Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
1.
Anaerobe ; 71: 102420, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34314865

ABSTRACT

A 42-year-old man was referred to the Department of Orthopedic Surgery with pain over his right greater trochanter and signs of systemic infection. CT showed an enhanced mass in his gluteus maximus as well as gas in the biceps femoris over the underlying hip joint. Tissue biopsy yielded Fusobacterium nucleatum and Actinomyces turicensis. The patient was successfully treated for 6 weeks with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875mg/125mg and metronidazole 500mg.


Subject(s)
Actinomycetaceae/isolation & purification , Actinomycetales Infections/microbiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , COVID-19/immunology , Fusobacterium Infections/microbiology , Fusobacterium nucleatum/isolation & purification , Hip/microbiology , Abscess/drug therapy , Abscess/microbiology , Actinomycetaceae/drug effects , Actinomycetaceae/genetics , Actinomycetales Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/virology , Fusobacterium Infections/drug therapy , Fusobacterium nucleatum/drug effects , Fusobacterium nucleatum/genetics , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Male , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
2.
Br J Surg ; 105(7): 893-899, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29600816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) has received increasing attention. Clinical trials have focused on the role of skin antisepsis in preventing SSI. The benefit of combining antiseptic chlorhexidine with alcohol has not been compared with alcohol-based skin preparation alone in a prospective controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Between August and October 2014, patients undergoing abdominal surgery received preoperative skin antisepsis with 70 per cent isopropanol (PA). Those treated between November 2014 and January 2015 received 2 per cent chlorhexidine with 70 per cent isopropanol (CA). The primary endpoint was SSI on postoperative day (POD) 10, which was evaluated using univariable analysis, and a multivariable logistic regression model correcting for known independent risk factors for SSI. The study protocol was published in the German Registry of Clinical Studies (DRKS00011174). RESULTS: In total, 500 patients undergoing elective midline laparotomy were included (CA 221, PA 279). The incidence of superficial and deep SSIs was significantly different on POD 10: 14 of 212 (6·6 per cent) among those treated with CA and 32 of 260 (12·3 per cent) in those who received PA (P = 0·038). In the multivariable analysis, skin antisepsis with CA was an independent factor for reduced incidence of SSI on POD 10 (P = 0·034). CONCLUSION: This study showed a benefit of adding chlorhexidine to alcohol for skin antisepsis in reducing early SSI compared with alcohol alone.


Subject(s)
2-Propanol/therapeutic use , Abdomen/surgery , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Antisepsis/methods , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Chlorhexidine/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology
3.
J Wound Care ; 26(5): 236-242, 2017 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28475440

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial bioburden in experimental in vitro wounds during the application of conventional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), with and without antimicrobial dressings (polyhexanide, silver), against NPWT instillation of octenidine. METHOD: Experimental wounds produced in an in vitro porcine wound model were homogenously contaminated with bacterial suspension and treated with NPWT and different options. Group A: non-antimicrobial polyurethane foam dressing; group B: antimicrobial polyurethane foam dressing containing silver; group C: antimicrobial gauze dressing containing polyhexanide; group D: non-antimicrobial polyurethane foam dressing intermittently irrigated with octenidine; group E: negative control (non-antimicrobial polyurethane foam dressing without NPWT). Standard biopsies were harvested after 24 and 28 hours. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that the use of NPWT with intermitted instillation of octenidine (group D) or application of silver-based polyurethane foam dressings (group B) is significantly superior against Staphylococcus aureus colonisation in experimental wounds compared with non-antimicrobial polyurethane foam dressing (group A) after 48 hours. Surprisingly, the polyhexanide-based dressing (group C) used in this model showed no statistical significant effect compared with the control group (group E) after 24 or 48 hours of treatment. CONCLUSION: Both intermitted instillation of octenidine and silver-based dressings in standard NPWT were significantly superior compared with non-antimicrobial polyurethane foam dressings or PHMB coated gauze dressing after 48 hours.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Bandages , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Silver/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy , Wound Infection/therapy , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Animals , Imines , In Vitro Techniques , Polyurethanes , Staphylococcus aureus , Swine
4.
J Wound Care ; 26(3): 79-87, 2017 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28277997

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Acute traumatic wounds are contaminated with bacteria and therefore an infection risk. Antiseptic wound irrigation before surgical intervention is routinely performed for contaminated wounds. However, a broad variety of different irrigation solutions are in use. The aim of this retrospective, non-randomised, controlled longitudinal cohort study was to assess the preventive effect of four different irrigation solutions before surgical treatment, on wound infection in traumatic soft tissue wounds. METHOD: Over a period of three decades, the prophylactic application of wound irrigation was studied in patients with contaminated traumatic wounds requiring surgical treatment, with or without primary wound closure. The main outcome measure was development of wound infection. From 1974-1983, either 0.04 % polihexanide (PHMB), 1 % povidone-iodine (PVP-I), 4 % hydrogen peroxide, or undiluted Ringer's solution were concurrently in use. From 1984-1996, only 0.04 % PHMB or 1 % PVP-I were applied. From 1997, 0.04 % PHMB was used until the end of the study period in 2005. RESULTS: The combined rate for superficial and deep wound infection was 1.7 % in the 0.04 % PHMB group (n=3264), 4.8 % in the 1 % PVP-I group (n=2552), 5.9 % in the Ringer's group (n=645), and 11.7 % in the 4 % hydrogen peroxide group (n=643). Compared with all other treatment arms, PHMB showed the highest efficacy in preventing infection in traumatic soft tissue wounds (p<0.001). However, compared with PVP-I, the difference was only significant for superficial infections. CONCLUSION: The large patient numbers in this study demonstrated a robust superiority of 0.04 % PHMB to prevent infection in traumatic soft tissue wounds. These retrospective results may further provide important information as the basis for power calculations for the urgently needed prospective clinical trials in the evolving field of wound antisepsis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Povidone-Iodine/therapeutic use , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Wound Healing/drug effects , Cohort Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Preoperative Care , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy
5.
J Wound Care ; 26(8): 470-475, 2017 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28795892

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The use of cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAPP) as a new therapeutic option to aid the healing of chronic wounds appears promising. Currently, uncertainty exists regarding their classification as medical device or medical drug. Because the classification of CAPP has medical, legal, and economic consequences as well as implications for the level of preclinical and clinical testing, the correct classification is not an academic exercise, but an ethical need. METHOD: A multidisciplinary team of physicians, surgeons, pharmacists, physicists and lawyers has analysed the physical and technical characteristics as well as legal conditions of the biological action of CAPP. RESULTS: It was concluded that the mode of action of the locally generated CAPP, with its main active components being different radicals, is pharmacological and not physical in nature. CONCLUSION: Depending on the intended use, CAPP should be classified as a drug, which is generated by use of a medical device directly at the point of therapeutic application.


Subject(s)
Atmospheric Pressure , Cold Temperature , Equipment and Supplies/classification , Pharmaceutical Preparations/classification , Plasma Gases/therapeutic use , Wound Infection/therapy , Humans
6.
Br J Dermatol ; 173(2): 351-8, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25772951

ABSTRACT

Infection is the likeliest single cause of delayed healing in healing of chronic open wounds by secondary intention. If neglected it can progress from contamination to colonization and local infection through to systemic infection, sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and it can be life-threatening. Infection in chronic wounds is not as easy to define as in acute wounds, and is complicated by the presence of biofilms. There is, as yet, no diagnostic for biofilm presence, but it contributes to excessive inflammation - through excessive and prolonged stimulation of nitric oxide, inflammatory cytokines and free radicals - and activation of immune complexes and complement, leading to a delay in healing. Control of biofilm is a key part of chronic wound management. Maintenance debridement and use of topical antimicrobials (antiseptics) are more effective than antibiotics, which should be reserved for treating spreading local and systemic infection. The continuing rise of antimicrobial resistance to antibiotics should lead us to reserve their use for these indications, as no new effective antibiotics are in the research pipeline. Antiseptics are effective through many mechanisms of action, unlike antibiotics, which makes the development of resistance to them unlikely. There is little evidence to support the theoretical risk that antiseptics select resistant pathogens. However, the use of antiseptic dressings for preventing and managing biofilm and infection progression needs further research involving well-designed, randomized controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Wound Infection/therapy , Acute Disease , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Biofilms , Chronic Disease , Debridement/methods , Forecasting , Humans , Occlusive Dressings , Wound Healing/physiology , Wound Infection/microbiology , Wound Infection/physiopathology
7.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(11): 2265-73, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26337434

ABSTRACT

Nosocomial surgical site infections (SSI) are still important complications in surgery. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to elucidate the possible role of skin flora surviving preoperative antisepsis as a possible cause of SSI. We conducted a two-phase prospective clinical trial in patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery at a university trauma center in northern Germany. Quantitative swab samples were taken from pre- and postantiseptic skin and, additionally, from the wound base, wound margin, and the suture of 137 patients. Seventy-four patients during phase I and 63 during phase II were investigated. Microbial growth, species spectrum, and antibiotic susceptibility were analyzed. In phase two, the clonal relationship of strains was additionally analyzed. 18.0 % of the swab samples were positive for bacterial growth in the wound base, 24.5 % in the margin, and 27.3 % in the suture. Only 65.5 % of patients showed a 100 % reduction of the skin flora after antisepsis. The microbial spectrum in all postantiseptic samples was dominated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Clonally related staphylococci were detected in ten patients [nine CoNS, one methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)]. Six of ten patients were suspected of having transmitted identical clones from skin flora into the wound. Ethanol-based antisepsis results in unexpected high levels of skin flora, which can be transmitted into the wound during surgery causing yet unexplained SSI. Keeping with the concept of zero tolerance, further studies are needed in order to understand the origin of this flora to allow further reduction of SSI.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Antisepsis/methods , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Preoperative Care/methods , Skin/microbiology , Wounds and Injuries/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteria/drug effects , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Orthopedics , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
J Wound Care ; 24(5): 196, 198-200, 202-3, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25970756

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In the age of multiresistant microbes and the increasing lack of efficient antibiotics, conventional antiseptics play a critical role in the prevention and therapy of wound infections. Recent studies have demonstrated the antiseptic effects of cold atmospheric pressure plasma (APP). In this pilot, study we investigate the overall suitability of one of the first APP sources for wound treatment focusing on its potential antimicrobial effects. METHOD: The wound closure rate and the bacterial colonisation of the wounds were investigated. Patients suffering from chronic leg ulcers were treated in a clinical controlled monocentric trial with either APP or octenidine (OCT). In patients who presented with more than one ulceration in different locations, one was treated with APP and the other one with OCT. Each group was treated three times a week over a period of two weeks. The antimicrobial efficacy was evaluated immediately after and following two weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Wounds treated with OCT showed a significantly higher microbial reduction (64%) compared to wounds treated with APP (47%) immediately after the treatment. Over two weeks of antiseptic treatment the bacterial density was reduced within the OCT group (-35%) compared to a slight increase in bacterial density in the APP-treated group (+12%). Clinically, there were no signs of delayed wound healing observed in either group and both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The immediate antimicrobial effects of the APP prototype source were almost comparable to OCT without any signs of cytotoxicity. This pilot study is limited by current configurations of the plasma source, where the narrow plasma beam made it difficult to cover larger wound surface areas and in order to avoid untreated areas of the wound bed, smaller wounds were assigned to the APP-treatment group. This limits the significance of AAP-related effects on the wound healing dynamics, as smaller wounds tend to heal faster than larger wounds. However, clinical wound healing studies on a larger scale now seem justifiable. A more advanced plasma source prototype allowing the treatment of larger wounds will address APP's influence on healing dynamics, synergetic treatment with current antiseptics and effects on multiresistant bacteria.


Subject(s)
Argon Plasma Coagulation/methods , Atmospheric Pressure , Cold Temperature , Plasma Gases/therapeutic use , Varicose Ulcer/therapy , Wound Infection/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Imines , Male , Middle Aged , Occlusive Dressings , Pilot Projects , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Varicose Ulcer/microbiology , Wound Healing
9.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 27(3): 148-57, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24434726

ABSTRACT

Because of its antimicrobial properties, nonthermal plasma could serve as an alternative to chemical antisepsis in wound treatment. Therefore, this study investigated the inactivation of biofilm-embedded Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG81 by a surface barrier-discharged (SBD) plasma for 30, 60, 150 and 300 s. In order to optimize the efficacy of the plasma, different carrier gases (argon, argon admixed with 1% oxygen, and argon with increased humidity up to approx. 80%) were tested and compared against 0.1% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) exposure for 600 s. The antimicrobial efficacy was determined by calculating the difference between the numbers of colony-forming units (CFU) of treated and untreated biofilms. Living bacteria were distinguished from dead by fluorescent staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Both SBD plasmas and CHG showed significant antimicrobial effects compared to the untreated control. However, plasma treatment led to a higher antimicrobial reduction (argon plasma 4.9 log10 CFU/cm(2), argon with admixed oxygen 3 log10 CFU/cm(2), and with increased gas humidity 2.7 log10 CFU/cm(2) after 300 s) compared to CHG. In conclusion, SBD plasma is suitable as an alternative to CHG for inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa embedded in biofilm. Further development of SBD plasma sources and research on the role of carrier gases and humidity may allow their clinical application for wound management in the future.


Subject(s)
Biofilms/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Plasma Gases/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Argon/chemistry , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Fluorescence , Humidity , Microscopy, Confocal , Oxygen/chemistry , Time Factors
10.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 43(2): 174-81, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22155121

ABSTRACT

The purpose of these recommendations is to provide a standard format for reporting treatment results and standardised epidemiologic data after aortic vascular graft infection to improve the comparison of clinical outcomes between different therapeutic approaches and different study populations. Analytical reporting standards for patients' characteristics, type and extent of the disease, type of treatment and study design are described. Adherence to these recommendations will improve clinical relevance, quality and comparability of future studies dealing with aortic vascular graft infections.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis/microbiology , Disease Notification/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Comorbidity , Demography , Europe , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Risk Factors , United States
11.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 25(6): 298-304, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22907313

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, treatment of genital tract infections is based on administration of either antibiotics or antiseptics. While antibiotics may be applied systemically or topically, antiseptics may be applied only topically. In case of bacterial vaginosis (BV), antibiotic therapy may often be limited and side effects due to systemic administration may develop. Polihexanide (PHMB) is a promising option for the topical treatment of genital tract infections, in particular BV and vaginitis. METHOD: A systematic search for publications on the use of PHMB for the treatment of genital infections in two electronic databases was performed. Titles, abstracts and citations were imported into a reference database. Duplicates were removed and two reviewers assessed each identified publication separately. RESULTS: Among a total of 204 references, 3 prospective randomized trials were identified. Two trials treated BV infections with PHMB in comparison to clindamycin as antibiotic standard therapy with no significant differences either in safety or in efficacy. The third controlled trial investigated the clinical efficacy of PHMB compared to placebo in the treatment of human papilloma virus. Patients treated with PHMB daily for up to 16-weeks showed significantly higher (52%) clearance of genital warts as compared to patients treated with placebo (4%). CONCLUSION: PHMB may be a clinically effective alternative for the treatment of BV and human papilloma virus. Although PHMB-based antiseptics are available since the late 90s, controlled trials to investigate its clinical potential for antiseptic treatment are scant. Clinical use of antiseptics for the treatment of infectious diseases should be explored and supported further.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Biguanides/therapeutic use , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/drug therapy , Reproductive Tract Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
12.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 30(7): 825-9, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21604206

ABSTRACT

Alcohol-based skin antiseptics are recommended with a minimum application time of 10 min on skin containing high numbers of sebaceous glands. In clinical practice, a 10-min application time is often too long. Therefore, we determined the efficacy of skin antiseptics on the forehead and lower back using shorter application times. Five alcoholic solutions were tested in a double-blind trial for their colony-forming units (cfu) reduction after 3, 4, 5 and 10 min on the forehead of 20 healthy volunteers and the lower back of 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients against the reference alcohol 70% propan-2-ol, 10 min. After an application time of 3 min, 3/5 (forehead) and 5/5 (lower back) preparations were at least equally as effective compared to the reference alcohol and an application time of 10 min. Alcohol-based skin antiseptics do not require a 10-min application time. For all of the tested antiseptics, a minimum application time of 3 min on sebaceous skin can be recommended.


Subject(s)
Alcohols/administration & dosage , Alcohols/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Skin/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 24(6): 337-41, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21832866

ABSTRACT

AIM: The efficacy of antimicrobial compounds included in wound dressings has been determined using the quantitative suspension test according to EN 13727 before. However, as suspension tests are not an accurate reflection of the conditions under which wound antiseptics are used, it was investigated if a disc carrier test would yield results simulating practical conditions on wound surfaces. A silver-leaching foam wound dressing was used for evaluation of the disc carrier test method. METHOD: The disc carriers consisted of circular stainless-steel discs measuring 2 cm in diameter and 1.5 mm in thickness, complying with the requirements of EN 10088-2. Carriers were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively, together with an artificial wound secretion and left to dry at room temperature for 30 min. The wound dressings being tested were placed on the discs for the length of the exposure time, and after neutralization by thioglycolate in phosphate-buffered saline the number of surviving test organisms was then counted. The logarithmic reduction factor was calculated from the difference between the initial inoculum and the number of recovered test organisms. RESULTS: The disc carrier test allowed determination of an antimicrobial efficacy in a realistic setting. It also imposed more stringent requirements on efficacy over time than the quantitative suspension test. The silver foam wound dressing showed a time-dependent antimicrobial efficacy. After 24-hour application time, the reduction factors against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and the methicillin-resistant S. aureus were 1.9 ± 0.15, 2.1 ± 0.14 and 3.1 ± 0.18, respectively. CONCLUSION: The disc carrier test was a useful method for testing the antimicrobial efficacy of a foam silver dressing. The antimicrobial dressing exhibited an antimicrobial effect after 3 h and achieved a reduction >2 log against the tested bacterial strains in the presence of a simulated wound secretion after 24 h.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Bandages , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Silver/pharmacology , Wound Infection/prevention & control , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
15.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 24(5): 245-55, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21508658

ABSTRACT

Currently, there are no generally accepted definitions for wounds at risk of infection. In clinical practice, too many chronic wounds are regarded as being at risk of infection, and therefore many topical antimicrobials - in terms of frequency and duration of use - are applied to wounds. Based on expert discussion and current knowledge, a clinical assessment score was developed. The objective of this wounds at risk (W.A.R.) score is to allow decision-making on the indication for the use of antiseptics on the basis of polihexanide. The proposed clinical classification of W.A.R. shall facilitate the decision for wound antisepsis and allow an appropriate general treatment regimen with the focus on the prevention of wound infection. The W.A.R. score is based on a clinically oriented risk assessment using concrete patient circumstances. The indication for the use of antiseptics results from the addition of differently weighted risk causes, for which points are assigned. Antimicrobial treatment is justified in the case of 3 or more points.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Biguanides/therapeutic use , Wound Infection/prevention & control , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/immunology , Biguanides/immunology , Humans , Immunocompetence , Immunocompromised Host , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Wound Infection/microbiology , Wounds and Injuries/microbiology , Wounds and Injuries/physiopathology
16.
J Wound Care ; 20(4): 149-50, 152, 154 passim, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21537301

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This cohort study evaluated the clinical efficacy of singlet oxygen, ActiMaris (AM) a hypertonic (3%) ionised (pH 9.8) sea water solution. It was assumed that when used for wound cleansing, disinfection and the reduction of inflammation, AM would be safe and effective. METHOD: Between May 2008 and May 2009, ambulant patients presenting at one of four wound healing centres were included in the study. Patients had critically colonised and/or infected, malodorous wounds, covered with slough/fibrin or wounds showing inflammation of the periwound skin. Wounds were assessed in terms of percentage changes in fibrin, slough and granulation tissue, they were assessed clinically and high resolution digital photographs were scored by a physician who was blinded to treatment allocation. Results were compared at baseline (week 0) and following 42 days of AM treatment (week 6). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included in the analysis. Dressing changes were at 2-day intervals on average, and the median treatment period was 46.04 days (range: 3-197). At 42 days, 33% (n=24) of included wounds had healed, 57% (n=42) had improved and 10% (n=7) remained stagnant. Cleansing and wound disinfection with AM was effective. In 31 patients (42%) wounds had showed clinical signs and symptoms of critical colonisation and/or infection at day 0, whereas at day 42 the infection was completely eradicated. Inflammation was reduced in 60% (n=44) of cases and patients did not report pain or discomfort when using AM. CONCLUSION: The use of singlet oxygen was shown to be safe and the results of this study indicate AM to be useful for wound cleansing, disinfection, reducing inflammation and promoting wound healing. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The centres were supplied with the study product by the sponsor. The authors have no financial interest in writing this article.


Subject(s)
Oxidants/therapeutic use , Singlet Oxygen/therapeutic use , Wound Infection/therapy , Aged , Bandages , Comorbidity , Disinfection , Humans , Leg Ulcer/therapy , Middle Aged , Oxidants/pharmacology , Singlet Oxygen/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing , Wound Infection/epidemiology
17.
J Hosp Infect ; 113: 104-114, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744383

ABSTRACT

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are the most common adverse outcomes due to delivery of medical care. HAIs increase morbidity and mortality, prolong hospital stay, and are associated with additional healthcare costs. Contaminated surfaces, particularly those that are touched frequently, act as reservoirs for pathogens and contribute towards pathogen transmission. Therefore, healthcare hygiene requires a comprehensive approach whereby different strategies may be implemented together, next to targeted, risk-based approaches, in order to reduce the risk of HAIs for patients. This approach includes hand hygiene in conjunction with environmental cleaning and disinfection of surfaces and clinical equipment. This review focuses on routine environmental cleaning and disinfection including areas with a moderate risk of contamination, such as general wards. As scientific evidence has not yet resulted in universally accepted guidelines nor led to universally accepted practical recommendations pertaining to surface cleaning and disinfection, this review provides expert guidance for healthcare workers in their daily practice. It also covers outbreak situations and suggests practical guidance for clinically relevant pathogens. Key elements of environmental cleaning and disinfection, including a fundamental clinical risk assessment, choice of appropriate disinfectants and cleaning equipment, definitions for standardized cleaning processes and the relevance of structured training, are reviewed in detail with a focus on practical topics and implementation.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Disinfectants , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care , Disinfection , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Humans , Hygiene
18.
J Hosp Infect ; 111: 189-199, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic not only had an impact on public life and healthcare facilities in general, but also affected established surgical workflows for elective procedures. The strategy to protect patients and healthcare workers from infection by SARS-CoV-2 in surgical departments has needed step-by-step development. Based on the evaluation of international recommendations and guidelines, as well as personal experiences in a clinical 'hot spot' and in a 450-bed surgical clinic, an adapted surgical site infection (SSI) prevention checklist was needed to develop concise instructions, which described roles and responsibilities of healthcare professionals that could be used for wider guidance in pandemic conditions. METHOD: Publications of COVID-19-related recommendations and guidelines, produced by health authorities and organizations, such as WHO, US-CDC, ECDC, the American College of Surgery and the Robert Koch Institute, were retrieved, assessed and referenced up to 31st January 2020. Additionally, clinical personal experiences in Germany were evaluated and considered. RESULTS: Part 1 of this guidance summarizes the experience of a tertiary care, surgical centre which utilized redundant hospital buildings for immediate spatial separation in a 'hot spot' COVID-19 area. Part 2 outlines the successful screening and isolation strategy in a surgical clinic in a region of Germany with outbreaks in surrounding medical centres. Part 3 provides the synopsis of personal experiences and international recommendations suggested for implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Understanding of COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2-related epidemiology, is constantly and rapidly changing, requiring continuous adaptation and re-evaluation of recommendations. Established national and local guidelines for continuation of surgical services and prevention of SSI require ongoing scrutiny and focused implementation. This manuscript presents a core facility checklist to support medical institutions to continue their clinical and surgical work during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Infection Control/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Germany , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
19.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 23 Suppl: 45-51, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20829662

ABSTRACT

Polihexanide is an antimicrobial compound suitable for clinical use in critically colonized or infected acute and chronic wounds. Its beneficial characteristic is attributable particularly to its broad antimicrobial spectrum, good cell and tissue tolerability, ability to bind to the organic matrix, low risk of contact sensitization, and wound healing promoting effect. In addition, no development of microorganism resistance during polihexanide use has been detected to date, nor does this risk appear imminent. The aim of therapy using polihexanide is to reduce the pathogen burden in a critically colonized or infected acute or chronic wound. An increasing number of articles on the subject of wound antisepsis with polihexanide can be found in the medical literature. However, there is still little published information on the practical use of polihexanide-containing wound antiseptics. The purpose of this review article is to describe the handling and the different possibilities of use of polihexanide-containing preparations, including the currently approved indications, contraindications and reservations. The use of polihexanide is not the only therapeutic option in management of wounds; therefore, priority is also given to prior surgical debridement and clarification of the cause of the underlying disease, including appropriate therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Biguanides/therapeutic use , Wound Healing/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Antisepsis , Biguanides/administration & dosage , Biguanides/adverse effects , Biguanides/pharmacology , Debridement , Decontamination , Humans , Therapeutic Irrigation/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 23(2): 86-90, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20016250

ABSTRACT

To reduce pruritus and colonization with Staphylococcus aureus, textiles containing silver are increasingly used as therapeutic option for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). While wearing such textiles, the contained silver is in close contact with the patient's skin. The silver serves two purposes: to reduce bacterial colonization of the skin, and to prevent contamination of the textile with ensuing growth of microorganisms. It is unknown whether the silver impregnation is able to reduce bacterial contamination of the textile during wearing and to prevent bacterial growth within the textile. The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial contamination in textiles containing silver versus placebo worn by patients with AD and to determine the efficacy of processing worn textiles by manual and machine-based washing. Additionally, the effect of silver textiles on S. aureus and total bacterial counts colonizing the skin of AD patients was analyzed. The reduction factor of silver textile compared to placebo was 0.5 log steps against S. aureus and 0.4 log steps against total bacteria. Silver textiles exhibited significantly less S. aureus as well as total bacterial colonization after 2 days of wearing without washing, as compared with a placebo textile. On placebo textiles 385.6 +/- 63.5 CFU total bacteria and 236.5 +/- 49.9 CFU S. aureus, and on silver textiles 279.9 +/- 78.7 CFU total bacteria and 119.3 +/- 39.4 CFU S. aureus were found on the inner side of the textiles facing the neurodermitis lesions. However, the unexpectedly high residual contamination despite the silver exposure represents a potential risk as recontamination source of S. aureus that could maintain the proinflammatory process in AD. This contamination is nearly completely eliminated by machine-based washing at 60 degrees C using conventional washing powder. AD patients wearing silver textiles should change their used clothes at least daily and wash them in a washing machine at 60 degrees C.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Neurodermatitis/therapy , Silver , Textiles , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Colony Count, Microbial , Dermatitis, Atopic/microbiology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Laundering/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Neurodermatitis/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/etiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL