Cancer Incidence in Heart Transplant Recipients With Previous Neoplasia History.

Neoplasm history increases morbidity and mortality after solid organ transplantation and has disqualified patients from transplantation. Studies are needed to identify factors to be considered when deciding on the suitability of a patient with previous tumor for heart transplantation. A retrospective epidemiological study was conducted in heart transplant (HT) recipients (Spanish Post-Heart Transplant Tumor Registry) comparing the epidemiological data, immu-nosuppressive treatments and incidence of post-HT tumors between patients with previous malignant noncardiac tumor and with no previous tumor (NPT). The impact of previous tumor (PT) on overall survival (OS) was also assessed. A total of 4561 patients, 77 PT and 4484 NPT, were evaluated. The NPT group had a higher proportion of men than the PT group (p < 0.001). The incidence of post-HT tumors was 1.8 times greater in the PT group (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.6; p < 0.001), mainly due to the increased risk in patients with a previous hematologic tumor (rate ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, p < 0.004). OS during the 10-year posttransplant period was significantly lower in the PT than the NPT group (p = 0.048) but similar when the analysis was conducted after a first post-HT tumor was diagnosed. In conclusion, a history of PT increases the incidence of post-HT tumors and should be taken into account when considering a patient for HT.

Health-related quality of life, social support, and caregiver burden between six and 120 months after heart transplantation: a Spanish multicenter cross-sectional study.

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the current heart transplant (HTx) outcomes in Spain. Clinical and functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), social support, and caregiver burden were analyzed in 303 adult transplant recipients (77.9% males) living with one functioning graft. Mean age at time of HTx (SD) was 56.4 (11.4) years, and the reason for transplantation in all patients was congestive heart failure. All patients had received a first heart transplant 6 (± 1), 12 (± 2), 36 (± 6), 60 (± 10), or 120 (± 20) months previously. Participants completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), the EQ-5D, the Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire, and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale. Reasonable HRQoL, social support, and caregiver burden levels were found at all time points, although a slight decrease in HRQoL was recorded at 120 months (p ≤ 0.033). Multivariate regression analyses showed that complications, comorbidities, and hospitalizations were associated with HRQoL (EQ-5D: 48.4% of explained variance, F4,164 = 38.46, p < 0.001; KCCQ overall summary score: 45.0%, F3,198 = 54.073, p < 0.001). Patient functional capabilities and complications affected caregiver burden (p < 0.05). In conclusion, HTx patients reported reasonable levels of HRQoL with low caregiver burden. Clinical variables related to these outcomes included functional status, complications, and number of admissions.

Randomized controlled trial of sirolimus conversion in cardiac transplant recipients with renal insufficiency.

This randomized, comparative, multinational phase 3b/4 study of patients 1-8 years postcardiac transplantation (mean 3.9 years) evaluated the effect of conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus on renal function in patients with renal insufficiency. In total, 116 patients on CNI therapy with GFR 40-90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were randomized (1:1) to sirolimus (n = 57) or CNI (n = 59). Intent-to-treat analysis showed the 1-year adjusted mean change from baseline in creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) was significantly higher with sirolimus versus CNI treatment (+3.0 vs. -1.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively; p = 0.004). By on-therapy analysis, values were +4.7 and -2.1, respectively (p < 0.001). Acute rejection (AR) rates were numerically higher in the sirolimus group; 1 AR with hemodynamic compromise occurred in each group. A significantly higher treatment discontinuation rate due to adverse events (AEs; 33.3% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) occurred in the sirolimus group. Most common treatment-emergent AEs significantly higher in the sirolimus group were diarrhea (28.1%), rash (28.1%) and infection (47.4%). Conversion to sirolimus from CNI therapy improved renal function in cardiac transplant recipients with renal impairment, but was associated with an attendant AR risk and higher discontinuation rate attributable to AEs.

Risk factors associated with cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant patients: a prospective, epidemiological study.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this epidemiological, prospective study were to describe the characteristics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in heart transplant (HT) recipients and to identify the variables that may influence the development of CMV viremia and CMV disease in these patients. METHODS: HT recipients ≥18 years of age (n=199) were included in the study. Variables studied included CMV serostatus, immunosuppressive treatment, and administration of anti-CMV prophylaxis. RESULTS: The mean age of the population was 52 years, and 84% were males. Immunosuppressive regimens were administered as induction therapy to 92.5% of patients; 88.5% of patients received calcineurin inhibitors as maintenance therapy. Anti-CMV treatment was given to 59% of 199 patients as prophylaxis (70%), preemptive therapy (10%), or to treat CMV infection (20%). Overall, 43% of patients had at least 1 positive viremia test. No patient with a high-risk serostatus (donor+/recipient-) receiving prophylaxis developed CMV syndrome, and only 2.5% of 199 patients developed CMV invasive disease. Multivariate analysis showed that having a positive donor CMV serostatus was associated with an increased risk of developing CMV viremia (P<0.012), while use of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In a population of HT recipients, the CMV infection rate was similar to that seen in previous studies, but the progression to overt CMV disease was very low. Having a CMV-positive donor was identified as an independent risk factor for developing CMV viremia, while the use of mTOR inhibitors was protective against viremia.

Outcomes of heart transplantation for cardiac amyloidosis: subanalysis of the spanish registry for heart transplantation.

Amyloidosis (Am), a systemic disease, has poor prognosis because of organ damage produced by protein deposition in the extracellular space. Although heart transplantation (HTx) is possible, donor availability concerns and high mortality make this approach controversial. The Spanish Registry for Heart Transplantation includes 25 Am patients (54 +/- 9 years): 13 with AL type, 2 with AA and 10 with TTR mutation. Fifteen patients (60%) died during follow-up (4.9 +/- 1.3 years): 9 AL-Am patients, both AA-Am patients and 4 with TTR-Am. HTx survival for Am patients was similar to patients without Am at 1 month but significantly worse at 5 years: 46% versus 78% (p < 0.02). Of 10 AL-Am patients undergoing successful HTx, 4 died of systemic Am. Stem cell transplantation was performed in 3 (1 died of acute rejection). Five of 10 patients with TTR-Am underwent liver transplant; 4 remained alive at the last follow-up. Findings include poor outcome for AL-Am patients despite HTx and better survival for TTR-Am patients if HTx is associated with liver transplantation. Given the shortage of donors and poor outcome for Am patients, we would recommend that HTx be reserved for patients without or with mild systemic Am and be supplemented by additional therapies as indicated.

What is the best biomarker for diagnosis of rejection in heart transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: Acute cellular rejection is a major cause of graft loss in heart transplantation (HT). Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for its diagnosis, but it is an invasive procedure not without risk. A proinflammatory state exists in rejection that could be assessed by determining plasma levels of inflammatory biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the utility of various inflammatory markers, which is most important and what values best classify patients to diagnose rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study in 123 consecutive cardiac transplant recipients was conducted from January 2002 to December 2006. Fibrinogen protein (Fgp) and function (Fgf), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and sialic acid (SA) determinations were performed at one, two, four, six, nine, and 12 months post-HT at the same time as biopsies. Coronary arteriography and intravascular ultrasound were performed on the first and last follow-up visits. Heart-lung transplants, retransplants, pediatric transplants, patients who died in the first month, and patients who refused consent were excluded. Also excluded were determinations that coincided with renal dysfunction, active infection, hemodynamic instability, or a non-evaluable biopsy. The final analysis included 79 patients and 294 determinations. The correlation between the levels of these biomarkers and the presence of rejection in the biopsy (> or = ISHLT grade 3) was studied. RESULTS: We did not find significant differences in the values of any of the markers analyzed on the six follow-up visits. Only CRP showed significant and sustained differences between the two groups (with and without rejection) from the second follow-up visit (month 2). The area under the curve showed significant differences in Fgp (0.614, p = 0.013), Fgf (0.585, p = 0.05), TNF-alpha (0.605, p = 0.02), SA (0.637, p = 0.002) and mainly CRP (0.765, p = 0.0001). CRP levels below 0.87 mg/dL ruled out rejection with a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Among the inflammatory markers analyzed, CRP was the most useful parameter for non-invasive screening of acute cellular rejection in the first year post-HT.

Malignancy after heart transplantation: incidence, prognosis and risk factors.

The Spanish Post-Heart-Transplant Tumour Registry comprises data on neoplasia following heart transplantation (HT) for all Spanish HT patients (1984-2003). This retrospective analysis of 3393 patients investigated the incidence and prognosis of neoplasia, and the influence of antiviral prophylaxis. About 50% of post-HT neoplasias were cutaneous, and 10% lymphomas. The cumulative incidence of skin cancers and other nonlymphoma cancers increased with age at HT and with time post-HT (from respectively 5.2 and 8.9 per 1000 person-years in the first year to 14.8 and 12.6 after 10 years), and was greater among men than women. None of these trends held for lymphomas. Induction therapy other than with IL2R-blockers generally increased the risk of neoplasia except when acyclovir was administered prophylactically during the first 3 months post-HT; prophylactic acyclovir halved the risk of lymphoma, regardless of other therapies. Institution of MMF during the first 3 months post-HT reduced the incidence of skin cancer independently of the effects of sex, age group, pre-HT smoking, use of tacrolimus in the first 3 months, induction treatment and antiviral treatment. Five-year survival rates after first tumor diagnosis were 74% for skin cancer, 20% for lymphoma and 32% for other tumors.

Tolerance profile of the proliferation signal inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus in heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The side effects of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) have been characterized as a class. However, it would be convenient to assess them according to the molecule. OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively the tolerance of PSIs among heart transplant (HT) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 56 HT patients who sequentially received PSIs to either withdraw (77%) or reduce the dosage of a calcineurin inhibitor; 42 received everolimus (EVE) and 14 sirolimus (SRL). We analyzed the demographic variables, side effects, and need to withdraw the drug during a median follow-up period of 365 days. RESULTS: No differences between groups were observed upon analysis of the clinical and demographic variables when the treatment was changed owing to renal dysfunction (67%) or tumor (32%). No difference between groups was observed over the follow-up period (P = .28). Infection was the most common side effect, 28.6%: EVE, 14.3% versus SRL, 71.4% (P < .0001). Edema occurred in 26.8% of patients: EVE, 14.3% versus SRL, 64.3% (P = .001); diarrhea in 5.4% of patients: EVE, 2.4% versus SRL, 14.3% (P = .15). Treatment was withdrawn in 23.2% of the patients due to intolerance: EVE, 11.9% versus SRL, 57.1% (P < .0001). EVE showed significantly better survival without edema or infections or used for drug withdrawal upon Kaplan-Meier analysis, (P = .01; P = .0005; P = .0097). Only SRL use was shown to be an independent predictor of side effects. CONCLUSION: Edema and infections are the main problems caused by PSIs. EVE may display a better tolerance profile than SRL.

Support program for heart transplant patients: initial experience.

INTRODUCTION: Trials of education and support in heart failure patients have shown an improvement in patient prognosis with favorable results in cost-benefit analysis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a telephone support program for heart transplant patients during the first year after transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 30 consecutive heart transplant patients at our institution, who were randomized to either a standard care group or a group with the additional possibility of direct telephone contact with a cardiologist. We analyzed the time employed answering the calls, the reasons for consultation, and the number of hospital trips avoided. RESULTS: Among the total sample, 15 patients were assigned to the intervention program. Over 194 +/- 103 days, we received 28 calls. The mean call duration was 10.2 +/- 3.9 minutes, with 39.3% of the consultations concerning medication dosages 28.6% lifestyle issues, 25% infectious symptoms, and the remaining 7%, medication side effects. Medication readjustments were made in 33% of the calls; 10.7% of the calls, all for infectious symptoms, required direct medical consultation. CONCLUSION: Telephone support may be useful to improve therapeutic compliance, adjust the medications, and avoid treatment errors, as well as detect early complications during follow-up. In addition, it may avoid unnecessary medical visits.

Utility of oral valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis: does it improve treatment compliance?

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among heart transplant (HT) patients. Various prophylactic and preemptive treatment regimens have been used for its prevention. We sought to assess the impact of oral valganciclovir on CMV prophylaxis in HT patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 536 consecutive HT patients at our institution allowed selection of subjects eligible for prophylaxis based on CMV serology (donor positive/recipient negative). Treatment compliance, rates of preemptive therapy and treatment for CMV disease were assessed according to prophylactic drug use. If the indication was present, treatment was considered to have been performed. RESULTS: Among 536 patients, 9.8% (n = 53) were eligible for prophylaxis. Seventeen patients (33%) received valganciclovir, with a compliance rate of 94.1%. The remaining 68% received prophylaxis mainly with IV. ganciclovir (5 mg/kg) during their hospital stay followed by oral ganciclovir, with a compliance rate of 57.1% (P = .01). No differences were observed when we analyzed the need for preemptive therapy (0 vs 7%; P = .28) or for treatment of systemic or organ-specific infection (6.3 vs 0%; 6.3 vs 14%, respectively; P = .8). CONCLUSION: Oral valganciclovir facilitated treatment compliance in prophylaxis for CMV without being inferior to other prophylactic therapies.

Analysis of heart rate turbulence in advanced heart failure and heart transplantation patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe heart rate turbulence (HRT) in advanced heart failure (HF) patients and in a group of patients who underwent heart transplantation (HT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed 24-hour Holter recordings in 20 patients with advanced HF referred to our hospital for HT, including 16 males of overall mean age of 44 +/- 13 years and with a mean ejection fraction (EF) 21 +/- 7%. An additional set of recordings was obtained in a second group of 27 patients who had already undergone HT, including of 21 males of overall mean age of 47 +/- 14 years. We recorded the number of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), mean heart rate (MHR), and 2 parameters of HRT-turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS). RESULTS: Patients with HT showed a low density of premature ventricular complexes, in contrast to patients in the advanced HF group. For this reason, HRT could only be analyzed in 15 of the patients with advanced HF (66%) and in 10 of the patients who underwent HT (37%). MHR was 77 +/- 10 bpm in the advanced HF group and 90 +/- 10 bpm in the HT group. In both groups, TO and TS showed highly attenuated values. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced HF showed a high number of PVCs with attenuated HRT parameters, reflecting increased circulating catecholamine levels and decreased response of the autonomic nervous system. Patients who underwent HT showed elevated MHRs, a small number of PVCs, and attenuated HRT values, as corresponds to a denervated heart.

Correlation between beta-adrenoceptors and G-protein-coupled receptor kinases in pretransplantation heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged catecholamine overstimulation of the myocardium in chronic heart failure causes a reduction in the number and functionality of beta1-adrenoceptors (beta1-AR) of the heart. Desensitization of beta1-AR is mediated by their phosphorylation by a group of cytosolic kinases (G-protein-coupled receptor kinases GRK). In advanced heart failure, an increase in GRK levels associated with the severity of the disease has been observed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of beta1-AR in the myocardium of patients who underwent transplantation for advanced heart failure and their correlation with expression of the major cardiac isoenzymes of GRK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Myocardial tissue samples were obtained from the left ventricles of 14 explanted hearts of patients who underwent transplantation for dilated (n = 7) and ischemic (n = 7) cardiomyopathy. RT-PCR techniques were used to analyze mRNA levels of beta1-AR and the isoenzymes GRK2, GRK3, and GRK5. RESULTS: We observed a significant correlation between beta1-AR and the 3 subtypes of GRK (R(2) = 0.668, 0.71, and 0.318, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced heart failure pretransplantation, we observed a significant correlation between beta1-AR and GRK2 and GRK3 levels. GRK5, the subtype predominantly expressed in the myocardium, showed a lesser correlation with beta1-AR levels.

Clinical variables associated with the presence of inflammatory infiltrates in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is, together with ischemic heart disease, the major cause of end-stage heart failure leading to heart transplantation. However, an unknown percentage of patients with this diagnosis has inflammatory foci found in the histopathological study of the explanted heart. This fact suggests an undetected process of acute myocarditis as the cause of cardiac dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify clinical and echocardiographic variables related to the presence of myocardial infiltrates, as a potential guide to determine which patients should undergo endomyocardial biopsy in DCM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 161 patients who underwent heart transplantation with a diagnosis of DCM between 1987 and 2007. The presence of inflammatory infiltrates was considered significant when the histopathological study of tissue blocks from the left ventricle showed 1 or more foci per cm(2) of perivascular or interstitial mononuclear or polymorphonuclear cells, whether or not in the presence of cytolysis. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (11%) had these inflammatory histological findings; of them, 6 (35%) showed preponderance of eosinophils and 7 (41%) showed areas of cytolysis. The DCM group with inflammatory infiltrates showed significant differences in terms of younger age (45 +/- 15 vs 50 +/- 11 years; P < .01) and smaller ventricular diameters (P < .05). Male gender was more frequent in this group, and the patients had a poorer clinical status and greater dependence on inotropic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory infiltrates are frequently present in DCM explanted hearts. Although there are no relevant clinical variables to identify subclinical myocarditis, these patients are younger and have smaller ventricular diameters and poorer functional status at the time of transplantation.

Differences in early postoperative complications in elective and emergency heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The immediate postoperative period is a critical phase in heart transplantation. Severe complications occur that may influence short-term and medium-term morbidity and mortality in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of severe complications in emergency and nonemergency transplantations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 152 patients who underwent heart transplantation between 2001 and 2007. Combined transplantations and retransplantations were excluded. Two groups were considered: emergency transplantations (36 patients, 24%) and elective transplantations. We compared survival and occurrence of infection, primary graft failure (PGF), renal and hepatic failure, respiratory complications, cardiac tamponade, arrhythmias, reoperation, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay. RESULTS: The emergency transplantation group had a greater number of ischemic patients, with a more prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, and a larger proportion of donors were women. Overall mortality in the intensive care unit was 2.6%, with no differences between groups. However, emergency procedures were significantly associated with a higher incidence of PGF, need for intraaortic balloon pump, and a more prolonged mechanical ventilation time, as well as a greater number of bacterial infections and a significantly longer ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, emergency transplantation showed no greater perioperative mortality. We observed a greater number of severe complications, such as PGF, bacterial infection, and more prolonged mechanical ventilation time.

Management of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacilli infections in solid organ transplant recipients: SET/GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI recommendations.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are especially at risk of developing infections by multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), as they are frequently exposed to antibiotics and the healthcare setting, and are regulary subject to invasive procedures. Nevertheless, no recommendations concerning prevention and treatment are available. A panel of experts revised the available evidence; this document summarizes their recommendations: (1) it is important to characterize the isolate's phenotypic and genotypic resistance profile; (2) overall, donor colonization should not constitute a contraindication to transplantation, although active infected kidney and lung grafts should be avoided; (3) recipient colonization is associated with an increased risk of infection, but is not a contraindication to transplantation; (4) different surgical prophylaxis regimens are not recommended for patients colonized with carbapenem-resistant GNB; (5) timely detection of carriers, contact isolation precautions, hand hygiene compliance and antibiotic control policies are important preventive measures; (6) there is not sufficient data to recommend intestinal decolonization; (7) colonized lung transplant recipients could benefit from prophylactic inhaled antibiotics, specially for Pseudomonas aeruginosa; (8) colonized SOT recipients should receive an empirical treatment which includes active antibiotics, and directed therapy should be adjusted according to susceptibility study results and the severity of the infection.

Differences in clinical profile and survival after heart transplantation according to prior heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare baseline characteristics and long-term survival among patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT) according to the 3 main types of prior heart disease: ischemic, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), and valvular. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-three HTs performed between 1989 and 2005 were included. We excluded pediatric transplantation, retransplantations, combined transplantations (lung and kidney), and transplantations due to heart diseases other than ischemic, IDC, and valvular. Baseline characteristics of the recipients were analyzed, as well as short-term and long- term survival by groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for continuous variables and chi-square was used for categorical variables. Survival analysis was computed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, as well as multivariate analysis using logistic regression. RESULTS: The ischemic and valvular heart disease groups were older and had a more frequent history of prior heart surgery and circulatory support at the time of transplantation compared with the IDC group. The incidence of arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia was higher among ischemic heart disease recipients. Survival rates at 30 days did not show significant differences (ischemic, 88%; IDC, 93%; and valvular; 84%; P = .21). Long-term survival rates were greater in the IDC than in the valvular or ischemic heart disease groups (75% vs 65% and 62%, respectively; P = .021). The multivariate analysis showed an association between the IDC group and long-term survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.89; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Patients showed a different clinical profiles depending on their pretransplantation heart disease. (2) There were no differences in early mortality between the groups. (3) Long-term survival was significantly greater among IDC transplant recipients and similar in ischemic and valvular heart disease transplant recipients.

Ezetimibe in heart transplantation: initial experience.

UNLABELLED: Dyslipidemia is a common problem among heart transplant (HT) recipients; it is a frequent risk factor in these patients that is exacerbated by immunosuppressive drugs. Statins are effective drugs to treat dyslipidemia in HT recipients, but control is suboptimal in some patients. Ezetimibe acts through inhibition of the enterohepatic recirculation, a mechanism different from but complementary to statins. Our objective was to assess the effect of the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy among a population of HT patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 19 stable patients on statin therapy with suboptimal control of cholesterol. Determinations were performed at baseline on statins and at 6 months (statins + ezetimibe). The analyzed variables were total cholesterol and fractions, triglycerides, cyclosporine levels, CPK, SGOT/SGPT, and bilirubin. The statistics were Student's t test for paired samples. RESULTS: The overall mean age was 59 +/- 9 years with 95% males and mean BMI 27.5 +/- 3.5. The time since HT was 7 +/- 3 years. The reason for HT included ischemic heart disease in 68%. Pre-HT risk factors included in arterial hypertension in 32% and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in 10%, Dyslipidemia occurred in 68%; hypertriglyceridemia in 16% and hyperuricemia in 21%. Immunosuppression was cyclosporine in 100% and steroids in 94%. Type of lipid-lowering agent was simvastatin in 5%; pravastatin, 32%; atorvastatin, 58%; fibrates, 10%. The ezetimibe dose was 10 mg/day in 95% of cases. When ezetimibe was added we observed differences in total cholesterol values (total cholesterol at baseline: 279 +/- 74, total cholesterol with ezetimibe: 198 +/- 47 mg/dL; P = .0001) and LDL-cholesterol values (LDL-cholesterol at baseline: 171 +/- 69, LDL-cholesterol with ezetimibe: 109 +/- 41 mg/dL; P = .001). The remaining variables did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION: The addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy among heart transplant patients was effective to control dyslipidemia and showed an excellent safety profile.

mTOR inhibitors: do they help preserve renal function?

BACKGROUND: Renal function deterioration is one of the main problems facing heart transplant recipients. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, in combination with or replacing calcineurin inhibitors, may help preserve renal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression of renal function after switching the immunosuppressive regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 23 heart transplant recipients (5.5 +/- 4.5 years since transplantation). An mTOR inhibitor was introduced to replace cyclosporine (everolimus, 65%; sirolimus, 35%). Patient clinical characteristics and renal function were studied after switching. The statistical analysis used Student t test for paired data. RESULTS: The reason for the transplantation was ischemic cardiopathy (52%), dilated myocardiopathy (39%), or other causes (9%). Mean age at time of transplantation was 52 +/- 9 years. Comorbidities were as follows hypertension (43%), insulin-dependent diabetes (22%), hypercholesterolemia (39%), and ex-smokers (70%). The reason for the switch was increased creatinine (65%), appearance of tumors (26%), or others (8%). Previous creatinine level was 1.89 +/- 0.6 mg/dL with clearance of 61.7 +/- 23 mL/min and at the end of follow-up (mean follow-up, 11 +/- 6 months) creatinine level was 2.0 +/- 1.45 mg/dL with clearance of 68.3 +/- 35 mL/min, namely, no significant difference (P = .49 and P = .57, respectively). In the subgroup of patients who switched treatment due to renal dysfunction, initial creatinine level was 2.38 +/- 0.4 mg/dL with clearance of 42.3 +/- 10 mL/min and at the end of follow-up it was 2.28 +/- 0.2 mg/dL and 43.6 +/- 11 mL/min, respectively (P = .68 for creatinine and clearance). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of mTOR inhibitors to the immunosuppressant regimen may be useful to delay renal functional deterioration caused by calcineurin inhibitors.

Clinical and hemodynamic profile of patients with advanced heart failure considered for heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The present study evaluated the clinical and hemodynamic situation of patients with advanced heart failure considered for heart transplantation (HT) to examine the possible impact of prior cardiac disease. METHODS: We analyzed the pretransplant clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters of 422 consecutive HT patients. Pediatric and heart plus lung transplants were excluded, as were retransplantations. The results were compared by dividing the patients into three groups according to the background heart disease that led to HT: ischemic heart disease (IHD), dilated myocardiopathy (DMC), or valvular disease. RESULTS: Differences were observed in the baseline characteristics according to the type of heart disease. Male gender, hypertension, and diabetes were more frequent among IHD, while DMC patients tended to be younger. There were no differences in the clinical parameters such as liver and kidney function, in the functional class, or in the need for inotropic treatment over the days prior to transplantation. Likewise, no differences were recorded in the hemodynamic parameters, such as pulmonary pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, or transpulmonary pressure gradient. As regards the echocardiographic parameters, the patients with DMC showed greater ventricular diameters and lesser ejection fractions for both ventricles. CONCLUSION: No important differences were recorded in the clinical situation or hemodynamic parameters of patients with advanced heart failure accepted for transplantation, according to the background cardiac disease. This observation could be due to the homogenization by strict transplant waiting list inclusion criteria.

Course of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection undergoing heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical course of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection undergoing heart transplantation (HT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 499 patients transplanted in our hospital between January 1989 and September 2006, 11 subjects (2.2%) had chronic HCV infection. We analyzed liver function laboratory parameters pretransplantation as well as at 3, 6, 12 months, and last available, pre- and postsurgical hepatobiliary ultrasounds, and mortality. The mean time since HT was 32 +/- 23 months. RESULTS: No abnormalities in the liver parenchyma were observed on the ultrasound examinations performed before or after transplantation. There were 3 deaths (27%), none of which was related to HCV infection. Liver function laboratory parameters remained stable during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of patients with chronic HCV infection undergoing HT whose presurgical assessment did not show significant liver damage was favorable. No morphological or laboratory abnormalities were observed that would suggest reactivation of the infection during the follow-up.