Robustness of intensity modulated proton treatment of esophageal cancer for anatomical changes and breathing motion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In this study, we assessed the robustness of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in esophageal cancer for anatomical variations during treatment. METHODS: The first sixty esophageal cancer patients, treated clinically with chemoradiotherapy were included. The treatment planning strategy was based on an internal target volume (ITV) approach, where the ITV was created from the clinical target volumes (CTVs) delineated on all phases of a 4DCT. For optimization, a 3 mm isotropic margin was added to the ITV, combined with robust optimization using 5 mm setup and 3 % range uncertainty. Each patient received weekly repeat CTs (reCTs). Robust plan re-evaluation on all reCTs, and a robust dose summation was performed. To assess the factors influencing ITV coverage, a multivariate linear regression analysis was performed. Additionally, clinical adaptations were evaluated. RESULTS: The target coverage was adequate (ITV V94%>98 % on the robust voxel-wise minimum dose) on most reCTs (91 %), and on the summed dose in 92 % of patients. Significant predictors for ITV coverage in the multivariate analysis were diaphragm baseline shift and water equivalent depth (WED) of the ITV in the beam direction. Underdosage of the ITV mainly occurred in week 1 and 4, leading to treatment adaptation of eight patients, all on the first reCT. CONCLUSION: Our IMPT treatment of esophageal cancer is robust for anatomical variations. Adaptation appears to be most effective in the first week of treatment. Diaphragm baseline shifts and WED are predictive factors for ITV underdosage, and should be incorporated in an adaptation protocol.

Time-resolved clinical dose volume metrics, calculations and predictions based on source tracking measurements and uncertainties to aid treatment verification and error detection for HDR brachytherapy-a proof-of-principle study.

Objective.High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy lacks routinely available treatment verification methods. Real-time tracking of the radiation source during HDR brachytherapy can enhance treatment verification capabilities. Recent developments in source tracking allow for measurement of dwell times and source positions with high accuracy. However, more clinically relevant information, such as dose discrepancies, is still needed. To address this, a real-time dose calculation implementation was developed to provide more relevant information from source tracking data. A proof-of-principle of the developed tool was shown using source tracking data obtained from a 3D-printed anthropomorphic phantom.Approach.Software was developed to calculate dose-volume-histograms (DVH) and clinical dose metrics from experimental HDR prostate treatment source tracking data, measured in a realistic pelvic phantom. Uncertainty estimation was performed using repeat measurements to assess the inherent dose measuring uncertainty of thein vivodosimetry (IVD) system. Using a novel approach, the measurement uncertainty can be incorporated in the dose calculation, and used for evaluation of cumulative dose and clinical dose-volume metrics after every dwell position, enabling real-time treatment verification.Main results.The dose calculated from source tracking measurements aligned with the generated uncertainty bands, validating the approach. Simulated shifts of 3 mm in 5/17 needles in a single plan caused DVH deviations beyond the uncertainty bands, indicating errors occurred during treatment. Clinical dose-volume metrics could be monitored in a time-resolved approach, enabling early detection of treatment plan deviations and prediction of their impact on the final dose that will be delivered in real-time.Significance.Integrating dose calculation with source tracking enhances the clinical relevance of IVD methods. Phantom measurements show that the developed tool aids in tracking treatment progress, detecting errors in real-time and post-treatment evaluation. In addition, it could be used to define patient-specific action limits and error thresholds, while taking the uncertainty of the measurement system into consideration.

Trends in incidence, treatment, and relative survival of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2021.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed rapidly over the years. The aim of this study was to assess the trends in incidence, treatment, and relative survival (RS) of patients diagnosed with CRC in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2021. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 2 75667 patients diagnosed with CRC between 2000 and 2021 were included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Analyses were stratified for disease extent (localised: T1-3N0M0; regional: T4N0M0/T1-4N1-2M0; distant: T1-4N0-2M1) and localisation (colon; rectum). Trends were assessed with joinpoint regression. RESULTS: CRC incidence increased until the mid-2010s but decreased strongly thereafter to rates comparable with the early 2000s. Amongst other trend changes, local excision rates increased for patients with localised colon (2021: 13.6 %) and rectal cancer (2021: 34.9 %). Moreover, primary tumour resection became less common in patients with distant colon (2000-2021: 60.9-12.5 %) or rectal cancer (2000-2021: 47.8-6.9 %), while local treatment of metastases rates increased. Five-year RS improved continuously for localised and regional colon (97.7 % and 72.0 % in 2017, respectively) and rectal cancer (95.2 % and 76.3 % in 2017, respectively). The rate of anti-cancer treatments decreased in distant colon (2010-2021: 80.3 % to 67.2 %; p < 0.001) and rectal cancer (2011-2021: 86.0 % to 77.0 %; p < 0.001). The improvement of five-year RS stagnated for distant colon (2010-2017: 11.2 % to 11.9 %; average percentage of change [APC]: 2.1, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -7.6, 4.7) and rectal cancer (2009-2017: 12.7 % to 15.6 %; APC: 1.4, 95 % CI: -19.1, 5.5). CONCLUSIONS: Major changes in the incidence and treatment of CRC between 2000 and 2021 were identified and quantified. Five-year RS increased continuously for patients with localised and regional CRC, but stagnated for patients with distant CRC, likely caused by decreased rates of anti-cancer treatment in this group.

Dosimetry and Monte Carlo modelling of the Papillon+ contact X-ray brachytherapy device.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a Monte Carlo (MC) model for the Papillon+ contact x-ray brachytherapy (CXB) device, producing 50 kilovolt (kV) X-rays, specifically focusing on its application with a 25 mm diameter rectal applicator for contact therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The validation process involved depth dose and transverse dose profile measurements using EBT3 gafchromic films positioned in a plastic water low energy range phantom. The half-value layer (HVL) was further measured and derived from the simulated X-ray spectra. RESULTS: Excellent agreement within ±2% was achieved between the measured and simulated on-axis depth dose curves for the 25 mm rectal applicator. Transverse dose profile measurements showed a high level of agreement between the simulation and measurements, on average 3.1% in contact with the applicator at the surface of the phantom and on average 1.7% at 10 mm depth. A close agreement within 5.5% was noticed concerning the HVL between the measurement and simulation. The simulated gamma spectra and 2D-dose distribution demonstrated a soft X-ray energy spectrum and a uniform dose distribution in contact with the applicator. CONCLUSIONS: An MC model was successfully developed for the Papillon+ eBT device with a 25 mm diameter rectal applicator. The validated model, with its demonstrated accuracy in depth dose and transverse dose profile simulations, is a valuable tool for quality assurance and patient safety and, in a later phase, may be used for treatment planning, dose calculations and tissue inhomogeneity corrections.

European clinical practice guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer (OMEC-4).

INTRODUCTION: The OligoMetastatic Esophagogastric Cancer (OMEC) project aims to provide clinical practice guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD). METHODS: Guidelines were developed according to AGREE II and GRADE principles. Guidelines were based on a systematic review (OMEC-1), clinical case discussions (OMEC-2), and a Delphi consensus study (OMEC-3) by 49 European expert centers for esophagogastric cancer. OMEC identified patients for whom the term OMD is considered or could be considered. Disease-free interval (DFI) was defined as the time between primary tumor treatment and detection of OMD. RESULTS: Moderate to high quality of evidence was found (i.e. 1 randomized and 4 non-randomized phase II trials) resulting in moderate recommendations. OMD is considered in esophagogastric cancer patients with 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 involved extra-regional lymph node station. In addition, OMD continues to be considered in patients with OMD without progression in number of metastases after systemic therapy. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is recommended for baseline staging and for restaging after systemic therapy when local treatment is considered. For patients with synchronous OMD or metachronous OMD and a DFI ≤ 2 years, recommended treatment consists of systemic therapy followed by restaging to assess suitability for local treatment. For patients with metachronous OMD and DFI > 2 years, upfront local treatment is additionally recommended. DISCUSSION: These multidisciplinary European clinical practice guidelines for the uniform definition, diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric OMD can be used to standardize inclusion criteria in future clinical trials and to reduce variation in treatment.