Safety and Efficacy of Standard of Care Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) CAR-T therapy was approved in 2022 for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report outcomes with cilta-cel in the standard-of-care setting. Patients with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis for cilta-cel manufacturing between 3/1/2022-12/31/2022 at 16 US academic medical centers were included. RESULTS: 255 patients underwent leukapheresis and 236 (92.5%) received cilta-cel. Of leukapheresed patients, 56% would not have met CARTITUDE-1 trial eligibility criteria. Manufacturing failure rates at first attempt and overall were 6% and 1%, respectively. Median prior lines of therapy were 6. In treated patients (N=236), cytokine release syndrome was seen in 75% (>= grade 3: 5%), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 14% (>= grade 3: 4%), and delayed neurotoxicity in 10%. Best overall and >= CR rates were as follows: infused patients (N=236): 89% and 70%; patients receiving conforming CAR-T product (N=191) 94% and 74%; conforming CAR-T product with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion (N=152): 95% and 76%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality was 10%, most commonly from infection. After median follow-up of 13 months from CAR-T, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, with 12- month estimate being 68% (95% CI: 62-74%). High ferritin levels, high-risk cytogenetics, and extramedullary disease were independently associated with inferior PFS, with a signal for prior BCMA-TT (p=0.08). Second primary malignancies (SPMs) excluding non-melanoma skin cancers were seen in 5.5% and myeloid malignancies/acute leukemia in 1.7%. We observed a favorable efficacy profile of standard of care cilta-cel in RRMM despite more than half the patients not meeting CARTITUDE-1 eligibility criteria.

Triplet Therapy, Transplantation, and Maintenance until Progression in Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, the effect of adding autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to triplet therapy (lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [RVD]), followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until disease progression, is unknown. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, adults (18 to 65 years of age) with symptomatic myeloma received one cycle of RVD. We randomly assigned these patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive two additional RVD cycles plus stem-cell mobilization, followed by either five additional RVD cycles (the RVD-alone group) or high-dose melphalan plus ASCT followed by two additional RVD cycles (the transplantation group). Both groups received lenalidomide until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or both. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Among 357 patients in the RVD-alone group and 365 in the transplantation group, at a median follow-up of 76.0 months, 328 events of disease progression or death occurred; the risk was 53% higher in the RVD-alone group than in the transplantation group (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.91; P<0.001); median progression-free survival was 46.2 months and 67.5 months. The percentage of patients with a partial response or better was 95.0% in the RVD-alone group and 97.5% in the transplantation group (P = 0.55); 42.0% and 46.8%, respectively, had a complete response or better (P = 0.99). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 78.2% and 94.2%, respectively; 5-year survival was 79.2% and 80.7% (hazard ratio for death, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with multiple myeloma, RVD plus ASCT was associated with longer progression-free survival than RVD alone. No overall survival benefit was observed. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; DETERMINATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01208662.).

Idecabtagene vicleucel chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with renal impairment.

We evaluated patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with renal impairment (RI) treated with standard of care idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), as outcomes with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are unknown in this population. RI was defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) <50 mL/min. CrCl of <30 mL/min or dialysis dependence were defined as severe RI. The study cohort included 214 patients, 28 (13%) patients with RI, including 11 patients severe RI (dialysis, N=1). Patients with RI were older, more likely to be female and had higher likelihood of having Revised International Staging System stage 3 disease. Rates and severity of cytokine release syndrome (89% vs. 84%, grade ≥3: 7% vs. 2%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (23% vs. 20%) were similar in patients with and without RI, respectively. Patients with RI had higher incidence of short-term grade ≥3 cytopenias, although cytopenias were similar by 3 months following CAR T-cell therapy. Renal function did not worsen after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RI. Response rates (93% vs. 82%) and survival outcomes (median progression-free survival: 9 vs. 8 months; P=0.26) were comparable in patients with and without RI, respectively. Treatment with ide-cel is feasible in patients with RI, with a comparable safety and efficacy profile as patients without RI, with notable exception of higher short-term high-grade cytopenias.

Factors associated with refractoriness or early progression after idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium real world experience.

While response rates and survival outcomes have been very promising for idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), a proportion of patients do not respond or relapse early after this B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) targeted CAR T-cell therapy. Understanding the characteristics of these patients is important for patient selection and development of novel strategies to improve outcomes. We evaluated factors associated with early progression (progression or death due to myeloma ≤ 3 months after CAR T infusion) in patients treated with standard of care ide-cel at 11 US academic centers. Among 211 patients that received ide-cel, 43 patients had a progressive event ≤ 3 months of infusion. Patients with a history of extramedullary disease, prior BCMA targeted therapy, elevated ferritin at lymphodepletion, use of bridging therapy, Hispanic ethnicity, plasma cell leukemia and t(4;14) were more likely to progress ≤ 3 months of infusion (p < 0.05). Of these risk factors for early progression identified in univariate analyses, history of extramedullary disease, prior BCMA targeted therapy, elevated ferritin at lymphodepletion, plasma cell leukemia, and t(4;14) were associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariable analysis. Presence of three or more of these factors had a significant negative impact on PFS (p < 0.001; median PFS for ≥ 3 factors, 3.2 months vs. 0 factors, 14.1 months). This study helps identify patients at high risk of early progression after CAR T who may benefit from specific interventions pre and post CAR T to improve outcomes.

A phase 1b study of once-weekly carfilzomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Twice-weekly carfilzomib with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is an effective regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Here we evaluated once-weekly carfilzomib with Rd (once-weekly KRd) in NDMM patients. The NDMM patients were enrolled regardless of transplant eligibility. Patients received carfilzomib on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40 mg on carfilzomib days (also day 22 for cycles 1-8) for ≤18, 28-day cycles. Enrollment initiated in a carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m2 (20 mg/m2 on cycle one, day 1; 70 mg/m2 thereafter) NDMM dose-expansion arm, which was suspended because of serious adverse events. After evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities in a two-step-up dose-evaluation cohort, an NDMM dose-expansion arm (carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m2 ) was opened. Fifty-one NDMM patients were enrolled in dose-finding and dose-expansion cohorts. Results are presented for the carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 NDMM dose-expansion arm (n = 33). The grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) rate was 63.6%. Twenty-five patients underwent stem cell collection; 18 proceeded to auto stem cell transplant, and five resumed KRd on study after autoSCT. The overall response rate (ORR) based on best overall response by cycle four was 97.0% (≥very good partial response [VGPR], 69.7%) in the NDMM 20/56 mg/m2 cohort. In patients who did not receive autoSCT (n = 15), the median number of cycles was 16.0; ORR was 93.3% (≥VGPR, 80.0%). At a median follow-up of 8.1 months, median progression-free survival was not reached. Once-weekly KRd (carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 ) had a favorable safety profile and promising activity in NDMM, supporting the use of this regimen in this setting.

Lenalidomide-based response-adapted therapy for older adults without high risk myeloma.

Combined lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a standard-of-care therapy for the treatment of older adults with multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide monotherapy has not been evaluated in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. We conducted a phase II study, evaluating a response-adapted therapy for older adults newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma without high-risk features who were ineligible for high-dose therapy and stem cell transplant. Patients were started on single-agent lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone was added in the event of progressive disease, in a response-adapted approach. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the International Myeloma Working Group's uniform response criteria were used to assess response and progression. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, and 20 (74%) experienced a partial response or better to this response-adapted therapy. After a median follow-up of 69 months, the median PFS was 36 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 29·8 to not reached], and the median overall survival was 65 months (95% CI, 35·3 to not reached). Grade 3/4 adverse events were mainly haematological in nature. This response-adapted therapy in this patient population is feasible and results in durable responses that compare favourably with concurrent lenalidomide and dexamethasone. These results should be validated in prospective studies.

Weekly carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A phase 1b study.

Twice-weekly carfilzomib (27 mg/m2 ) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) is a standard-of-care in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This phase 1b study evaluated KRd with once-weekly carfilzomib in RRMM. Patients received carfilzomib (30-minute infusion; 56 or 70mg/m2 ) on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (day 22 omitted for cycles 9+) of 28-day cycles. Primary objective was safety/tolerability; efficacy was a secondary objective. Fifty-six RRMM patients enrolled: 22 during dose evaluation (56-mg/m2 , n = 10; 70-mg/m2 , n = 12) and 34 during dose expansion (all initiated dosing at 70 mg/m2 ). After 2 fatal adverse events (AEs) during 70-mg/m2 dose expansion, dosage reduction to 56 mg/m2 was permitted. Results are presented for carfilzomib 56-mg/m2 (n = 10) and 70-mg/m2 groups (dose evaluation/expansion; n = 46). Median carfilzomib dose was 53.2 mg/m2 (56-mg/m2 group) and 62.4 mg/m2 (70-mg/m2 group). Grade ≥3 AE rates were 70.0% (56 mg/m2 ) and 69.6% (70 mg/m2 ). Overall response rates were 90.0% (56 mg/m2 ) and 89.1% (70 mg/m2 ); ≥very good partial response rates were 50.0% (56 mg/m2 ) and 73.9% (70 mg/m2 ). Once-weekly KRd was active with acceptable toxicity in RRMM, supporting further evaluation of this regimen.

Hypoalbuminemia at Day +90 Is Associated with Inferior Nonrelapse Mortality and Overall Survival in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients: A Confirmatory Study.

Prognostic biomarkers in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) are needed to improve risk assessment and help guide therapeutic and surveillance strategies to mitigate the risk of death from the procedure. We previously identified hypoalbuminemia at day +90 post-transplantation as an independent predictor of increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and inferior overall survival (OS) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome who were treated with an allo-HCT. Here, we aim to confirm the prognostic significance of day +90 hypoalbuminemia in 783 patients, median age 52 years (range, 18 to 76), who received an allo-HCT for various hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure syndromes. Multivariate analysis for NRM demonstrated a negative effect of low serum albumin levels (<3.0 versus 3.0 to 3.5 versus >3.5 g/dL) at day +90 post-transplantation (hazard ratios, 8.03 [95% CI, 3.59 to 17.97] versus 2.84 [95% CI, 1.59 to 5.08] versus reference; P < .0001). This was also the case for OS (hazard ratios, 6.86 [95% CI, 4.24 to 11.10] versus 1.52 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.20] versus reference; P < .0001). Patients with hypoalbuminemia at day +90 post-transplantation are more likely to die from causes other than relapse, particularly infections. This large study confirms the ability of day +90 serum hypoalbuminemia to predict worse NRM and inferior OS. Presence of hypoalbuminemia at day +90 should drive a more rigorous real-time surveillance strategy considering the anticipated high-risk of NRM and poor survival in these patients. Future studies should consider incorporating day +90 serum albumin levels in prognostic models of NRM and OS.

Recurrent cardiotoxicity potentiated by the interaction of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved treatment options, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). Despite their efficacy, increased rates of cardiovascular (CV) complications occur in patients exposed to some of these therapies. While previous research has focused on identifying the toxicities inherent to each specific agent, the CV side effects may be potentiated by the combination of PIs and IMiDs plus dexamethasone. We present a patient with MM with recurrent cardiotoxicity only when exposed to combination PI and IMiD-based therapy. We also review the literature in this context, and propose a potential algorithm for cardiotoxicity prevention in this population.

Randomized multicenter phase 2 study of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma.

Pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (PomDex) is standard treatment of lenalidomide refractory myeloma patients who have received >2 prior therapies. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the addition of oral weekly cyclophosphamide to standard PomDex. We first performed a dose escalation phase 1 study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of cyclophosphamide in combination with PomDex (arm A). A randomized, multicenter phase 2 study followed, enrolling patients with lenalidomide refractory myeloma. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pomalidomide 4 mg on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with weekly dexamethasone (arm B) or pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (PomCyDex) 400 mg orally on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm C). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Eighty patients were enrolled (10 in phase 1 and 70 randomized in phase 2: 36 to arm B and 34 to arm C). The ORR was 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23-54.8%) and 64.7% (95% CI, 48.6-80.8%) for arms B and C, respectively (P = .035). As of June 2015, 62 of the 70 randomized patients had progressed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 (95% CI, 2.3-5.7) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 4.6-14) for arms B and C, respectively (P = .106). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic in nature but was not statistically higher in arm C. The combination of PomCyDex results in a superior ORR and PFS compared with PomDex in patients with lenalidomide refractory multiple myeloma. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01432600.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2018.

The NCCN Guidelines for Multiple Myeloma provide recommendations for diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, including supportive-care, and follow-up for patients with myeloma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the important updates/changes specific to the myeloma therapy options in the 2018 version of the NCCN Guidelines.

Case Report of IgM Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosing a Rare Hematologic Entity.

IgM multiple myeloma is an exceedingly rare hematologic entity comprising only less than 0.5% of multiple myeloma cases. Given the rarity of this disorder, it makes it a challenge to differentiate from other more prevalent hematologic disorders like Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. These 2 diseases have the common finding of an IgM monoclonal gammopathy and distinguishing between these 2 diagnoses is of great importance given that therapy and prognosis differ significantly. This report illustrates the case of a 64-year-old man who presented with IgM lambda monoclonal gammopathy in whom signs, symptoms, laboratories, and imaging were initially thought to be consistent with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Upon further analysis, which included bone marrow biopsy, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and MYD88 (L265P) gene mutation analysis, the rare diagnosis of IgM multiple myeloma was confirmed. As highlighted by this patient's case, reaching the diagnosis of IgM multiple myeloma can be a difficult task which requires a high index of suspicion and accurate diagnostic methods. By using the approach detailed in this report, more cases of IgM multiple myeloma can be diagnosed early, which in turn may lead to earlier treatment and better outcomes.

Clonal haemopoiesis and therapy-related myeloid malignancies in elderly patients: a proof-of-concept, case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Clonal haemopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is an age-associated genetic event linked to increased risk of primary haematological malignancies and increased all-cause mortality, but the prevalence of CHIP in patients who develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms is unknown. We did this study to investigate whether chemotherapy-treated patients with cancer who have CHIP are at increased risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. METHODS: We did a nested, case-control, proof-of-concept study to compare the prevalence of CHIP between patients with cancer who later developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) and patients who did not develop these neoplasms (controls). We identified cases from our internal biorepository of 123 357 patients who consented to participate in the Total Cancer Care biobanking protocol at Moffitt Cancer Center (Tampa, FL, USA) between Jan 1, 2006, and June 1, 2016. We included all individuals who were diagnosed with a primary malignancy, were treated with chemotherapy, subsequently developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, and were 70 years or older at either diagnosis. For inclusion in this study, individuals must have had a peripheral blood or mononuclear cell sample collected before the diagnosis of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. Controls were individuals who were diagnosed with a primary malignancy at age 70 years or older and were treated with chemotherapy but did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Controls were matched to cases in at least a 4:1 ratio on the basis of sex, primary tumour type, age at diagnosis, smoking status, chemotherapy drug class, and duration of follow-up. We used sequential targeted and whole-exome sequencing and described clonal evolution in cases for whom paired CHIP and therapy-related myeloid neoplasm samples were available. The primary endpoint of this study was the development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and the primary exposure was CHIP. FINDINGS: We identified 13 cases and 56 case-matched controls. The prevalence of CHIP in all patients (23 [33%] of 69 patients) was higher than has previously been reported in elderly individuals without cancer (about 10%). Cases had a significantly higher prevalence of CHIP than did matched controls (eight [62%] of 13 cases vs 15 [27%] of 56 controls, p=0·024; odds ratio 5·75, 95% CI 1·52-25·09, p=0·013). The most commonly mutated genes in cases with CHIP were TET2 (three [38%] of eight patients) and TP53(three [38%] of eight patients), whereas controls most often had TET2 mutations (six [40%] of 15 patients). In most (four [67%] of six patients) cases for whom paired CHIP and therapy-related myeloid neoplasm samples were available, the mean allele frequency of CHIP mutations had expanded by the time of the therapy-related myeloid neoplasm diagnosis. However, a subset of paired samples (two [33%] of six patients) had CHIP mutations that decreased in allele frequency, giving way to expansion of a distinct mutant clone. INTERPRETATION: Patients with cancer who have CHIP are at increased risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. The distribution of CHIP-related gene mutations differs between individuals with therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and those without, suggesting that mutation-specific differences might exist in therapy-related myeloid neoplasm risk. FUNDING: Moffitt Cancer Center.

IL-2 promotes early Treg reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major cause of transplant-related mortality. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus sirolimus (SIR) synergistically reduces acute GvHD in rodents and promotes regulatory T cells. This phase II trial tested the hypothesis that IL-2 would facilitate STAT5 phosphorylation in donor T cells, expand regulatory T cells, and ameliorate GvHD. Between 16th April 2014 and 19th December 2015, 20 patients received IL-2 (200,000 IU/m2 thrice weekly, days 0 to +90) with SIR (5-14 ng/mL) and tacrolimus (TAC) (3-7 ng/mL) after HLA-matched related or unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The study was designed to capture an increase in regulatory T cells from 16.0% to more than 23.2% at day +30. IL-2/SIR/TAC significantly increased regulatory T cells at day +30 compared to our published data with SIR/TAC (23.8% vs. 16.0%, P=0.0016; 0.052 k/uL vs. 0.037 k/uL, P=0.0163), achieving the primary study end point. However, adding IL-2 to SIR/TAC led to a fall in regulatory T cells by day +90 and did not reduce acute or chronic GvHD. Patients who discontinued IL-2 before day +100 showed a suggested trend toward less grade II-IV acute GvHD (16.7% vs. 50%, P=0.1475). We surmise that the reported accumulation of IL-2 receptors in circulation over time may neutralize IL-2, lead to progressive loss of regulatory T cells, and offset its clinical efficacy. The amount of phospho-STAT3+ CD4+ T cells correlated with donor T-cell activation and acute GvHD incidence despite early T-cell STAT5 phosphorylation by IL-2. Optimizing IL-2 dosing and overcoming cytokine sequestration by soluble IL-2 receptor may sustain lasting regulatory T cells after transplantation. However, an approach to target STAT3 is needed to enhance GvHD prevention. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01927120).

Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is caused by the neoplastic proliferation of plasma cells. These neoplastic plasma cells proliferate and produce monoclonal immunoglobulin in the bone marrow causing skeletal damage, a hallmark of multiple myeloma. Other MM-related complications include hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and infections. The NCCN Multiple Myeloma Panel members have developed guidelines for the management of patients with various plasma cell dyscrasias, including solitary plasmacytoma, smoldering myeloma, multiple myeloma, systemic light chain amyloidosis, and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. The recommendations specific to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with newly diagnosed MM are discussed in this article.

A phase 2 trial of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory myeloma.

In this prospective, multicenter, phase 2 study, 64 patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) received up to 8 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), lenalidomide 15 mg/day (days 1-14), and dexamethasone 40/20 mg/day (cycles 1-4) and 20/10 mg/day (cycles 5-8) (days of/after bortezomib dosing). Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy. Median age was 65 years; 66% were male, 58% had relapsed and 42% had relapsed and refractory MM, and 53%, 75%, and 6% had received prior bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide, respectively. Forty-eight of 64 patients (75%; 90% confidence interval, 65-84) were alive without progressive disease at 6 months (primary end point). The rate of partial response or better was 64%; median duration of response was 8.7 months. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 9.5 and 30 months, respectively (median follow-up: 44 months). Common treatment-related toxicities included sensory neuropathy (53%), fatigue (50%), and neutropenia (42%); common grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (22%), and lymphopenia (11%). Grade 3 motor neuropathy was reported in 2 patients. Lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone appears effective and tolerable in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM, demonstrating substantial activity among patients with diverse prior therapies and adverse prognostic characteristics. This trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00378209.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2016.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the important updates/changes specific to the 2016 version of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Multiple Myeloma. These changes include updated recommendations to the overall management of multiple myeloma from diagnosis and staging to new treatment options.

Ofatumumab in combination with glucocorticoids for primary therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease: phase I trial results.

Standard primary therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is incompletely effective. Based on biologic insights implicating pathogenic B cells, we conducted a phase I trial examining the combination of standard (1 mg/kg/day prednisone) glucocorticoid therapy with ofatumumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, for primary chronic GVHD therapy. Patients ages ≥ 18 with National Institutes of Health Consensus moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD newly requiring 1 mg/kg/day prednisone were treated at 3 escalating dose levels (300 mg, 700 mg, and 1000 mg) of i.v. ofatumumab on days 1 and 14 of initial glucocorticoid therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined by grade 4 infusion reactions, related grade 4 constitutional symptoms, related grade ≥ 3 organ toxicities, or grade 4 neutropenia lasting > 14 days. A total of 12 patients (median age 54; range, 25 to 72) were treated (dose level 1: n = 3; level 2: n = 3; level 3: n = 6). At enrollment, overall chronic GVHD was moderate (n = 7) or severe (n = 5), with diverse organ involvement (skin: n = 8; mouth: n = 8; eye: n = 8; lung: n = 4; gastrointestinal: n = 3; liver: n = 5; genital: n = 2; joint/fascia: n = 5). Infusion of ofatumumab was well tolerated, and no DLT was observed. From the total number of adverse events (n = 29), possibly related adverse events (n = 4) included grade 1 fatigue, grade 1 transaminitis, and 2 infusion reactions (grades 2 and 3). Infectious complications were expected, and there were no cases of hepatitis B reactivation or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Ofatumumab in combination with prednisone is safe and a phase II examination of efficacy is ongoing.

A comparison of salvage infusional chemotherapy regimens for recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Despite the impact of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, infusional chemotherapy regimens continue to be used for patients with multiple myeloma. To the authors' knowledge, contemporary data regarding salvage chemotherapy regimens are sparse, with no direct comparisons. METHODS: The authors performed a single-institution study comparing 3 salvage chemotherapy regimens in 107 patients with recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma: dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) in 52 patients; bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VTD-PACE) in 22 patients; and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVAD) in 33 patients. RESULTS: Differences between treatment groups existed, including higher baseline creatinine for patients treated with CVAD (P<.001) and greater prior use of infusional chemotherapy for those receiving VTD-PACE (P<.001). There was no significant difference in response noted among the 3 regimens: 55% overall (P = .18). For the intent-to-transplant population, a similar percentage were successfully bridged to transplant without further therapy (62%; P = .9). There was no difference in survival observed across the 3 regimens, with an overall median progression-free survival of 4.5 months (95% confidence interval, 3.6-5.5 months [P = .8]) and a median overall survival of 8.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-11 months [P = .8]). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference noted among clinically relevant adverse events, although there was a suggestion of fewer adverse events with DCEP. Patients treated with the intent to transplant had superior outcomes for response (odds ratio, 3.40; P = .01), progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.28; P<.001), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.19; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 3 salvage regimens demonstrated similar responses, survival, and adverse events. Given the short response durations observed in the recurrent/refractory disease setting, infusional chemotherapy is best suited for cytoreduction before more definitive therapy is administered.

Phase 2 dose-expansion study (PX-171-006) of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma.

We previously reported a phase 1b dose-escalation study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (CRd) in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma where the maximum planned dose (MPD) was carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and 27 mg/m2 days 8, 9, 15, 16, and thereafter; lenalidomide 25 mg days 1 to 21; and dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly on 28-day cycles. Herein, we present results from the phase 2 dose expansion at the MPD, focusing on the 52 patients enrolled in the MPD cohort. Median follow-up was 24.4 months. In the MPD cohort, overall response rate (ORR) was 76.9% with median time to response of 0.95 month (range, 0.5-4.6) and duration of response (DOR) of 22.1 months. Median progression-free survival was 15.4 months. ORR was 69.2% in bortezomib-refractory patients and 69.6% in lenalidomide-refractory patients with median DOR of 22.1 and 10.8 months, respectively. A median of 9.5 (range, 1-45) carfilzomib cycles were started with 7.7% of patients requiring carfilzomib dose reductions and 19.2% discontinuing CRd due to adverse events (AEs). Grade 3/4 AEs included lymphopenia (48.1%), neutropenia (32.7%), thrombocytopenia (19.2%), and anemia (19.2%). CRd at the MPD was well tolerated with robust, rapid, and durable responses.