force (62.4%), different methods (29.5%) or suppositories (20.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Most parents used over-the-counter medications to reduce fever, often below 38.5 degrees C. The belief that these medications were harmful was overridden by fears of harmful outcomes from fever.


Assuntos
Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Pais/psicologia , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Formulários Homeopáticos como Assunto , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Queensland , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
HNO ; 44(8): 462-6, 1996 Aug.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8805013

RESUMO

Within a prospective group study of five practicing otorhinolaryngologists, conventional therapy of acute otitis media in children was compared with homeopathic treatments. Group A (103 children) was primarily treated with homeopathic single remedies (Aconitum napellus, Apis mellifica, Belladonna, Capsicum, Chamomilla, Kalium bichromicum, Lachesis, Lycopodium, Mercurius solubilis, Okoubaka, Pulsatilla, Silicea). Group B (28 children) was treated by decongestant nose-drops, antibiotics, secretolytics and/or antipyretics. Comparisons were done by symptoms, physical findings, duration of therapy and number of relapses. The children of the study were between 1 and 11 years of age. The difference in numbers was explained by the children with otitis media being primarily treated by pediatricians using conventional methods. The median duration of pain in group A was 2 days and in group B 3 days. Median therapy in group A lasted 4 days and in group B 10 days. Antibiotics were given over a period of 8-10 days, while homeopathic treatments were stopped after healing. In group A 70.7% of the patients were free of relapses within 1 years and 29.3% had a maximum of three relapses. Group B had 56.5% without relapses and 43.5% a maximum of six relapses. Five children in group A were given antibiotics and 98 responded solely to homeopathic treatments. No side effects of treatment were found in either group.


Assuntos
Homeopatia , Otite Média/terapia , Doença Aguda , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Expectorantes/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Rev. cuba. plantas med ; 9(1)ene.-abr. 2004. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-394329

RESUMO

Con el propósito de valorar el efecto diurético y antipirético de un extracto fluido de Rosmarinus officinalis L. se hizo esta investigación. El modelo biológico usado fue la rata Wistar. Las dosis probadas: 100, 200 y 400 mg/kg., y los controles positivo utilizados: furosemida 10 mg/Kg y analgín 25 mg/kg, respectivamente. Se conformaron grupos controles que recibieron como tratamiento agua destilada. Todos los grupos constaban de 6 animales distribuidos de forma aleatoria. Las variables valoradas fueron: diuresis de 24 h y temperatura rectal a las 0, 4, 5 y 6 h postratamiento. Los resultados demostraron un efecto diurético a la dosis de 200 mg/kg y antipirético con 400 mg/kg, dosis máxima experimentada. La fiebre se indujo con solución al 15 por ciento de levadura desecada en cloruro de sodio al 0,9 por ciento. El nivel de significación se fijó en una p menor o igual que 0,05. Se discuten los resultados a la luz de los conocimientos actuales sobre tamizaje fitoquímico y efectos farmacológicos atribuidos científicamente a esta planta


Assuntos
Animais , Ratos , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Diuréticos/uso terapêutico , Terapêutica Homeopática , Extratos Vegetais , Plantas Medicinais , Rosmarinus , Ratos Wistar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA