A Portable Shoulder-Mounted Camera System for Surgical Education in Spine Surgery.

The past several years have demonstrated an increased recognition of operative videos as an important adjunct for resident education. Currently lacking, however, are effective methods to record video for the purposes of illustrating the techniques of minimally invasive (MIS) and complex spine surgery. We describe here our experiences developing and using a shoulder-mounted camera system for recording surgical video. Our requirements for an effective camera system included wireless portability to allow for movement around the operating room, camera mount location for comfort and loupes/headlight usage, battery life for long operative days, and sterile control of on/off recording. With this in mind, we created a shoulder-mounted camera system utilizing a GoPro™ HERO3+, its Smart Remote (GoPro, Inc., San Mateo, California), a high-capacity external battery pack, and a commercially available shoulder-mount harness. This shoulder-mounted system was more comfortable to wear for long periods of time in comparison to existing head-mounted and loupe-mounted systems. Without requiring any wired connections, the surgeon was free to move around the room as needed. Over the past several years, we have recorded numerous MIS and complex spine surgeries for the purposes of surgical video creation for resident education. Surgical videos serve as a platform to distribute important operative nuances in rich multimedia. Effective and practical camera system setups are needed to encourage the continued creation of videos to illustrate the surgical maneuvers in minimally invasive and complex spinal surgery. We describe here a novel portable shoulder-mounted camera system setup specifically designed to be worn and used for long periods of time in the operating room.

Complications associated with the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: a comprehensive review of the literature.

The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is an alternative to rigid instrumentation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Although many outcomes studies have shown good results, currently lacking is a comprehensive report on complications associated with this system, especially in terms of how it compares with reported complication rates of fusion. For the present study, the authors reviewed the literature to find all studies involving the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system that reported complications or adverse events. Twenty-one studies were included for a total of 1166 patients with a mean age of 55.5 years (range 39-71 years) and a mean follow-up period of 33.7 months (range 12.0-81.6 months). Analysis of these studies demonstrated a surgical-site infection rate of 4.3%, pedicle screw loosening rate of 11.7%, pedicle screw fracture rate of 1.6%, and adjacent-segment disease (ASD) rate of 7.0%. Of studies reporting revision surgeries, 11.3% of patients underwent a reoperation. Of patients who developed ASD, 40.6% underwent a reoperation for treatment. The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system appears to have a fairly similar complication-rate profile compared with published literature on lumbar fusion, and is associated with a slightly lower incidence of ASD.

Complications and outcomes after spinal deformity surgery in the elderly: review of the existing literature and future directions.

OBJECT: The elderly population (age > 60 years) is the fastest-growing age group in the US. Spinal deformity is a major problem affecting the elderly and, therefore, the demand for surgery for spinal deformity is becoming increasingly prevalent in elderly patients. Much of the literature on surgery for adult deformity focuses on patients who are younger than 60 years, and therefore there is limited information about the complications and outcomes of surgery in the elderly population. In this study, the authors undertook a review of the literature on spinal deformity surgery in patients older than 60 years. The authors discuss their analysis with a focus on outcomes, complications, discrepancies between individual studies, and strategies for complication avoidance. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases was performed to identify articles published from 1950 to the present using the following key words: "adult scoliosis surgery" and "adult spine deformity surgery." Exclusion criteria included patient age younger than 60 years. Data on major Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, patient-reported outcomes, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles were obtained and are included in this review. The mean age was 74.2 years, and the mean follow-up period was 3 years. The mean preoperative ODI was 48.6, and the mean postoperative reduction in ODI was 24.1. The mean preoperative VAS score was 7.7 with a mean postoperative decrease of 5.2. There were 311 reported complications for 815 patients (38%) and 5 deaths for 659 patients (< 1%). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patient outcomes were inconsistent in the published studies. Overall, most elderly patients obtained favorable outcomes with low operative mortality following surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity.

OBJECT: Recently, the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal, transpsoas approach to the thoracolumbar spinal column has been described by various authors. This is known as the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the approach-related morbidity associated with the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. To date, there have been only a couple of reports regarding the morbidity of the transpsoas muscle approach. METHODS: A nonrandomized, prospective study utilizing a self-reported patient questionnaire was conducted between January 2006 and June 2008 at Northwestern University. Data were collected in 53 patients with a follow-up period ranging from 6 months to 3.5 years. Only 2 patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent (19 of 53) of patients reported subjective hip flexor weakness, 25% (13 of 53) anterior thigh numbness, and 23% (12 of 53) anterior thigh pain. However, 84% of the 19 patients reported complete resolution of their subjective hip flexor weakness by 6 months, and most experienced improved strength by 8 weeks. Of those reporting anterior thigh numbness and pain, 69% and 75% improved to their baseline function by the 6-month follow-up evaluations, respectively. All patients with self-reported subjective hip flexor weakness underwent examinations during subsequent clinic visits after surgery; however, these examinations did not confirm a motor deficit less than Grade 5. Subset analysis showed that the L3-4 and L4-5 levels were most often affected. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive, transpsoas muscle approach to the lumbar spine has a number of advantages. The data show that a percentage of the patients undergoing the transpsoas approach will have temporary sensory and motor symptoms related to this approach. The majority of the symptoms are thought to be related to psoas muscle inflammation and/or stretch injury to the genitofemoral nerve due to the surgical corridor traversed during the operation. No major injuries to the lumbar plexus were encountered. It is important to educate patients prior to surgery of the possibility of these largely transient symptoms.

Treatment of Enneking stage 3 aggressive vertebral hemangiomas with intralesional spondylectomy: report of 10 cases and review of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of consecutive series of Enneking stage 3 vertebral hemangiomas surgically treated at a major tertiary spine tumor center. OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term recurrence rates, pain improvement, and operative morbidity of intralesional spondylectomy combined with preoperative embolization for Enneking stage 3 vertebral hemangiomas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Aggressive vertebral hemangiomas (Enneking stage 3) often involve both the anterior and posterior columns with spinal canal and local soft tissue extension and may present with dramatic bony destruction, spinal instability, and pain accompanied with neurologic compromise. Although the current treatment paradigm for most vertebral hemangiomas is conservative management directed toward symptomatic relief, the subset of patients presenting with this rare variant requires more extensive surgical treatment. METHODS: A retrospective clinical review of patients diagnosed with Enneking stage 3 vertebral hemangiomas was conducted at the University of California at San Francisco. RESULTS: We identified 10 consecutive cases of Enneking stage 3 hemangiomas. Average follow-up was 2.42 years. The most common presentation was pain with or without myelopathy. Three of the 10 cases were recurrences after prior partial resection and reconstruction or cement augmentation. All patients underwent preoperative embolization. Average blood loss despite embolization was 2.1 L (range: 0.8 to 5 L). Average preoperative back pain visual analog scale was 7.2 and postoperative visual analog scale was 3.1 at 6 months. On postoperative imaging, all patients had gross total resection. Six patients had staged posterior/anterior transcavitary approach and 4 patients underwent single stage posterior transpedicular spondylectomy. To date, no patient has required adjuvant radiation therapy for tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that complete wide resection of aggressive Enneking stage 3 lesions can be safely accomplished with acceptable morbidity and blood loss and significant improvement in pain and neurological status. Partial resection of stage 3 lesions, even with stabilization or vertebroplasty, may lead to early recurrence.

Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes of multilevel circumferential lumbar spinal fusion in the elderly.

Combined anterior-posterior lumbar fusion across multiple levels is thought to be associated with increased perioperative morbidity and worse clinical outcomes when performed in elderly patients. We conducted a retrospective review of the medical, surgical, and radiological records of 73 patients who underwent multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with posterolateral lumbar fusion with instrumentation for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease. Mean follow-up was 19 months. Thirty patients were at least 65 years old and 43 patients were younger. There were no significant differences in the number of levels fused, operative time, mean length of hospital stay or perioperative complication rates in either group. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in the improvement in back pain or in the rates of fusion between the groups at last follow-up. Perioperative events, intermediate-term clinical outcomes, and fusion rates after multilevel 360-degree lumbar fusion in the elderly are comparable to those of younger patients.

Patient satisfaction and radiographic outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion without iliac crest bone graft or transverse process fusion.

Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold standard for promoting bony fusion of the spine. However, harvest-site infection and pain are two of the most significant drawbacks of using iliac crest autograft in spinal fusion procedures. The rationale for its continued use, despite these drawbacks, has been based on the relatively higher rate of fusion reported in the literature. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether modern allograft and fusion-promoting materials combined with local bone graft results in acceptable fusion rates and patient satisfaction. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, surgical, and radiographic records of 200 consecutive patients with symptomatic degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine who underwent non-revision fusion using local bone graft combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 with or without allograft. Rates of radiographic fusion and patient satisfaction were analyzed at discharge, 6 months, and 12 months, and every year thereafter. Mean follow-up was 32 months. Fusion was performed across an average of 2.5 levels and the overall fusion rate was 97%. In patients undergoing posterior fixation only there was a 5% incidence of pseudarthrosis, while the incidence was only 0.5% for patients undergoing circumferential fixation. Overall patient satisfaction at discharge was good to excellent in over 90% of patients and did not significantly change at the 6 month, 12 month and 24 month follow-up. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in rates of spinal fusion using laminectomy bone autograft combined with rhBMP-2 with or without allograft, compared to historical controls using ICBG. Fusion rates may be further improved with the use of circumferential fixation. Patient satisfaction remained high and might be because the morbidity associated with harvesting ICBG was avoided, as was the additional muscle dissection required for the fusion of lateral transverse processes.

Addition of Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Pain Management in Pediatric Spine Surgery: A Meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether adjunctive intrathecal morphine (ITM) reduces postoperative analgesic consumption following pediatric spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies that have tested supplemental ITM to manage pain after pediatric spine surgery have been limited by small sample sizes. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed for clinical trials and observational studies. Time to first analgesic demand, postoperative analgesic use, pain scores, and complication data were abstracted from each study. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare continuous outcomes and odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were used for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective chart reviews, containing 636 subjects, were incorporated into meta-analysis. Subjects that were administered ITM in addition to postoperative analgesics (ITM group) were compared with those receiving postoperative analgesics only (control group). In the ITM group, time to first analgesic demand was longer (MD, 8.79; 95% CI, 4.20-13.37; P<0.001), cumulative analgesic consumption was reduced at 24 hours (MD, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.24; P<0.001), and cumulative analgesic consumption was reduced at 48 hours (MD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.27; P<0.001). Neither postoperative pain scores at 24 hours (P=0.16) nor 48 hours (P=0.18) were significantly different between ITM and control groups. Rates of respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were not different between groups (all Ps>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of ITM in pediatric spine surgery produced a potent analgesic effect in the immediate postoperative period. Patients administered ITM did not request opiates as early as control and consumed fewer opiates by the second postoperative day. Furthermore, use of ITM did not increase complications such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, or pruritus.

Use of a Reverse Bohlman Technique for Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of spondylolisthesis can be difficult with regard to patients with high sacral slopes that may prohibit placement of interbody grafts for fusions across that segment. Here, we describe placement of a reverse Bohlman technique from an anterior approach to obtain fusion across a low-grade spondylolisthesis with a high sacral slope to obtain anterior fusion. METHODS: A chart review was conducted on this single patient regarding his clinical course and outcome. RESULTS: A 54-year-old male presented with low-back pain associated with bilateral leg pain dating back several years. Plain films demonstrated a Grade II isthmic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 with spinopelvic measurements of 73° sacral slope, 82° lumbar lordosis, 12° pelvic tilt, and 94° pelvic incidence. Magnetic resonance imaging showed bilateral L5 pars defects with diffuse degenerative disease from L4 through S1 and significant ligamentous and facet hypertrophy. He underwent an L4-5 anterior lumbar interbody fusion and an L5-S1 reverse Bohlman placement of a transvertebral transsacral titanium mesh cage. This was supplemented with a posterior decompression and instrumentation from L4-ilium. He had resolution of his radiculopathy and has maintained a good clinical outcome at 3 years follow up. CONCLUSIONS: We present here a patient with low-grade spondylolisthesis and a steep sacral slope who underwent a successful reverse Bohlman approach with long-term follow up. This report highlights the potential utility of this method as a viable alternative for patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Technical description of surgical technique.

Attitudes of Spine Surgeons Regarding Management of Preoperative Anxiety: A Cross-sectional Study.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate spine surgeons' attitudes regarding preoperative anxiety measurement, management, and responsibility. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The vast majority of patients scheduled for spine surgery experience preoperative anxiety. However, there are currently no consensus guidelines for measure or management of preoperative anxiety in spinal operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent online to spine surgeons of AO Spine North America to capture their views regarding preoperative anxiety. RESULTS: Of 69 complete responses, most respondents were male (n=66, 95.7%), orthopedic surgeons (n=52, 75.4%), and practicing at an academic setting (n=39, 56.5%). Most spine surgeons practiced for at least 20 years (n=52, 75.4%), operated on 100-300 patients per year (n=48, 69.6%), and were attending physicians (n=61, 88.4%). Most did not measure preoperative anxiety (n=46, 66.7%) and would not use a rating scale to measure it (n=38, 55.1%). However, most would discuss it if mentioned by the patient (n=40, 58.0%). Other spine surgeons measured anxiety verbally (n=22, 31.9%) or with a rating scale or survey (n=6, 8.7%). Although preferences for preoperative anxiety management varied, most respondents used patient education (n=54, 78.3%) and permitting family members' presence (n=36, 52.2%) to reduce patient anxieties. Spine surgeons held themselves, anesthesiologists, and patients most responsible to manage preoperative anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of spine surgeons surveyed did not regularly measure preoperative anxiety, but would discuss its management if the subject was broached by the patient. Spine surgeons relied on a variety of methods to manage a patient's anxiety, but most preferred preoperative education and permitting the presence of family members. Responsibility for controlling preoperative anxiety was chiefly allocated to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and patients. Future avenues for research may include developing a preoperative anxiety measurement scale and management protocol specific to spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Detection of postoperative granulation tissue with an ICG-enhanced integrated OI-/X-ray System.

BACKGROUND: The development of postoperative granulation tissue is one of the main postoperative risks after lumbar spine surgery. This granulation tissue may lead to persistent or new clinical symptoms or complicate a follow up surgery. A sensitive non-invasive imaging technique, that could diagnose this granulation tissue at the bedside, would help to develop appropriate treatments. Thus, the purpose of this study was to establish a fast and economic imaging tool for the diagnosis of granulation tissue after lumbar spine surgery, using a new integrated Optical Imaging (OI)/X-ray imaging system and the FDA-approved fluorescent contrast agent Indocyanine Green (ICG). METHODS: 12 male Sprague Dawley rats underwent intervertebral disk surgery. Imaging of the operated lumbar spine was done with the integrated OI/X-ray system at 7 and 14 days after surgery. 6 rats served as non-operated controls. OI/X-ray scans of all rats were acquired before and after intravenous injection of the FDA-approved fluorescent dye Indocyanine Green (ICG) at a dose of 1 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg. The fluorescence signal of the paravertebral soft tissues was compared between different groups of rats using Wilcoxon-tests. Lumbar spines and paravertebral soft tissues were further processed with histopathology. RESULTS: In both dose groups, ICG provided a significant enhancement of soft tissue in the area of surgery, which corresponded with granulation tissue on histopathology. The peak and time interval of fluorescence enhancement was significantly higher using 10 mg/kg dose of ICG compared to the 1 mg/kg ICG dose. The levels of significance were p < 0.05. Fusion of OI data with X-rays allowed an accurate anatomical localization of the enhancing granulation tissue. CONCLUSION: ICG-enhanced OI is a suitable technique to diagnose granulation tissue after lumbar spine surgery. This new imaging technique may be clinically applicable for postoperative treatment monitoring. It could be also used to evaluate the effect of anti-inflammatory drugs and may even allow evaluations at the bedside with new hand-held OI scanners.

Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex via C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pedicle screw fixation in a multicenter clinical experience in 102 patients: modification of the Harms and Goel techniques.

OBJECT: Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex has proven to be very challenging. Because of the high mobility of the C1-2 motion segment, fusion rates at this level have been substantially lower than those at the subaxial spine. The set of potential surgical interventions is limited by the anatomy of this region. In 2001 Jürgen Harms described a novel technique for individual fixation of the C-1 lateral mass and the C-2 pedicle by using polyaxial screws and rods. This method has been shown to confer excellent stability in biomechanical studies. Cadaveric and radiographic analyses have indicated that it is safe with respect to osseous and vascular anatomy. Clinical outcome studies and fusion rates have been limited to small case series thus far. The authors reviewed the multicenter experience with 102 patients undergoing C1-2 fusion via the polyaxial screw/rod technique. They also describe a modification to the Harms technique. METHODS: One hundred two patients (60 female and 42 male) with an average age of 62 years were included in this analysis. The average follow-up was 16.4 months. Indications for surgery were instability at the C1-2 level, and a chronic Type II odontoid fracture was the most frequent underlying cause. All patients had evidence of instability on flexion and extension studies. All underwent posterior C-1 lateral mass to C-2 pedicle or pars screw fixation, according to the method of Harms. Thirty-nine patients also underwent distraction and placement of an allograft spacer into the C1-2 joint, the authors' modification of the Harms technique. None of the patients had supplemental sublaminar wiring. RESULTS: All but 2 patients with at least a 12-month follow-up had radiographic evidence of fusion or lack of motion on flexion and extension films. All patients with an allograft spacer demonstrated bridging bone across the joint space on plain x-ray films and computed tomography. The C-2 root was sacrificed bilaterally in all patients. A postoperative wound infection developed in 4 patients and was treated conservatively with antibiotics and local wound care. One patient required surgical debridement of the wound. No patient suffered a neurological injury. Unfavorable anatomy precluded the use of C-2 pedicle screws in 23 patients, and thus, they underwent placement of pars screws instead. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion of C1-2 according to the Harms technique is a safe and effective treatment modality. It is suitable for a wide variety of fracture patterns, congenital abnormalities, or other causes of atlantoaxial instability. Modification of the Harms technique with distraction and placement of an allograft spacer in the joint space may restore C1-2 height and enhance radiographic detection of fusion by demonstrating a graft-bone interface on plain x-ray films, which is easier to visualize than the C1-2 joint.

Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Laboratory investigation.

OBJECT: Increased structural stability is considered sufficient justification for higher-risk surgical procedures, such as circumferential fixation after severe spinal destabilization. However, there is little biomechanical evidence to support such claims, particularly after traumatic lumbar burst fracture. The authors sought out to compare the biomechanical performance of the following 3 fixation strategies for spinal reconstruction after decompression for an unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture: 1) short-segment anterolateral fixation; 2) circumferential fixation; and 3) extended anterolateral fixation. METHODS: Thoracolumbar spines (T10-L4) from 7 donors (mean age at death 64+/-6 years; 1 female and 6 males) were tested in pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Thoracolumbar burst fractures were surgically induced at L-1, and testing was repeated sequentially for each of the following fixation techniques: short-segment anterolateral, circumferential, and extended anterolateral. Primary and coupled 3D motions were measured across the instrumented site (T12-L2) and compared across treatment groups. RESULTS: Circumferential and extended anterolateral fixations were statistically equivalent for primary and off-axis range-of-motions in all loading directions, and short-segment anterolateral fixation offered significantly less rigidity than the other 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study strongly suggest that extended anterolateral fixation is biomechanically comparable to circumferential fusion in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior column and posterior ligamentous injury. In cases in which an anterior procedure may be favored for load sharing or canal decompression, extension of the anterior instrumentation and fusion one level above and below the unstable segment can result in near equivalent stability to a 2-stage circumferential procedure.

Two-level total en bloc lumbar spondylectomy with dural resection for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Only five reports of multilevel spondylectomy for tumor have been reported in the literature, mostly in the thoracic spine. We report a successful two-level spondylectomy with en bloc dural resection in a patient with metastatic renal carcinoma to the L3 and L4 vertebrae.

Partial spondylectomy: modification for lateralized malignant spinal column tumors of the cervical or lumbosacral spine.

Total en bloc spondylectomy is a useful technique in treating primary and secondary spinal malignancies, but requires extensive instrumentation to achieve difficult fusions, and requires extensive exposure of neurovascular structures that poses additional risk of nerve root and vascular injury. More limited resections may reduce these risks, especially in the cervical or lumbosacral spine. We report a technique used in two patients with lateralized primary vertebral tumors of the cervical or lumbosacral spine where tumor removal was achieved through a partial spondylectomy. The advantages of a partial spondylectomy included: (i) avoidance of injuring contralateral neurovascular structures during exposure; and (ii) supplementation of instrumentation by additional fixation at the level of spondylectomy. Partial spondylectomy can be an alternative to total en bloc spondylectomy in properly selected patients with lateralized encapsulated malignant spinal tumors and may be performed in the cervical or lumbosacral spinal regions.

Preferences of Spine Surgeons With Regard to Management of Intraoperative Durotomy: A Survey of Current Management.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine spine surgeons' preferences for the intraoperative and postoperative management of intraoperative durotomy (IDT) in decompression and spinal fusion surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Management guidelines for IDT remain elusive. Traditionally, management consists of intraoperative suturing and postoperative bed rest. However, preferences of North American spine surgeons may vary, particularly according to type of surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spine surgeons of AO Spine North America (AOSNA) were surveyed online anonymously to determine which techniques they preferred to manage IDT in decompression and fusion. Differences in preferences according to surgery type were compared using the Fisher exact test. A series of linear regressions were conducted to identify demographic predictors of spine surgeons' preferences. RESULTS: Of 217 respondents, most were male (95%), orthopedic surgeons (70%), practiced at an academic center (50%), were in practice 0-19 years (71%) and operated on 100-300 patients per year (70%). The majority of surgeons applied sutures (93%-96%) and sealant (82%-84%). Surgeons also used grafts (26%-27%), drains (18%), other techniques (4%-5%), blood patch (2%-3%), or no intraoperative management (1%-2%). Postoperatively, most surgeons recommended bed rest (74%-75%). Antibiotics (22%), immediate mobilization (18%-20%), reoperation (14%-16%), other techniques (6%), or no postoperative management (5%) were also preferred. Management preferences did not vary significantly between decompression and fusion surgeries (all P-values>0.05). Specialty, practice facility, years in practice, and patients per year were identified as independent predictors of IDT management preferences (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although North American spine surgeons preferred to manage IDT with sutures augmented by sealant followed by bed rest after surgery, less common techniques were also preferred during the intraoperative and postoperative periods. Notably, intraoperative and postoperative IDT management preferences did not change in accordance to the type of surgery being conducted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Complications associated with intrathecal morphine in spine surgery: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Supplemental intrathecal morphine (ITM) represents an option to manage postoperative pain after spine surgery due to ease of administration and ability to confer effective short-term analgesia at low dosages. However, whether ITM increases risk of surgical site infections (SSI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and incidental dural tears (IDT) has not been investigated. Therefore, this study was performed to determine the rates of SSI, CSF leak, and IDT in patients that received ITM. METHODS: Patients that underwent posterior instrumented fusion from January 2010 to 2016 that received ITM were compared to controls with respect to demographic, medical, surgical, and outcome data. Fisher's exact test was used to compare rates of SSI, CSF leak, and IDT between groups. Poisson regression was used to analyze complication rates after adjusting for the influence of covariates and potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 512 records were analyzed. ITM was administered to 78 patients prior to wound closure. The remaining 434 patients compromised the control group. IDT was significantly more common among patients receiving ITM (P=0.009). Differences in rates of CSF leak and SSI were not statistically significant (P=0.373 and P=0.564, respectively). After compensating for additional variables, Poisson regression revealed a significant increase in rates of IDT (P=0.007) according to ITM injection and advanced age (P=0.014). There was no significant difference in rates of CSF leak or SSI after accounting for the additional variables (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ITM for pain control in posterior instrumented spinal fusion surgery was linked to increased likelihood of IDT but not CSF leaks or SSI. Age was also noted to be a significant predictor of IDT. Spine surgeons should weigh potential risks against benefits when deciding whether to administer ITM for postoperative pain management following spine surgery.

Stand-alone anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion with plate: initial experience.

BACKGROUND: The stability of the lumbar spine after ALIF with lateral plate fixation and/or posterior fixation has previously been investigated; however, stand-alone ALDF with plate has not. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated poor fusion rates with stand-alone anterior interbody fusion in the absence of posterior instrumentation. We review our initial experience with stand-alone ALDF with segmental plate fixation for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine and compare these results with our experience with traditional ALIF and supplemental posterior instrumentation. METHODS: Forty-nine patients treated at the University of California, San Francisco between 2002 and 2005 were included in this analysis. The study was retrospective in nature. All patients presented with discogram-positive back pain and had failed conservative treatment. Twenty-four patients underwent ALDF with plate, and 25 underwent ALIF with posterior instrumentation. Patients underwent flexion/extension imaging at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. All patients completed ODI and VAS questionnaires at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 11.6 and 21.7 months in the ALDF with plate and ALIF with instrumentation groups, respectively. All patients demonstrated radiographic evidence of fusion at last follow-up. None developed instability at the fusion level, and none developed hardware failure (plate back-out, screw lucency, etc). Average subsidence at 6 months postoperatively was 2.2 and 2.5 mm, respectively. The VAS and ODI scores are presented in Tables 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results of stand-alone ALDF with plate suggest it may be safe and effective for the surgical treatment of patients with degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. Long-term follow-up is clearly needed. Subsidence is diminished with ALDF and plating compared with ALIF with posterior instrumentation. It is unclear at this time which subset of patients may ultimately require posterior hardware supplementation, but those with circumferential stenosis or severe facet disease are not ideal candidates for ALDF with plate. For some patients in whom lumbar arthroplasty is not indicated, or as a salvage procedure, ALDF with plate may be a satisfactory alternative and may eliminate the need for a supplemental posterior procedure.

Corpectomy followed by the placement of instrumentation with titanium cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for vertebral osteomyelitis.

OBJECT: The treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis includes antibiotics with or without surgical intervention. The decision to place instrumentation into an infected spinal column remains controversial. The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in patients with osteomyelitis is also extremely controversial. The authors review their experience in performing corpectomy and fusion with titanium cages and rhBMP-2 in patients with vertebral instability and/or neurological compromise due to vertebral osteomyelitis. METHODS: Data obtained in 15 patients treated between 2001 and 2005 were included in this analysis. Nine patients presented primarily with axial pain and six with radiculopathy or myelopathy. Seven patients had an associated epidural abscess. The cervical spine was affected in six patients, the thoracic spine in five, and the lumbar spine in four. All patients underwent corpectomy of the involved vertebral bodies; the authors then performed spinal reconstruction, placing a titanium cage-plate system with morcellized allograft/autograft and rhBMP-2. In 10 patients, supplemental posterolateral screw-rod fixation was conducted. A one-level corpectomy was performed in one patient, a two-level corpectomy in 13, and a six-level corpectomy in one. A morcellized allograft and rhBMP-2-filled titanium cage was used in 10 patients, and an autograft and rhBMP-2-filled cage in five patients. The most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. All patients received intravenous antibiotics for at least 6 weeks postoperatively, and life-long antibiotic therapy was required in three patients with coccidiomycoses, candida, and tuberculosis osteomyelitis, respectively. There were no recurrent infections. Radiography demonstrated evidence of fusion in all patients at the last follow-up examination. The mean follow-up period was 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Corpectomy followed by titanium cage-plate reconstruction and the placement of rhBMP-2 may be a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with vertebral osteomyelitis. This surgical therapy does not appear, at least based on preliminary results, to lead to recurrent hardware infections. Based on the results obtained in this limited series, the authors found that rhBMP-2 can be used in the setting of active infection with excellent fusion rates and without complication. The morbidity associated with the autograft donor site is avoided when using cages. Antibiotic therapy tailored to the specific organism should be continued for at least 6 weeks after surgery, and life-long therapy is required in cases of fungal or tuberculosis infections.