Histidine 6.55 is a major determinant of ligand-biased signaling in dopamine D2L receptor.

In our previous studies, we demonstrated that the mutation of His393(6.55) to alanine results in an increased affinity of 1,4-disubstituted phenylpiperazines to the dopamine D(2L) receptor. This change most likely accounts for the reduced steric hindrance in this part of the binding pocket. In this work, we investigated the role of the steric hindrance imposed by the residue His393(6.55) for the receptor activation modulated by 1,4-disubstituted aromatic piperidines/piperazines. Site-directed mutagenesis and ligand modifications were used to probe the structural basis of ligand efficacy. The operational model of agonism was used to quantify the ligand bias between the ability of compounds to inhibit cAMP accumulation and stimulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation. Whereas substantial ligand-biased signaling was observed for the D(2L) wild-type receptor, an overall increase in agonism was observed for the D(2L) H393(6.55)A mutant without noteworthy functional selectivity. Targeted chemical modification of the phenylpiperazine moiety at the site of its interaction with the residue His393(6.55) led to the functionally selective ligand {3-[4-(2,3-dihydro-benzofuran-7-yl)-piperazin-1-yl]-propyl}-pyrazol[1,5-a]pyridine-3-carboxamide (FAUC350) that has distinct signaling profiles toward adenylyl cyclase and ERK1/2. FAUC350 behaves as an antagonist in the inhibition of cAMP accumulation and as a partial agonist in the stimulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation (efficacy = 55%). Overall, the residue His393(6.55) and proximate molecular substructures of receptor ligands were identified to be crucial for multidimensional ligand efficacy.

Novel pyridylmethylamines as highly selective 5-HT(1A) superagonists.

To further improve the maximal serotonergic efficacy and better understand the configurational requirements for 5-HT(1A) binding and activation, we generated and biologically investigated structural variants of the lead structure befiradol. For a bioisosteric replacement of the 3-chloro-4-fluoro moiety, a focused library of 63 compounds by solution phase parallel synthesis was developed. Target binding of our compound collection was investigated, and their affinities for 5-HT(2), α(1), and α(2)-adrenergic as well as D(1)-D(4) dopamine receptors were compared. For particularly interesting test compounds, intrinsic activities at 5-HT(1A) were examined in vitro employing a GTPγS assay. The investigation guided us to highly selective 5HT(1A) superagonists. The benzothiophene-3-carboxamide 8bt revealed almost exclusive 5HT(1A) recognition with a K(i) value of 2.7 nM and a maximal efficacy of 124%. To get insights into the bioactive conformation of our compound collection, we synthesized conformationally constrained bicyclic scaffolds when SAR data indicated a chair-type geometry and an equatorially dispositioned aminomethyl substituent for the 4,4-disubstituted piperidine moiety.

Dopamine D2, D3, and D4 selective phenylpiperazines as molecular probes to explore the origins of subtype specific receptor binding.

Assembling phenylpiperazines with 7a-azaindole via different spacer elements, we developed subtype selective dopamine receptor ligands of types 1a,c, 2a, and 3a preferentially interacting with D4, D2, and D3, respectively. To complete this set, the methylthio analogues 2b and 3b exceeding the affinity of 2a and 3a by one order of magnitude and the structural intermediate 1b were synthesized. These chemically similar but biologically divergent target compounds served as molecular probes for radioligand displacement experiments, mutagenesis, and docking studies on homology models based on the recent crystal structure of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. Specific interactions with the highly conserved amino acids Asp3.32 and His6.55 and less conserved residues at positions 2.61, 2.64, 3.28, and 3.29 were identified. Inclusion of a carefully modeled extracellular loop 2 displayed two nonconserved residues in EL2 that differently contribute to ligand binding. Obviously, subtype selectivity is caused by nonconserved but frequently mediated by conserved amino acids.