How complementary and alternative medicine practitioners use PubMed.

BACKGROUND: PubMed is the largest bibliographic index in the life sciences. It is freely available online and is used by professionals and the public to learn more about medical research. While primarily intended to serve researchers, PubMed provides an array of tools and services that can help a wider readership in the location, comprehension, evaluation, and utilization of medical research. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to establish the potential contributions made by a range of PubMed tools and services to the use of the database by complementary and alternative medicine practitioners. METHODS: In this study, 10 chiropractors, 7 registered massage therapists, and a homeopath (N = 18), 11 with prior research training and 7 without, were taken through a 2-hour introductory session with PubMed. The 10 PubMed tools and services considered in this study can be divided into three functions: (1) information retrieval (Boolean Search, Limits, Related Articles, Author Links, MeSH), (2) information access (Publisher Link, LinkOut, Bookshelf ), and (3) information management (History, Send To, Email Alert). Participants were introduced to between six and 10 of these tools and services. The participants were asked to provide feedback on the value of each tool or service in terms of their information needs, which was ranked as positive, positive with emphasis, negative, or indifferent. RESULTS: The participants in this study expressed an interest in the three types of PubMed tools and services (information retrieval, access, and management), with less well-regarded tools including MeSH Database and Bookshelf. In terms of their comprehension of the research, the tools and services led the participants to reflect on their understanding as well as their critical reading and use of the research. There was universal support among the participants for greater access to complete articles, beyond the approximately 15% that are currently open access. The abstracts provided by PubMed were felt to be necessary in selecting literature to read but entirely inadequate for both evaluating and learning from the research. Thus, the restrictions and fees the participants faced in accessing full-text articles were points of frustration. CONCLUSIONS: The study found strong indications of PubMed's potential value in the professional development of these complementary and alternative medicine practitioners in terms of engaging with and understanding research. It provides support for the various initiatives intended to increase access, including a recommendation that the National Library of Medicine tap into the published research that is being archived by authors in institutional archives and through other websites.

[Research trend of complementary and alternative medicine].

PURPOSE: This study was done to describe the research trend of Complementary and Alternative Medicine(CAM) in Korea and internationally. METHOD: A Systematic review of CAM related literature published from 2000 to 2005 was done. A comprehensive search by using 34 CAM modalities as search terms to identify all articles dealing with CAM was undertaken from 4 databases: PubMed, RICHIS, KoreaMed, and Riss4U. A Total of 588 abstracts and 223 original articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers using systematic analysis guidelines. Data regarding the types of study design, characteristics of subjects and researchers, and classification of CAM modalities was recorded. The outcome measures of CAM were identified. RESULTS: CAM research has been rapidly increasing worldwide in the last decade. In Korea, nursing(53.5%) followed by medicine(42.7%) occupied the majority of CAM research in comparison to medicine(42.9%) and disciplines in CAM(25.0%), like homeopathy, internationally. Prevailing research designs in Korea were experimental and quasi-experimental, however, randomized clinical trials were found. Internationally, survey research was dominant, with the exception of randomized clinical trials that were mostly an experimental design. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that a robust research design in CAM research is needed to accumulate strong scientific evidence and to adopt nursing interventions from CAM modalities.

Síndrome de Hiper IgD: espectros clínicos, achados genéticos e condutas terapêuticas / Hyper-IgD syndrome: clinical spectrum, genetic findings, and therapeutic approaches

A deficiência de mevalonato quinase (MVK; MIM #142680; ORPHA #343) é uma doença genética, espectral, rara, associadas a mutações ao longo do gene MVK causando distúrbios na síntese do colesterol, que culminam em: inflamação sistêmica com febre, adenopatia, sintomas abdominais e outros achados clínicos. Enquanto no polo leve da doença os achados mais comuns são febres recorrentes com linfadenopatia, no polo mais grave adiciona-se o acometimento do sistema nervoso central (meningites assépticas, vasculites e atraso do desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor) e do sistema hematopoiético (síndrome de ativação macrofágica). Apesar de inúmeras terapêuticas, os bloqueadores da interleucina-1 ainda são os únicos medicamentos capazes de controlar a doença e de impedir a evolução para amiloidose. Os estudos atuais visam tentar novos tratamentos, como o transplante de células-tronco hematopoiéticas, ou mesmo a terapia gênica.

Mevalonate kinase deficiency (MVK; MIM #142680; ORPHA #343) is a rare spectral genetic disorder linked to mutations along the MVK gene leading to impaired cholesterol synthesis, clinically observed as systemic inflammation with fever, adenopathy, abdominal manifestations, and other clinical findings. While on mild forms recurrent fever with lymphadenopathy is commonly observed, severe forms add to that neurological (aseptic meningitis, vasculitis, and neuropsychomotor developmental delay) and hematopoietic involvement (macrophage activation syndrome). Despite of several therapeutic approaches, blocking interleukin-1 is the only effective method to control the disease and prevent the development of systemic amyloidosis. Ongoing studies aim to test new treatments, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and gene therapy.

A systematic review of homoeopathy for the treatment of fibromyalgia.

Homoeopathy is often advocated for fibromyalgia (FM) and many FM patients use it. To critically evaluate all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of homoeopathy as a treatment for FM, six electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant studies. Data extraction and the assessment of the methodological quality of all included studies were done by two independent reviewers. Four RCTs were found, including two feasibility studies. Three studies were placebo-controlled. None of the trials was without serious flaws. Invariably, their results suggested that homoeopathy was better than the control interventions in alleviating the symptoms of FM. Independent replications are missing. Even though all RCTs suggested results that favour homoeopathy, important caveats exist. Therefore, the effectiveness of homoeopathy as a symptomatic treatment for FM remains unproven.