Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 119
Filter
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 53(4): 567-575, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28215512

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of angiosome targeted (direct) revascularisation according to revascularisation method in patients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study cohort comprised 545 diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia and tissue loss (Rutherford 5, 6). All patients underwent infrapopliteal endovascular (PTA) or open surgical revascularisation between January 2008 and December 2013. Differences in the outcome after direct revascularisation, bypass surgery, and PTA were investigated by means of Cox proportional hazards analysis. The endpoints were wound healing, leg salvage, and amputation free survival. RESULTS: Overall, 60.3% of the ischaemic wounds healed during 1 year of follow-up. The highest wound healing rate was achieved after direct bypass (77%) and the worst after indirect PTA (52%). The Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the number of affected angiosomes <3 (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.84) was associated with improved wound healing, whereas wound healing was poorest after indirect PTA (p = .001). When Cox proportional hazard analysis was adjusted for the number of affected angiosomes, direct bypass gave the best wound healing (p = 0.003). The overall amputation rate was 25.1% at 1 year of follow-up, and the Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that haemodialysis compared with patients with no haemodialysis (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.49-4.38), C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/dL (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.45-2.90), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.26), and number of affected angiosomes >3 (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.24-2.46) were significantly associated with poor leg salvage. Direct PTA was associated with a lower rate of major amputation compared with indirect PTA (HR 0.57 95% CI 0.37-0.89). CONCLUSION: In diabetics, indirect endovascular revascularisation leads to significantly worse wound healing and leg salvage rates compared with direct revascularisation. Therefore, endovascular procedures should be targeted according to the angiosome concept. In bypass surgery, however, the concept is of less value and the artery with the best runoff should be selected as the outflow artery.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Diabetic Angiopathies/therapy , Ischemia/therapy , Models, Cardiovascular , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Collateral Circulation , Critical Illness , Diabetic Angiopathies/diagnostic imaging , Diabetic Angiopathies/physiopathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Ischemia/physiopathology , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Regional Blood Flow , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Wound Healing
2.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 52(2): 179-88, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27102201

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To compare the post-operative and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic aortic surgery with those of conventional aortic surgery performed by a surgical team trained in laparoscopic aortic surgery. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between January 2006 and December 2011 with 228 consecutive patients having undergone aortic bypass surgery for either an abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 139) or occlusive aorto-iliac disease (n = 89). Conventional open aortic surgery was carried out in 145 patients, and total laparoscopic repair in 83 patients. The composite primary end point measure grouped together the following adverse events (AEs): (1) any deaths < 30 days or later deaths related to the operation; (2) post-operative hemorrhage necessitating reoperation; (3) myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days; (4) stroke ≤ 30 days; (5) post-operative respiratory failure necessitating re-intubation or assisted ventilation ≥ 4 days; (6) aortic prosthesis infection; (7) aortic prosthesis occlusion; (8) any re-operation related to aortic surgery. In order to diminish bias attributable to the absence of randomization, the two surgical groups were matched by a propensity score enabling analysis of 50 pairs of patients having presented with identical pre-operative characteristics. Univariate analysis of the AE occurring during the first 30 post-operative days was followed by multivariate analysis through logistic regression. The rate of AE during follow up was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the roles of the different co-variables were analyzed using the Cox model. RESULTS: Univariate analysis of the groups adjusted for propensity score showed that laparoscopic repair was associated with a significantly higher risk of AE over the first 30 post-operative days (p = .03). Logistic regression analysis showed that laparoscopic aortic technique (odds ratio [OR] 4.50; p = .01) and coronary artery disease (OR 4.67; p = .02) were independently related to the occurrence of an AE during the post-operative period. The occurrence of AEs during follow up was analyzed using the Cox model. Only two variables, laparoscopic aortic surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 4.40; p = .002) and coronary artery disease (HR 2.70, p = .02), were independently associated with the occurrence of an AE during follow up. The small number of patients included prevented a separate analysis with regard to aneurysmal and occlusive aortic disease. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that even with a well trained surgical team, the laparoscopic approach increases the risk for AEs observed in the course of aortic surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02325700.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 18(10): 1010-1015, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26919191

ABSTRACT

AIM: The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare robot-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy procedures for posterior compartment procidentia in terms of restoration of the anatomy using magnetic resonance (MR) defaecography. METHOD: Sixteen female patients (four with total prolapse, twelve with intussusception) underwent robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) and 14 female patients (two with prolapse, twelve with intussusception) laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR). Primary outcome measures were perioperative parameters, complications and restoration of anatomy as assessed by MR defaecography, which was performed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Patient demographics, operation length, operating theatre times and length of in-hospital stay were similar between the groups. The anatomical defects of rectal prolapse, intussusception and rectocele and enterocele were similarly corrected after rectopexy in either technique as confirmed with dynamic MR defaecography. A slight residual intussusception was observed in three patients with primary total prolapse (two RVMR vs one LVMR) and in one patient with primary intussusception (RVMR) (P = 0.60). Rectocele was reduced from a mean of 33.0 ± 14.9 mm to 5.5 ± 8.4 mm after RVMR (P < 0.001) and from 24.7 ± 17.5 mm to 7.2 ± 3.2 mm after LVMR (P < 0.001) (RVMR vs LVMR, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ventral rectopexy can be performed safely and within the same operative time as conventional laparoscopy. Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy allows good anatomical correction as assessed by MR defaecography, with no differences between the techniques.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Rectocele/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Aged , Defecography/methods , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Rectal Prolapse/pathology , Rectocele/pathology , Rectum/surgery , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 50(5): 671-4, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26319477

ABSTRACT

Type II endoleak is a common condition occurring after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR), and may result in aneurysm sac growth and/or rupture in a small number of patients. A prophylactic strategy of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization before EVAR has been advocated, however, the benefits of this strategy are controversial. A clinical vignette allows the authors to summarize the available data about this issue and discuss the possible benefits and risks of prophylactic IMA embolization before EVAR. The authors performed a meta-analysis of available data which showed that the pooled rate of type II endoleak after IMA embolization was 19.9% (95% CI 3.4-34.7%, I2 93%) whereas it was 41.4% (95% CI 30.4-52.3%, I2 76%) in patients without IMA embolization (5 studies including 596 patients: p < .0001, OR 0.369, 95% CI 0.22-0.61, I2 27%). Since treatment for type II endoleaks is needed in less than 20% of cases and this complication can be treated successfully in 60-70% of cases resulting in an aneurysm rupture risk of 0.9%, these data indicate that embolization of patent IMA may be of no benefit in patients undergoing EVAR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endovascular Procedures , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior , Preoperative Care/methods , Aged , Endoleak/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control
5.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 49(4): 412-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25747173

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of angiosome targeted revascularization according to the revascularization method. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study cohort comprised 744 consecutive patients who underwent infrapopliteal endovascular or surgical revascularization between January 2010 and July 2013. Differences in outcomes after bypass surgery and PTA were adjusted by estimating a propensity score, which was employed for one to one matching as well as adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that angiosome-targeted revascularization (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.65), bypass surgery (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.27), C-reactive protein ≤10 mg/dL (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.11-1.81), and the number of affected angiosomes (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98) were independent predictors of improved wound healing. When adjusted for the number of affected angiosomes and C-reactive protein ≤10 mg/dL, angiosome-targeted bypass surgery was associated with a significantly higher rate of wound healing than non-angiosome-targeted angioplasty (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.61-3.20). This was confirmed in propensity score adjusted analysis (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.35-2.16). Among patients who underwent angiosome-targeted revascularization, the propensity score adjusted analysis showed that bypass surgery was associated with a significantly better rate of wound healing (HR 154, 95% CI 1.09-2.16) but similar limb salvage rates when compared with angioplasty (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.44-1.43). CONCLUSION: Rates of wound healing and limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) were significantly better after angiosome-targeted revascularization, bypass surgery achieving significantly better wound healing than angioplasty.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty , Foot/blood supply , Foot/surgery , Ischemia/surgery , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty/methods , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Limb Salvage/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Grafting/methods , Wound Healing
6.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 47(5): 517-22, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24491282

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of angiosome-targeted revascularization to achieve healing of ischemic tissue lesions of the foot and limb salvage is controversial. This issue has been investigated in this meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of data on angiosome-targeted lower limb revascularization for ischemic tissue lesions of the foot were performed. RESULTS: Nine studies reported on data of interest. No randomized controlled study was available. There were 715 legs treated by direct revascularization according to the angiosome principle and 575 legs treated by indirect revascularization. The prevalence of diabetes was >70% in each study group and three studies included only patients with diabetes. The risk of unhealed wound was significantly lower after direct revascularization (HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.52-0.8, I2 0%, four studies included) compared with indirect revascularization. Direct revascularization was also associated with significantly lower risk of major amputation (HR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.75, I2 62%, eight studies included). Pooled limb salvage rates after direct and indirect revascularization were at 1 year 86.2% vs. 77.8% and at 2 years 84.9% vs. 70.1%, respectively. The analysis of three studies reporting only on patients with diabetes confirmed the benefit of direct revascularization in terms of limb salvage (HR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.75, I2 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that, when feasible, direct revascularization of the foot angiosome affected by ischemic tissue lesions may improve wound healing and limb salvage rates compared with indirect revascularization. Further studies of better quality and adjusted for differences between the study groups are needed to confirm the present findings.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Foot/blood supply , Ischemia/surgery , Limb Salvage/methods , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans
7.
Dis Esophagus ; 27(8): 715-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24118339

ABSTRACT

Esophageal perforation is associated with significant mortality, and this may markedly increase with advanced age. This multicenter study investigates this issue in patients older than 80 years. Data on 33 patients >80 years old who underwent conservative (10 patients), endoclip (one patient), stent grafting (11 patients), or surgical treatment (11 patients) for esophageal perforation were collected from nine centers. Surgical repair consisted of repair on drain in one patient, primary repair in seven patients, and esophagectomy in two patients. Among patients who underwent stent grafting, one required repeat stenting and another stent graft repositioning. One patient was converted to surgical repair after stent grafting. Thirteen patients (39.4%) died during the 30-day and/or in-hospital stay. Their mortality was significantly higher than in a series of patients<80 years old (13.0%, 21/161 patients, P=0.001). Three patients (30.0%) died after conservative treatment, one (100%) after treatment with endoclips, five (45.5%) after stent grafting, and four (36.4%) after surgical repair (P=0.548). Early survival with salvaged esophagus was 42.4% (conservative treatment: 70.0% endoclips 0%, stent grafting: 54.5%, and surgical repair: 54.5%, respectively, P=0.558). Estimated glomerular filtration rate<60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 (70.0% vs. 25.0%, P=0.043) and sepsis (100% vs. 32.1%, P=0.049) at presentation were associated with increased risk of early mortality in univariate analysis. Esophageal perforation in octogenarians is associated with very high early and intermediate high mortality irrespective of the treatment method used.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Perforation/mortality , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Esophageal Perforation/complications , Esophagectomy , Esophagoscopy , Esophagus/surgery , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Postoperative Period , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Treatment Outcome
8.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 45(3): 227-30, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23305788

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was planned to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for suspected rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. PATIENTS: A total of 97 patients who underwent open aneurysm repair for suspected rupture of AAA. METHODS: The accuracy of preoperative and post hoc evaluation of CTA scans was evaluated by using the intra-operative findings as reference. RESULTS: At surgery, 58 patients were found to have a ruptured aneurysm. Interpretation of CTA findings at admission resulted in one false-negative and two false-positive diagnoses of aneurysm rupture as observed at surgery (sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 94.9%, positive predictive value 96.6%, negative predictive value 97.4%). Post hoc, blinded review of CTA findings resulted in one false-negative and three false-positive diagnoses of aneurysm rupture (sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 92.3%, positive predictive value 95.0%, negative predictive value 97.3%). Agreement between initial and post hoc assessment of CTA-findings was statistically significant (kappa 0.978, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CTA is highly accurate in the diagnosis of suspected rupture of AAA. The risk of false-positive diagnosis is very low and it is not likely to affect the correct analysis of the results of comparative studies on endovascular versus open repair of ruptured AAA.


Subject(s)
Angiography, Digital Subtraction/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Aortic Rupture/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 45(2): 128-34, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23273900

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Currently most abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programmes discharge patients with aortic diameter of less than 30 mm. However, sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation (25 mm-29 mm) does not represent a normal aortic diameter. This observational study aimed to determine the outcomes of patients with screening detected sub aneurysmal aortic dilatation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Individual patient data was obtained from 8 screening programmes that had performed long term follow up of patients with sub aneurysmal aortic dilatation. Outcome measures recorded were the progression to true aneurysmal dilatation (aortic diameter 30 mm or greater), progression to size threshold for surgical intervention (55 mm) and aneurysm rupture. RESULTS: Aortic measurements for 1696 men and women (median age 66 years at initial scan) with sub-aneurysmal aortae were obtained, median period of follow up was 4.0 years (range 0.1-19.0 years). Following Kaplan Meier and life table analysis 67.7% of patients with 5 complete years of surveillance reached an aortic diameter of 30 mm or greater however 0.9% had an aortic diameter of 54 mm. A total of 26.2% of patients with 10 complete years of follow up had an AAA of greater that 54 mm. CONCLUSION: Patients with sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation are likely to progress and develop an AAA, although few will rupture or require surgical intervention.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/pathology , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Aged , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/pathology , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/etiology , Aortic Rupture/pathology , Dilatation, Pathologic , Disease Progression , Europe , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Ultrasonography , Vascular Surgical Procedures
10.
G Chir ; 33(8-9): 254-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23017283

ABSTRACT

Esophageal perforation is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Its etiology is as heterogenous as modalities currently employed for its treatment. There is no clear evidence which is the treatment of choice for esophageal perforation. This is partly due to the suboptimal quality of available studies and failure to accurately report on the characteristics, treatment and outcome of these patients. Indeed, baseline, operative and outcome data are important for a better evaluation of published data and possibly for including them in meta-analyses of aggregate or individual patient data. We propose a checklist for reporting data on esophageal perforation in order to standardize reporting of data of studies on this severe condition.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Perforation/diagnosis , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Medical Records/standards , Humans
11.
Diabetologia ; 54(12): 2971-7, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21845468

ABSTRACT

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to stratify the risk of diabetic patients with leg ulcer or gangrene undergoing infrainguinal revascularisation for critical limb ischaemia. METHODS: The study cohort included 732 revascularisation procedures performed in 597 diabetic patients with ulcer or gangrene. Logistic regression and CART analysis were used for identification of predictors of 1-year outcome. RESULTS: Logistic regression showed that chronic kidney disease (CKD) class (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16, 1.65) was an independent predictor of 1-year leg salvage (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve 0.60, 95% CI 0.54, 0.65). The terminal nodes of the CART for 1-year leg salvage were CKD classes 4-5, the level (infrapopliteal vs femoropopliteal revascularisation), type of revascularisation (bypass surgery vs percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) and gangrene (area under the ROC curve 0.62, 95% CI 0.57, 0.68). Logistic regression showed that pulmonary disease (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.11, 2.78), CKD class (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.24, 1.65), foot gangrene (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.21, 2.60) and patient age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01, 1.04) were independent predictors of 1-year amputation-free survival (area under the ROC curve 0.65, 95% CI 0.60, 0.69). The terminal nodes of the CART for 1-year amputation-free survival were CKD classes 3-5, patient's age of ≥ 75 years and foot gangrene (area under the ROC curve 0.64, 95% CI 0.60, 0.68). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: CKD is a formidable risk factor for poor intermediate outcome after infrainguinal revascularisation in diabetic patients with foot ulcer or gangrene. CART analysis indicates that foot gangrene is also a significant risk factor for adverse outcome.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/surgery , Foot/blood supply , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Foot/surgery , Gangrene/surgery , Humans , Ischemia/physiopathology , Ischemia/surgery , Limb Salvage/methods , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Patency , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
12.
Br J Surg ; 98(12): 1713-8, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22034180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in patients aged 80 years and older may be questioned owing to the patients' high operative risk and short life expectancy. METHODS: Data on patients aged at least 80 years, admitted for RAAA at four Finnish university hospitals, were collected and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Three hundred and ten consecutive patients aged 80 years and older with RAAA reached hospital alive; 200 (64·5 per cent) underwent open repair. The number of open repairs increased during the last 5 years (49·0 per cent of the whole series), with no significant increase in the number of patients treated conservatively. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 72·9 per cent. The operative mortality rate was 59·0 per cent and decreased from 66 to 52 per cent during the last 5 years (P = 0·050). On multivariable analysis, shock was the only independent predictor of immediate postoperative death (odds ratio 4·97, 95 per cent confidence interval 2·09 to7·94; P < 0·001). Classification and regression tree analysis showed that preoperative haemoglobin level and presence of shock were predictive of immediate postoperative death; 19 (95 per cent) of 20 patients with shock and a haemoglobin level below 68 g/l died immediately after surgery. Among the 82 survivors of surgery, survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 90, 68 and 45 per cent respectively. These values were not significantly different from those of the age-, sex- and year-matched general population (P = 0·885). CONCLUSION: Survival after open repair of RAAA among patients aged 80 years and older is sufficient to justify the procedure, particularly in patients in a stable haemodynamic condition.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Shock/mortality
13.
Br J Surg ; 98(4): 518-26, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21271556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infrainguinal revascularization for critical leg ischaemia (CLI) in patients aged 80 years and over is associated with increased operative risk. The aim was to compare the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bypass surgery in these patients. METHODS: Some 584 consecutive patients aged at least 80 years treated with either PTA (277) or bypass surgery (307) for CLI between 2000 and 2007 were included in this study. RESULTS: After 2 years PTA achieved better results than bypass surgery (leg salvage: 85.4 versus 78.7 per cent, P = 0.039; survival: 57.7 versus 52.3 per cent, P = 0.014; amputation-free survival (AFS): 53.0 versus 44.9 per cent, P = 0.005). Cox regression analysis showed that increased age (relative risk (RR) 1.05, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.02 to 1.08), decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (RR 0.99, 0.99 to 1.00), diabetes (RR 1.30, 1.04 to 1.62), coronary artery disease (RR 1.36, 1.05 to 1.75) and bypass surgery (RR 1.55, 1.24 to 1.93) were associated with decreased AFS. In 95 propensity score-matched pairs, leg salvage at 2 years (88 versus 75 per cent; P = 0.010) and AFS (53 versus 45 per cent; P = 0.033) were significantly better after PTA. Classification and regression tree analysis suggested that PTA was associated with better 1-year AFS, especially in patients with coronary artery disease (63.8 versus 48.9 per cent; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: When feasible, a strategy of PTA first appears to achieve better results than infrainguinal bypass surgery in patients aged 80 years and older.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Ischemia/therapy , Leg/blood supply , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical/mortality , Angioplasty/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Ischemia/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Propensity Score
14.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 42(5): 571-6, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21820922

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular treatment (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is thought to be of benefit, particularly in patients aged ≥80 years. This issue was investigated in the present meta-analysis. DESIGN: The study design involved a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of data on elective EVAR vs. open repair of AAA in patients aged ≥80 years were performed. RESULTS: Six observational studies reporting on 13,419 patients were included in the present analysis. Pooled analysis showed higher immediate postoperative mortality after open repair compared with EVAR (risk ratio 3.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.19-4.68; risk difference, 6.2%, 95%CI 5.4-7.0%). The pooled immediate mortality rate after open repair was 8.6%, whereas it was 2.3% after EVAR. Open repair was associated with a significantly higher risk of postoperative cardiac, pulmonary and renal complications. Pooled analysis of three studies showed similar overall survival at 3 years after EVAR and open repair (risk ratio 1.10, 95%CI 0.77-1.57). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that elective EVAR in patients aged ≥80 years is associated with significantly lower immediate postoperative mortality and morbidity than open repair and should be considered the treatment of choice in these fragile patients. These results indicate also that, when EVAR is not feasible, open repair can be performed with acceptable immediate and late survival in patients at high risk of aneurysm rupture.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Elective Surgical Procedures , Endovascular Procedures , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/pathology , Humans
15.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 41(2): 186-92, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21095141

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of colour-Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 2007 to April 2009, 108 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR were evaluated with CDUS, CEUS, CTA and MRA as well as angiography, if further treatment was necessary. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value of ultrasound examinations were compared with CTA and MRA as the reference standards, or with angiography when available. RESULTS: Twenty-four endoleaks (22%, type II: 22 cases, type III: two cases) were documented. Sensitivity and specificity of CDUS, CEUS, CTA, and MRA were 58% and 93%, 96% and 100%, 83% and 100% and 96% and 100% respectively. CEUS allowed better classification of endoleaks in 10, two and one patients compared with CDUS, CTA and MRA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of CEUS in detecting endoleaks after EVAR is markedly better than CDUS and is similar to CTA and MRA. CEUS seems to be a feasible tool in the long-term surveillance after EVAR, and it may better classify endoleaks missed by other imaging techniques.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Contrast Media , Endoleak/diagnosis , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Prosthesis Failure , Stents , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Aged , Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
16.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 41(3): 378-84, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21195637

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bypass surgery for critical limb ischaemia (CLI). DESIGN: The study is retrospective in nature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 858 consecutive patients, who underwent femoropopliteal revascularisation for CLI at Helsinki University Central Hospital during 2000-2007. As many as 517 patients (60%) underwent PTA and 341 (40%) bypass surgery. Propensity score analysis was used for risk adjustment in multivariable analysis and for one-to-one matching. RESULTS: In the overall series, PTA had poorer long-term results than bypass (5-year leg salvage, 78.2% vs. 91.8%, p < 0.0001; survival 49.2% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.048; amputation-free survival, 42.0% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.003; freedom from surgical re-intervention 86.2% vs. 94.3%, p < 0.0001). When treatment method was adjusted for propensity score as well as in the propensity score-matched pairs, leg salvage and freedom from surgical re-intervention were worse after PTA than after bypass (among the 241 propensity score-matched pairs, 74.3% vs. 88.2%, p = 0.031, and 86.1% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.025, respectively). Differences in survival, amputation-free survival and freedom from any re-intervention were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: In CLI patients, femoropopliteal PTA seems to be associated with poorer long-term leg salvage and freedom from surgical re-intervention than bypass surgery. However, the treatment method did not affect long-term amputation-free survival.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/therapy , Femoral Artery/surgery , Ischemia/therapy , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Propensity Score , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/mortality , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/complications , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/mortality , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Chi-Square Distribution , Constriction, Pathologic , Critical Illness , Female , Finland , Humans , Ischemia/etiology , Ischemia/mortality , Ischemia/surgery , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Limb Salvage , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
17.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 52(2): 271-6, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21460778

ABSTRACT

AIM: We have evaluated the outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery in very high risk patients (additive EuroSCORE ≥ 10). The impact of beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery (BHCAB) on their outcome has been evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective study including 160 consecutive patients with additive EuroSCORE ≥ 10. RESULTS: . The overall survival rates at 30-day, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year were 83.8%, 76.0%, 72.4% and 66.8%, respectively. Baseline cardiac index (O.R. 0.20, 95%C.I. 0.08-0.53), preoperative inotropic support (O.R. 4.55, 95%C.I. 1.41-14.73) and preoperative resuscitation (O.R. 3.937, 95%C.I. 1.02-15.26) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Baseline cardiac index (R.R. 0.48, 95%C.I. 0.28-0.85), left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.032), preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump (R.R. 3.22, 95% C.I. 1.50-6.93), preoperative tracheal intubation (R.R. 3.44, 95%C.I. 1.37-8.68) and creatinine (R.R. 1.004, 95%C.I. 1.00-1.01) were independent predictors of late death. OPCAB/BHCAB was associated with somewhat lower 30-day mortality rate (16.2% vs. 18.0%, P=0.73), stroke (2.0% vs. 4.9%, P=0.37), red blood cells transfusion (3.4 vs. 5.4 units, P=0.004) and combined adverse outcome (43.4% vs. 50.8%, P=0.42). OPCAB/BHCAB surgeons compared with surgeons with a prevalent conventional approach achieved slightly better the 30-day mortality rate (16.7% vs. 27.9%, P=0.15) and stroke rate (2.8% vs. 4.7%, P=0.60) and 5-year survival rate (65.3% vs. 57.4%, P=0.35). CONCLUSION: Despite their poor immediate postoperative outcome, 5-year survival of these high risk patients is satisfactory and supports efforts in the treatment of this very high risk population. A more confident approach toward OPCAB/BHCAB is also suggested in these patients.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/mortality , Female , Finland , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Patient Selection , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 51(2): 273-5, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20354498

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of deep pericardial sling (DPS) versus lateral pericardial sutures (LPSs) for heart stabilization and adequate coronary artery exposure during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB). METHODS: One surgeon employed in 101 consecutive patients a series of four to six 2-0 polyglactin sutures placed laterally between the left phrenic nerve and the left pulmonary veins (LPS). Two other surgeons used in 104 consecutive patients a single 0-0 braided silk suture with moistened gauze placed in the oblique sinus of the posterior pericardium, between the inferior vena cava and the right lower pulmonary vein (DPS). RESULTS: One conversion to beating heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass support occurred in each study group. No patient in the LPS group was converted to DPS technique. The use of LPSs allowed a number of distal anastomoses somewhat higher than the DPS technique (4.1+/-1.1 vs. 3.7+/-1.1, P=0.02). Postoperative results were similar in both study groups. A lower incidence of postoperative low-cardiac output syndrome and of prolonged need of inotropes has been observed in the LPS group, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance. One patient in the LPS group had postoperative left phrenic nerve palsy. One patient in the DPS group suffered of intraoperative bleeding secondary to rupture of the inferior vena cava likely related to placement of DPS, which was successfully repaired. CONCLUSION: LPS technique is as effective as DPS technique and allows complete revascularization with a postoperative outcome similar to the latter technique.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump , Pericardium/surgery , Suture Techniques , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polyglactin 910 , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Silk , Suture Techniques/adverse effects , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Sutures , Treatment Outcome
19.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 51(6): 915-21, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21124289

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pulmonary function as assessed by spirometry affects the immediate and late outcome after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). METHODS: Data on preoperative percentages of the predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were retrieved from a series of 1848 patients who underwent isolated CABG. Pulmonary disease was defined according to EuroSCORE criteria. RESULTS: Logistic regression showed that percentage of predicted FVC was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality along with estimated glomerular filtration rate, age and extracardiac arteriopathy. Cox regression analysis showed that pulmonary disease and percentages of predicted FVC were independent predictors of late overall mortality. Percentage of predicted FVC < 70% (at 10-year: 63.8% vs. 74.3%, Cox regression analysis: P = 0.014, RR 1.50, 95%C.I. 1.08-2.08) and pulmonary disease (at 10-year: 58.0% vs. 76%, Cox regression analysis: P < 0.0001, RR 1.75, 95%C.I. 1.29-2.39), but not percentage of predicted FEV1 < 70%, were associated with a marked decrease in late survival. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the significant, negative prognostic impact of pulmonary disease on the immediate and long-term survival after isolated CABG.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass , Lung Diseases/complications , Lung/physiopathology , Age Factors , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Databases as Topic , Female , Finland , Forced Expiratory Volume , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Lung Diseases/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Spirometry , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Diseases/complications , Vital Capacity
20.
J Hosp Infect ; 104(2): 236-238, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563527

ABSTRACT

The antiplatelet agent ticagrelor has recently been found to have bactericidal activity, demonstrated in vitro and in an in vivo mouse model, which warrants further clinical investigations. The aim of this study was to evaluate infectious complications after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients pre-operatively treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. In a multi-centre trial, all adult patients who were pre-operatively treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel prior to isolated primary coronary artery bypass grafting were eligible. Propensity score matching was used. Outcome measures were any sternal wound infection, deep sternal wound infection, and any in-hospital use of postoperative antibiotics. Of 2311 patients who were included, 1293 (55.9%) received clopidogrel and 1018 (44.1%) ticagrelor pre-operatively. In both overall and propensity score matched analyses, ticagrelor was associated with a similar incidence of infectious complications compared to clopidogrel. Our findings do not support a clinically relevant bactericidal effect of ticagrelor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.


Subject(s)
Clopidogrel/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/pharmacology , Ticagrelor/pharmacology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/methods , Propensity Score
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL