Tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, decreases sensitivity to rectal distension in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Tegaserod reduces the symptoms associated with irritable bowel syndrome, and anti-nociceptive effects have been demonstrated in animals. Its effect on the rectal sensitivity in humans has not been delineated clearly. AIM: To evaluate the action of tegaserod on rectal sensitivity in response to distension by means of a reflexological technique based on electrophysiological recordings of the RIII nociceptive reflex. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, performed in 20 healthy women, quantified the effects of slow or rapid rectal distensions on the RIII reflex at baseline and on day 8 following treatment with either placebo or tegaserod (6 mg b.d.). RESULTS: At baseline, slow distensions performed up to the pain threshold induced gradual inhibitions of the RIII reflex. On day 8, these inhibitory effects were significantly reduced in the tegaserod group, but not in the placebo group (P = 0.0001). The effects of rapid distensions were not significantly modified by tegaserod or placebo. The intensity of subjective pain perception and rectal compliance were not altered by either treatment. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that tegaserod reduces the sensitivity to rectal distension in healthy subjects and interacts with the processing of sensory visceral information.

What technique should be used for routine detection and quantification of HBV DNA in clinical samples?

Detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in serum allows monitoring of HBV replication and assessing responses to antiviral treatment. HBV DNA quantification measures virus replication and can be used as a prognosis indicator of liver disease and an index of response to antiviral drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of three HBV DNA detection and/or quantification techniques for assessing HBV replication. Three hundred unselected sera with a request for HBV DNA detection and quantification were tested with a molecular hybridisation technique without amplification (Digene Hybrid-Capture, Murex Diagnostics Ltd), a signal amplification assay based on branched DNA technology (Quantiplex HBV DNA, Chiron diagnostics), and an 'in-house' qualitative, non quantitative target amplification assay based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers located in the S gene of the HBV genome. Hybrid-capture and branched DNA gave concordant results in 278 cases (93%). In the 128 samples positive by both assays, DNA titres in pg/ml were related significantly (r = 0.70, P < 0.0001). but branched DNA titres increased more rapidly than hybrid-capture titres when the amount of HBV DNA in the sample increased. Twenty-two sera (7%) were negative by hybrid-capture, but positive in branched DNA (detection rate gain: 15%). In these 22 patients, DNA titres were low, HBsAg was present in all instances and alanine aminotransferase activity was elevated in 18 patients (82%); HBeAg was present in seven patients (32%) and anti-HBe antibodies in 18 patients (82%); liver biopsy, undertaken in 18 patients, revealed chronic active hepatitis in all instances, associated with cirrhosis in eight cases. Qualitative, non-quantitative HBV DNA PCR was positive in 75 (50%) of the 150 hybrid-capture-negative, branched DNA-negative samples, including a significant proportion of patients without evidence of ongoing HBV-related liver disease. The results show that in general, the branched DNA assay detects HBV DNA in more patients than hybrid-capture and that this improved detection rate is relevant clinically and genome equivalents/ml are preferred to pg/ml to quantify HBV DNA in clinical specimens and finally qualitative, non-quantitative polymerase chain reaction can detect HBV DNA in patients without evidence of active HBV-related liver disease. This study emphasizes the need for more sensitive, university standardised quantitative HBV DNA assays and for the definition of clinically relevant cutoffs with these assays.

Routine detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA in clinical laboratories: performance of three commercial assays.

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes in molecular biology-based assays appear to be the most reliable methods for monitoring HBV infection and assessing responses to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three HBV-DNA detection and quantification assays currently used for the management of HBV-infected patients: a solution-hybridization assay based on hybrid-capture (Digene Hybrid-Capture, Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK); a signal-amplification assay based on 'branched-DNA' (bDNA) technology (Quantiplex HBV DNA, Bayer Diagnostics, Emeryville, CA); and a target-amplification assay based on competitive polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor HBV Monitor, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA). The Monitor assay was significantly more sensitive than both the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. This better sensitivity appeared to be clinically relevant. The linear ranges of quantification in the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor methods were 6.5-9 log10 genome copies/ml, 6.5-9.5 log10 genome equivalents/ml, and 3-5.5 log10 genome copies/ml, respectively. However, the HBV-DNA units used in the three assays were not comparable. The specificity of the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor assays was 99.2% (95% confidence interval: 97.7-100.0%), 99.2% (97.7-100.0%), and 97.8% (95.3-100%), respectively. Their within-run coefficients of variation and log10 SDs were 5.5% (+/- 0.025 log10 copies/ml), 6.7% (+/- 0.029 log10 Eq/ml) and 21.0% (+/- 0.093 log10 copies/ml), respectively. Between-run coefficients of variation ranged from 4.4-39.1%, 5-39.5%, and 17.8-96.1%, respectively. The competitive PCR-based Monitor assay appears to be significantly more sensitive but slightly less specific and reproducible than the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. Given their respective performance, these three assays should be used in complementary fashion in the management of HBV-infected patients.

Quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum by branched DNA-based signal amplification assays.

The objective of the study was to compare the clinical sensitivity and specificity of versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the branched DNA (bDNA)-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification assay, and also to compare the values yielded by the two versions according to the HCV genotype. Serum samples from 268 patients tested routinely by a non-quantitative HCV RNA PCR assay (group A) were tested with version 2.0 of the bDNA assay. Samples from 342 HCV PCR-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C eligible for interferon treatment (group B) were tested with both version 1.0 and version 2.0 of the bDNA assay. Version 2.0 had a clinical sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval (CI): 87-97%) in group A and 89% (86-92%) in group B. In group B, the gain in sensitivity with bDNA 2.0 was 16% relative to bDNA 1.0 (P < 0.001). The log values of the two assays correlated with samples positive by both assays (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001), but the distribution of values was larger in samples containing HCV genotypes 2 and 3. The mean ratio of assay 2.0/assay 1.0 values was 1.69 +/- 1.44 (range: 0.33-13.43). The mean ratio was close to 1 with samples containing genotype 1 or 4, but ranged from 0.33 to more than 5. The mean ratio was close to 3 with samples containing genotype 2 or 3, and ranged from 0.5 to more than 13. HCV RNA levels were significantly lower in samples containing genotype 4 than in those containing other genotypes. Sera from 200 anti-HCV-negative, HCV RNA PCR-negative blood donors (group C), and from 164 anti-HCV-negative patients with symptoms of chronic liver disease (group D) were used to assess the clinical specificity of bDNA 2.0. In addition, samples with an HCV RNA titer between 0.2 (assay cutoff) and 0.5 MEq/ml from a group of 546 patients tested routinely for HCV RNA load by bDNA 2.0 (group E) were retested by bDNA 2.0 and by qualitative PCR. The specificity of bDNA 2.0 was 100% (98-100%) in group C and 99% (97-100%) in group D. Among the 41 samples from group E, 38 were positive by bDNA 2.0 retesting (36 were PCR-positive) and three were negative by bDNA 2.0 retesting (all were PCR-positive). It is concluded that version 2.0 of the bDNA assay is markedly more sensitive than version 1.0 and has a good specificity. In contrast with version 1.0, version 2.0 is not influenced by the HCV genotype. The relationship between values obtained with assays 1.0 and 2.0 on clinical specimens is not linear, indicating that HCV RNA titers cannot reliably be calculated from the results of version 1.0.

[Strategies of hepatitis C screening in general practice. Results of a two-center randomized trial]. / Stratégies de dépistage de l'hépatite virale C en Médecine générale. Résultats d'un essai randomisé bicentrique.

OBJECTIVES: To improve the detection of patients infected with hepatitis C virus. METHODS: A study was undertaken in the general medicine setting in two hepatitis C networks. General practitioners volunteered and received training on hepatitis C, then were randomly assigned to one of two screening strategies: group 1: general practitioners prescribed hepatitis C virus testing if the risk factors for HCV hepatitis C virus infection were identified during questioning of patients, group 2: general practitioners were helped in their screening approach by posters and leaflets on the risk factors of hepatitis C virus, available in the waiting room. RESULTS: A total of 184 general practitioners enrolled 90 from group 1 and 94 from group 2. During a 15-month-period, 617 serologies were prescribed, 323 by general practitioners in group 1 (in patients who were an average of 40 year-old) and 294 in group 2 (in patients who were an average of 44 year-old); 489 serologies (79.3%) were actually performed (261 and 228 respectively) and 25 (5.1%) tested positive (15 and 10 respectively). The number of prescribed, performed, and positive serologies did not differ from one group to the other. The motive for hepatitis C virus screening was similar in both groups and included a history of transfusion in 27% of cases, intravenous drug use in 6%, increased ALT or symptoms compatible with hepatitis in 13%, nosocomial exposure in 22%. Risk factors in the 25 patients who were hepatitis C virus positive were drug use (44%), history of transfusion before 1991 (16%), elevated ALT or symptoms (12%), others (28%). CONCLUSION: This study comparing screening strategies in general medicine, resulted in the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in 5% of tested patients, regardless of the strategy. However, the fewer serologies prescribed by general practitioners (an average of 3 tests in a 15-month-period) suggests a low rate of identified risk factors in general practice, and emphasizes that other types of screening procedures should be implemented and evaluated.

[Hemolytic anemia disclosing Wilson's disease. Report of 2 cases]. / Anémie hémolytique révélatrice d'une maladie de Wilson. A propos de deux observations.

INTRODUCTION: The liver and central nervous system are the usual targets of Wilson's disease, an inherited disorder of copper metabolism. Severe hemolytic anemia is an unusual complication of Wilson's disease. EXEGESIS: We report two cases of Wilson's disease revealed by acute intravascular hemolytic anemia associated with liver failure. Blood smear analysis showed stippled red cells in one case; hemolytic anemia improved within a few weeks in both patients but progressive liver failure required transplantation in the other. Hemolysis probably results from the toxic effect of free serum copper on erythrocyte membrane. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of Wilson's disease must be considered in case of acute hemolytic anemia associated with liver failure in young adults.

The KRAS mutation detection within the initial management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a status report in France in 2011.

BACKGROUND: The detection of KRAS mutations is mandatory to initiate an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational retrospective study was performed in 160 French centres during a 2-week period in 2011. Its main objective was to evaluate the rate of KRAS testing in patients with mCRC having initiated their first-line therapy. Secondary objectives included time of process, techniques used and reasons for non-prescription. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty eight mCRC patients (67.1 ± 11.3 years, synchronous metastases: 69.9%) were enrolled in the study. KRAS testing was prescribed in 81.1% of patients, in a median of 15 days after the diagnosis of metastases, and of 15 days prior to the initiation of the first-line metastatic chemotherapy. KRAS status was available for 87% of patients, after 23.6 ± 28.2 days, but after the choice of the first-line therapy in 56.6% of patients. Heterogeneity of reception time was noteworthy within regions (8.3 ± 7 days to 38.8 ± 101 days). KRAS testing was not prescribed mainly due to the planned non-prescription of an anti-EGFR antibody. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that KRAS testing is definitely part of the management of most of mCRC patients, despite discrepancies observed in the rate of prescription and the time of results.

Epidemiological factors affecting the severity of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease: a French survey of 6,664 patients. The Study Group for the Prevalence and the Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Virus.

Cirrhosis is a frequent and severe event in the course of chronic hepatitis C, but it is unclear why some patients develop cirrhosis after a given period whereas others do not. We studied a large cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis C to determine the role of the route of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the onset of cirrhosis. Six thousand six hundred sixty-four patients were enrolled in a nationwide survey of chronic hepatitis C in France. We first randomly defined a representative sample of 30 hospitals with medical units managing patients with HCV infection. All patients with chronic hepatitis C were enrolled if hepatitis C was diagnosed or treated in these units in 1991, 1992, or 1993. A questionnaire was filled in from the patients' charts and covered demographic data, risk factors for HCV infection, clinical and histological data, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus status, and alcohol intake. Descriptive statistics were prepared, and factors potentially related to the onset of cirrhosis were identified by means of univariate analysis followed by stepwise logistic regression analysis. Among the patients enrolled, 21.4% had biopsy-proven cirrhosis. Prevalence of cirrhosis markedly varied according to the route of transmission of HCV. It was significantly more frequent in blood recipients (23.4%) than in drug users (7.0%). Although the occurrence of cirrhosis was dependent on disease duration, it remained more frequent in blood recipients than in drug users for a given duration. Apart from the route of transmission, excessive alcohol intake was also associated with a higher risk of cirrhosis (34.9% vs. 18.2%; P < .001), and so was HBV infection (24.6% vs. 21.1%; P < .05). These factors acted independently of the route of transmission. Hepatocellular carcinoma was observed in 3.6% of all patients and in 17.8% of cirrhotic patients, and its occurrence was strongly and mainly related to the presence of cirrhosis. In conclusion, cirrhosis occurred in about 20% of the HCV-infected patients in this study and was more frequent in blood recipients than in drug users, independently of disease duration. Expected changes in the epidemiology of HCV infection might modify the risk of developing cirrhosis and, thereafter, cancer.

[Hepatitis C virus infection. Epidemiology]. / Infection par le virus de l'hépatite C épidémiologie.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission is parenteral in 60 to 70% of cases, related either to blood transfusion or to intravenous drug use. Minor routes of infection have also been identified: sexual transmission, intrafamilial transmission, mother-to-infant transmission. In 30 to 40% of cases, no obvious risk factor for HCV contamination can be identified. Subjects at risk for HCV infection are patients who received transfusions of blood or blood products, hemophiliacs, patients under renal dialysis, patients who underwent organ transplantation, intravenous drug users and, to a lesser extent, healthcare workers. HCV is present everywhere in the world. The prevalence of HCV markers varies from 0.5% in Scandinavia or Switzerland to more than 5% in some developing countries. This prevalence is about 1% in France. The study of HCV genotypes shows that their distribution varies according to geographical localization and that some genotypes are associated with special routes of contamination.

Type I membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and HCV infection.

Type I membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) is secondary to chronic bacterial, parasitic, viral (HB) infections, to autoimmune disorders or primary or malignant haemopathies. MPGN are thought to be linked to the deposition of immune complexes preformed in the circulation or formed in situ in the glomeruli. A link between HCV and type I MPGN was reported for the first time in 1993. In some patients, the renal clinical pattern is the most obvious (nephrotic syndrome) whereas in others liver disease or cryoglobulinaemia prevail. A risk factor of HCV infection exists in 80% of cases. Renal biopsy and scanning electron microscopy usually substantiate cryoglobulinaemia. Circulating cryoglobulins are most often detected, usually of type II. CH50 is decreased in 90% of patients and rheumatoid factors have been found in two-thirds of patients. The cryoprecipitate contains viral RNA and anti-HCV antibodies. The viral RNA is nearly always found in the cryoprecipitate. Analysing the viral genotype does not elicit predominance of any particular type. Viral genome detection in renal biopsy specimens appears to be technically difficult. Type I MPGN secondary to HCV infection appear to be improved by interferon-alpha therapy but treatment suspension is immediately followed by the recurrence of viraemia and nephrotic syndrome. Serological tests to detect anti-HCV antibodies and viral RNA by PCR in type I MPGN, so far considered as 'primary', are scarce and produce conflicting results: there might be a link between those glomerulopathies and HCV infection in the USA and in Japan only, not in Europe.

Low HCV replication levels in end-stage hepatitis C virus-related liver disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The relationship between HCV RNA levels and the severity of HCV-related liver disease has been addressed in a few studies, which has led to conflicting results. To clarify this point, we studied serum HCV RNA levels in patients with HCV liver disease at various stages, using a second-generation branched DNA (bDNA) assay. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight patients with chronic HCV infection were classified into 3 groups: group A included 92 patients with chronic active hepatitis (CAH) without cirrhosis; group B included 30 patients with CAH and compensated cirrhosis; group C included 26 patients with end-stage cirrhosis. In all patients, serum HCV RNA was sought by qualitative PCR and quantified using second-generation bDNA assay. HCV RNA was also quantified after liver transplantation in 22 patients from group C. HCV genotype was determined in all patients. RESULTS: HCV RNA was detected by PCR in 100%, l00% and 92% of the patients from groups A, B and C, respectively (NS). The proportion of patients with HCV RNA levels higher than the cut-off of bDNA assay was significantly lower in patients from group C than in patients from groups A and B (50% vs 94% and 93% respectively, p<0.0001). The mean HCV viremia was lower in group C than in groups A and B (1.35+/-0.24 MEq/ml vs 5.00+/-6.04 MEq/ml and 5.85+/-7.70 MEq/ml, respectively, p<0.0001). This difference was independent of HCV genotype. In the patients from group C, post-transplant HCV RNA levels were significantly higher than pretransplant HCV RNA levels (14.90+/-26.40 vs 1.35+/-0.24 MEq/ml, p=0.0065). CONCLUSIONS: HCV RNA levels do not appear to differ significantly among patients with CAH with or without compensated cirrhosis. In contrast, HCV RNA levels seem to be significantly lower in patients with end-stage HCV-related liver cirrhosis. In these patients, high levels of replication are restored after liver transplantation, suggesting that low pretransplant viral loads are not due to the intrinsic characteristics of the infective viral strains, but rather to the severity of liver disease.

Worsening of steatosis is an independent factor of fibrosis progression in untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C and paired liver biopsies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Steatosis, a frequent histological finding in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), has been suggested to influence liver fibrosis progression. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in patients with CHC and paired liver biopsies the relationship between the evolution of steatosis and that of fibrosis between the two biopsies. METHODS: Ninety six patients were selected according to the following criteria: absence of treatment; absence of cirrhosis at initial biopsy; and serum hepatitis B surface antigen and human immunodeficiency virus antibody negativity. Degrees of necroinflammatory activity, fibrosis, and steatosis grades were assessed in the two biopsies. In addition to histological lesions, parameters studied included the source of infection, duration of infection, body mass index, alcohol intake, alanine aminotransferase levels, hepatitis C virus genotype, and viral load. RESULTS: The mean interval between the two biopsies was 48 (32) months. Steatosis was found in 54% of patients at first biopsy, and was severe in 9%. Worsening of steatosis was observed in 34% of patients, stability in 50%, and improvement in 16%. Worsening of steatosis was significantly associated with hepatic fibrosis progression in patients with (p=0.03) or without (p<0.03) steatosis at diagnosis. Overall, fibrosis progression was observed in 31% of patients and stability in 69%. In a univariate analysis, fibrosis progression was associated with male sex (p=0.05), worsening of histological activity (p=0.04), and worsening of steatosis (p=0.0003). In a multivariate analysis, the only factor independently associated with fibrosis progression was worsening of steatosis (worsening v improvement/stability: odds ratio 4.7 (95% confidence interval 1.3-10.8); p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in untreated patients with CHC and serial liver biopsies, fibrosis progression is strongly associated with worsening of steatosis.

Factors affecting treatment responses to interferon-alpha in chronic hepatitis C.

Parameters have been studied to predict responses to interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C, but the definition of a response, the times at which responses were assessed, and the pretreatment parameters considered differ markedly from study to study. Thus, 113 patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated 3-6 months with 3 MU of IFN-alpha 2a three times a week and assessed for pretreatment parameters predictive of responses to IFN. In a multivariate analysis, a biochemical response (normal aminotransferase activity) at the end of treatment was significantly associated with low body weight, normal gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity, and a pretreatment hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype other than 1. Six months after the end of treatment, a low virus burden and a lack of anti-HCV IgM core antibodies were independently associated with sustained virologic response (i.e., normal aminotransferase activity and HCV RNA negativity). Therefore, these pretreatment parameters should be taken into account when individual treatment protocols are designed.

Significance of indeterminate third-generation hepatitis C virus recombinant immunoblot assay.

Indeterminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA3.0; Ortho Diagnostic Systems) patterns were arbitrarily defined by the manufacturer as the detection of only one antibody out of the four that were sought, namely, c100 (NS4 encoded), c22 (core encoded), c33c (NS3 encoded), and NS5 (NS5 encoded). The aims of the present study were (i) to determine the prevalence of indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns in patients consecutively tested for anti-HCV antibodies in a university hospital; (ii) to evaluate the significance of these patterns in terms of viral replication, liver disease, and risk factors for HCV; and (iii) to get an insight into the mechanism underlying this peculiar immune response. Among 3,074 serum samples consecutively tested for anti-HCV antibodies, 588 were found to be positive by screening assays. Fifty-nine of them (10%) were RIBA3.0 indeterminate and were compared with 59 RIBA3.0-positive ones. Thirty-one RIBA3.0-indeterminate and 53 RIBA3.0-positive serum samples were HCV RNA positive by PCR (53 versus 90%; P < 10(-6). RIBA3.0-indeterminate and RIBA-3.0-positive patients with positive PCR results were not significantly different for the prevalence of risk factors for HCV infection and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase activities. Immunosuppression, attributable to coexisting human immunodeficiency virus infection, organ transplantation, or the administration of immunosuppressive drugs, was significantly more frequent in PCR-positive, RIBA3.0-indeterminate patients than in PCR-negative, RIBA3.0 indeterminate patients (P < 0.001) and PCR-positive patients with a positive RIBA3.0 result (P < 0.01). The distribution of HCV genotypes did not differ significantly between HCV RNA-positive patients with indeterminate or positive RIBA3.0 results. In conclusion, the prevalence of indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns in virology laboratories is about 10%; in about half of these patients HCV replication is detected by PCR; the main factor responsible for indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns could be immunosuppression, whereas HCV genotypes do not seem to play major role.

Histopathologic impact of GB virus C infection on chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dual infection by hepatitis GB virus type C (GBV-C) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common. To assess the histopathologic impact of GBV-C infection on liver lesions, liver biopsy specimens of 105 patients chronically infected with HCV, 17 of whom (15%) were also infected with GBV-C, were reviewed. METHODS: Semiquantitative histopathologic assessment of liver lesions was performed using the Knodell's score and the METAVIR grading system. RESULTS: Hepatitis activity was mild, moderate, or severe in 3 (18%), 11 (64%), and 3 (18%) patients, respectively, infected with GBV-C and HCV vs. 26 (29%), 56 (64%), and 6 (7%) patients, respectively, infected with HCV alone (no significant difference). Cirrhosis was present in 4 (24%) coinfected patients vs. 19 (22%) HCV-positive patients (no significant difference). No significant difference in fibrosis, presence of portal lymphoid aggregates, steatosis, and hemosiderosis was observed between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the evaluation of each item of the Knodell's score. CONCLUSIONS: This detailed histopathologic evaluation of GBV-C infection in chronic hepatitis C shows that GBV-C infection does not affect histopathologic severity and characteristics of chronic hepatitis C, thus suggesting a minor role of GBV-C infection in liver disease.

Genetic complexity of the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of hepatitis C virus (HCV): influence on the characteristics of the infection and responses to interferon alfa therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

HCV exists within its host as pools of related genetic variants referred to as quasispecies. The hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of the E2 envelope gene is subjected to strong selective pressure from neutralizing antibodies. The genetic complexity of this region is defined as the total number of genetic variants within the quasispecies population. The genetic complexity of the HVR1 region was examined in patients with chronic hepatitis C and its relationship with the epidemiology of HCV infection, and its influence on liver disease and the response to interferon treatment were determined in 114 patients with chronic hepatitis C. The genetic complexity of the HVR1 major variants was measured before treatment by using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique, and was compared with epidemiological, clinical, virological and histological features. The patients were treated with 3 megaunits of interferon (IFN) alfa for 3 to 6 months and the response to treatment was assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. The HVR1 could be studied in 101 of the 114 patients (89%). Genetic complexity was significantly higher in patients infected through blood transfusion than intravenous drug use (mean complexity index: 5.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.7 +/- 1.5, respectively; P = 0.04). This relationship was independent of age and the estimated time since infection. No significant relationship was found with other parameters of infection or liver disease. In univariate analysis, the genetic complexity of HVR1 major variants did not affect the rates of ALT normalization at months 3 and 6 of IFN treatment. HVR1 genetic complexity was lower in patients with a sustained virological response than in non-responders (4.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.4 +/- 2.0, respectively; P = 0.07). In multivariate analysis of pretreatment parameters associated with a sustained virological response to treatment, three parameters appeared to be independent predictors of such a response: a low viral load (P < 0.04), a low anti-HCV core IgM titer (P = 0.03) and a low genetic complexity of HVR1 major variants (P < 0.04). In conclusion, the HVR1 of HCV has a quasispecies distribution in infected individuals. Its genetic complexity is significantly higher in transfusion recipients than in intravenous drug users, suggesting that the size of the initial inoculum affects the later emergence and development of viral quasispecies. The genetic complexity of HVR1, together with viral load and the anti-HCV IgM titer, are independent predictors of a sustained virological response to IFN alfa in patients with chronic hepatitis.

Liver iron accumulation in patients with chronic active hepatitis C: prevalence and role of hemochromatosis gene mutations and relationship with hepatic histological lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver iron accumulation has been described in patients with chronic active hepatitis (CAH) C, and could play a role in the course of liver disease and negatively influence the response to interferon. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of liver iron accumulation in CAH C, to assess its relationship with the HFE C282Y and H63D mutations, and to study its interactions with hepatic histological lesions. METHODS: Two hundred and nine patients (131 men, 78 women, mean age 44.3+/-12.0 years) with CAH C, including 19 patients with cirrhosis (9.1%) were studied. A semiquantitative grading system from 0 to 3 was used for histological assessment of liver iron accumulation on Perls' staining. The HFE C282Y and H63D mutations were screened for by restriction enzyme analysis performed on PCR-amplified products. Histological scores of activity and fibrosis were determined according to a previously validated METAVIR score system. RESULTS: Liver iron accumulation was found in 88/209 patients (42.1%), and was generally mild. The C282Y and H63D allele frequencies were in 23 (11.0%), and 50 (23.9%), respectively. No association was found between the presence of liver iron accumulation and the detection of the C282Y and H63D mutations. A significant relationship was found between the severity of histological activity and liver iron accumulation of macrophagic or mixed (i.e. both macrophagic and hepatocytic) type (p = 0.04). Although the number of cirrhotic patients was small, cirrhosis was more frequently observed in patients with than without liver iron accumulation (17.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data suggest that the liver iron accumulation in patients with CAH C is significantly associated with histological activity and cirrhosis, whereas the two missense hemochromatosis gene mutations are not major determinants.

GB virus C (GBV-C) infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Influence on liver disease and on hepatitis virus behaviour: effect of interferon alfa therapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, 1) the prevalence and the epidemiological characteristics of GB virus C (GBV-C) infection, 2) the influence of GBV-C on hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, 3) the pathogenicity of GBV-C in the absence of treatment and under interferon therapy, and 4) the effect of interferon alfa on GBV-C and HCV replications. One hundred fifteen patients with chronic hepatitis C were studied. Before treatment, they were tested for GBV-C RNA by PCR and GBV-C genotype was determined for positive samples. Pretreatment information was collected, including age, gender, source of HCV, estimated duration of HCV infection, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activities, cirrhosis and Knodell's score on liver biopsy, HCV genotype, HCV viral burden and anti-HCV core IgM antibodies. The genetic complexity of the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of HCV was studied by PCR-Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism. All patients were treated with 3 to 9 mega units of interferon alfa-2a three times per week for 3 to 6 months. The influence of GBV-C on the evolution of ALT and HCV replication during and after treatment was studied, and GBV-C and HCV RNA were monitored monthly by PCR during this period. Eighteen patients (16%) were GBV-C RNA-positive. Among 11 samples studied, GBV-C genotype 2a was present in 9 cases, 2b in one case and type 3 in one case. GBV-C RNA-positive patients were significantly younger than GBV-C RNA-negative ones (38.4 +/- 11.5 vs. 47.4 +/- 14.0, P = 0.012), a result independent of the route of transmission and the disease duration. No difference between GBV-C RNA-positive and -negative patients was found for other epidemiological parameters (e.g. gender, risk factor for parenteral viral infections, disease duration and HCV genotypes), or for the characteristics of HCV infection and related liver disease (e.g. HCV RNA level, genetic complexity of the HVR1, anti-HCV core IgM, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activities, cirrhosis and Knodell's score). GBV-C did not influence the rates of ALT normalization at months 3, 6 and 12 and of sustained hepatitis C virological response at month 12 of treatment follow-up. During treatment, GBV-C viremia became undetectable in 12 patients (67%) but relapse occurred after treatment withdrawal in all the nine patients with sufficient follow-up. In the remaining six patients (33%), GBV-C resisted interferon. Whatever the effect of interferon on GBV-C replication, the ALT levels correlated with the presence of HCV RNA. In conclusion, GBV-C infection is frequent in patients with chronic hepatitis C, who are mainly, but not exclusively, infected by GBV-C genotype 2a. GBV-C positive patients are significantly younger than GBV-C negative ones. GBV-C does not seem to affect HCV replication, liver disease and responses of HCV infection and liver disease to interferon therapy. GBV-C is sensitive to 3 mega units of interferon alfa administered three times per week in two-thirds of the patients, but relapse is constant with this dosage after treatment withdrawal.

Reinforced regimen of interferon alfa-2a reduces the incidence of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a multicentre randomised trial. Multicentre GER-CYT-04 Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our aim was to assess and compare the long-term effect of interferon at standard (6 months) and reinforced dose and duration regimens in chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: A multicentre institutional trial included 244 previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C, without cirrhosis, who were randomly allocated to either standard (3 MU thrice a week for 24 weeks; n=120) or reinforced (6 MU daily for 12 days, 6 MU thrice a week for 22 weeks, 3 MU thrice a week for 24 weeks; n=124) regimens. The main endpoint was sustained ALT response at 72 weeks (18 months); secondary end-points were virological (branched DNA and PCR) and histological responses (incidence of cirrhosis) at month 18. RESULTS: Sustained ALT response was observed in five patients (4%, 95% confidence interval 0-8%) in the standard group and in 21 patients (18%, 95% confidence interval 11-25%), from the reinforced group (p=0.002), in agreement with virological response in 21 (81%) patients. Cirrhosis at month 18 was observed in ten (10%) patients in the standard group and one (1%) in the reinforced group (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The standard regimen of interferon, in chronic hepatitis C, confers a minimal sustained response rate at 18 months and may not prevent the occurrence of cirrhosis. Reinforced regimens allow sustained response to be reached in a limited number of patients and reduce the risk of cirrhosis during 18 months of follow-up.