ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To define the impact of missed ordering of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in high-risk general surgery populations. BACKGROUND: The primary cause of preventable death in surgical patients is VTE. Although guidelines and validated risk calculators assist in dosing recommendations, there remains considerable variability in ordering and adherence to recommended dosing. METHODS: All adult inpatients who underwent a general surgery procedure between 2016 and 2019 and were entered into Atrium Health National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry were identified. Patients at high risk for VTE (2010 Caprini score ≥5) and without bleeding history and/or acute renal failure were included. Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative VTE. Electronic medical record identified compliance with "perfect" VTE chemoprophylaxis orders (pVTE): no missed orders and no inadequate dose ordering. Multivariable analysis examined association between pVTE and 30-day VTE events. RESULTS: A total of 19,578 patients were identified of which 4252 were high-risk inpatients. Hospital compliance of pVTE was present in 32.4%. pVTE was associated with shorter postoperative length of stay and lower perioperative red blood cell transfusions. There was 50% reduced odds of 30-day VTE event with pVTE (odds ratio: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.80) and 55% reduction in VTE event/mortality (odds ratio: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63). After controlling for relevant covariates, pVTE remained significantly associated with decreased odds of VTE event and VTE event/mortality. CONCLUSIONS: pVTE ordering in high-risk general surgery patients was associated with 42% reduction in odds of postoperative 30-day VTE. Comprehending factors contributing to missed or suboptimal ordering and development of quality improvement strategies to reduce them are critical to improving outcomes.
Subject(s)
Venous Thromboembolism , Adult , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Chemoprevention , Retrospective Studies , Anticoagulants/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive (MIS) left pancreatectomy (LP) is increasingly used to treat pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite improved short-term outcomes, no studies have demonstrated long-term benefits over open resection. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried between 2010 and 2016 for patients with PDAC, grouped by surgical approach (MIS vs open). Demographics, comorbidities, clinical staging, and pathologic staging were used for propensity-score matching. Perioperative, short-term oncologic, and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: After matching, both cohorts included 805 patients. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, staging, or preoperative therapy between cohorts. The MIS cohort had a shorter length of stay (6.8 ± 5.5 vs 8.5 ± 7.3 days; P < .0001) with the trend toward improved time to chemotherapy (53.9 ± 26.1 vs 57.9 ± 29.9 days; P = .0511) and margin-positive resection rate (15.3% vs 18.9%; P = .0605). Lymph node retrieval and receipt of chemotherapy were similar. The MIS cohort had higher median overall survival (28.0 vs 22.1 months; P = .0067). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest survival for robotic compared with laparoscopic and open LP (41.9 vs 26.6 vs 22.1 months; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety of MIS LP and favorable long-term oncologic outcomes. The improved survival after MIS LP warrants further study with prospective, randomized trials.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Propensity Score , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Robotic Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Bismuth-Corlette (BC) classification is used to categorize hilar cholangiocarcinoma by proximal extension along the biliary tree. As the right hepatic artery crosses just behind the left bile duct, we hypothesized that BC IIIb tumors would have a higher likelihood of local unresectability due to involvement of the contralateral artery. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma taken to the operating room for intended curative resection between April 2008 and September 2016. Cases were assigned BC stages based on preoperative imaging. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included in the study. All underwent staging laparoscopy after which 16 cases were aborted for metastatic disease. Of the remaining 52 cases, 14 cases were explored and aborted for locally advanced disease. Thirty-eight underwent attempt at curative resection. After excluding cases aborted for metastatic disease, the chance of proceeding with resection was 55.6% for BC IIIb staged lesions compared to 80.0% of BC IIIa lesions and to 82.4% for BC I-IIIa staged lesions (P < 0.05). About 44.4% of BC IIIb lesions were aborted for locally advanced disease versus 17.6% of remaining BC stages. CONCLUSIONS: When hilar cholangiocarcinoma is preoperatively staged as BC IIIb, surgeons should anticipate higher rates of locally unresectable disease, likely involving the right hepatic artery.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/classification , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Klatskin Tumor/classification , Klatskin Tumor/surgery , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Hepatic Artery/pathology , Humans , Klatskin Tumor/pathology , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
Incorporation of liver transplant techniques in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery has created an opportunity for the resection of locally advanced hepatic tumors formerly considered unresectable. A 73-year-old woman presented with cholangiocarcinoma involving inferior vena cava, all three hepatic veins, and right anterior portal pedicle, initially deemed nonoperative. This case demonstrates the first combined application of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy and ex vivo resection to perform an R0. For diseases dependent upon resection, surgical advances and innovations expand the spectrum of interventions through interdisciplinary techniques.
Subject(s)
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Hepatectomy/methods , Ligation , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Portal Vein/surgery , Aged , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Female , Hepatic Veins/pathology , Hepatic Veins/surgery , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Portal Vein/pathology , Vena Cava, Inferior/pathology , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgerySubject(s)
Digestive System Neoplasms/pathology , Digestive System Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Care Team , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm, Residual , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Vena Cava, Inferior/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown that for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), survival is associated with negative resection margins (R0). This requires increasingly proximal resection, putting patients at higher risk for complications, which may delay chemotherapy. For patients with microscopically positive resection margins (R1), the use of modern adjuvant therapies may offset the effect of R1 resection. METHODS: Patients at our institution with HC undergoing curative-intent resection between January 2008 and July 2019 were identified by retrospective record review. Demographic data, operative details, tumor characteristics, postoperative outcomes, recurrence, survival, and follow-up were recorded. Patients with R0 margin were compared to those with R1 margin. Patients with R2 resection were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients underwent attempted resection with 34 (45.3%) cases aborted due to metastatic disease or locally advanced disease. Forty-one (54.7%) patients underwent curative-intent resection with R1 rate of 43.9%. Both groups had similar rates of adjuvant therapy (56.5% vs. 61.1%, P = .7672). Complication rates and 30 mortality were similar between groups (all P > .05). Both groups had similar median recurrence-free survival (R0 29.2 months vs. R1 27.8 months, P = .540) and median overall survival (R0 31.2 months vs. R1 38.8 months, P = .736) with similar median follow-up time (R0 29.9 months vs. R1 28.5 months, P = .8864). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, patients undergoing hepatic resection for HC with R1 margins have similar recurrence-free and overall survival to those with R0 margins. Complications and short-term mortality were similar. This may indicate that with use of modern adjuvant therapies obtaining an R0 resection is not an absolute mandate.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Klatskin Tumor/mortality , Klatskin Tumor/surgery , Margins of Excision , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Postoperative Complications , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy may improve survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, determining response to therapy is difficult. Artificial intelligence allows for novel analysis of images. We hypothesized that a deep learning model can predict tumor response to NAC. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy prior to pancreatoduodenectomy were identified between November 2009 and January 2018. The College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Grades 0-2 were defined as pathologic response (PR) and grade 3 as no response (NR). Axial images from preoperative computed tomography scans were used to create a 5-layer convolutional neural network and LeNet deep learning model to predict PRs. The hybrid model incorporated decrease in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) of 10%. Accuracy was determined by area under the curve. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided between PR (333 images) and NR (443 images). The pure model had an area under the curve (AUC) of .738 (P < .001), whereas the hybrid model had an AUC of .785 (P < .001). CA19-9 decrease alone was a poor predictor of response with an AUC of .564 (P = .096). CONCLUSIONS: A deep learning model can predict pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and the model is improved with the incorporation of decreases in serum CA19-9. Further model development is needed before clinical application.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/pathology , Adenoma/surgery , Deep Learning , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The collaboration of hepatopancreaticobiliary with transplant surgery expands technical options and opportunity for potentially curative resection in traditionally inoperable cases. We identified and describe three different types of ex vivo hepatic resections that include (1) explantation with formal hepatectomy, (2) explantation with re-implantation of the whole liver after vascular reconstruction, and (3) explantation with formal hepatectomy after future liver remnant volume augmentation.
Subject(s)
Hepatectomy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation/methods , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgery , Adult , Aged , Blood Transfusion, Autologous , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/blood supply , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimal management following index laparotomy is poorly defined in secondary peritonitis patients. Although "open abdomen" (OA), or temporary abdominal closure with planned relaparotomy, is used to reassess bowel viability or severity of contamination, recent studies demonstrate comparable morbidity and mortality with primary abdominal closure (PC). This study evaluates differences between OA and PC following emergent laparotomy. METHODS: Using the Premier database at a quaternary care center (2012-2016), nontrauma patients with secondary peritonitis requiring emergent laparotomy were identified (N = 534). Propensity matching for PC (n = 331; 62%) or OA (n = 203; 38%) was performed using variables: Mannheim Peritonitis Index, lactate, and vasopressor requirement. One hundred eleven closely matched pairs (PC:OA) were compared. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-four patients (55.0% female; mean age, 59.6 ± 15.5 years) underwent emergent laparotomy. Of the OA patients, 136 (67.0%) had one relaparotomy, while 67 (33.0%) underwent multiple reoperations. Compared to daytime cases, laparotomies performed overnight (6 pm-6 am) had more temporary closures with OA (42.8% OA vs. 57.2% PC, p = 0.04). When assessing by surgeon type, PC was performed in 78.7% of laparotomies by surgical subspecialties compared to 56.7% (p < 0.0001) of acute care surgeons. After propensity matching, OA patients had increased postoperative complications (71.2% vs. 41.4%, p < 0.0001), mortality (22.5% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.006), and longer median length of stay (13 vs. 9 days, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Open abdomen was performed in 38.0% of patients, with one-third of those requiring multiple reoperations. Complications, mortality rates, and costs associated with OA were significantly increased when compared to PC. Given these findings, future studies are needed to determine appropriate indications for OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.